Assessment of Intervention Outcomes Workshop: Thursday 7th February IYW Conference, Llandrindod Wells - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Assessment of Intervention Outcomes Workshop: Thursday 7th February IYW Conference, Llandrindod Wells

Description:

Assessment of Intervention Outcomes Workshop: Thursday 7th February IYW Conference, Llandrindod Wells Dr Dave Daley & Dr Tracey Bywater Overview of workshop Rationale ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:177
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: SchoolofP7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Assessment of Intervention Outcomes Workshop: Thursday 7th February IYW Conference, Llandrindod Wells


1
Assessment of Intervention Outcomes Workshop
Thursday 7th FebruaryIYW Conference, Llandrindod
Wells
  • Dr Dave Daley Dr Tracey Bywater

2
Overview of workshop
  • Rationale for conducting your own evaluations
  • How to manage the numbers
  • Suggested evaluation material

3
Why evaluate clinical work?
  • NHS Trusts need require you to conduct evaluation
  • It is imperative to be able to demonstrate
    improvement associated with your groups
  • Helps to maintain funding and/or win new funding

4
Is it difficult to evaluate outcome?
  • The most important decisions to make when
    considering evaluation are
  • 1) Design
  • 2) Evaluation measures

5
1. Design
  • It is very important that you have baseline
    measures (before) and outcome measures (after)
  • It is also important that you have the same
    measures on everyone

6
What can we do with our evaluation scores I?
  • Even simple spreadsheet programmes like Excel
    will allow you to conduct simple statistics
  • For evaluation purposes you are most interested
    in change from start to end

7
Pros Cons of change scores
  • Change scores are most useful
  • Easy and simple way of evaluating change
  • However recent suggestion that change scores on
    SDQ are less sensitive
  • However formula is complicated, has not yet been
    fully validated and is not recommended for
    evaluations of small groups

8
What can we do with our evaluation scores II?
  • Change scores should demonstrate improvements in
    child behaviour outcome
  • You can also begin to examine whether your groups
    are more effective for particular types of parents

9
What can we do with our evaluation scores III?
  • Rather than do lots of fancy statistics, it is
    also interesting to examine scores at outcome
  • Most evaluation measures will have scores which
    indicate clinical concern
  • It is very easy but also meaningful to examine
    the percentage of children and/or parents who
    score above cut off scores before intervention
    and after intervention

10
2. Evaluation Measures
  • Which ones?
  • Pathfinders project uses
  • Demographic Questionnaire
  • Beck Depression Inventory
  • Eyberg Child Behaviour Inventory
  • Strengths Difficulties Questionnaire x 2
  • Parenting Scale
  • Overt Hostility Scale
  • Teacher Questionnaire/Report

11
Demographics
  • What do you need to know?
  • Do you want to compare outcomes of-
  • older versus younger parents?
  • Boys versus girls?
  • Different areas?
  • Any other ideas?

12
The Eyberg Child Behaviour Inventory
  • 36 items, ages 2-16 years, 10 minutes to complete
  • Problem score has a minimum of 0, maximum of 36
    (yes/no answers, problem or not)
  • Intensity scale - minimum score of 36, maximum
    252 (scale of 1 7, where 1 never and 7
    always)
  • Clinical cut-off scores, 127 intensity, or 11
    problem
  • Purchase from http//www3.parinc.com/

13
Strengths Difficulties Questionnaire
  • FREE, website http//www.sdqinfo.com/b1.html
  • 10 minutes to complete, 25 items
  • Emotional symptoms
  • Conduct problems
  • Hyperactivity
  • Peer relationship problems
  • Prosocial behaviour
  • An additional impact supplement
  • Parent teacher
  • Normal, borderline atypical ranges/cut-off

14
Beck Depression Inventory
  • 21-item elf-report inventory measuring the
    severity of characteristic attitudes symptoms
    associated with depression
  • Each item contains four possible responses which
    range in severity from 0 ( I do not feel sad) to
    3 ( I am so sad or unhappy that I cant stand it)
  • Score of 10-18 mild to moderate depression
  • Score of 19-29 moderate to severe depression

15
Statistics with little maths
  • Excel
  • Graphs
  • Mean SD
  • Change scores
  • Effect sizes

16
Welsh Sure Start Data
17
Effect sizes
Interven fup1 Control fup1 Difference pooled SD effect sizes
BDI 10.33 13.66 3.33 10.23 0.33
ECBI-P 9.55 13.68 4.13 8.11 0.51
ECBI-I 116.19 142.98 26.79 32.25 0.83
Cohens 1988 guidelines difference between means
divided by pooled SD. 0.3 clinically useful
change, 0.5 medium effect, 0.8 large effect
18
  • Any questions?????
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com