Using CBAM When Planning and Implementing New Practices - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Using CBAM When Planning and Implementing New Practices

Description:

Using CBAM When Planning and Implementing New Practices Concerns-Based Adoption Model Stages of Concern Change Facilitator Stages of Concern Levels of Use ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:94
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: Lind185
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Using CBAM When Planning and Implementing New Practices


1
Using CBAM When Planning and Implementing New
Practices
2
Definition of Concern
  • The composite representation of the feelings,
    preoccupation, thought, and consideration given
    to a particular issue or task is called concern.
  • Hall Hord, p. 61

3
Stages of Concern
  • One-legged interview
  • Open-ended concerns statement
  • Stages of Concern questionnaire

4
Identifying Stages of Concern
Stages of Concern Expressions of Concern
Stage 6 Refocusing I have some ideas about something that would work even better.
Stage 5 Collaboration I am concerned about relating what I am doing with what my co-workers are doing.
Stage 4 Consequence How is my use affecting clients?
Stage 3 Management I seem to be spending all of my time getting materials ready.
Stage 2 Personal How will using it affect me?
Stage 1 Informational I would like to know more about it.
Stage 0 Awareness I am not concerned about it.
IMPACT
TASK
SELF
Hall Hord, p. 63
5
One-Legged Interview
  • Begin with open-ended questions
  • How is it going?
  • What are you doing with (innovation)?
  • How do you feel about the innovation?
  • Probe to clarify understanding
  • Tell me what you mean by
  • Give me an example of

6
Advantages Disadvantages
Interview can take place anywhere/anytime (e.g., face-to-face, over the phone, e-mail) Facilitator shows interest and support of what teacher is doing Accuracy
7
Open-Ended Statement
  • When you think about innovation what
    concerns do you have? Please be frank, and
    answer in complete sentences.

  • Hall Hord, p. 68

8
Advantages Disadvantages
Concerns written in teachers own words Concern statement used any time Input given by teachers prior to assist in planning of workshop Inconsistency in the length and depth of completion of concern statements by different teachers
9
Stages of Concern Questionnaire
  • SoCQ - 35-item questionnaire
  • Valid and reliable instrument
  • SoC Quick Scoring Device
  • Technical manual to assist in scoring
  • and interpreting information
  • Capability of developing concern profile
  • over time

  • Hall Hord, p. 69 Hall et al., 1979

10
Consequence
Collaboration
Refocusing
Personal
Management
Informational
Awareness
100





Relative Intensity
80
60
40
20
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Stages of Concern
11
Consequence
Collaboration
Refocusing
Personal
Management
Informational
Awareness
100





Relative Intensity
80
60
40
20
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Stages of Concern
12
Interpreting Concern Profile
  • Identify the peaks and valleys . . .
  • Peaks intense concerns
  • Valleys little or no concerns
  • Identify potential intervention activities . . .

13
Interventions
Stage 6, Refocusing Respect and encourage teacher interests Channel their ideas and energies act on their concerns.
Stage 5, Collaboration Provide opportunities to develop skills needed to work collaboratively Rearrange schedules so people can collaborate
Stage 4, Consequence Provide positive feedback and needed support Provide opportunities for teachers to share knowledge and skills
Stage 3, Management Answer specific how to questions Avoid considering future impact at this time
Stage 2, Personal Address potential personal concerns directly Implement changes progressively over time
Stage 1, Informational Provide clear and accurate information Relate changes to current practices
Stage 0, Awareness Involve teachers in discussion and decisions Give permission not to know
Hall, George, Rutherford, 1986
14
Talking Points
  • Think about planning a professional development
    workshop in your district . . .
  • How were the teachers concerns identified?
  • How did the workshop match the concerns of the
  • individuals?

15
Comparison of SoC and LoU
  • Stages of Concern (SoC) addresses the affective
    side of change peoples reactions, feelings,
    perceptions, and attitudes.
  • Levels of Use (LoU) has to do with behaviors
    and portrays how people are acting with respect
    to specified change.

