Government of the District of Columbia Office of the Chief Technology Officer Public Safety Wireless Communications Wireless Accelerated Responder Network (WARN) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Government of the District of Columbia Office of the Chief Technology Officer Public Safety Wireless Communications Wireless Accelerated Responder Network (WARN)

Description:

Government of the District of Columbia Office of the Chief Technology Officer Public Safety Wireless Communications Wireless Accelerated Responder Network (WARN) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:781
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Government of the District of Columbia Office of the Chief Technology Officer Public Safety Wireless Communications Wireless Accelerated Responder Network (WARN)


1
Government of the District of ColumbiaOffice of
the Chief Technology Officer Public
Safety Wireless Communications Wireless
Accelerated Responder Network (WARN)
2
DC Wireless PS Communications
3
WARN Overview
  • Dedicated to public safety
  • 2 x 1.25 MHz channels in 700 MHz whitespace with
    experimental license
  • N1 (same frequency use at three sectors per
    site)
  • Flash-OFDM
  • 12 sites (3 sectored)
  • Secure network within District WAN
  • On separate SONET ring no intermediate
    electronics
  • Uses same sites as LMR net using existing
    redundant infrastructure
  • PC Card and PAD Access
  • App and user QoS
  • 19 Agencies, including three Federal, and over
    200 users

4
WARN Results
  • Average throughput of 1 Mbps and 300 kbps on
    downlink and uplink (respectively)
  • 200 kbps at 95th percentile outdoor coverage - 68
    mi2 total
  • High Reliability 99.997 availability in 2006
  • Low latency (30 50 mS)
  • Main use around significant events, driven by
    streaming video (up to 10 Gbytes in day with 56
    active users)

5
WARN Results (Cont.)
  • First use January 20, 2005
  • Six users streamed 5 GBytes during the
    Presidential Inauguration in 2005
  • Motion JPG video application caused overloading
    condition on downtown cells
  • Average more than 25 Gbytes per month
  • Applications
  • GIS (3D imagery)
  • Streaming Video
  • Web
  • E-Mail
  • Desktop Extension

6
WARN Lessons Learned
  • Video
  • Tradeoff in codecs between flexibility and
    efficiency
  • 100 kbps is adequate for most video applications
    using advanced codecs
  • Need dymanic codecs and blocking to properly
    manage access and QoS
  • Applications
  • Need to plan now for interoperable data (esp.
    video)
  • Bandwidth control is critical Much different
    than voice
  • Hundreds of times different load between users.
  • Managing capacity real-time will be crucial.
  • Throughput
  • Cell edge throughput critical, especially for
    streaming video
  • Devices need PDAs, embedded modems, AVL modems,
    small form factors in addition to PC Cards

7
National Capital Region Interoperability Program
  • NCR is a UASI designated Metropolitan Washington,
    DC area 18 jurisdictions over 3 states with
    state and local governance
  • NCR Interoperability Program Fixed Broadband,
    Regional Wireless Broadband Network (RWBN), Data
    Exchange Hub
  • RWBN Regional broadband network(s) with
    seamless interoperability
  • Waiver for broadband operations ongoing (11/14
    reply comment) in advance of Eighth NPRM,
    overwhelming national support
  • Working with Region 20 broadband allowance in
    R20 plan
  • Clear TV spectrum due to LP-TV
  • RFP out to build network, contract expected end
    of year
  • First phase build-out in 1H07
  • Projecting 100 sites to cover 2,500 square
    miles, delivering peak speed of more than 930
    Mbps with only one 1.25 MHz channel region-wide
  • Seeking PC Cards, AVL Modems, PDAs, and embedded
    modems
  • Contract rider requested for CA, AZ, MD, and VA

8
Final Thoughts
  • 700 MHz vs. 4.9 GHz
  • 700 leverages LMR infrastructure
  • Is a national solution (not just urban)
  • Provides in-building coverage
  • COTS broadband standards should be leveraged to
    tap in to exponential improvements in spectral
    efficiency, features as well as cost effective
    for infrastructure based communications
  • How can MESA help?
  • 100 communications
  • Develop cost-effective means to deliver the last
    5 and a solution in the absence of
    infrastructure
  • Augment broadband coverage to match LMR link
    budget while maintaining low power solutions
  • PC Cards, PDAs, embedded modems
  • Push for global solutions that further drive cost
    model down (esp. for features that differentiate
    public safety and COTS)

9
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com