What next for the railways? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

What next for the railways?

Description:

Title: A plague of boiling frogs Author: Ford Created Date: 2/1/2003 2:09:43 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show Company.Modern Railways/RBI – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:130
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: ford80
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What next for the railways?


1
What next for the railways?
  • Presentation to the
  • Public Transport Group
  • Northern Home Counties Region
  • By
  • Roger Ford AIRSE MCILT
  • Industry Technology Editor
  • Modern Railways
  • Founding Editor
  • Rail Business Intelligence

2
Another four years
  • Transport never became an issue in the election
    campaign
  • Railways even less so
  • Transport Secretary Alistair Darling did a good
    job!
  • And he is staying on

3
Unfinished business
  • Labours first term assumed that privatisation
    would deliver
  • 10 Year Transport Plan
  • Labours second term revealed the failure to
    deliver
  • The future of rail White Paper
  • Railways Act 2005

4
Confusing signals
  • Since privatisation the cost of the railway to
    the taxpayer has increased by a factor of five.
  • Costs of railway projects has increased by a
    multiple of pi
  • Yet the railway supply industry is undergoing
    another order hiatus

5
What the DfT remembers
6
Record Government support
  • In 2005/06 subsidies and grants will reach 6.5
    billion (excluding CTRL)
  • This is
  • Triple British Rails subsidy in its worst ever
    years 1982 and 1983
  • More than six times what BR received in its best
    ever year 1989/90.

7
Where the money goes
8
Expenditure by category
9
Cost to the taxpayer increasing
  • Proportion of railways income from the customer
    a key indicator
  • Historically has gone up and down with the
    economic cycle.
  • As the economy recovered after the recession at
    the start of the 90s the proportion increased.

10
But then the trend reversed.
11
Growth not an issue
  • A common excuse is that the railway is carrying
    record number of passengers.
  • But ridership grew as fast in the 1980s
  • Infrastructure maintenance costs not an issue
  • Nor are the decades of underinvestment

12
Diseconomies of scale
  • 1989/90
  • 812 million journeys
  • Subsidy 985 million
  • 1.21 per passenger journey
  • 2003/04
  • 1 billion journeys
  • Subsidy 3.8 billion
  • 3.80 per passenger journey

13
The long term underinvestment myth
14
What decades of underinvestment?
  • Consistent spend by BR on maintenance and renewal
  • Health warning some double counting on renewals
    still to be reviewed
  • But maintenance in line with current Network Rail
    forecasts

15
Darlings conundrum
  • Record ridership
  • Continuing growth
  • But
  • new projects to provide extra capacity
    unaffordable
  • Route modernisation programme abandoned.
  • And subsidy fixed until next Periodic Review

16
Network Rails future budget
17
Network Rail funding2004/5-2008/9
18
Time to retrench
  • What you people have got to realise is that the
    future is about service cuts and fares increases
  • Senior DfT Official

19
Getting costs under control
  • Regulator determined Network Rails income for
    five years in the Interim Review.
  • Next Control period starts on 1 April 2009
  • Railways Act means no repeat of Ministerial
    radio silence during the Interim Review

20
Ministers must decide
  • Under the Railways Act Ministers have to specify
    how much railway they want and what they are
    prepared to pay for it.
  • ORR and Network Rail work out the present cost of
    the railway the Government specifies.
  • If there is a gap - iteration

21
Ministers must decide
  • If the gap between Government budget and cost of
    the railway cant be closed, ORR decides on how
    much railway the available funding will buy.
  • From unelected Regulator deciding how much money
    the railway needs to unelected ORR deciding
    service and quality cuts?

22
Ministers really must decide
  • A knotty issue. ORR interprets Act as meaning
    that it will seek guidance from Government on any
    cut backs. We shall see

23
What will the minister specify?
  • Typical objectives and standards of what the
    railways are to achieve
  • Capacity (types and number of trains) of networks
  • Frequency of passenger services
  • Journey times
  • Reliability
  • Measures to prevent or mitigate overcrowding
  • Fares levels and ticket types
  • Quality of passenger information
  • Accessibility for the disabled
  • Implementation of major projects to improve
    railway services.
  • Protection of persons from dangers arising from
    the operation of railways.

24
What happens next?
  • Periodic Review Timetable
  • Informal process to determine funding and service
    levels 2006
  • Formal statement by DfT early 2007
  • ORR publishes draft conclusions Early 2008
  • ORR publishes final determination Mid 2008

25
No time to lose
  • DfT Rail has to start developing specification
    this year given the detail
  • Still recruiting people for the new Rail
    Directorate under Mike Mitchell
  • Hopes to be fully operational in October

26
Meanwhile.
  • Sundry minor issues to be taken forward
  • Thameslink
  • CrossRail
  • CTRL Domestic Services
  • Franchise replacement
  • International Freight charges
  • HST replacement

27
Not to mention.
  • Virgin West Coast renegotiation
  • Conventional Interoperability
  • ERTMS
  • RAIB
  • Plus achieving major cost reductions across the
    railway

28
WCRM - Money no object
  • By BR standards the 125 mile/h upgrade was
    generously funded
  • Black diamond review could be accepted as
    reflecting the many inefficiencies introduced by
    privatisation and Health Safety
  • But 12.4 million/mile for a 15mile/h upgrade is
    ridiculous

29
Project costs 1966-2003
30
Southern Region power
  • Southern Region power supply
  • December 2001 - tens of millions
  • June 2002 - 500 million
  • January 2003 Roundly a billion
  • January 2004 - 780 million
  • BUT

31
Southern Region Power
  • BUT
  • Heavily despecified
  • No increase in power per train
  • 50 of minor overloads to be monitored and
    upgraded if necessary
  • No provision for growth

32
Power - a mini case history
  • Ashford-Hastings and Uckfield lines
  • 1993 Ashford- Hastings 19-25 million
  • 1998 Both schemes 30.5 million
  • 2002 Both schemes 154 million
  • 2003 New diesel multiple units ordered

33
Signalling Hidden costs
34
Project cancelled (1)
35
Project cancelled (2)
36
Poor little rich railway
  • The railway has run out of money
  • Between the Strategic Rail Authoritys 2002 and
    2003 strategic plans investment in enhancement
    over the next 10 years has fallen from 25
    billion to 16 billion.
  • Massive expenditure on renewals

37
Record investment levels
38
But money is buying less
  • Ford Factor now pi
  • But that is modest inflation compared with some
    cases already mentioned
  • SRA and Network Rail in denial over comparisons
    with BR

39
Inflated franchise costs
40
So there
  • Personally I couldn't care less what it cost BR.
    All that matters is what it costs now and what we
    have to do to get it under control.
  • Richard Bowker
  • 11 September 2002

41
Funding investment 1991-2011
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com