  • Hall Hord, p. 81

16
Levels of Use
  • Identify if person is a user or
  • nonuser . . .
  • Three nonuse levels
  • Five use levels

17
Levels of Use Behaviors Associated with LoU
0 Non-Use No interest shown in the innovation no action taken
1 Orientation Begins to gather information about the innovation
2 Preparation Begins to plan ways to implement the innovation
3 Mechanical Concerned about mechanics of implementation
4A Routine Comfortable will innovation and implements it as taught
4B Refinement Begins to explore ways for continuous improvement
5 Integration Integrates innovation with other initiatives does not view it as an add-on collaborates with others
6 Renewal Explores new and different ways to implement innovation
Hall Hord, p. 82
18
Assessing Individuals Level of Use
  • LoU Branching Interview
  • Quick assessment of a persons LoU
  • LoU Focused Interview
  • In-depth interview by a certified interviewer and
    analyzed using a specific matrix

19
LoU Branching Interview
Are you currently looking for information about
the innovation?
No LoU O, I
Have you decided to use it and set a date to
begin use?
II
Yes
No - LoU 0, I, II
Are you using the innovation?
III
User-Oriented
Yes LoU III, IVA, IVB, V, VI
IVA
What kinds of changes are you making in your
use of the innovation?
IVB
Nothing Unusual
No LoU IVB, VI
No
Are you coordinating your use of the innovation
with others, including another not in your
original group of users?
Are you planning or exploring making major
modifications or replacing the innovation?
VI
Impact-Oriented LoU IVB, V, VI
Yes
V
No
Hall Hord, p. 89
Yes LoU V
20
Categories for Levels of Use
Knowledge Knows about the innovation, how to use it, and consequences of its use.
Acquiring Information Solicits information in a variety of ways (e.g., resource persons, printed materials, site visits,
Sharing Collaborates with others (e.g., sharing plans, ideas, resources, problem solving)
Assessing Examines implementation as well as collecting and analyzing data
Planning Designs and outlines short- and long-term outcomes (i.e., aligns resources, collaborates, schedules activities)
Status Reporting Describes personal level of implementation
Performing Operationalizes the actions and activities of innovation
Hall Hord, p. 90
21
Talking Points
  • Think about teachers in your district
    implementing new knowledge and skills . . .
  • How were the teachers levels of use
    identified?
  • How does the teachers levels of use impact
    student
  • achievement?

22
Innovation Configuration (IC) Map
  • The IC map is composed of word picture
    descriptions of the different operational forms
    of an innovation or change.

  • Hall Hord, p.
    41

23
Three Key Questions
  • What does the innovation look like when it
  • is in use?
  • What would I see in classrooms where it is
  • used well (and not so well)?
  • What will teachers and students be doing
  • when the innovation is in use?

  • Hall Hord, p. 49

24
Talking Points
  • Think about planning and implementing a
    professional development program in your district
    . . .
  • Who should develop an IC map?
  • What effect does the results from an IC map
    have on
  • continuous progress?

25
Change Facilitator (CF) Styles
  • Initiator
  • Manager
  • Responder

26
Initiator
  • push teachers, students, parents, and personnel
    in the district office to support the things that
    will help students learn, teachers learn, and the
    school move forward.
  • focused on assessment, instruction, and
    curriculum.
  • Hall Hord, p. 131

27
Manager
  • do not rush in.
  • buy time, which they use to study and learn
    more about the change and to consider whether
    they should have the school engage in it.
  • Hall
    Hord, p. 133

28
Responder
  • most willing to have others lead.
  • delay making decisions.


  • Hall Hord, p. 133

29
CF Profile
Concern for People Social/informal Formal/meaningful
Organizational Efficiency Trust in others Administrative efficiency
Strategic Sense Day-to-Day Vision and planning
Hall Hord, p. 138
30
Talking Points
  • Think about the success of implementing a
    professional development program in your district
    . . .
  • What is the principals role in successful
  • implementation of a professional development
  • program?
  • Why is it important to know the CF style?

