CAS LX 502 Semantics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

CAS LX 502 Semantics

Description:

CAS LX 502 Semantics 4a. Events and Theta roles 3.5, 4.4 (8.1, 8.2) Situations We can think of sentences as referring to situations (events, states, eventualities). – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: buEduling
Learn more at: https://www.bu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CAS LX 502 Semantics


1
CAS LX 502Semantics
  • 4a. Events and Theta roles
  • 3.5, 4.4 (8.1, 8.2)

2
Situations
  • We can think of sentences as referring to
    situations (events, states, eventualities).
  • A sentence like Pat opened the door can be
    thought of as meaning
  • There is an event, it is an opening, it affects
    the door, and it is instigated by Pat.
  • In understanding the details of our interpretive
    system, reference to events/situations can prove
    useful.

3
Tense
  • Events take place in time, and language uses
    tense to situate events in time.
  • Pat sang the national anthem.
  • (The singing event was in the pastbefore now)
  • Pat will sing the national anthem.
  • (The singing event is in the futureafter now)
  • Pat is singing the national anthem.
  • (The singing event is now)

Now
4
Situation types
  • States static and unchanging
  • Individual-level
  • Pat is tall.
  • Pat knows French.
  • Stage-level
  • Pat is hungry.
  • Pat is bored.
  • Events dynamic, involving motion/change
  • Pat is pushing the cart into the corner.

5
Tense vs. aspect
  • Tense locates a situation in time, aspect
    describes the internal temporal structure of the
    situation.
  • Completed (perfect)
  • Pat had eaten a sandwich.
  • Pat has eaten a sandwich.
  • Pat will have eaten a sandwich.
  • Ongoing (progressive)
  • Pat was eating a sandwich.
  • Pat is eating a sandwich.
  • Pat will be eating a sandwich.

6
Classifying situations
  • States (want, love, hate, know, believe)
  • Activities (run, walk, swim, push a cart)
  • Accomplishments (run a mile, walk to the store,
    paint a picture, draw a circle)
  • Achievements (recognize, find, stop, reach the
    top)
  • Semelfactives (cough, knock) (dont change state)

7
Classifying situations
  • The different situation types essentially define
    the different kinds of shadow the situation
    casts on the timeline.
  • Point Part of our semantic knowledge includes
    knowledge about situations/events.
  • We will return to a more detailed discussion of
    tense and aspect and event structure later in the
    course.

8
Roles in an event
  • Pat pushed the cart into the corner with a stick.
  • This sentence describes an event, tying together
    several participants
  • The event is a pushing event
  • Pat is the instigator of the event
  • The cart is affected (moved) during the event
  • The corner marks the endpoint of the path
  • A stick is the instrument used to effect the
    movement

9
Thematic roles
  • Agent initiator, capable of acting with volition
  • Patient entity undergoing change
  • Theme entity moved or located
  • Experiencer Aware of event, but not in control
  • Beneficiary Entity for whose benefit the event
    occurs
  • Instrument Means by which event comes about
  • Location Place in which event occurs
  • Goal Entity/place toward which something moves
  • Source Entity/place from which something moves

10
thematic roles (q-grids)
  • Among the pieces of information stored in our
    mental lexicon about predicates is the q-grid of
    a predicate.
  • The predicate names a kind of event, and
    specifies what entities play a role in the event.
  • put V ltAgent, Theme, Locationgt
  • Pat put the book on the table.

11
q-grids
  • put V ltAgent, Theme, Locationgt
  • Pat put the book on the table.
  • Conventionally, only required q-roles are listed
    in the q-roles. That is, q-roles that are
    necessary in specifying the event.
  • Pat put on the table.
  • Pat put the book.
  • Pat put the book on the table with a spatula.

12
Arguments and adjuncts
  • An argument is required by the q-grid.
  • An adjunct is superfluous, less connected to the
    event, freer in ordering. Can be added to further
    specify any kind of compatible event.
  • Pat put the fork.
  • Pat put the fork on the table.
  • Pat put the fork on the table with gusto at 6pm.
  • Pat put the fork on the table at 6pm with gusto.
  • With gusto, Pat put the fork on the table at 6pm.
  • Pat put the fork at 6pm with gusto on the table.
  • On the table, Pat put the fork at 6pm with gusto.

