Update to MW-COG GIS Committee - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

Update to MW-COG GIS Committee

Description:

... Local GeoDatabase Washington, DC Jurisdiction n Consistent Map Symbolization (.axl) National Capital Region HIRA Data Sharing Concept (October 10, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: mwcogOrgu
Learn more at: https://www.mwcog.org
Category:
Tags: cog | gis | committee | update

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Update to MW-COG GIS Committee


1
Update to MW-COGGIS Committee
  • December 5, 2006

2
Updates
  • Data acquisition status
  • Physical Transfer
  • Montgomery County
  • Prince Georges County
  • Prince William County
  • Alexandria
  • Falls Church
  • Loudoun County
  • Manassas
  • Web Services (WMS)
  • Fairfax County
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Arlington
  • Missing
  • Manassas Park
  • Fairfax City

3
Data assembly
  • Basemap
  • Point layers
  • FGDC Homeland Security working group symbol
    standard
  • NSDI framework layers
  • The National Map standards
  • Other layers
  • Research and best judgement
  • HIRA Results
  • Pending output from SRA team

4
Application deployment
  • Initial deployment of NCR Map
  • Graphic design consistent with COG website
  • Built on EMMA platform
  • Expandable in the future
  • Requirements communicated to COG IT
  • Install scheduled for Monday, December 11th

5
National Capital Region HIRA Data Sharing
Concept (October 10, 2006)
Jurisdiction n
Map Layers
Web / Spatial Server(s)
External Map Service n
Consistent Map Symbolization (.axl)
User
External Map Service 2
Local GeoDatabase
External Map Service 1
Fairfax County
Base Map Service
Web / Spatial Server(s)
4. HIRA Results 3. Regional Assembly of Data 2.
HSIP Gold Data other Fed Sources 1. Existing
COG Regional Datasets
Web / Spatial Server(s)
Local GeoDatabase
MW COG
Washington, DC
6
Technical Approach
  • Base map Common, consistent regional data
  • Local mapservice at MW-COG
  • Jurisdictional data Detailed local data
  • 3 WMS Service Providers
  • Add External Data capability
  • Hosted by jurisdiction
  • 7 non-WMS
  • Service hosted _at_ MW-COG
  • 2 remaining
  • No data availability
  • Not included in HIRA project

7
Future Capabilities
  • Maintaining current data _at_ COG
  • Database replication
  • Increased data sharing capabilities
  • Data Exchange Hub
  • Expand capabilities
  • Build upon EMMA platform to include
  • WebEOC Integration
  • Geospatial Data Manager
  • HSIP Gold Data

8
HSIP Gold
  • State provides existing data. This data does not
    have to be geospatial, a list will suffice. For
    any given layer, it is highly likely that some
    agency within your state has an authoritative
    list for that layer.
  • State sends letter (fax, email or conf. call can
    also work) to relevant officials (e.g. fire
    chiefs) letting them know about program and
    asking them to cooperate. Letter should give
    state level poc for officials to call if they
    have questions about the legitimacy of the
    program.
  • TGS improves data. Most improvements are done by
    telephoning local officials to verify the name,
    address, phone number, and geospatial location of
    their facilities. Geospatial location is
    determined by asking the local official to
    describe their location relative to landmarks
    visible in ortho imagery.
  • TGS incorporates improved state data into
    "License Free HSIP" and makes it available to the
    states.
  • TGS incorporates improved state data into HSIP
    and delivers to NGA.
  • State considers sharing the improved data with
    the USGS.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com