Title: What next for the railways?
1What next for the railways?
- Presentation to the
- Public Transport Group
- Northern Home Counties Region
- By
- Roger Ford AIRSE MCILT
- Industry Technology Editor
- Modern Railways
- Founding Editor
- Rail Business Intelligence
2Another four years
- Transport never became an issue in the election
campaign - Railways even less so
- Transport Secretary Alistair Darling did a good
job! - And he is staying on
3Unfinished business
- Labours first term assumed that privatisation
would deliver - 10 Year Transport Plan
- Labours second term revealed the failure to
deliver - The future of rail White Paper
- Railways Act 2005
4Confusing signals
- Since privatisation the cost of the railway to
the taxpayer has increased by a factor of five. - Costs of railway projects has increased by a
multiple of pi - Yet the railway supply industry is undergoing
another order hiatus
5What the DfT remembers
6Record Government support
- In 2005/06 subsidies and grants will reach 6.5
billion (excluding CTRL) - This is
- Triple British Rails subsidy in its worst ever
years 1982 and 1983 - More than six times what BR received in its best
ever year 1989/90.
7Where the money goes
8Expenditure by category
9Cost to the taxpayer increasing
- Proportion of railways income from the customer
a key indicator - Historically has gone up and down with the
economic cycle. - As the economy recovered after the recession at
the start of the 90s the proportion increased.
10But then the trend reversed.
11Growth not an issue
- A common excuse is that the railway is carrying
record number of passengers. - But ridership grew as fast in the 1980s
- Infrastructure maintenance costs not an issue
- Nor are the decades of underinvestment
12Diseconomies of scale
- 1989/90
- 812 million journeys
- Subsidy 985 million
- 1.21 per passenger journey
- 2003/04
- 1 billion journeys
- Subsidy 3.8 billion
- 3.80 per passenger journey
13The long term underinvestment myth
14What decades of underinvestment?
- Consistent spend by BR on maintenance and renewal
- Health warning some double counting on renewals
still to be reviewed - But maintenance in line with current Network Rail
forecasts
15Darlings conundrum
- Record ridership
- Continuing growth
- But
- new projects to provide extra capacity
unaffordable - Route modernisation programme abandoned.
- And subsidy fixed until next Periodic Review
16Network Rails future budget
17Network Rail funding2004/5-2008/9
18Time to retrench
- What you people have got to realise is that the
future is about service cuts and fares increases - Senior DfT Official
19Getting costs under control
- Regulator determined Network Rails income for
five years in the Interim Review. - Next Control period starts on 1 April 2009
- Railways Act means no repeat of Ministerial
radio silence during the Interim Review
20Ministers must decide
- Under the Railways Act Ministers have to specify
how much railway they want and what they are
prepared to pay for it. - ORR and Network Rail work out the present cost of
the railway the Government specifies. - If there is a gap - iteration
21Ministers must decide
- If the gap between Government budget and cost of
the railway cant be closed, ORR decides on how
much railway the available funding will buy. - From unelected Regulator deciding how much money
the railway needs to unelected ORR deciding
service and quality cuts?
22Ministers really must decide
- A knotty issue. ORR interprets Act as meaning
that it will seek guidance from Government on any
cut backs. We shall see
23What will the minister specify?
- Typical objectives and standards of what the
railways are to achieve - Capacity (types and number of trains) of networks
- Frequency of passenger services
- Journey times
- Reliability
- Measures to prevent or mitigate overcrowding
- Fares levels and ticket types
- Quality of passenger information
- Accessibility for the disabled
- Implementation of major projects to improve
railway services. - Protection of persons from dangers arising from
the operation of railways.
24What happens next?
- Periodic Review Timetable
- Informal process to determine funding and service
levels 2006 - Formal statement by DfT early 2007
- ORR publishes draft conclusions Early 2008
- ORR publishes final determination Mid 2008
25No time to lose
- DfT Rail has to start developing specification
this year given the detail - Still recruiting people for the new Rail
Directorate under Mike Mitchell - Hopes to be fully operational in October
26Meanwhile.
- Sundry minor issues to be taken forward
- Thameslink
- CrossRail
- CTRL Domestic Services
- Franchise replacement
- International Freight charges
- HST replacement
27Not to mention.
- Virgin West Coast renegotiation
- Conventional Interoperability
- ERTMS
- RAIB
- Plus achieving major cost reductions across the
railway
28WCRM - Money no object
- By BR standards the 125 mile/h upgrade was
generously funded - Black diamond review could be accepted as
reflecting the many inefficiencies introduced by
privatisation and Health Safety - But 12.4 million/mile for a 15mile/h upgrade is
ridiculous
29Project costs 1966-2003
30Southern Region power
- Southern Region power supply
- December 2001 - tens of millions
- June 2002 - 500 million
- January 2003 Roundly a billion
- January 2004 - 780 million
- BUT
31Southern Region Power
- BUT
- Heavily despecified
- No increase in power per train
- 50 of minor overloads to be monitored and
upgraded if necessary - No provision for growth
32Power - a mini case history
- Ashford-Hastings and Uckfield lines
- 1993 Ashford- Hastings 19-25 million
- 1998 Both schemes 30.5 million
- 2002 Both schemes 154 million
- 2003 New diesel multiple units ordered
-
33Signalling Hidden costs
34Project cancelled (1)
35Project cancelled (2)
36Poor little rich railway
- The railway has run out of money
- Between the Strategic Rail Authoritys 2002 and
2003 strategic plans investment in enhancement
over the next 10 years has fallen from 25
billion to 16 billion. - Massive expenditure on renewals
37Record investment levels
38But money is buying less
- Ford Factor now pi
- But that is modest inflation compared with some
cases already mentioned - SRA and Network Rail in denial over comparisons
with BR
39Inflated franchise costs
40So there
- Personally I couldn't care less what it cost BR.
All that matters is what it costs now and what we
have to do to get it under control. - Richard Bowker
- 11 September 2002
41Funding investment 1991-2011