Title: General Equilibrium
1Chapter 16
2General Equilibrium Analysis
- To study how markets interrelate, we can use
general equilibrium analysis - The feedback effect is the price or quantity
adjustment in one market caused by price and
quantity adjustments in related markets
3Two Interdependent Markets Moving to General
Equilibrium
- Scenario
- The competitive markets of
- DVD rentals
- Movie theater tickets
- Changing prices in one market are likely to
affect the other market
4Two Interdependent Markets Moving to General
Equilibrium
- Scenario
- Equilibrium price of movies is 6.00
- Equilibrium price of DVD rentals are 3.00
- Government places a 1.00 tax on each movie
ticket - Need to look at effect of tax on
- Market for DVDs
- Feedback effects in Movie market
5Two Interdependent Markets Movies and DVDs
1 tax on each movie ticket causes supply to fall
General Equilibrium Analysis Increase in movie
ticket prices increases demand for videos.
Price
Price
Number of Videos
Number of Movie Tickets
6Two Interdependent Markets Movies and DVDs
The increase in the price of videos increases the
demand for movies.
General Equilibrium Analysis The Feedback
effects continue.
Price
Price
Number of Videos
7Two Interdependent Markets Movies and DVDs
- Observation
- Without considering the feedback effect with
general equilibrium, the impact of the tax would
have been underestimated - This is an important consideration for policy
makers.
8Reaching General Equilibrium
- Must be able to determine the equilibrium price
of both movies and DVDs simultaneously - We must simultaneously find two prices that
equate quantity demanded and quantity supplied in
all related markets - This requires finding the solution to four
equations demand and supply for DVDs and Movies
9The Advantages of Trade
- Assumptions
- Two consumers (countries)
- Two goods
- Zero transaction costs
- James Karen have a total of 10 units of food
and 6 units of clothing.
10The Advantage of Trade
Individual Initial Allocation Trade Final Allocation
James 7F, 1C -1F, 1C 6F, 2C
Karen 3F, 5C 1F, -1C 4F, 4C
11The Advantage of Trade
- There is room for trade
- James values clothing more than Karen
- Karen values food more than James
- Actual terms of trade are determined through
bargaining
12The Advantage of Trade
- From this analysis we obtain an important result
- An allocation of goods is efficient only if the
goods are distributed so that the marginal rate
of substitution between any pair of goods is the
same for all consumers.
13The Edgeworth Box Diagram
- A diagram showing all possible allocations of
either two goods between two people is called an
Edgeworth Box
14The Edgeworth Box Diagram
- Each point describes the market baskets of both
consumers - James has 7 units of food and 1 unit of clothing
point A - Karen has 3 units of food and 5 units of clothing
point A from different axis
15Exchange in an Edgeworth Box
10F
0K
6C
The initial allocation before trade is A James
has 7F and 1C Karen has 3F and 5C.
6C
0J
10F
16Exchange in an Edgeworth Box
The allocation after trade is B James has 6F
and 2C Karen has 4F and 4C.
1C
-1F
17Efficient Allocations
- A trade from A to B makes both Karen and James
better off - If Jamess and Karens MRS are the same at B the
allocation is efficient.
18Efficient Allocations
- We can see both parties are better off at point B
since they both end up on a higher indifference
curve - Although a trade might make both parties better
off, the new allocation is not necessarily
efficient
19Efficiency in Exchange
10F
0K
6C
A UJ1 UK1, but the MRS is not equal. All
combinations in the shaded area are preferred to
A.
6C
0J
10F
20Efficiency in Exchange
10F
0K
6C
D is also a possible efficient allocation
depending on bargaining
At point C, MRSs are equal and allocation is
efficient
Point B is on higher IC but is not efficient
6C
0J
10F
21Efficiency in Exchange
- Any move outside the shaded area will make one
person worse off (closer to their origin). - B is a mutually beneficial trade--higher
indifference curve for each person. - Trade may be beneficial but not efficient.
- MRS is equal when indifference curves are tangent
and the allocation is efficient.
22Efficiency in Exchange
- The Contract Curve
- To find all possible efficient allocations of
food and clothing between Karen and James, we
would look for all points of tangency between
each of their indifference curves. - The contract curve shows all the efficient
allocations of goods between two consumers, or of
two inputs between two production functions
23The Contract Curve
Karens Food
0K
E, F, G are Pareto efficient .
Jamess Clothing
Karens Clothing
0J
Jamess Food
24Contract curve
- All points of tangency between the indifference
curves are efficient. - MRS of individuals is the same
- No more room for trade
- The contract curve shows all allocations that are
Pareto efficient. - Pareto efficient allocation occurs when further
trade will make someone worse off.
25Consumer Equilibrium in a Competitive Market
- We can show opportunities for trade for many
consumers - When prices of food and clothing are equal, we
can show the price line, PP with a slope of 1 - James buys 2 clothing for 2 food A to C
- Karen buys 2 food for 2 clothing A to C
- Both increase satisfaction
26Consumer Equilibrium in a Competitive Market
10F
0K
Karens Food
6C
Begin at A Each James buys 2C and sells
2F moving from Uj1 to Uj2, which is preferred (A
to C).
