Common challenges, common issues - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Common challenges, common issues

Description:

Title: Retreat Objectives Author: Authorized OCLC User Last modified by: Robert C. Bolander Created Date: 9/4/2002 1:47:45 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:139
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: Authorize9
Learn more at: https://www.oclc.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Common challenges, common issues


1
Common challenges, common issues
  • Lorcan DempseySchool for scanningThe Hague, 16
    October 2002

2
Overview
  • Part 1
  • Part 2
  • Part 3

I do not know an awful lot about archival
institutions .
or museums
3
Part one
The words of things entangle and confuse
4
(No Transcript)
5
Goals which encourage shared activity
  • To release the value of Europe's scientific,
    industrial and cultural heritage in creative use
    by its citizens.
  • To engage with the cultural identities and
    aspirations of Europe and its peoples.
  • To develop practices appropriate to upholding the
    values and purposes of the library, archival and
    museum traditions in a digital environment.
  • To explore what it means to develop virtual civic
    presence.
  • To explore sustainable economic models which
    support both development and continued equitable
    access to the cultural heritage.

..
6

It challenges libraries to assert their public
service role, to make the links with education,
with cultural institutions, with public service
broadcasting, and to demonstrate their real value
as physical and virtual assembly places. A
life-long learning agenda cannot be realised
without public institutions that support
equitable access to the stuff of learning. This
case needs to be made and supported by visible
services, print and digital. Library values make
them such institutions they need to ensure that
their practices do also.
..
7

Finally, and critically, people spend large parts
of their lives in the converging network spaces
of broadcasting and the Internet. Are we really
saying that such spaces should lack the
civilising presence of libraries, archives,
museums? That libraries should not try to enrich
such spaces with learning opportunity, should not
disclose the history of communities there, should
not support reading and access to cultural
resources?
..
8
Part 2
the scene was set it repeated what Was in
the script. Then the
theatre was changedTo something else. Its past
was a souvenir.
9
Grid
stewardship
high
low
low
uniqueness
high
10
(No Transcript)
11
Libraries becoming like .
  • Unique
  • Processing model
  • Routine for discovery and request
  • Content management
  • Woods and trees
  • Provenance and context
  • Evidential and informational
  • Descriptive practices
  • Preservation and archiving
  • Repurposing content
  • High acronymic density
  • Selective exposure
  • Exhibition
  • Narrative
  • Pedagogy

12
Part 3
It must give pleasure
13
The recombinant library
user environments
library
resource environment
14
The recombinant library
User environment
Resource environment
  • Resource environment
  • Distributed
  • Heterogeneous
  • Recombinant
  • Interoperability becomes very real
  • New organizational patterns
  • Distributed
  • Heterogeneous
  • Recombinant
  • Interoperability becomes very real
  • New organizational patterns

15
Interoperability as recombinant potential
  • Disaggregating scholarly publishing
  • Linking, Identifiers
  • Play learning objects
  • Packaged
  • Federated searching
  • Fusing metadata
  • Processing content
  • Ingesting content
  • Plugging in services
  • Collectible?
  • Examples
  • Can I add a document to a repository?
  • Can I add a repository to a distributed query?
  • Can I fuse metadata from one repository with
    another?
  • Can I aggregate these resources into a learning
    package?

16
Libraries, archives and museums .
  • Cannot achieve the big picture on a one by one
    basis
  • Resource environment
  • No economies of scale
  • The expense of learning
  • E.g. object management preservation services
    disclosure
  • User environment
  • A distributed approach
  • Z, OAI
  • An aggregated approach
  • SCRAN, ArtStor, Amico, Cultural Materials
    Initiative, OCLC,
  • Proquest, Gale,

17
And
  • Need to move from single initiative
  • Nsdl
  • JISC Information environment
  • NOF
  • IMLS
  • COLIS
  • Memory of the Netherlands
  • Recombinant organization
  • Fragmented by
  • Initiative
  • Domain
  • Country
  • Funding regime
  • E.g UK higher education

18
So
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
Thank you
22
Interoperability
Archiving
Discovery
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com