Improving Public Safety Communications - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Improving Public Safety Communications

Description:

Improving Public Safety Communications in the 800 MHz Band (WT Docket No. 02-55) International Wireless Communications Expo Las Vegas, Nevada April 7, 2005 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:86
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: NicoleM85
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Improving Public Safety Communications


1
Improving Public Safety Communications in
the 800 MHz Band (WT Docket No.
02-55) International Wireless Communications
Expo Las Vegas, Nevada April 7,
2005 Cathy W. Seidel Deputy
Bureau Chief Wireless Telecommunications
Bureau Federal Communications Commission
2
Background
  • A History of Interference in the 800 MHz band
  • Since 1999, the Commission has received reports
    of interference to public safety communications
    systems caused by Commercial Mobile Radio Service
    (CMRS) providers operating systems in close
    proximity to mobile and portable radios.
  • In 2000, representatives of the public safety and
    CMRS communities adopted Best Practices, a
    series of voluntary technical measures to
    prevent or reduce interference.

3
Background
  • A Call for Commission Action
  • Despite Best Practices, reports of interference
    to public safety systems have increased in recent
    years, demonstrating that voluntary measures are
    insufficient and emphasizing the need for
    Commission relief.
  • Absent Commission action, growing interference
    will impede the reliability of critical public
    safety communications systems.

4
The 800 MHz Solution
  • Essential Objectives of the
  • Commissions Plan
  • Resolution of the problem of interference to
    public safety radio systems.
  • Equitable treatment of all affected spectrum
    licensees with minimal disruption to both
    spectrum users and the public.
  • Administration of the spectrum for the public
    good, exercising sound principles of spectrum
    management.
  • The provision of additional 800 MHz spectrum that
    public safety agencies can access and integrate
    into their existing systems.

5
The 800 MHz Solution
  • 800 MHz Report and Order
  • The most effective solution to Public Safety
    Interference is a plan comprised of both
    short-term and long-term components
  • Short TermIn the short term, the Commission
    will implement interference abatement measures,
    including Enhanced Best Practices.
  • Long Term
  • In the long term, the Commission will
    reconfigure the 800 MHz band, thereby addressing
    the root cause of interference.

6
  • THE 800 MHz INTERFERENCE SOLUTION, PART I
  • INTERFERENCE ABATEMENT
  • Short-term, much-needed relief from individual
    interference events

7
Interference Abatement
  • Entitlement to Interference Protection
  • Adoption of a new objective technical standard
    for determining whether a public safety or other
    non-cellular 800 MHz licensee is entitled to
    interference protection.
  • Unacceptable interference is defined, for
    purposes of this proceeding as that which occurs
    in an area in which the public safety or other
    800 MHz system provides an adequate threshold
    signal level.

8
Interference Abatement
  • Signal Strength Threshold
  • Upon completion of band reconfiguration of a
    NSPAC region, public safety, CII and other
    non-cellular 800 MHz systems operating in that
    region will receive interference protection in
    areas where they provide a minimum measured
    input signal power of -101 dBm for portable and
    -104 dBm for vehicular mobile units.
  • Prior to completion of band reconfiguration,
    however, public safety and CII systems will be
    entitled to this interference protection only in
    areas in which they provide a minimum measured
    input signal power of -85 dBm (portable) or -88
    dBm (mobile).

9
Interference Abatement
  • Rules and Procedures
  • Prior Notification On request, cellular
    architecture 800 MHz licensees are required to
    notify non-cellular 800 MHz public safety and CII
    licensees of changes to their systems which could
    change the interference environment. The public
    safety and CII licensees likewise must notify the
    cellular-architecture licensees of such changes.
  • Responsibility for Abating Interference Any
    ESMR or cellular telephone licensee that causes,
    or contributes to, unacceptable interference to a
    non-cellular licensee is responsible for abating
    it promptly at its own expense.
  • Interference Resolution Procedures Licensees
    must comply with standardized procedures for
    reporting 800 MHz interference, identifying its
    source, and implementing a solution.

