Reconfigurable Versus Fixed Versus Hybrid Architectures - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Reconfigurable Versus Fixed Versus Hybrid Architectures

Description:

Title: Dynamic Configuration Steering for a Reconfigurable Superscalar Author: moul2402 Last modified by: John K. Antonio Created Date: 4/9/2006 4:51:18 PM – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:190
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: moul97
Learn more at: http://www.oscer.ou.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Reconfigurable Versus Fixed Versus Hybrid Architectures


1
Reconfigurable Versus Fixed Versus Hybrid
Architectures
  • John K. Antonio
  • Oklahoma Supercomputing Symposium 2008
  • Norman, Oklahoma
  • October 6, 2008

2
Overview
  • The (past) world of reconfigurable computing
  • The (past) world of multi-core
  • The (emerging) world of reconfigurable multi-core
    architectures
  • Illustrative analysis
  • Conclusions

3
Drivers for reconfigurable computing
  • Near performance of custom ASIC
  • Near cost of commodity processor
  • More flexible than custom ASIC
  • Programming tools improving steadily
  • Often used in embedded applications having high
    computational throughput requirements and strict
    SWAP constraints

4
SAR processing on a UAV
Predator
Jeffrey T. Muehring, Optimal Configuration of a
Parallel Embedded System for Synthetic Aperture
Radar Processing, MS Thesis, Texas Tech
University, Dec. 1997.
5
A prototype hybrid system
Mercury DSP/GPP Subsystem
SPARC
Annapolis FPGA Subsystem (F)
Annapolis FPGA Subsystem (B)
Data Source PC
Data Sink PC
Custom Interface Cables
6
A prototype hybrid system
Data Source PC
Data Source PC
Mercury DSP/GPP Subsystem
Mercury DSP/GPP Subsystem
SPARC
SPARC
Data Sink PC
Data Sink PC
Annapolis FPGA Subsystem (F)
Annapolis FPGA Subsystem (F)
Annapolis FPGA Subsystem (B)
Annapolis FPGA Subsystem (B)
Custom Interface Cables
Custom Interface Cables
7
Minimum Power Configurations
400
XT Xr Xa
YTYrYa
350
1 1 2
2 1 1
300
1 1 2 1 2 1
1 1 2 2 0 1
1 1 2 2 0 2
250
Velocity
1 1 2 2 1 1
1 2 1 2 0 2
200
1 3 0 2 0 2
1 3 0 2 1 1
2 0 2 2 1 1
150
2 1 1 2 2 0
100
50
0.5
1
1.5
2
Resolution
Jeffrey T. Muehring, Optimal Configuration of a
Parallel Embedded System for Synthetic Aperture
Radar Processing, MS Thesis, Texas Tech
University, Dec. 1997.
8
Minimum Power
Jeffrey T. Muehring, Optimal Configuration of a
Parallel Embedded System for Synthetic Aperture
Radar Processing, MS Thesis, Texas Tech
University, Dec. 1997.
9
Overview
  • The (past) world of reconfigurable computing
  • The (past) world of multi-core
  • The (emerging) world of reconfigurable multi-core
    architectures
  • Illustrative analysis
  • Conclusions

10
Drivers for multi-core technology path
  • Single-core path leading to increased cost, heat,
    and power consumption
  • Single-core path widens the pocessor/memory speed
    gap
  • Multi-core path transparent to many application
    domain developers
  • Multi-core path can improve performance of
    threaded software

11
Typical multi-core architecture
Dual Core Chip
Dual Core Chip
Core
Core
Core
Core
L2 Cache
L2 Cache
Memory
L. Chai, Q. Gao, D.K. Panda, Understanding the
Impact of Multi-Core Architecture in
Cluster Computing A Case Study with Intel
Dual-Core System, Seventh Int'l Symposium on
Cluster Computing and the Grid (CCGrid), Rio de
Janeiro - Brazil, May 2007.
12
Overview
  • The (past) world of reconfigurable computing
  • The (past) world of multi-core
  • The (emerging) world of reconfigurable multi-core
    architectures
  • Illustrative analysis
  • Conclusions

13
Emerging drivers and requirements for multi-core
architectures
  • Scale to support massively data parallel (SPMD)
    applications
  • Match coupling among cores with application
    granularity
  • Power is a major challenge for large data centers
    and supercomputing facilities

14
Hybrid architectural frameworkMulti-core Chip
Reconfigurable Logic
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
L2 Cache
L2 Cache
L2 Cache
L2 Cache
L2 Cache
L2 Cache
MU
MU
MU
MU
MU
MU
Reconfigurable logic
15
Shared everything configurationMulti-core Chip

Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Interconnection Network
L2 Cache
L2 Cache
L2 Cache
L2 Cache
L2 Cache
L2 Cache
Interconnection Network
MU
MU
MU
MU
MU
MU
Reconfigurable logic
16
Shared nothing configurationMulti-core Chip

Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Co- Proc
Co- Proc
Co- Proc
Co- Proc
Co- Proc
Co- Proc
L2 Cache
L2 Cache
L2 Cache
L2 Cache
L2 Cache
L2 Cache
MU
MU
MU
MU
MU
MU
Reconfigurable logic
17
Hybrid configurationMulti-core Chip

Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Core
Co-Proc
Co-Proc
Co-Proc
Co-Proc
Co-Proc
Co-Proc
L2 Cache
L2 Cache
L2 Cache
L2 Cache
L2 Cache
L2 Cache
Interconnection Network
MU
MU
MU
MU
MU
MU
Reconfigurable logic
18
Features of hybrid architecture
  • Match core coupling and core processing capacity
    with application granularity
  • Fixed multiprocessor architecture not well
    matched with all application granularities
  • Proposed reconfigurable multi-core architecture
    can be configured to match core coupling with
    application granularity

19
Mismatched SPMD execution
Core coupling too loose relative to application
granularity
Communication time
Computation time
time
core 1 core 2 core 3 core 4 core c
20
Matched SPMD execution
Core coupling tightened to match application
granularity
Communication time
Computation time
time
core 1 core 2 core 3 core 4 core c
21
Overview
  • The (past) world of reconfigurable computing
  • The (past) world of multi-core
  • The (emerging) world of reconfigurable multi-core
    architectures
  • Illustrative analysis
  • Conclusions

22
Illustrative Analysis
  • Notation
  • Number of cores c
  • Problem size n
  • Sequential time complexity
  • Parallel time complexity
  • Computational complexity
  • Communication complexity
  • Core coupling ratio

23
Example
  • Sequential Time
  • Parallel Time
  • Speedup
  • The value of K related to core processing
    capacity
  • The value of L related to interconnection among
    cores

24
K 1.0, L 1.0
Speedup
Number of cores, c
25
K 1.5, L 0.5
Speedup
Number of cores, c
26
K 0.5, L 1.5
Speedup
Number of cores, c
27
n 1024
Speedup
Number of cores, c
28
Overview
  • The (past) world of reconfigurable computing
  • The (past) world of multi-core
  • The (emerging) world of reconfigurable multi-core
    architectures
  • Illustrative analysis
  • Conclusions

29
Conclusions
  • Current multi-core approaches may not scale to
    support massive parallelism
  • Hybrid reconfigurable multi-core approach enables
    trades between core coupling and core processing
    capacity
  • More research needed in reconfigurable
    micro-architecture to support hybrid architectures
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com