How to get your papers published in Nature journals? ?????????<??>????? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

How to get your papers published in Nature journals? ?????????<??>?????

Description:

How to get your papers published in Nature journals? ? Rachel Pei Chin Won, PhD Associate Editor Nature Photonics – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:188
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 57
Provided by: Akh54
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: How to get your papers published in Nature journals? ?????????<??>?????


1
How to get your papers published in Nature
journals??????????lt??gt?????
Rachel Pei Chin Won, PhD Associate
Editor Nature Photonics 5 March 2008
2
Overview
  • ? nature and Nature research journals
  • How to get published
  • - Manuscript preparation
  • - Manuscript submission
  • Summary

3
nature Nature research Journals
4
nature
  • nature was launched on 4 Nov 1869
  • The worlds foremost weekly scientific journal
  • For 2006, natures impact factor is 26.681
  • A flagship journal of Nature Publishing Group
    (NPG)

5
nature
  • A weekly print copy (gt65,000)
  • An anytime-anywhere electronic rendition of an
    item or of a print copy (gt3 million users of
    nature.com per month)
  • A gateway to a seamless flow of relevant and
    timely information and opinion

6
NPGs Biological Sciences Division
7
NPGs Physical Sciences Division
Nature Nanotechnology Launched in Oct 2006
Nature Materials Launched in 2002 Impact factor
19.194
Nature Physics Launched in Oct 2005 Impact factor
12.040
Nature Chemistry will be launched in Jan 2009
Nature Photonics Launched in Jan 2007
Nature Geoscience Launched in Jan 2008
8
Nature Publshing Groups Publications
Nature Research Journals Nature
Biotechnology Nature Cell Biology Nature Chemical
Biology Nature Genetics Nature Geoscience (Jan
2008) Nature Immunology Nature Materials Nature
Medicine Nature Methods Nature Nanotechnology Natu
re Neuroscience Nature Photonics (Jan
2007) Nature Physics Nature Protocol Nature
Structural and Molecular Biology Nature
Chemistry (Jan 2009)
Nature Review Journals Nature Reviews
Cancer Nature Reviews Drug Discovery Nature
Reviews Genetics Nature Reviews Immunology Nature
Reviews Microbiology Nature Reviews Molecular
Cell Biol. Nature Reviews Neuroscience Nature
Clinical Practice 8 titles Academic
Journals Around 40 titles The ISME Journal
9
What makes Nature titles distinct?
  • Highly selective
  • Focus is on quality rather than volume
  • High impact
  • Full-time professional editorial staff
  • No external editorial board or affiliations
  • Editorially independent of each other
  • Share general policies but not submissions
  • Pass on manuscripts only at request of authors

10
Publications from China
11
Submissions from China to nature
12
Myth of Editors Bias
  • Ever since Natures foundation in 1869, Natures
    editors and editors of all Nature journals have
    been 100 responsible for selection of papers
    no editorial boards.
  • Editors read and assess papers in a way that is
    independent of country of origin.
  • Editors are of many nationalities, including
    Asian.
  • Editors visit many countries, including China.
  • There is no bias against countries by the editors
    of Nature or Nature journals.

13
How to get published in Nature journals?
14
Steps to a great paper
  • Thoughtful research
  • ??/?????
  • Thorough preparation
  • ?????
  • Logical exposition
  • ?????
  • Plan your papers
  • When you plan your research
  • Again before you start writing the draft

15
Before writing a paper
  • Why does the topic interest YOU?
  • What are the key findings of your work?
  • What was thought/known/done before this work?
  • Whats the main message for your readers?
  • Re-evaluate the original data, not only the for
    publication figures
  • How does new data change thinking, or support
    current approach, or open new avenues or research?

16
  • ????
  • ???? ????