13
Classes of verbs
  • We can classify verbs by the number of q-roles in
    their q-grids.
  • Intransitive trip ltThemegt
  • Transitive kick ltAgent, Patientgt
  • Ditransitive put ltAgent, Theme, Locationgt
  • Atransitive rain lt gt
  • Sort of.
  • The baby kicked, Pat tripped Tracy, Chris read
    (the book). Its more complicated than it seems.

14
Classes of verbs
  • Even apart from valency (number of arguments in
    the q-grid), we can identify lots of classes of
    verbs that behave alike in terms of q-roles.
  • give, lend, supply, pay, donate, contributeV
    ltAgent, Theme, Recipientgt
  • receive, accept, borrow, buy, purchase, rent,
    hireVltRecipient, Theme, Sourcegt
  • break, open, sink, collapseV ltPatientgtV
    ltAgent, Patientgt
  • eat, drink, read, paintV ltAgentgtV ltAgent,
    Patientgt

15
What are the q-roles?
  • How do we know that the list of q-roles we have
    is right?
  • We dont.
  • We can group q-roles in various ways, or
    subdivide them. The question is what provides the
    greatest insight to linguistic structure.
  • The rock frightens Pat.
  • Pat frightens the rock.
  • The car ran over the nail in the road.
  • Theme Patient? Recipient Goal Beneficiary?
    Does it matter?
  • Actor vs. Agent?
  • Malicious Agent vs. Benevolent Agent?

16
Can an argument get more than one thematic
role/q-role?
  • Pat threw the ball to Tracy.
  • Yes.
  • (e.g., Jackendoff) Pat Agent, Source the ball
    Patient, Theme Tracy Goal.
  • No.
  • (e.g., Chomsky) q-roles can contain more than one
    q-relation, but it is linguistically one role
    (bundle of q-relations). Pat Agent, Source.
  • Depends on what generalization is most useful in
    predicting things. Seems likely that the second
    one is better by that measure.

17
Subjects and objects
  • We can identify parts of sentences as subjects,
    predicates, objects.
  • Often these are defined by position and by case.
  • I met her. She met me.
  • Grammatical roles and q-roles are dissociable.
  • Pat closed the door.
  • The door closed.

18
Linking
  • Almost any q-role can be a structural subject.
  • Chris planned the heist.
  • Tracy saw the crime occur.
  • The window broke.
  • The hammer smashed the glass.
  • Chris tripped.
  • Chris got a summons.

19
Linking
  • There are tendencies at least.
  • If theres an Agent, it is the subject.
  • The exam failed Pat.
  • Otherwise, if theres an instrument, it is the
    subject.
  • The hammer broke the vase.
  • Otherwise, if theres a Theme or Patient, it is
    the subject.
  • The vase broke.
  • The vase broke with the hammer.

20
Linking hierarchies
  • Determining which q-role is the
    subject?Agent/Experiencer gt Instrument gt
    Theme/Patient
  • Pat broke the vase on Tuesday with a hammer.
  • The hammer broke the vase on Tuesday.
  • The vase broke on Tuesday (with a hammer)
  • The dog ate my homework.
  • My homework was eaten (by the dog).
  • Tracy was given my homework.
  • A fork was eaten my homework.

21
Why q-roles?
  • We are trying to describe generalizations about
    language, meaning, the mapping to structure.
  • We can imagine a lot of different kinds of roles.
    E.g., Patient could undergo a lot of different
    degrees of affectedness
  • Touch (no change)
  • Squeeze (temporary change)
  • Break (fundamental change)

22
(
23
Dowty on q-roles
  • Fine-grain q-roles are really collections of
    entailments. E.g., does a volitional act, with
    intent, moves or changes externally. Many
    verbs share this entailment with their most
    prominent argument (Agent).
  • Course-grain There are only these collections of
    q-roles, of two kinds (Proto-Agent,
    Proto-Patient). Which collection plays the more
    prominent role depends on the constitution of the
    collection (relatively).

24
Proto-Agent, Proto-Patient
  • Proto-Agent
  • Volitional involvement
  • Sentience/perception
  • Causing event or change of state in another
    participant
  • Movement relative to another participant
  • Proto-Patient
  • Undergoes change of state
  • Incremental theme
  • Causally affected by another participant
  • Stationary relative to another participant
  • Agent is a prototypical Proto-Agent. Experiencer,
    less so, Instrument less so. Patient is a
    prototypical Proto-Patient, Beneficiary less so.

