Title: Requirements Analysis
1(No Transcript)
2Introduction
3Requirements Analysis
- NC FY 13-17 IPL Priority 9 Information Sharing
- NC STIPL FY 13-17 Priority 15 FPCON Threat
Information Coordination - EC FY13-17 IPL Priority 4 Information Sharing
Policies, Procedures - NATO STANAG 5511 Tactical Data Exchange
- NATO STANAG 5616 Data Forwarding between
Tactical Data Systems - JROCM (VCJCS, 30May12) Joint Staff Capabilities
Gap Assessment - Description Per the DOD Fort Hood Independent
Review Panel Finding 3.6 no force protection
processes or procedures exist to share near
real-time event information among commands,
installations and components. - Ft. Hood Recommendation Evaluate requirements
for creating systems, process, policy and tools
to share near real-time unclassified information
among military installations in CONUS to increase
situational awareness and ensure
disaster-resilient functions and facilities. - Result USNORTHCOM, Services, and Components may
not receive sufficient warning of terrorist or
criminal threats to DOD installations, personnel,
facilities, or defense critical infrastructure to
permit timely force protection decisions and to
enable the DOD or other appropriate Federal
Agencies to deter, interdict or neutralize the
threats.
4Justification
- Supporting Evidence
- Unified Command Plan (UCP)
- Paragraph 13C(4) USNORTHCOM will maintain the
security of and carry out force protection
responsibilities for the command, including
assigned or attached commands, forces, and
assets. The commander is also responsible for
exercising force protection responsibilities for
all U.S. military forces within the AOR. - USNORTHCOM Instruction 10-222 Force Protection
Mission and Antiterrorism Program. - Secretary of Defense Memorandum Final
Recommendations of the Fort Hood Follow on
Review dated 18 August 2010 - Recommendation 3.4 Develop Guidance on Force
Protection Threat Information Sharing - Recommendation 3.5 Adopt a Common Force
Protection Threat Reporting System - Recommendation 3.6 Create a Process for Sharing
Real-Time Force Protection Information among
installations - Recommendation 4.5.a.(EMSG) Deploy a Common
Operating Picture (COP) capability into EOCs
5What is MATADRR?
- Summary A Joint initiative to establish
theater-wide information sharing interfaces
across stove-piped unclassified emergency
management and force protection applications to
improve situational awareness - Executive sponsor OASD for Nuclear Matters
- Initiative team composition
- Physical Security Enterprise Analysis Group
(PSEAG) - U.S. Northern Command (USNORTHCOM)
- Armaments Research Development and Engineering
Center (ARDEC) - Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Pacific
(SPAWAR) - Goals
- Share information - all hazard/threat situational
awareness, emergency management and force
protection information sharing - Mission assurance - identify a systems
architecture to demonstrate the ability to pass
near real-time emergency all hazard threat
information
6OV-1
UNCLASSIFIED
Must comply with established Intelligence
Oversight and LE data sharing protocols, laws, and
7(No Transcript)
8MATADRR Phase 1 FY12
- Technical Idea/Approach/FY12
- Enhance development of an existing (TRL 6)
government-owned, decision support system for
demonstration in an operational environment (TRL
7) at Joint Base McGuire-Dix- Lakehurst - Multi-source UDOP architecture
- Expected Outcome Phase 1 FY12
- An enhanced (TRL 7) software architecture to
demonstrate a UDOP and common interoperability
for sharing near real-time threat information - The virtual repository and fusion framework
delivered by the end of Phase 1 will reduce the
time to build and deliver the final capability
through the MATADRR Initiative - A roles-based web application framework for
Service Components that currently lack an FP
threat and response application - A virtual repository of threat report forms
(e.g. EagleEyes, OPREP-3, SIR, et al) for a
software application providing user-defined