Begin at A Each Karen buys 2F and sells 2C
moving from UK1 to UK2, which is preferred (A to
C).
Karens Clothing
Jamess Clothing
6C
0J
10F
Jamess Food
27Consumer Equilibrium in a Competitive Market
- The amount of clothing that Karen wanted to sell
is equal to the amount of clothing that James
wanted to buy - An equilibrium is a set of prices at which the
quantity demanded equals the quantity supplied in
every market - Also called competitive equilibrium
28Consumer Equilibrium in a Competitive Market
- In a general equilibrium setting where all
markets are perfectly competitive, we can show
the same result - Best example of Adam Smiths invisible hand
- Economy will automatically allocate all resources
efficiently without need for regulatory control
29Consumer Equilibrium in a Competitive Market
- Competitive equilibrium
- Because the indifference curves are tangent, all
MRSs are equal between consumers - Because each indifference curve is tangent to the
price line, each persons MRS is equal to the
price ratio of the two goods
30Consumer Equilibrium in a Competitive Market
- Difficult for efficient allocation with many
consumer and producers unless all markets are
perfectly competitive - Efficient outcomes can also be achieved by
centralized system
31Equity and Efficiency
- Although there are many efficient allocations,
some may be fairer than others - The difficult question is what is the most
equitable allocation? - There is no reason to believe that efficient
allocation from competitive markets will give an
equitable allocation
32The Utility Possibilities Frontier
- From the Edgeworth box we showed a two person
exchange - The utility possibilities frontier represents all
allocations that are efficient in terms of the
utility levels of the two individuals
33The Utility Possibilities Frontier
OJ James has zero utility OK Karen has zero
utility E, F, G points on contract curve H
inefficient can do better in shaded area L -
unobtainable
Karens Utility
James Utility
34The Utility Possibilities Frontier
- Are all efficient points equitable?
- Efficient points E or F make both persons better
off without making one worse off from H - If only possible points are H and G, can argue
that one is more equitable to James and one to
Karen
Karens Utility
James Utility
35The Utility Possibilities Frontier
- From previous example, we can see that an
inefficient allocation might be more equitable
than an efficient one. - But how do we define an equitable allocation?
36Four Views of Equity
Egalitarian All members of society receive equal amount of goods
Rawlsian Maximize the utility of the least-well-off person
Utilitarian Maximize the total utility of all members of society
Market - Oriented The market outcome is the most equitable
37Equity and Perfect Competition
- A competitive equilibrium can occur at any point
on the contract curve depending on the initial
allocation. - Since not all competitive equilibriums are
equitable, we rely on the government to help
reach equity by redistributing income. - Taxes
- Pubic services
38Efficiency in Production
- We can extend to the efficient use of inputs used
for production. - Assume
- Two fixed inputs capital and labor
- Produce same two goods food and clothing
- Many consumers own inputs to production and earn
income from selling them - Income allocated between goods
39Efficiency in Production
- Using the Edgeworth box diagram, we can show
efficient use of inputs in production - Labor on horizontal axis
- Capital on vertical axis
- 50 hours of labor and 30 hours of capital
available
40Production in an Edgeworth Box
50L
0C
30K
The initial allocation is A. Every combination of
labor and capital used to produce two goods is
represented as point in box
30K
0F
50L
41Production in an Edgeworth Box
- Can use production isoquants to show levels of
output produced with each combination of inputs - 3 isoquants representing 50, 60 and 80 units of
food - 3 isoquants representing 10, 25 and30 units of
clothing
42Production in an Edgeworth Box
50L
15L
0C
30K
3 isoquants representing food production
3 isoquants representing clothing production
5K
25K
30K
0F
50L
35L
43Production in an Edgeworth Box
- To find efficient production, we must find
different combinations of inputs used to produce
the two outputs - An allocation of inputs is technically efficient
if the output of one good cannot be increased
without decreasing the output of another goods
44Production in an Edgeworth Box
50L
15L
0C
30K
Can move from A to B or C which increases
efficiency.
Any place in shaded area will increase efficiency
from allocation A.