25
)
26
Why q-roles?
  • We get some generalization power by considering
    q-roles, allowing us to define classes of verbs
    that share similar behavior.
  • As an example, psychological verbs (admire,
    enjoy, amuse, frighten), which have an
    Experiencer and a Stimulus (or Percept).
  • Two types, differing in the linking of arguments
    to syntactic positions.
  • Point here we need to refer to q-roles to
    differentiate the two types.

27
Psych verbs
  • Type 1 (Subject-experiencer)
  • admire, enjoy, fear, like, love, relish, savor
  • V ltExperiencer, Stimulusgt
  • Type 2 (Object-experiencer)
  • amuse, entertain, frighten, interest, please,
    surprise, thrill
  • V ltStimulus, Experiencergt

28
q-roles and language description
  • Saeed (in another Semantics textbook) gives the
    example of Lakhota, which morphologically marks
    Patient and Agent (hence we need the concepts to
    adequately describe the language).
  • Agent subjects or objects wa-
  • Patient subjects or objects ma-

29
Active vs. Passive (Voice)
  • Pat ate the sandwich
  • The sandwich was eaten (by Pat)
  • Passive demotes the Agent/Experiencer,
    promoting the next q-role to subject.
  • eat V ltAgent, Patientgt (active)eaten V
    ltPatientgt (passive)
  • The book was given to Pat. (theme)
  • Pat was given a book. (recipient)
  • The shot was heard round the world. (percept)
  • The kids were frightened. (experiencer)
  • The ghost was feared. (stimulus)

30
Passive
  • Generally, only the highest argument can be
    promoted to subject position in the passive.
  • He sprayed paint on the wall. He sprayed the wall
    with paint.
  • Paint was sprayed on the wall. The wall was
    sprayed with paint.
  • The wall was sprayed paint on. Paint was
    sprayed the wall with.
  • He loaded hay onto the truck. He loaded the truck
    with hay.
  • Hay was loaded onto the truck. The truck was
    loaded with hay.
  • The truck was loaded hay onto. Hay was loaded
    the truck with.
  • He gave a book to Mary. He gave Mary a book.
  • A book was given to Mary. Mary was given a book.
  • Mary was given a book to. A book was given Mary.

31
Passive usage
  • Passives are often useful to background the
    subject (either to total omission or at least to
    a less prominent role).
  • Pat took a trip to Providence yesterday.
  • The police arrested him.
  • He was arrested by the police.
  • He sprayed the car with paint.
  • The car was sprayed with paint.

32
Middles
  • Middles are sort of like passives the
    Agent/Experiencer is suppressed and the next
    q-role is promoted to subject. The verb does not
    take on a passive form (in English), and the
    construction is generally only available to
    describe a degree of success
  • Pat broke the calculator.
  • The calculator was broken.
  • This calculator breaks easily.

33
Adverbs
  • How might we describe the meaning of an adverb?
    Say, loudly.
  • The hooligan shouted loudly.
  • Well, it seems a bit like this
  • There was a shouting event.
  • The hooligan was the Agent of that event.
  • It was a loud event.
  • Adverbs seem to modify events

34
Adverb(-like thing)s as event modifiers
  • The hooligan shouted loudly on Saturday atop the
    bench by the tree in the rain.
  • This asserts the existence of an event that
  • Is a shouting
  • Has the hooligan as Agent
  • Is loud
  • Is on Saturday
  • Is atop the bench
  • Is by the tree
  • Is in the rain
  • Great for manner and temporal adverbs.

35
Subject-oriented adverbs
  • Zinédine intentionally hit Marco.
  • Marco was intentionally hit by Zinédine.
  • Its not the whole event that is intentional, it
    is somehow related to one of the participants.
    The subject? Well, yes. The Agent? Maybe.
  • That second one seems a bit ambiguous

36
Speaker-oriented adverbs
  • Annoyingly, Pat was late.
  • Predictably, Pat (stupidly) answered the
    questions (brilliantly)

37
?
  • ? ?
  • ?
  • ? ?
  • ? ?
  • ?
  • ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com