presentation layers graphic user interface (GUI),
service-oriented interfaces, business
configuration controllers, and situational
awareness data management
9MATADRR Phase 2 FY13
- Technical Idea/Approach/FY13
- Integrate and timely correlate the collection,
analysis, reporting and processing of domestic
force protection and threat information from
existing multiple stove-piped systems - Integrate currently available DOD systems,
software and equipment such as N-NC NIPR-SAGE,
PACOM GCCS-J, SOUTHCOM C2PC-Agile Client, NGB
GeoGuard, and JTF-HD DisasterAware without
establishing a new stove-piped system or
requiring additional user-level equipment - Expected Outcome FY13
- Deliver a system architecture within DOD to
- Share, coordinate and collaborate on force
protection measures and threat information with
DOD forces - Integrate the capability with the Navy and Marine
Corps existing C4I system - Demonstrate the capability with a Joint base, off
installation facility in-transit element - Provide the functionality that supports
trend/pattern/temporal analysis and dissemination
of the analyzed product
10MATADRR Phase 3 FY14
- Technical Idea/Approach/FY14
- Tie in the installation COPs such as C4I (DON),
WebEOC (USAF), DSS 5.0 (USA) and both AtHoc and
EM2P (selected Joint Bases) - Perform independent verification and validation
testing on the system - Expected Outcome FY14
- Document and analyze all operational and
technical demonstration results continue the
spiral development of the system to meet all
documented requirements deliver a hardened
system to meet the need to pass Force Protection
and Threat Information Sharing data in an
encrypted, timely, and reliable manner - Deliver a system that will provide near real
time, web-accessible, encrypted data pertaining
to FPCON status changes standard forms such as
SARs, SIRs, BLUDARTs, and Status Reports will
be shared between DoD entities the system will
be tailorable to all roles and scalable based on
the technology available - Extend connectivity/ capability with federal
mission partners (DHS, DOJ, DOI, DOS, HHS) - Integrate iCav, iPAWS, LE systems
11Coalition of the Willing
DISA CBRNE PM/DEP AT DTRA SEC/CTR-INT-ATO DLA SEC
EM SRV NSA MEADEDPTMS-MDW-SC PFPA
OSD-CIO EM2P GCAS DCMA AT/EM AAFES AT/FP/EM JPEO
Chem Bio Defense JPM Guardian EM2P HQ-MC MAAT NGB
AT/FP/EM
Ops Prog Manager, N37 EM HQ Program Dir, N37 OSD
Mission Assurance -NSWCDD Pacific Disaster
Center -HS/HD
Joint Staff J34 AT/FP JFHQ-NCR NGB J7 AT/FP
Office US Army G2 G34 USAF EM Office USNORTHCOM
J34 USSTRATCOM Fleet Forces Command MARFORNORTH AR
NORTH AFNORTH USCG AT/EM CA ARNG AT/EM/FP
Pending Contact NGA NRO DIA GSA
Ongoing Coordination
12Summary
- Joint problem - no force protection processes
exist for shared awareness - Requirements N-NC EUCOM IPL, JROCM 30 May
2012 UCP Par13C(4) - Analysis of technologies, systems/applications
interface - Concept of Employment
- No new stove-piped system or additional
user-level equipment - A flexible architecture allowing minimal
integration - Connecting a variety of technical platforms
- Concept of Operations - share near real-time
unclassified force protection and emergency
management information among all DOD mission
partners
13Points of Contact
- USNORTHCOM
- Mr. Jorge Zambrana, N-NC/ST, Project Lead,
719.556.7457, Jorge.Zambrana_at_northcom.mil - Mr. Tom Baron, NC/J34, Project Advisor,
719.556.8700, Thomas.Baron_at_northcom.mil - Mr. David Hotop, N-NC/ST, Contract Support,
719.359.7910, david.hotop.ctr_at_northcom.mil
dhotop_at_camber.com - Mr. Shawn Schulze, N-NC/ST, Contract Support,
719.685.7525, sschulze_at_camber.com - ARNORTH
- Mr. Craig Hinman, ARNORTH PMO, Project Advisor,
210.221.1999, craig.hinman_at_us.army.mil - MAJ Ryan Lueders, ARNORTH ST Advisor,
210.221.2525, ryan.lueders_at_us.army.mil - SPAWARSYSCEN-Pacific
- Mr. Doug Hardy, Transition Manager (XM),
(619)553-5410 douglas.hardy_at_navy.mil - ARDEC
- Mr. Don Fulloon, Technical Manager (TM),
973-724-8093 donald.w.fulloon.civ_at_mail.mil
14QUESTIONS?
QUESTIONS?