Collision Avoidance Systems: Computing Controllers which Prevent Collisions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

Collision Avoidance Systems: Computing Controllers which Prevent Collisions

Description:

Title: Slide 1 Author: acataldo Last modified by: acataldo Created Date: 3/17/2004 1:46:01 AM Document presentation format: On-screen Show Company – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:422
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: acat7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Collision Avoidance Systems: Computing Controllers which Prevent Collisions


1
Collision Avoidance SystemsComputing
Controllers which Prevent Collisions
  • By Adam Cataldo
  • Advisor Edward Lee
  • Committee Shankar Sastry, Pravin Varaiya, Karl
    Hedrick

PhD Qualifying Exam UC Berkeley December 6, 2004
2
Talk Outline
  • Motivation and Problem Statement
  • Collision Avoidance Background
  • Potential Field Methods
  • Reachability-Based Methods
  • Research Thrusts
  • Continuous-Time Methods
  • Discrete-Time Methods

3
MotivationSoft Walls
  • Enforce no-fly zones using on-board avionics
  • A collision occurs if the aircraft enters a
    no-fly zone

4
The Research Question
  • For what systems can I compute a collision
    avoidance controller?
  • Correct by construction
  • Analytic

Control Law, Safe Initial States
System Model, Collision Set
5
Collision Avoidance Problem(Continuous Time)
6
Collision Avoidance Problem(Discrete Time)
7
Potential Field Methods(Rimon Koditschek,
Khatib)
  • Provide analytic solutions, derived from a
    virtual potential field
  • No disturbance is allowed
  • Dynamics must be holonomic

Oussama Khatib Real-time Obstacle Avoidance
for Manipulators and Mobile Robots
8
Reachability-Based Avoidance(Mitchell, Tomlin)
compact
9
Hamilton Jacobi Equation(Mitchell, Tomlin)
10
Computing Safe Control laws(Mitchell, Tomlin)
offline
online
11
Applied to Soft Walls(Masters Report)
  • Works for a many systems
  • Storage requirements may be prohibitive
  • 40 Mb for the Soft Walls example
  • Cannot analyze qualitative system behavior under
    numerical control law
  • switching surfaces, equilibrium points, etc.

12
Analytic ComputationSoft Walls Example
13
Change of Variables
14
Lyapunov Function
15
A Sufficient Condition(Leitmann)
16
A Sufficient Condition(Leitmann)
  • Find a Lyapunov function over an open set
    encircling the collision set which ensures
    against collisions

17
One Possible Extension
18
One Possible Extension
19
Open Questions
  • When can we find our control law analytically?
  • When can we find the corresponding Lyapunov
    function analytically?
  • Can we build up complex models from simple ones?

20
Bisimilarity and Collision Avoidance
  • When is the system bisimilar to an finite-state
    transition system (FTS)?
  • If the system is bisimilar to an FTS, can I
    compute a control law from a controller on the
    FTS?

unsafe state
disable this transition
21
Example Controllable Linear Systems (Tabuada,
Pappas)
semilinear sets on W
LTL formula
22
The Result(Tabuada, Pappas)
  • There exists a bisimilar FTS for observations
    given as semilinear subsets of W
  • A feedback strategy k which enforces the LTL
    constraint exists iff a controller for the FTS
    which enforces the constraint exists

23
Bounded Control Inputs
  • If we want to extend this for disturbances, we
    will need to be able to bound the control inputs
  • Adding states wont work we may lose
    controllability

24
Research Questions
  • When we have bounds on the control input, when
    can we find a bisimilar FTS?
  • For systems with disturbances, when can we find a
    bisimilar FTS?
  • For nonlinear systems with disturbances, when can
    we find a bisimilar FTS?

25
Where is this Going?
  • Build a toolkit of collision avoidance methods
  • These methods must give correct by construct
    control strategies
  • We should be able to analyze the control
    strategies

26
Conclusions
  • I plan to develop new collision avoidance methods
  • Many approaches to collision avoidance have been
    developed, but methods which produce analytic
    control laws have limited scope
  • In the end, we would like to automate controller
    design for problems such as Soft Walls

27
Acknowledgements
  • Aaron Ames
  • Alex Kurzhanski
  • Xiaojun Liu
  • Eleftherios Matsikoudis
  • Jonathan Sprinkle
  • Haiyang Zheng
  • Janie Zhou

28
Additional Slides
29
Global Existence and Uniqueness(Sontag)
  • Given the initial value problem
  • There exists a unique global solution if
  • f is measurable in t for fixed x(t)
  • f is Lipschitz continuous in x(t) for fixed t
  • f bounded by a locally integrable function in t
    for fixed x

30
Potential Functions(Rimon Koditschek)
31
Holonomic Constraints(Murray, Li, Sastry)
  • Given k particles, a holonomic constraint is an
    equation
  • For m constraints, dynamics depend on n3k-m
    parameters
  • Obtain dynamics through Lagrange's equation

32
Information Patterns(Mitchell, Tomlin)
  • In computing the unsafe set, we assume the
    disturbance player knows all past and current
    control values (and the initial state)
  • The control player knows nothing (except the
    initial state)
  • This is conservative
  • In computing a control law, we assume the control
    player will at least know the current state

33
Relation to Isaacs Equation
  • Isaacs Equation
  • W(t,p) gives the optimal cost at time t
  • (terminal value only)

34
Relation to Isaacs Equation
  • Isaacs Equation
  • The min with 0 term gives the minimum cost over
    t,0

35
Viscosity Solutions(Crandall, Evans, Lions)
36
Convergence of V
  • At each p, V can only decrease as t decreases
  • If g bounded below, then V converges as
  • It may be the case that all values are negative,
    that is, no safe states

37
Applying Optimal ControlSoft Walls Example
safe
unsafe
38
Lyapunov-Like Condition(Leitmann)
  • Given a C1 Lyapunov function V??S??, A is
    avoidable under control law k if
  • Note that this can be generalized when V is
    piecewise C1

39
Lyapunov-Like Condition(Leitmann)
  • Let Yi be a countable partition of ??S, and let
    Wi be a collection of open supersets of Yi,
    that is, Wi?Yi

40
Lyapunov-Like Condition(Leitmann)
  • Given a continuous Lyapunov function VS??, A is
    avoidable under control k if

41
Transition System
42
Bisimulation
43
Linear Temporal Logic (LTL)
  • Given a set P of predicates, the following are
    LTL formula

44
Semilinear Sets
  • The complement, finite intersection, finite
    union, or of semilinear sets is a semilinear set
  • The following are semilinear sets

45
Computing Safe Control Laws(Tabuada, Pappas)
LTL Formula
Buchi Automaton
Hybrid, Discrete-Time State-Feedback Control Law
Finite-State Supervisor
Finite Transition System
Discrete-Time System
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com