Title: How to get your papers published in Nature journals? ?????????<??>?????
1How to get your papers published in Nature
journals??????????lt??gt?????
Rachel Pei Chin Won, PhD Associate
Editor Nature Photonics 5 March 2008
2Overview
- ? nature and Nature research journals
- How to get published
- - Manuscript preparation
- - Manuscript submission
- Summary
-
3nature Nature research Journals
4nature
- nature was launched on 4 Nov 1869
- The worlds foremost weekly scientific journal
- For 2006, natures impact factor is 26.681
- A flagship journal of Nature Publishing Group
(NPG)
5nature
- A weekly print copy (gt65,000)
- An anytime-anywhere electronic rendition of an
item or of a print copy (gt3 million users of
nature.com per month) - A gateway to a seamless flow of relevant and
timely information and opinion
6NPGs Biological Sciences Division
7NPGs Physical Sciences Division
Nature Nanotechnology Launched in Oct 2006
Nature Materials Launched in 2002 Impact factor
19.194
Nature Physics Launched in Oct 2005 Impact factor
12.040
Nature Chemistry will be launched in Jan 2009
Nature Photonics Launched in Jan 2007
Nature Geoscience Launched in Jan 2008
8Nature Publshing Groups Publications
Nature Research Journals Nature
Biotechnology Nature Cell Biology Nature Chemical
Biology Nature Genetics Nature Geoscience (Jan
2008) Nature Immunology Nature Materials Nature
Medicine Nature Methods Nature Nanotechnology Natu
re Neuroscience Nature Photonics (Jan
2007) Nature Physics Nature Protocol Nature
Structural and Molecular Biology Nature
Chemistry (Jan 2009)
Nature Review Journals Nature Reviews
Cancer Nature Reviews Drug Discovery Nature
Reviews Genetics Nature Reviews Immunology Nature
Reviews Microbiology Nature Reviews Molecular
Cell Biol. Nature Reviews Neuroscience Nature
Clinical Practice 8 titles Academic
Journals Around 40 titles The ISME Journal
9What makes Nature titles distinct?
- Highly selective
- Focus is on quality rather than volume
- High impact
- Full-time professional editorial staff
- No external editorial board or affiliations
- Editorially independent of each other
- Share general policies but not submissions
- Pass on manuscripts only at request of authors
10Publications from China
11Submissions from China to nature
12Myth of Editors Bias
- Ever since Natures foundation in 1869, Natures
editors and editors of all Nature journals have
been 100 responsible for selection of papers
no editorial boards. - Editors read and assess papers in a way that is
independent of country of origin. - Editors are of many nationalities, including
Asian. - Editors visit many countries, including China.
- There is no bias against countries by the editors
of Nature or Nature journals.
13How to get published in Nature journals?
14Steps to a great paper
- Thoughtful research
- ??/?????
- Thorough preparation
- ?????
- Logical exposition
- ?????
- Plan your papers
- When you plan your research
- Again before you start writing the draft
15Before writing a paper
- Why does the topic interest YOU?
- What are the key findings of your work?
- What was thought/known/done before this work?
- Whats the main message for your readers?
- Re-evaluate the original data, not only the for
publication figures - How does new data change thinking, or support
current approach, or open new avenues or research?
16 17What editors seek
- High degree of novelty or innovation
- ??????????
- Interesting to a broad range of readers
- ???????????
- Significant step forward
- ????????
- Breakthrough in performance
- ?????
- High impact in the field
- ?????
- Important advance in scientific understanding
that provides new directions for research - ?????????, ??????????????
- Data persuasively supports conclusions
- ????????????
18Editorial Processes
Editorial assessment
Submission
Decline
Revision requested
External peer review
Editorial decision
Decline
Accept
19Results
- Several possibilities
- Accept, with or without editorial revisions
- Invite the authors to revise their manuscript
to address - specific concerns
- Reject, but indicate to the authors that
further work might - justify a resubmission
- Reject outright, typically on grounds of
specialist interest, - lack of novelty, insufficient conceptual
advance or - technical/interpretational problems
20How to make an appeal?
- Write (not phone) to us and explain why you
believe we (referees and editors) have overlooked
or misunderstood something - Revised manuscripts normally go back to the same
referees need a strong case to replace a referee
as they normally come back with new set of points - The paper must not be submitted for publication
elsewhere during this time - It is likely that some time will elapse before we
can respond
www.nature.com/naturephotonics
21Manuscript preparation
How to get your point across HINT Write for
both the beginner and the expert
22Which journal?
- Nature is for broadest or deepest impact
- Research journals overlap
- Depends on the editorial scope of the journal
and your target audience
23Presubmission enquiry
- Ask us!