17
What editors seek
  • High degree of novelty or innovation
  • ??????????
  • Interesting to a broad range of readers
  • ???????????
  • Significant step forward
  • ????????
  • Breakthrough in performance
  • ?????
  • High impact in the field
  • ?????
  • Important advance in scientific understanding
    that provides new directions for research
  • ?????????, ??????????????
  • Data persuasively supports conclusions
  • ????????????

18
Editorial Processes
Editorial assessment
Submission
Decline
Revision requested
External peer review
Editorial decision
Decline
Accept
19
Results
  • Several possibilities
  • Accept, with or without editorial revisions
  • Invite the authors to revise their manuscript
    to address
  • specific concerns
  • Reject, but indicate to the authors that
    further work might
  • justify a resubmission
  • Reject outright, typically on grounds of
    specialist interest,
  • lack of novelty, insufficient conceptual
    advance or
  • technical/interpretational problems

20
How to make an appeal?
  • Write (not phone) to us and explain why you
    believe we (referees and editors) have overlooked
    or misunderstood something
  • Revised manuscripts normally go back to the same
    referees need a strong case to replace a referee
    as they normally come back with new set of points
  • The paper must not be submitted for publication
    elsewhere during this time
  • It is likely that some time will elapse before we
    can respond

www.nature.com/naturephotonics
21
Manuscript preparation
How to get your point across HINT Write for
both the beginner and the expert
22
Which journal?
  • Nature is for broadest or deepest impact
  • Research journals overlap
  • Depends on the editorial scope of the journal
    and your target audience

23
Presubmission enquiry
  • Ask us!
  • All Nature journals have a presubmission enquiry
    procedure on the submissions page
  • It is not compulsory
  • Simply send in a fully referenced summary with a
    cover letter and well tell you within 23
    working days if its suitable
  • Editors cannot make an absolute commitment to
    have a contribution refereed before seeing the
    entire paper

24
Manuscript Transfer System
  • All Nature journals including Nature are
    editorially independent
  • A rejection from one does not mean a rejection
    from the others
  • Manuscripts rejected from one journal can be
    automatically transferred to any of the others
  • Eliminates need for author to re-input a
    manuscript
  • Authors choice if they wish to do full transfer
    or just partial transfer
  • Transfer link can be found at the end of the
    rejection letter

25
Types of submission
  • Letter
  • usual format for research findings, up to 1500w
  • Article
  • more detailed study, around 2000 3000w
  • Review article
  • overviews of an up and coming topic, 4000
    5000w
  • Commentaries
  • opinion articles on topics that are considered
    of wide-ranging appeal and timely
  • News Views
  • short articles explaining the significance of a
    recent piece of research (not your own)

26
General format for Letters and Articles
  • Double-spaced
  • Normal A4 paper, single column in word or Latex
    format
  • English as in Oxford English dictionary
  • Title, text, methods, references, end notes
    (Supplementary Information, Acknowledgements,
    author contributions (optional)), tables and
    figure legends

27
Title
  • Clear and attractive
  • Not too general or vague
  • Not too long, less than 90 characters for Letters
    less than 75 characters for Articles (incl.
    spaces)
  • Does not normally include numbers, acronyms,
    abbreviations or punctuation
  • Instead of
  • Record electro-optic coefficient of 170 pm/V
    and V? of 1V at 1.55 µm in hybrid crosslinkable
    polymer/sol-gel waveguide modulators,
  • why not
  • Hybrid polymer/sol-gel waveguide modulators
    with exceptionally large electro-optic
    coefficient?

