- PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Description:

Title: SDJS: Efficient Statistics in Wireless Networks Subject: Synchronous Distributed Jam Signalling Author: Albert Krohn Last modified by: Telecooperation Office – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: AlbertK150
Learn more at: https://www.teco.edu
Category:
Tags: networks

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title:


1
SDJS Efficient Statistics in Wireless Networks
  • Albert Krohn, Michael Beigl, Sabin Wendhack
  • TecO (Telecooperation Office)
  • Institut für Telematik
  • Universität Karlsruhe
  • www.teco.edu

2
SDJS research and application area
  • WSN (wireless sensor network)
  • Battery powered
  • Low computation capabilities
  • MANET (mobile ad hoc networks)
  • Fast changing environment
  • Devices frequently join and leave a group
  • BAN (body area network),
  • PAN (personal area networks)
  • Sensors attached to people
  • Many small devices
  • Ubiquitous and Pervasive Computing
  • Settings with many devices (typically gt100)
  • Battery powered
  • Mid computation capabilities

3
SDJS Synchronous Distributed Jam Signalling
  • What is SDJS?
  • Method for ultra fast estimation of a parameter
    of a group of devices
  • Novel transmission scheme
  • Extension of standard wireless ad hoc protocol
  • Synchronous, parallel, superimposing jam signals
  • Works infrastructure less
  • For highly mobile settings with high number of
    networked devices

Example for this talk How many devices are
present in the cell?
4
Related Work
  • ExampleHow many devices are present in the
    cell?
  • Budianu et al. 2003
  • Collect IDs from the Devices and do a Good-Turing
    estimation, can be done iteratively
  • Targeted on large scale networks, not on speed
  • Also probabilistic
  • Vogt 2002
  • For passive RFID
  • Using a slotted aloha protocol, where tags
    randomly select a slot
  • Adaptive frame size
  • Time to estimate 200 nodes with 99 reliability gt
    3 sec. (assuming ISO 18000 RFID standard)
  • Normal ping on 802.11b
  • Around 5 seconds (best case) for 100 stations

5
Motivation Idea of SDJS
  • ExampleHow many devices are present in the
    cell?
  • Novel
  • Specific solution for collecting data of the same
    context
  • Reduce redundant overhead
  • Reduce transported information to necessary
    minimum
  • SDJS include the physical layer
  • Ultra Fast and efficient typ. 1000x faster
  • Probabilistic, but adjustable accuracy/reliability
    (trade-off)
  • Traditional
  • Ping HELO, OLEH
  • Slow, each node answers
  • Packet implosion, collisions
  • High bandwidth necessary
  • deterministic
  • Generic functionality of data transport in the
    network
  • Same mechanisms for all information flow

6
SDJS Activity Flow
  1. Station B starts SDJS
  2. Each node prepares its transmission vector
  3. SDJS scheme is processed
  4. Each node has a reception vector
  • Slotted (framed) Aloha
  • Reduce Information to a single jam signal
  • Full distributed operation
  • Hardware Requirements?
  • Network Requirements?
  • Collisions?

7
SDJS The duck hunter problem
  • ExampleHow many devices are present in the
    cell?
  • Estimation of the real number from a given number
    of signals (the reception vector)
  • Classical Duck Hunter Problem
  • Solution surjective mapping, partition theory

How many hunterswere there?
Group of hunters
8
SDJS The Estimation 1
  • Duck hunter problem analogon in SDJSs Slotsk
    Devices sending one jam signal eacha
    received jam signals
  • gt P(ak) Distribution
  • No a-priori informationMaximum Likelihood
  • kMLEarg maxk P(ak)
  • With a-priori informationMaximum a-posteriori
  • kMAParg maxk P(ak) P(k)

9
SDJS The Estimation 2
  • How is estimation done in practice?

Start count the number of received jam signals a
  1. ML-Point estimationGive an estimationFor k
    (MLE)

2. MAP-Confidence intervalGive an interval,
kmin,kmax that contains the actual k with a
given confidence (e.g. 90)
In both cases look-up table that can be prepared
(no computation on nodes necessary)
10
SDJS Accuracy and Noise
  • Noisefalse positives and detection errors
    duringcarrier sense affect theestimation
  • Accuracy vs. Speed trade-offaccuracy depends on
    number of slots s

11
SDJS The Implementation
  • TecOs particle computer
  • Wireless sensor platform with 8Bit 20 Mhz
    processor
  • 4kRAM, 4MBit Flash
  • 125kbit/s wireless communication
  • Customized ad hoc protocol
  • Find a partner lt20ms
  • Low power
  • Low collisions
  • Development tools
  • Over 1000 produced, largedeveloper community all
    over the world

12
SDJS The Experiment
  • Setting in an office with up to 50 particle
    computer
  • Impressive prove of concepttheory and real
    world setting are nearly identical

13
SDJS Conclusion
  • SDJS is
  • An extension to wireless radio protocols
  • Efficient group communication for very specific
    tasks
  • Probabilistic by nature
  • SDJS can
  • Efficiently and fast estimate parameters (1000x
    faster)
  • Achieve adjustable accuracy (speed accuracy
    trade off)
  • Overall performance of SDJS depends severely on
    the underlying technology

14
SDJS Efficient Statistics in Wireless Networks
Thank you for your attention!
  • Albert Krohn, Michael Beigl, Sabin Wendhack
  • TecO (Telecooperation Office)
  • Institut für Telematik
  • Universität Karlsruhe
  • www.teco.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com