- All Nature journals have a presubmission enquiry
procedure on the submissions page - It is not compulsory
- Simply send in a fully referenced summary with a
cover letter and well tell you within 23
working days if its suitable - Editors cannot make an absolute commitment to
have a contribution refereed before seeing the
entire paper
24Manuscript Transfer System
- All Nature journals including Nature are
editorially independent - A rejection from one does not mean a rejection
from the others - Manuscripts rejected from one journal can be
automatically transferred to any of the others - Eliminates need for author to re-input a
manuscript - Authors choice if they wish to do full transfer
or just partial transfer - Transfer link can be found at the end of the
rejection letter
25Types of submission
- Letter
- usual format for research findings, up to 1500w
- Article
- more detailed study, around 2000 3000w
- Review article
- overviews of an up and coming topic, 4000
5000w - Commentaries
- opinion articles on topics that are considered
of wide-ranging appeal and timely - News Views
- short articles explaining the significance of a
recent piece of research (not your own)
26General format for Letters and Articles
- Double-spaced
- Normal A4 paper, single column in word or Latex
format - English as in Oxford English dictionary
- Title, text, methods, references, end notes
(Supplementary Information, Acknowledgements,
author contributions (optional)), tables and
figure legends
27Title
- Clear and attractive
- Not too general or vague
- Not too long, less than 90 characters for Letters
less than 75 characters for Articles (incl.
spaces) - Does not normally include numbers, acronyms,
abbreviations or punctuation - Instead of
- Record electro-optic coefficient of 170 pm/V
and V? of 1V at 1.55 µm in hybrid crosslinkable
polymer/sol-gel waveguide modulators, - why not
- Hybrid polymer/sol-gel waveguide modulators
with exceptionally large electro-optic
coefficient?
28Articles
- Original reports with substantial advance in
understanding of an important problem and have
immediate, far-reaching implications - Do not normally exceed 5 pages
- Summary of up to 150 words
- Introduction of about 500 words
- 2 Headings Results and Discussions
- ? 6 subheadings in Results
- Main Text of typically 3000 words (excl. summary,
incl. Introduction) - 5-6 displays (figures or tables)
- Up to 50 References
29Summary ? 150 words
Heading 1 Results
Introduction ? 500 words
30Articles
- Summary
- 150 words
- equivalent to Abstract in many journals
- separate from main text
- no references, numbers, abbreviations, acronyms
or measurements - aimed at readers outside the discipline
- 2-3 sentences of basic-level introduction
- a brief account of the background and motivation
of the work - a statement of main conclusions (introduced by
Here we show) - 2-3 sentences putting the main findings into
general context
31Letters
- Short reports of original research focused on an
outstanding finding that will be of interest to
scientists in other fields - Do not normally exceed 4 pages
- No summary or introduction sections
- Introductory paragraph of about 200 words
- Main text of not more than 1500 words (excl.
introductory paragraph) - No subheadings
- Discussion does not repeat previous introductory
paragraph, briefly conveys the general relevance
of the work - 3-4 displays (figures and tables)
- No more than 30 references
32No summary!!!
Introductory Paragraph ? 200 words
No heading!!!
33Letters
- Introductory Paragraph
- ideally of about 200 words, definitely not more
than 300 words - aimed at readers in other disciplines
- with references
- 2-3 sentences on basic introduction to the field
- one-sentence statement of the main conclusions
starting with 'Here we show' or equivalent
phrase - 2-3 sentences putting the main findings into
general context - note that main text will continue to describe the
findings of the paper
34Main text
- Materials
- Methods
- Principles
- Mechanisms
- Results with displays
- Discussion
35Discussion
- Comparison to previous work
- Theoretical or practical implications
- Conclusion regarding the significance of the work
- Limitations
- Future work
36Write with the readers in mind!
- Focus on a single main question
- Plan the content and organization with an outline
especially the flow of reasoning - Use simple, direct and concise wording
- Check that all parts are connected with
persuasive reasoning, appropriate structure,
linkage and context - Express appropriate level of confidence
- impossible implausible unlikely
- plausible possible probable likely
- certain
37Paper writing tips
- Write in active voice for example, We
demonstrate rather than It is demonstrated - State the present work in present tense
- State already published work in past tense
- Do not extend your conclusions beyond those that
are directly supported by your results - Give potential impact and future work
38Paper writing tips
- Make sure that you reference relevant previous
literature - Be concise format for letters is 1500 words for
the main text put lengthy method and simulation
details in separate sections at the end of the
paper if you need more space - Clearly put your work into context, explain the
importance of your findings in relationship to
previous papers - Refer briefly to your results to support your
discussion statements
39Methods
- If brief (less than 200 words in total), include
them in the text at an appropriate place - Cite a reference to methods published before to
save space with the new addition or variation
briefly stated - Can also create a new section called Methods ?
