Title: Cross-border Education in ASEAN Countries
1Cross-border Education in ASEAN Countries
7th CRISU-CUPT Conference Challenges of ASEAN
Higher Education in Globalized World
- Dr. Libing Wang
- APEID Coordinator Senior Programme Specialist
in Higher Education - UNESCO Bangkok
2Contents
- Trends of Regional Integration
- Education Harmonization in ASEAN Countries
- Cross-border Higher Education
- UNESCOs Work
- Concluding Remarks
3Part 1
- Trends of Regional Integration
41.1 Regional Integration for Peace and Development
- Regional integration (RI) is the high level of
international cooperation, covering all aspects
of social life, including education - Lessons from the two World Wars suggest that war
comes from clear separation and narrow conception
of nation state and exclusive pursuit of the
so-called national interests - RI is an important way to achieve peace and
development in a region
51.2 Story of European Integration
- The integration process in Europe started with
the establishment of three supranational
institutions - - European Coal and Steel Community
(1951-2002) - - European Economic Community (1958-)
- - European Atomic Energy Community (1958-)
-
- Make war not only unthinkable but materially
impossible - Robert Shuman, ECSC advocator and
then French Foreign Minister
6European Integration (Contd)
Source Wiki ????
7European Integration (Contd)
- RI is a multi-facet process with harmonization in
different social and economic aspects
supplementing each other to achieve the overall
goal of peace and development - Integration and harmonization should be based on
consensus among member states, and should not be
at the expenses of national traditions and
identities
Unity within diversity
81.3 Emerging ASEAN Integration
- Aims of ASEAN
- - Accelerating economic growth, social
progress, cultural development among its members - - Protecting regional peace and stability
- - Providing opportunities for member
countries to discuss differences peacefully
Source
9Emerging ASEAN Integration (Contd)
- Bali Summit (1976), economic corporation
- The Common Effective Preferential Tariff (CEPT,
1992), ASEAN Free Trade Area - Southeast Asia Nuclear-Weapon-Free-Zone Treaty
(1995) - Agreements and partnerships in environment,
democracy, investment, and trade in services - ASEAN Charter (2008) with the aim of moving
closer to an EU-style Community - ASEAN Community by 2015. Three pillars including
AEC, APSC, and ASCC
Source
104. Implications for HE
- More active roles of education/HE as grounds of
economic integrations - Education as a determinant of human development
- HE as one of possible ways to facilitate mutual
understanding and/or to nurture next generations
with regional identity, etc.
11Part 2
- Educational Harmonization
- in ASEAN Countries
122-1 Efforts towards Intl Cooperation in ASEAN
and beyond
- Discussion at ASEAN Education Ministers Meetings
- At the1st Meeting in 2006 building of ASEAN
social and cultural community awareness and
education quality for national development were
discussed - At the 2nd Meeting in 2007 discussed the
fostering of ASEAN citizens, the importance of
cultivating ASEAN identity and education, the
continuation of the ASEAN Student Exchange
Programme, the formation of high school networks
on science and math, educational cooperation with
participating nations of the East Asian Summit,
cooperation with SEAMEO, fortifications of the
AUN and the promotion of ASEANness among
students -
Source Miki Sugimura (2012), Possibility of East
Asian integration through the regional networks
and universities cooperation in higher education
13ASEAN ED Ministers Meeting and Other Regional
Networks
- ASEAN Education Ministers Meeting (Contd)
- At 3rd meeting in 2008 agreement was reached on
progressing regional networks in HE, further
strengthening the relationships between ASEAN and
SEAMEO
- Multi-layered nature of regional networks
- e.g. ASEAN, SEAMEO RIHED, AUN (ASEAN University
Network) and AUN SEED-Net, etc. - Mutually intimate and overlapping networks
supporting regional cooperation -
Source Miki Sugimura (2012)
14Activities of Regional Networks in the Field of
HE in ASEAN and Beyond
- Regional education harmonization tools
Student Exchange Programs
M-I-T Program (AIMS) and other exchange programs
Credit Transfer System
ASEAN Credit Transfer System (ACTS), UCTS, etc.