28
Articles
  • Original reports with substantial advance in
    understanding of an important problem and have
    immediate, far-reaching implications
  • Do not normally exceed 5 pages
  • Summary of up to 150 words
  • Introduction of about 500 words
  • 2 Headings Results and Discussions
  • ? 6 subheadings in Results
  • Main Text of typically 3000 words (excl. summary,
    incl. Introduction)
  • 5-6 displays (figures or tables)
  • Up to 50 References

29
Summary ? 150 words
Heading 1 Results
Introduction ? 500 words
  • 6 Subheadings

30
Articles
  • Summary
  • 150 words
  • equivalent to Abstract in many journals
  • separate from main text
  • no references, numbers, abbreviations, acronyms
    or measurements
  • aimed at readers outside the discipline
  • 2-3 sentences of basic-level introduction
  • a brief account of the background and motivation
    of the work
  • a statement of main conclusions (introduced by
    Here we show)
  • 2-3 sentences putting the main findings into
    general context

31
Letters
  • Short reports of original research focused on an
    outstanding finding that will be of interest to
    scientists in other fields
  • Do not normally exceed 4 pages
  • No summary or introduction sections
  • Introductory paragraph of about 200 words
  • Main text of not more than 1500 words (excl.
    introductory paragraph)
  • No subheadings
  • Discussion does not repeat previous introductory
    paragraph, briefly conveys the general relevance
    of the work
  • 3-4 displays (figures and tables)
  • No more than 30 references

32
No summary!!!
Introductory Paragraph ? 200 words
No heading!!!
33
Letters
  • Introductory Paragraph
  • ideally of about 200 words, definitely not more
    than 300 words
  • aimed at readers in other disciplines
  • with references
  • 2-3 sentences on basic introduction to the field
  • one-sentence statement of the main conclusions
    starting with 'Here we show' or equivalent
    phrase
  • 2-3 sentences putting the main findings into
    general context
  • note that main text will continue to describe the
    findings of the paper

34
Main text
  • Materials
  • Methods
  • Principles
  • Mechanisms
  • Results with displays
  • Discussion

35
Discussion
  • Comparison to previous work
  • Theoretical or practical implications
  • Conclusion regarding the significance of the work
  • Limitations
  • Future work

36
Write with the readers in mind!
  • Focus on a single main question
  • Plan the content and organization with an outline
    especially the flow of reasoning
  • Use simple, direct and concise wording
  • Check that all parts are connected with
    persuasive reasoning, appropriate structure,
    linkage and context
  • Express appropriate level of confidence
  • impossible implausible unlikely
  • plausible possible probable likely
  • certain

37
Paper writing tips
  • Write in active voice for example, We
    demonstrate rather than It is demonstrated
  • State the present work in present tense
  • State already published work in past tense
  • Do not extend your conclusions beyond those that
    are directly supported by your results
  • Give potential impact and future work

38
Paper writing tips
  • Make sure that you reference relevant previous
    literature
  • Be concise format for letters is 1500 words for
    the main text put lengthy method and simulation
    details in separate sections at the end of the
    paper if you need more space
  • Clearly put your work into context, explain the
    importance of your findings in relationship to
    previous papers
  • Refer briefly to your results to support your
    discussion statements

39
Methods
  • If brief (less than 200 words in total), include
    them in the text at an appropriate place
  • Cite a reference to methods published before to
    save space with the new addition or variation
    briefly stated
  • Can also create a new section called Methods ?
    1000 words, not counted as main text
  • Figures in Methods should be submitted as
    Supplementary Information

40
Supplementary information
  • Supplementary information is encouraged
  • Peer-reviewed
  • Online access only, not in print
  • Material directly relevant to the conclusion of a
    paper that cannot be included in the printed
    version for reasons of space or medium, e.g.
    movie clips or sound files
  • Not subedited authors should ensure that it is
    clearly presented

41
Manuscript Submission
42
Cover Letter
  • A letter that you submit together with your
    manuscript but in a separate file only to the
    editors
  • Authors are encouraged to write cover letter

43
Cover Letter
  • Restate main message and significance of paper
  • Explain in clear and simple terms why the
    findings are important and what is their
    potential impact e.g. first time, big leap in
    performance, will help enable applications
    in, new level of understanding
  • Include a separate summary for non-specialist
    audience
  • List the details of the submission
  • - submission type
  • - number of words and figures
  • - any supplementary information and supporting
    manuscripts