10
  • THE 800 MHz INTERFERENCE SOLUTION, PART II
  • BAND RECONFIGURATION
  • Long-term, sustainable solution to the problem of
    800 MHz interference

11

806
824
746
762
764
849
Mobile
D
C
B
A
B
B
A
700 MHz Public Safety (764-776 MHz 794-806 MHz)
800 MHz Band
Upper 700 MHz Commercial
Cellular
792
794
776
894
Base
869

700 MHz Guard Band
Mobile and Control Station Transmit Frequencies
(in MHz)
806
809.75
821
816
824
NPSPAC (Public Safety)
General Category
Interleaved Spectrum
ESMR (Upper 200)
851
854.75
866
861
869
Base Station Transmit Frequencies (in MHz)
General Category -7.5 MHz 150 Channels Licensed
by EA Blocks of 25 channels (SMR) Some Incumbent
Operators Remain
Interleaved Spectrum -12.5 MHz 250 Channels 80
SMR Channels (Licensed by EA, Some Incumbent
Operators Remain) 70 Public Safety Channels 50
Business Channels 50 Industrial Land
Transportation Channels
NPSPAC - 6 MHz 225 Channels _at_ 12.5 kHz spacing 5
Channels _at_ 25 kHz spacing 5 Mutual Aid Channels
ESMR/Upper 200 10 MHz 200 Channels Licensed by
EA Non EA incumbents are currently undergoing
mandatory relocation
PRE-RECONFIGURATION BAND PLAN
12

806
824
746
762
764
849
Mobile
D
C
B
A
B
B
A
700 MHz Public Safety (764-776 MHz 794-806 MHz)
800 MHz Band
Upper 700 MHz Commercial
Cellular
792
794
776
894
Base
869

700 MHz Guard Band
Mobile and Control Station Transmit Frequencies
(in MHz)
824
817
806
809
815
816
Public Safety B/ILT Non-Cellular SMR
NPSPAC (Public Safety)
809
Expansion Band
Guard Band
ESMR
NPSPAC
869
861
851
854
860
862
Base Station Transmit Frequencies (in MHz)
No public safety system will be required to
remain in or relocate to the Expansion Band
although they may do so if they choose. No
public safety or CII licensee may be
involuntarily relocated to occupy the Guard Band.
POST-RECONFIGURATION BAND PLAN
13
Band Reconfiguration
  • Public Safety Benefits from Band Reconfiguration
  • Band realignment will result in the availability
    of an average
  • of 4.5 MHz of additional 800 MHz-band spectrum.
  • Additional spectrum is sufficient to provide for
    90 additional two-way channels for public safety
    and critical infrastructure.
  • Relocating Public Safety to the lower portion of
    the 800 MHz band affords Public Safety the
    potential to realize interoperability with
    adjacent 700 MHz public safety operations.

14
Band Reconfiguration
  • Full Funding of Relocation Costs
  • Nextel must pay for 800 MHz incumbent relocation
    costs and must secure no more than ten letters of
    credit in the amount of 2.5 billion to ensure
    adequate funding of 800 MHz reconfiguration.
  • Nextel must provide 800 MHz relocated public
    safety licensees and other 800 MHz incumbents
    with comparable facilities.
  • All channel changes necessary to implement band
    reconfiguration will be paid by Nextel.

15
Band Reconfiguration
  • Transition Administrator
  • To ensure a smooth transition to the new 800 MHz
    band plan, an independent Transition
    Administrator is managing the relocation process.
  • The independent TA is
  • overseeing the administrative and financial
    aspects of the band reconfiguration process
  • providing accountability
  • ensuring that reconfiguration is achieved with
    minimal disruption to licensees, particularly
    public safety entities
  • requesting disbursement of funds for band
    reconfiguration based on requests for payment by
    affected parties
  • resolving relocation disputes.
  • TA decisions are subject to de novo review by the
    Commission.

16
Band Reconfiguration
  • Milestones
  • Transition Administrator Search Committee
    selected Bearing Point, Squires
    Squires-Sanders-Dempsey, LLP and Baseline
    Telecom, Inc. (BearingPoint Team) as the
    Transition Administrator on September 20, 2004.
  • The BearingPoint Team provided the Commission
    with a band reconfiguration schedule for each
    NPSPAC Region on January 31, 2005.
  • Nextel filed its written acceptance of the
    conditions of 800 MHz reconfiguration with the
    Commission on February 7, 2005.
  • Nextel/Southern submitted agreement for channel
    assignments in Southerns operating territory on
    February 7, 2005.