1000 words, not counted as main text - Figures in Methods should be submitted as
Supplementary Information
40Supplementary information
- Supplementary information is encouraged
- Peer-reviewed
- Online access only, not in print
- Material directly relevant to the conclusion of a
paper that cannot be included in the printed
version for reasons of space or medium, e.g.
movie clips or sound files - Not subedited authors should ensure that it is
clearly presented
41Manuscript Submission
42Cover Letter
- A letter that you submit together with your
manuscript but in a separate file only to the
editors - Authors are encouraged to write cover letter
43Cover Letter
- Restate main message and significance of paper
- Explain in clear and simple terms why the
findings are important and what is their
potential impact e.g. first time, big leap in
performance, will help enable applications
in, new level of understanding - Include a separate summary for non-specialist
audience - List the details of the submission
- - submission type
- - number of words and figures
- - any supplementary information and supporting
manuscripts
44Cover Letter
- Can suggest referees and include their areas of
expertise - Can suggest exclusion list who should NOT be
approached to review the MS because of conflicts
of interest - Statements that experiments done comply with
animal care and human subject laws - Statement that manuscript is not simultaneously
being considered at another journal - Include your contact information (email, phone,
address)
45Cover Letter
How not to write a cover letter
- Whats wrong ?
- - Too brief
- No explanation as to why paper is important
- No suggested list of qualified referees or
exclusions - No details of format, length
46Cover Letter
- Explains paper is letter format
- Explains and emphasizes main important points of
the paper - Gives a list of referees
A good example
47More tips
- Visit Natures manuscript formatting guide
www.nature.com/nature/authors/gta/ - Visit Nature journals websites
- www.nature.com/siteindex/
- Read published papers
- Always run the spelling checker no excuse
- Find someone you trust who is a native speaker to
check your paper
48Summary
- Plan your paper when you plan your research
- Consider the reader/listener
- Organize your material well
- - focus sharply
- - outline
- - provide appropriate structure, linkage and
context - Carefully choose the journal and follow the
guidelines - Seek and value feedback and criticism
49Helpful websites
- SciDev.Nets How do I?
- www.scidev.net/ms/howdoi/
- Inter-Biotec gives free online writing course to
help biomedical scientists - www.inter-biotec.com
- Human Frontier Programs Websites and searching
for collaborations - www.hfsp.org/pubs/HFSP_articles/websites-scol.php
- Element of Style by William J. Strunk is free
online www.bartleby.com/141/ - Nature has one-page downloadable information
sheet on summary paragraph and many more - www.nature.com/authors/author_services/how_write.
html
50?????????lt??gt???????!
Rachel Pei Chin Won, PhD Associate
Editor Nature Photonics
51Summary in Articles introductory paragraph in
Letters
- The most-read section of any paper
- Key points
- One or two broad general statements to orient the
reader, set the stage, and provide context - Concise description of results, with mention of
methodology used - Major conclusion
- How this advances the field - why this is
significant for readers
52Summary in Articles or introductory paragraph in
Letters
- How to confuse your readers?
- Mix already published conclusions with claims
made in this paper - Overinterpret overspeculate
- Misrepresent the data or conclusions
- End with a throw-away line
- effect on butterfly wings are discussed.
- when it is better with
- The iridescent scales of the Morpho butterfly
give a different optical response to different
individual vapours, and that this optical
response dramatically outperforms that of
existing nano-engineered photonic sensors.
53Paper writing tips
- All variables should be defined
- Avoid ambiguous use of pronouns this, that,
these, - Avoid jargons and the excessive use of
abbreviations and acronyms - Dont make claims that you are not sure, avoid
hype and speculation - Never say for various reasons
54References
- Are numbered sequentially
- Reference numbers are superscript
- Use et al. if more than five authors
- Cite only published or submitted articles
- Titles are required
- References to websites should give authors if
known, title of cited page, URL in full and year
of posting in parentheses
55Figures
- Figures tell the story
- Order is absolutely critical
- Strive for data-rich presentation
- Show as much raw data as possible. If n
experiments done for each data point, then show
all points, rather than the average and standard
deviation
56More on figures
- Label clearly
- Figures must accurately reflect data as gathered
- Choose carefully
- Main text for main data
- Figures in Supplementary Information appear
online only - No data not shown. Either put data in the
Supplementary Information section, or remove
reference to it altogether