Quality Assurance Guidelines
AUN-AQ Guideline, UNESCO-APQN Toolkit Regulating
the Quality of Cross-border Education, etc.
15ASEAN Framework Agreement on Trade in Services
(AFAS)
- AFAS adopted in Bangkok in 1995, resulting in
commitments in service sectors liberalization
after 6 rounds of negotiations
Limitation on market access Cross-border supply Consumption abroad Commercial presence Presence of natural persons
Cambodia None None None Unbound, except as indicated in the horizontal section
Myanmar None None As indicated in the horizontal commitments As indicated in the horizontal commitments
Brunei None None Only through a joint venture with foreign equity not exceeding 49 Unbound, except as indicated in the horizontal section
Indonesia None None As indicated in the horizontal commitments Unbound, except as indicated in the horizontal section
Lao PDR None None As indicated in the horizontal commitments Unbound, except as indicated in the horizontal section
Thailand None None At least half of its director(s), and if applicable its managing director, must be the person of Thai nationality Unbound
16Part 3
- Cross-border Higher Education
173.1 Internationalization of HE Student Mobility
in the World
- Number of Tertiary Students studying abroad in
1999 and 2007
Source UNESCO-UIS (2009), Global Education
Digest 2009
17
18Student Mobility in the Asia-Pacific
Major 15 sending countries account for 44 of
the worlds mobile students Largest outflow
China(421K), India(153K) and Korea(105K)
Source UNESCO-UIS (2009), Global Education
Digest 2009
18
1919
Flowing out more than flowing in
Region of origin, 1977 and 2007 and distribution
of the destination of mobile students by their
region
Share of mobile students Studying within their
region of origin
Share of mobile students Studying outside their
region of origin
19
20Increasing Mobile Students within the Region
Source UNESCO-UIS (2009), Global Education
Digest 2009
Composition of study destination by students
region of origin, 2007
20
21Students flow in 1997 and 2007 Between ASEAN,
China, Japan and Korea
Source Kazuo Kuroda (2010)
21
223.2 Programme Mobility in the AP
- Franchise
- e.g. London External Degrees in many countries,
Stanford Executive MBA in Singapore - Twinning
- e.g. 21 Programme in many of the private
colleges in Malaysia and 22 Programme in Korea - Double or joint degrees
- e.g. many MBA degrees in private universities in
Malaysia - E-learning or distance learning
- e.g. U21 Global by Universitas 21
22
233.3 Provider/Institution Mobility in the AP
- Branch campuses
- Provider in country A establishes a satellite
campus in country B to deliver courses and
programs to mainly local students in country B /
qualification awarded is from provider in country
A - E.g. Monash University in Malaysia, RMIT
University in Vietnam, Nottingham University in
China - Independent institution
- Foreign provider A (a traditional university, a
network or commercial company) establishes in
country B a stand-alone HEI to offer courses/
programmes and awards - E.g. Bright University in Cambodia
-
23
243.4. Challenges
- Very diverse education systems in this region
- How to harmonize different systems not
compromising diversity? - Lack of trust and/or information-sharing among
countries and institutions - How to promote information-sharing and to build
trust by establishing QA systems and other
recognition tools? - Students tend to destine to English-speaking/weste
rn countries. Not so many interested in further
studying within this region though this trend is
changing slowly - How to facilitate mobility within ASEAN
countries?
