Best Practices Precepting Models Student Self-Assessment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Best Practices Precepting Models Student Self-Assessment

Description:

Best Practices Precepting Models Student Self-Assessment Michelle E. Allen, PharmD, BCPS Clinical Specialist, Adult Critical Care Shands at the University of Florida – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:110
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: all121
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Best Practices Precepting Models Student Self-Assessment


1
Best Practices Precepting ModelsStudent
Self-Assessment
  • Michelle E. Allen, PharmD, BCPS
  • Clinical Specialist, Adult Critical Care
  • Shands at the University of Florida
  • Clinical Associate Professor
  • University of Florida, College of Pharmacy

UF Fall Faculty Workshop Sept. 12, 2008
2
Disclosures
  • None
  • Opinion and practice based

3
The What and How
  • Rotation presentation(s)
  • UF rotation competencies
  • 1-month rotation 3 self-evaluations
  • 2-month rotation 4 5 evaluations

4
Benefits
  • Saves me some time
  • Documentation, just in case
  • Question of grade determination
  • Letters of recommendation
  • Student value
  • Learning how to be a life-long learner
  • Education vs. evaluation
  • Maintaining professional development and
    competence
  • Grade satisfaction

5
Potential Problems
  • Expectations
  • Competency is a good thing, a great thing, that
    is the goal
  • Inaccurate self-assessment
  • Overestimation
  • Underestimation
  • Time consuming particularly in the over-estimator

6
Conflicting EvidenceAbilityAccuracy
7
Inability to Self-Assess
  • Inability to peer-reference
  • Knowledge of standards
  • Knowledge of expectations
  • Process nonverbal feedback
  • Rewards or punishments to change one's actions

Maki RH, Johas D, Kallod M. T. Psychonomic Bull
Rev. 199411269. Metcalf J. Pers Soc Psychol
Rev. 1998210010.
8
Self-Assessment Accuracy
  • Systematic review 17 / 725 studies met inclusion
    criteria
  • 13 little, no or inverse relationship
  • 7 positive association

Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, et.al. JAMA
20062961094-1102.
9
Self-Assessment Accuracy
  • Procedure performance
  • Dementia assessment
  • Health promotion counseling
  • Critical care skills
  • Palliative care
  • Explain evidence-based medicine
  • Predict students assessments of teaching
    abilities
  • Knowledge in primary care
  • Dementia assessment
  • Basic clinical skills
  • Managing psychological aspects of family practice
  • Sexual abuse by physical exam
  • Diagnostic features of small pox
  • Language and cultural competence
  • Sensitivity to emotional and psychological stress

Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, et.al. JAMA
20062961094-1102.
10
Self-Assessment Accuracy
Those that performed the poorest by
external review are the worst at self-assessment
Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, et.al. JAMA
20062961094-1102.
11
Self-Assessment Accuracy
  • Evidence-based guidelines (required ACGME
    competency)
  • Self-perceived competence (1st part of the
    survey) vs. actual performance (2nd)
  • Average actual score 55
  • Chasm between perceived and actual performance

Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical
Educations Practice-Based Learning
Caspi O, McKnight P, Kruse L, et al. Medical
Teacher 200624318-25.
12
Self-Assessment Accuracy
  • Student self-assessment vs. resident/faculty
  • 3rd year medical students on Ob/gyn rotation
  • 5-point Likert scale
  • Suggest that students do not have an
    understanding of their own strengths and
    weaknesses ? may not know personal or
    professional limitations

Knowledge Attitude
Problem-solving Technical skills
Written/verbal skills (agreement) Written/verbal skills (agreement)
Weiss PM, Koller CA, Hess LW, et.al. Medical
Teacher 200527445-9.
13
Feedback
  • Shown a video, given a pre-test and randomized
    into groups
  • Computer generated economy feedback
  • Above expert reference values
  • Above expert verbal feedback
  • 18 practice trials, post-test

Porte MC, Xeroulis G, Reznick RK, et.al. Am J
Surgery 2007193105-10.
14
Feedback
  • 1-month later 5 sutures evaluated
  • Only the expert feedback group was able to
    predictably retain the skills
  • Evaluation vs. education
  • For education technology cannot replace the
    expert

Porte MC, Xeroulis G, Reznick RK, et.al. Am J
Surgery 2007193105-10.
15
  • William is a short shy man. He has a passion for
    reading and loves strolling through museums. As
    a child, he was bullied by his classmates.
  • Do you suppose William is a
  • a) truck driver
  • b) classics professor

Austin Z, Gregory PAM, Chiu S. Am J Pharm Ed
2008721-8.
16
Reflection and Self-Assessment
  • 24-item critical thinking test
  • Rule-based (logical) vs. short-cut (flawed)
  • Completed test without interferenceor
  • Prompted at question 13 and 18 to reflect and
    self-assess
  • Rate confidence in the answer
  • Provide an explanation of how they arrived at the
    confidence rating
  • Provide explanation, rationalization or
    justification of why they selected the answer

Austin Z, Gregory PAM, Chiu S. Am J Pharm Ed
2008721-8.
17
Take Home Messages
  • Feedback direct and immediate
  • Feedback opportunity to develop skills under
    supervision and mentorship
  • Reflection does not have to be complicated or
    cumbersome
  • Feedback expert feedback cannot be replaced by
    technology

18
Knowing is not enoughwe must apply.Willing is
not enoughwe must do.
  • Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
  • 1749-1832

19
Best Practices Precepting ModelsStudent
Self-Assessment
  • Michelle E. Allen, PharmD, BCPS
  • Clinical Specialist, Adult Critical Care
  • Shands at the University of Florida
  • Clinical Associate Professor
  • University of Florida, College of Pharmacy

UF Fall Faculty Workshop Sept. 12, 2008
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com