5K
25K
30K
0F
50L
35L
45Production in an Edgeworth Box
- Points B and C are efficient allocations and
therefore lie on the production contract curve - Curve showing all technically efficient
combinations of inputs. - Curve connects the origins, OF and OC
- All points on curve are tangencies between two
isoquants
46Production in an Edgeworth Box
50L
15L
0C
30K
Production Contract Curve
5K
25K
30K
0F
50L
35L
47Producer Equilibrium Competitive Input Markets
- If input markets are competitive, an efficient
point will be achieved - In competitive input markets
- Wage rate, w, will be equal in all industries
- Rental rate of capital, r, will be equal in all
industries
48Producer Equilibrium Competitive Input Markets
- If producers minimize costs, they will choose
inputs to the point where the ratio of the
marginal products of the two inputs is equal to
the ratio of input prices
49Producer Equilibrium Competitive Input Markets
- Ratio of marginal products is the same as the
marginal rate of technical substitution of labor
for capital
50Producer Equilibrium Competitive Input Markets
- The MRTS is the slope of the isoquant, so
competitive equilibrium exists only if - Slopes of the isoquants are equal to one another
- These also equal the ratio of the prices of two
inputs - Competitive equilibrium lies on the production
contract curve, and the competitive equilibrium
is efficient in production
51Production Possibilities Frontier
- PPF shows the various combinations of two goods
that can be produced with fixed quantities of
inputs. - Frontier is derived from the production contract
curve - Points on PPF show efficiently produced levels of
both goods
52Production Possibilities Frontier
- Point A is inefficient
- Points B, C and D are efficient
- All points in triangle ABC completely utilize
capital and labor but distortion in labor market
leads to inefficient use
Clothing(units)
OF
B
C
A
D
OC
Food (units)
53Production Possibilities Frontier
- PPF is downward sloping
- In order to produce more of one good, must give
up producing some of the other good - PPF is concave
- Slope is the MRTS which increases as the level of
production of food increases
54Production Possibilities Frontier
- Marginal rate of transformation (MRT) of food for
clothing is the magnitude of the slope of the
frontier at each point - How much clothing must be given up to produce one
additional unit of food - As we increase the production of food my moving
along the PPF, the MRT increases
55Marginal Rate of Transformation
- The productivity of labor and capital differs
depending on whether the inputs are used to
produce more food or clothing. - Starting where only clothing is produced, MP of
labor and capital are relatively low - Transferring some to food production where MP are
relatively high - As we do this, MP in food decreases and MP in
clothing increases
56Production Possibilities Frontier
Clothing(units)
OF
OC
Food (units)
57Marginal Rate of Transformation
- Can also describe in terms of costs
- When producing at OF the MC of food is very low
and MC of clothing is very high - When MRT is low, so is the ratio of the MC of
producing food to clothing - Slope of PPF measures the MC of producing one
good relative to the MC of producing the other
58Output Efficiency
- For efficiency,
- MRS consumers WTP for additional food by
consuming less clothing - MRT cost of additional unit of food in terms of
producing less clothing - Efficiency means MRS MRT
59Output Efficiency
Clothing(units)
60
Food (units)
100
60Efficiency in Output Markets
- For perfectly competitive markets, all consumers
allocate their budgets so their MRS between two
good are equal to the ratio of prices - Profit maximizing firms produce output to the
point where price is equal to MC - MRT is equal to the MRS
61The Gains from Free Trade
- We have showed gains from trade in an Edgeworth
box, but what about gains from trade with two
countries where one has the comparative advantage - A country has a comparative advantage over
another country in the production of a good if
the first country can produce the good at a lower
opportunity cost than the other country
62The Gains from Free Trade
- EX Two countries producing two goods
- Holland and Italy
- Cheese and Wine
- Holland has comparative advantage in cheese
production - Italy as comparative advantage in wine production
- Trade is good for both countries
63The Gains from Free Trade
Hours of Labor Required to Produce Cheese and Wine Hours of Labor Required to Produce Cheese and Wine Hours of Labor Required to Produce Cheese and Wine
Cheese (1 LB) Wine (1 GAL)
Holland 1 2
Italy 6 3
64The Gains from Free Trade
- When there is comparative advantage, free trade
allows the country to consume outside their PPF - Before trade
- Produces at A on indifference curve U1 where MRT
and pre-trade price ratio is 2 - Holland would want to export 2 pounds of cheese
for 1 gallon of wine
65The Gains from Free Trade
- After trade
- Suppose they choose to trade 1 gallon of wine for
1 pound of cheese - Holland will produce at the point of tangency on
the 1/1 price line and PPF point B - Consumption will occur at D, on a higher
indifference curve U2 tangent to the trade price
line
66The Gains from Trade
- Trade allows Holland to consume outside PPF
Cheese (lbs)
Wine (gal)
67Overview Efficiency of Competitive Markets
- Efficiency in Exchange
- MRSJFC MRSKFC
- MRSJFC PF/PC MRSKFC
- Efficiency in the use of inputs in production
- MRTSFLK MRTSCLK
- MRTSFLK w/r MRTSCLK
68Overview Efficiency of Competitive Markets
- Efficiency in the output market
- MRTFC MRSPC (for all consumers)
- PF MCF, PC MCC resulting in
- MRTFC MCF/MCC PF/PC therefore
- MRSFC MRTFC
69Why Markets Fail
- Market Power
- Those with market power choose the price and
quantity - Less output is sold than in competitive markets
- Inefficiency
70Why Markets Fail
- Incomplete Information
- Consumers must have accurate information about
market prices or production quality for markets
to operate efficiency - Lack of information can change supply
- Some markets may never develop
71Why Markets Fail
- Externalities
- Consumption or production has indirect effect on
other consumption or production not reflected in
market prices
72Why Markets Fail
- Public Goods
- Nonexclusive, nonrival good that can be made
available cheaply but which, once available, is
difficult to prevent others from consuming - Company thinking about researching a new
technology if cant get patent - Once its made pubic, others can duplicate it