44
Cover Letter
  • Can suggest referees and include their areas of
    expertise
  • Can suggest exclusion list who should NOT be
    approached to review the MS because of conflicts
    of interest
  • Statements that experiments done comply with
    animal care and human subject laws
  • Statement that manuscript is not simultaneously
    being considered at another journal
  • Include your contact information (email, phone,
    address)

45
Cover Letter
How not to write a cover letter
  • Whats wrong ?
  • - Too brief
  • No explanation as to why paper is important
  • No suggested list of qualified referees or
    exclusions
  • No details of format, length

46
Cover Letter
  • Explains paper is letter format
  • Explains and emphasizes main important points of
    the paper
  • Gives a list of referees

A good example
47
More tips
  • Visit Natures manuscript formatting guide
    www.nature.com/nature/authors/gta/
  • Visit Nature journals websites
  • www.nature.com/siteindex/
  • Read published papers
  • Always run the spelling checker no excuse
  • Find someone you trust who is a native speaker to
    check your paper

48
Summary
  • Plan your paper when you plan your research
  • Consider the reader/listener
  • Organize your material well
  • - focus sharply
  • - outline
  • - provide appropriate structure, linkage and
    context
  • Carefully choose the journal and follow the
    guidelines
  • Seek and value feedback and criticism

49
Helpful websites
  • SciDev.Nets How do I?
  • www.scidev.net/ms/howdoi/
  • Inter-Biotec gives free online writing course to
    help biomedical scientists
  • www.inter-biotec.com
  • Human Frontier Programs Websites and searching
    for collaborations
  • www.hfsp.org/pubs/HFSP_articles/websites-scol.php
  • Element of Style by William J. Strunk is free
    online www.bartleby.com/141/
  • Nature has one-page downloadable information
    sheet on summary paragraph and many more
  • www.nature.com/authors/author_services/how_write.
    html

50
?????????lt??gt???????!
Rachel Pei Chin Won, PhD Associate
Editor Nature Photonics
51
Summary in Articles introductory paragraph in
Letters
  • The most-read section of any paper
  • Key points
  • One or two broad general statements to orient the
    reader, set the stage, and provide context
  • Concise description of results, with mention of
    methodology used
  • Major conclusion
  • How this advances the field - why this is
    significant for readers

52
Summary in Articles or introductory paragraph in
Letters
  • How to confuse your readers?
  • Mix already published conclusions with claims
    made in this paper
  • Overinterpret overspeculate
  • Misrepresent the data or conclusions
  • End with a throw-away line
  • effect on butterfly wings are discussed.
  • when it is better with
  • The iridescent scales of the Morpho butterfly
    give a different optical response to different
    individual vapours, and that this optical
    response dramatically outperforms that of
    existing nano-engineered photonic sensors.

53
Paper writing tips
  • All variables should be defined
  • Avoid ambiguous use of pronouns this, that,
    these,
  • Avoid jargons and the excessive use of
    abbreviations and acronyms
  • Dont make claims that you are not sure, avoid
    hype and speculation
  • Never say for various reasons

54
References
  • Are numbered sequentially
  • Reference numbers are superscript
  • Use et al. if more than five authors
  • Cite only published or submitted articles
  • Titles are required
  • References to websites should give authors if
    known, title of cited page, URL in full and year
    of posting in parentheses

55
Figures
  • Figures tell the story
  • Order is absolutely critical
  • Strive for data-rich presentation
  • Show as much raw data as possible. If n
    experiments done for each data point, then show
    all points, rather than the average and standard
    deviation

56
More on figures
  • Label clearly
  • Figures must accurately reflect data as gathered
  • Choose carefully
  • Main text for main data
  • Figures in Supplementary Information appear
    online only
  • No data not shown. Either put data in the
    Supplementary Information section, or remove
    reference to it altogether
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com