31
Principals Leadership and Support
  • Is the principal an active and enthusiastic
  • learner?
  • Is the principal an attentive participant in
  • professional development activities?
  • Is the principal open to new ideas and
  • suggestions?
  • Does the principal work with teachers to
  • improve instructional practices?
    Guskey, p. 158

32
Questions About Collegial Support
  • Are colleagues engaged in active learning?
  • Are teachers encouraged by their colleagues to
  • learn about new ideas and strategies?
  • Do teachers have opportunities to visit the
  • classrooms of colleagues and observe their
  • teaching?
  • Do teachers often collectively look at student
  • data?
  • Guskey, p. 157

33
Methods of Assessing Organization Support and
Change
  • Direct observations
  • Analysis of district or school records
  • Analysis of minutes from meetings
  • Questionnaires
  • Structured interviews
  • Personal learning logs and reflective journals
  • Participant portfolios Guskey,
    p. 173

34
Concerns-Based Adoption Model
  • Stages of Concern
  • Change Facilitator Stages of
  • Concern
  • Levels of Use
  • Innovation Configuration Map


  • Hall Hord, 2001

35
Methods of Assessing Participants Use of New
Knowledge and Skills
  • Direct observations
  • Participant interviews or conferencing
  • Supervisor interviews or conferencing
  • Student interviews or conferencing
  • Questionnaires
  • Focus groups
  • Implementation logs and reflective journals
  • Participant portfolios Guskey, p.
    202

36
Impact of Training Components
37
Change Facilitator Team
  • A key responsibility of all CF Team members is
    to continuously let the implementors know that
    the change/innovation is important, that their
    efforts to implement it are valued, and that
    there will be continuing backup and support.
  • Hall Hord, p. 157

38
Change Facilitator Team
  • Sanctioning
  • Providing continued back up
  • Providing resources
  • Providing technical coaching
  • Monitoring
  • Following up

39
Change Facilitator Team
  • Training
  • Reinforcing
  • Pushing
  • Telling others
  • Approving Adaptations

40
Talking Points
  • Think about the role of the Change Facilitator
    Team in your district . . .
  • Who are the change facilitators in your
    district?
  • How do they function?
  • What are their group dynamics?

41
References
  • Hall, G. George, A. (1999). The impact of
    principal Change Facilitator Style on school and
    classroom culture. In H. J. frei erg (Ed.),
    School climate Measuring, improving, and
    sustaining healthy learning environments.
    Philadelphia, PA Falmer Press.
  • Hall, G., George, A., Rutherford, W. (1979).
    Measuring Stages of Concern about the innovation
    A manual for use of the SoC Questionnaire.
    Austin, TX The University of TX at Austin,
    Research and Development Center for Teacher
    Education.
  • Hall, G., Newlove, B., George, A., Rutherford,
    W., Hord, S. (1991). Measuring change
    facilitator Stages of Concern A manual for use
    of the CFSoC Questionnaire. Greeley, CO
    University of Northern Colorado.

42
References
  • Hall, G. Hord, S. (2001). Implementing change
    Patterns, principles, and potholes. Boston, MA
    Allyn Bacon.
  • Hall, G. Hord S. (1987). Change in schools
    Facilitating the process. Albany, NY SUNY
    Press.
  • Hall, G. Newlove, B. (1987). A manual for
    assessing open-ended statements of concern about
    an innovation. Austin, TX University of TX at
    Austin, Research and Development Center for
    Teacher Education.

43
References
  • Heck, S., Stiegelbauer, S., Hall, G., Loucks,
    S. (1981). Measuring innovation configurations
    Procedures and applications. Austin, TX
    University of TX at Austin.
  • Hord, S., Rutherford, W., Huling-Austin, L.,
    Hall, G. (1987).
  • Taking charge of change. Alexandria, VA ASCD.
  • Loucks, S., Newlove, B., Hall, G. (1975).
    Measuring levels of use of the innovation A
    manual for trainers, interviewers, and raters.
    Austin, TX University of TX at Austin, Research
    and Development Center for Teacher Education.

44
Reflection
  • 3 important things Ive learned
  • 2 ideas/thoughts I would like to share with
  • others
  • 1 action I will take immediately is
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com