17
Band Reconfiguration
  • Milestones
  • Commission approval of Transition Administrators
    reconfiguration schedule (March 2005.)
  • ESMR/cellular licensees responsible for
    establishing common electronic data base for
    interference complaints by March 22, 2005.
  • Completion of band reconfiguration within 36
    months of start of reconfiguration of first
    NPSPAC region.

18
Band Reconfiguration
  • Step-by-Step Relocation Process
  • TA notifies a licensee of the need to relocate.
  • Cost of relocation is estimated and submitted to
    the Transition Administrator or directly to
    Nextel (licensee will be paid for the cost of
    producing the estimate).
  • Any disputes are referred to the Transition
    Administrator.
  • Unresolved disputes may be referred to the
    Commission.
  • Licensee begins operation on the new channel.

19
Rebanding Schedule
20
What Should I Be Doing?
  • Determine If Your System
  • Will Need to be Reconfigured
  • Generally, licensees currently operating in the
    806-809/851-854 MHz segment (former channels
    1-120) or the 821-824/866-869 MHz segment (former
    channels 601-830) will have to change frequency.
  • Except in border areas, licensees operating in
    the 809-815 MHz/854-860 MHz portion of the band
    will likely not need to change frequency.
  • However, public safety licensees operating in the
    815-816/860-861 MHz segment (former channels
    361-400) must be relocated out of this portion of
    the band unless they specifically request to
    remain on their current channel(s).

21
What Should I Be Doing?
  • Preparing for Reconfiguration
  • Educate Yourself
  • Make sure you understand the rules, policies and
    important dates pertaining to 800 MHz band
    reconfiguration.
  • Information concerning 800 MHz band
    reconfiguration is available on the Commission's
    web page at www.800MHz.gov.  Information is also
    available on the TA's web site at www.800ta.org.
  • Inventory Your Equipment
  • Inventory all 800 MHz radio equipment that is
    used in a constructed and operating system and
    that is subject to reconfiguration, whether or
    not it is under your direct control.
  • Develop a list of any changes to your 800 MHz
    radio system that will be necessary in order to
    use the replacement channels.

22
What Should I Be Doing?
  • Preparing for Reconfiguration
  • Check Your License
  • Make sure that your contact information is
    current and correct.
  • Make sure that your license reflects your current
    system parameters.
  • Make sure that you are in compliance with
    relevant regulatory requirements.
  • Document Unique Aspects of Your System
  • Simplify the negotiation and reconfiguration
    process by specifying any aspects of your system
    that may be different from garden variety 800
    MHz systems.
  • Keep Track of Costs
  • Keep a detailed account of all costs associated
    with preparing for reconfiguration.
  • To get credit for money spent, all associated
    reconfiguration costs must be reasonable, well
    documented and the minimum necessary to obtain
    comparable facilities on your new channel(s).
  • Negotiation Choice
  • Decide if you want to negotiate directly with
    Nextel, through the TA or through another third
    party.

23
Conclusion
  • For More Information
  • TA Regional Prioritization Plan
  • http//gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?n
    ative_or_pdfpdfid_document6516982905
  • FCC Wireless Telecommunications Bureau
  • http//wireless.fcc.gov/
  • http//wireless.fcc.gov/publicsafety/
  • http//wireless.fcc.gov/publicsafety/800MHz/bandr
    econfiguration/index2.html
  • http//wireless.fcc.gov/publicsafety/800MHz/bandi
    nterference.html

24
Conclusion
  • For More Information
  • Text of the 800 MHz Decision (FCC 04-168)
  • http//hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch
    /FCC-04-168A1.pdf
  • http//wireless.fcc.gov/publicsafety/800MHz/bandr
    econfiguration/downloads/DA-04-2962A1.pdf
  • Text of 800 MHz Supplemental Order and Order on
    Reconsideration (FCC 04-294)
  • http//wireless.fcc.gov/publicsafety/800MHz/bandr
    econfiguration/downloads/FCC-04-294A1.pdf
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com