Title: First Amendment Project
1First Amendment Project
Austin K. Raphael W. Wieland Academy
2The First Amendment Today
Â
3The First Amendment Today
The 45 words of the First Amendment haven't
changed since their adoption in 1791. Yet they
are called upon to help guide a society that is
radically different from the one in which the
Founding Fathers lived. In this century, the
First Amendment has been stretched and
reinterpreted as the government has become
involved in nearly all spheres of expressive
activity -- campaign financing, federal funding
of the arts, and regulation of mass media, to
name but a few. In the following slides I will
show you some of the things that have shaped the
first amendment into what it is today.
4The Declaration of Independence
Â
5The Declaration of Independence
The United States Declaration of Independence is
a statement adopted by the Continental Congress
on July 4, 1776, which announced that the
thirteen American colonies then at war with Great
Britain were now independent states, and thus no
longer a part of the British Empire. Written
primarily by Thomas Jefferson, the Declaration is
a formal explanation of why Congress had voted on
July 2 to declare independence from Great
Britain, more than a year after the outbreak of
the American Revolutionary War. The birthday of
the United States of AmericaIndependence Dayis
celebrated on July 4, the day the wording of the
Declaration was approved by Congress.
6The Constitution of the United States of America
Â
7The Constitution of the United States of America
The Constitution of the United States of America
is the supreme law of the United States. It is
the foundation and source of the legal authority
underlying the existence of the United States of
America and the federal government of the United
States. It provides the framework for the
organization of the United States government and
for the relationship of the federal government to
the states, to citizens, and to all people within
the United States.
8The First Amendment
9The First Amendment
The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United
States Constitution is part of the Bill of
Rights. The amendment prohibits the making of any
law "respecting an establishment of religion",
impeding the free exercise of religion,
infringing on the freedom of speech, infringing
on the freedom of the press, interfering with the
right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the
petitioning for a governmental redress of
grievances. Originally, the First Amendment only
applied to the Congress. However, in the 20th
century, the Supreme Court held that the Due
Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
applies the First Amendment to each state,
including any local government
10United States v. Cruikshank
United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876)
was an important United States Supreme Court
decision in United States constitutional law, one
of the earliest to deal with the application of
the Bill of Rights to state governments following
the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment.
11Reynolds v. United States
- Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1878),
was a Supreme Court of the United States case
that held that religious duty was not a suitable
defense to a criminal indictment. George Reynolds
was a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints, charged with bigamy under the
Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act after marrying Amelia
Jane Schofield while still married to Mary Ann
Tuddenham in Utah Territory.
12The Sedition Act of 1918
- The Sedition Act of 1918 was an Act of the United
States Congress signed into law by President
Woodrow Wilson on May 16, 1918. It forbade the
use of "disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive
language" about the United States government, its
flag, or its armed forces or that caused others
to view the American government or its
institutions with contempt. The act also allowed
the Postmaster General to refuse to deliver mail
that met those same standards for punishable
speech or opinion. It applied only to times "when
the United States is in war."It was repealed on
December 13, 1920.
13Schenck v. United States
- Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919), was
a United States Supreme Court decision that
upheld the Espionage Act of 1917 and concluded
that a defendant did not have a First Amendment
right to free speech against the draft during
World War I. Charles Schenck was the Secretary of
the Socialist party and was responsible for
printing, distributing, and mailing 15,000
leaflets to men eligible for the draft that
advocated opposition to the draft. These leaflets
contained statements such as "Do not submit to
intimidation", "Assert your rights", "If you do
not assert and support your rights, you are
helping to deny or disparage rights which it is
the solemn duty of all citizens and residents of
the United States to retain." Ultimately, the
case served as the founding of the "clear and
present danger" rule.
14Scopes Trial
- The Scopes Trialformally known as Scopes vs. The
State of Tennessee and informally known as the
Scopes Monkey Trialwas an American legal case
that tested the Butler Act which made it unlawful
to teach any thoughts on the origin of man other
than the Biblical account of mans origin. It was
enacted as Tennessee Code Annotated Title 49
(Education) Section 1922 . The law also prevented
the teaching of the evolution of man from lower
orders of animals in place of the Biblical
account, in any Tennessee state-funded school and
university.
15West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette
- West Virginia State Board of Education v.
Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943), is a decision by
the Supreme Court of the United States that held
that the Free Speech Clause of the First
Amendment to the United States Constitution
protected students from being forced to salute
the American flag and say the Pledge of
Allegiance in school.
16New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
- New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254
(1964),1 was a United States Supreme Court case
which established the actual malice standard
which has to be met before press reports about
public officials or public figures can be
considered to be defamation and libel and hence
allowed free reporting of the civil rights
campaigns in the southern United States. It is
one of the key decisions supporting the freedom
of the press. The actual malice standard requires
that the plaintiff in a defamation or libel case
prove that the publisher of the statement in
question knew that the statement was false or
acted in reckless disregard of its truth or
falsity. Because of the extremely high burden of
proof on the plaintiff, and the difficulty in
proving essentially what is inside a person's
head, such caseswhen they involve public
figuresrarely prevail.
17United States v. O'Brien
- United States v. O'Brien, 391 U.S. 367 (1968),
was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United
States, which ruled that a criminal prohibition
against burning a draft card did not violate the
First Amendment's guarantee of free speech.
Though the Court recognized that O'Brien's
conduct was expressive as a protest against the
Vietnam War, it considered the law justified by a
significant government interest that was
unrelated to the suppression of speech and was
tailored towards that end
18Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School
District
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School
District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969) was a decision by
the United States Supreme Court that defined the
constitutional rights of students in U.S. public
schools. The Tinker test is still used by courts
today to determine whether a school's
disciplinary actions violate students' First
Amendment rights
19Texas v. Johnson
- Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), was a
landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the
United States that invalidated prohibitions on
desecrating the American flag in force in 48 of
the 50 states. Justice William Brennan wrote for
a five-justice majority in holding that the
defendant's act of flag burning was protected
speech under the First Amendment to the United
States Constitution. Johnson was represented by
attorneys David D. Cole and William Kunstler.
20Beussink v. Woodland R-IV School District
- Beussink v. Woodland R-IV School district, 30 F.
Supp. 2d 1175 (E.D. Mo. 1998) is an important
case in United States law regarding the First
Amendment and its application in public schools.
It was decided in the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of Missouri,
Southeastern Division.
21Morse v. Frederick
- Morse v. Frederick, 551 U.S. 393 (2007) was a
school speech case in which the United States
Supreme Court held that the First Amendment does
not prevent educators from suppressing student
speech, at a school-supervised event, that is
reasonably viewed as promoting illegal drug use.
22United States v. Stevens
- United States v. Stevens, 559 U.S. (2010) was a
decision by the Supreme Court of the United
States, which ruled that 18 U.S.C. 48, a
federal statute criminalizing the commercial
production, sale, or possession of depictions of
cruelty to animals, was an unconstitutional
abridgment of the First Amendment right to
freedom of speech.
23And now..
- On to the First Amendment in Our Community.
24Congress shall make no law respecting the
establishment of religion
25(No Transcript)
26(No Transcript)
27(No Transcript)
28(No Transcript)
29or prohibiting the free exercise thereof
30(No Transcript)
31(No Transcript)
32(No Transcript)
33or abridging the freedom of speech
34or of the press
35(No Transcript)
36(No Transcript)
37(No Transcript)
38(No Transcript)
39or the right of the people peaceably to assemble
40and to petition the Government for a redress of
grievances
41Thanks for Watching!