25Part 4
26UNESCOs Work
- Standards Setting
- UNESCO-OECD guideline on the provision of CBE
- Convention on the recognition of HE
qualifications - Capacity Building
- Workshops to raise awareness of Regional
Convention etc. - Clearing house Filling the knowledge gap
- ERI-net (Educational Research Institute
Networking in the AP) established by UNESCO BKK
in 2009 - International cooperation
26
27Standards Setting in Cross-border HE
27
- UNESCO-OECD Guidelines on Quality Provision of
Cross-border Education (2005) - Voluntary and non-binding document
- Guidelines for governments, HE institutions,
student bodies, quality assurance and
accreditation bodies, and academic recognition
bodies
28Standards Setting (Contd)
28
- UNESCO-APQN Toolkit Regulating the Quality of
Cross-border Education (2006) - UNESCO Bangkok cooperated with Asia-Pacific
Quality Network (APQN) to support the
implementation of UNESCO/OECD guidelines - A reference tool to assist governments and policy
makers in the development of regulatory
frameworks for quality assurance in cross-border
education - Partnerships and dialogue between sending and
receiving countries emphasized
http//www2.unescobkk.org/elib/publications/087/AP
QN_Toolkit.pdf
29UNESCO Regional Conventions
29
- UNESCO Regional Conventions on the Recognition of
Academic Qualifications in Higher Education - 5 regional 1 inter-regional Asia-Pacific,
Africa, Arab States, Latin America, Europe and
North America, Mediterranean - The only legally binding instrument in the world
- Revision of Asia-Pacific Regional Convention
- Current Regional Convention adopted in 1983 and
21 states ratified to date - Revision to address challenges such as new modes
of HE and increasing cross-border education, with
need for consideration of quality assurance, etc.
(Working Group meetings since 2005)
30State Parties to 1983 AP Convention
30
31The Revised Convention
- Revised AP Convention adopted in the
International Conference of States held in Tokyo,
Japan in Nov 2011
- Main changes includes
- Competent recognition authorities
- Basic principles related to assessment of
qualifications - Partial studies
- Recognition of qualifications held by refugees,
displaced persons, and persons in similar
situation - And implementation mechanisms etc.
31
32Follow-ups to Revised AP Convention and
Discussion on a Global Convention (GC)
32
- 11th Asia-Pacific Regional Committee meeting in
conjunction with expert seminar on National
Information Center (Seoul, May 2012) - To facilitate dialogue among Member States and to
discuss follow-up actions related to the revised
AP Convention - Decided to establish AP Working Group and to
revitalize the Asia-Pacific Academic Recognition
Network (APARNET, http//www.aparnet.org) - 1st Regional Expert Meeting on the Feasibility of
a Global Convention (China, Oct 2012) - Possibility of the GC raised at Conference in
Tokyo in 2011 - Regional experts to discuss the feasibilities of
GC based on the comments from the regions
33Clearinghouse Filling the knowledge Gap
- Educational Research Institute Network in
Asia-Pacific (ERI-Net) since 2009 - Established managed by UNESCO BKK to facilitate
regional collaboration in conducting analytical
work pertinent to the region - 17 institutions from 15 countries and economies
participate - Regional seminars to share research findings
- The Impact of Economic Crisis on HE and the Use
of ICT in HE (2010) - International Student Mobility (2011)
- Public-private partnerships in HE TVET and
Youth Employment (2012)
For more information http//www.unescobkk.org/ed
ucation/epr/epr-partnerships/eri-net/
34Part 5
35- It may be time to think about harmonization of
higher education systems in ASEAN countries as
there are mounting increase of students and
academic mobility in this region. The adoption of
the A-P revised regional convention can serve as
important platform for regional cooperation.
36- The convention mainly focuses on academic
recognition for further studies and employment
opportunities. Recognition of professional
qualifications remains untouched and will be
subject to separate efforts in which UNESCO can
also have a role to play with the collaboration
of member states and professional bodies.
37- Information-based comparison is the main
principle for academic recognition.
Policy-makers, practitioners, and researchers can
work together to provide reliable, transparent,
and comparable information for the purpose of
academic recognition.
38- The nature of quality assurance mechanisms is
very important for the promotion of mutual trusts
between different countries. More efforts should
be made to work out a common quality assurance
framework in Asia and the Pacific, so that the
convention can attract the participation of more
member states in this region.
39THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!
l.wang_at_unesco.org