Title: International Technology Roadmap
1 International Technology Roadmap for
Semiconductors (ITRS 2000) Assembly
Packaging International Technical Working
Group December 6, 2000
2ITWG MEMBERSHIP
EUROPE Jean-Pierre Moscicki,
STMicroelectronics Bernd Roemer,
Infineon Co van Veen, Philips
TAIWAN Ho-Ming Tong, First Intl. Computer
Enboa Wu, ERSO/ITRI
KOREA S.Y. Kang, Samsung H.S. Chun,
Hyundai JAPAN Seiji Hamano, Fujitsu
Henry Utsunomiya, MITI
Consultant U.S. Alex Oscilowski,
Kulicke Soffa Bill Bottoms,
3rd Millenium Test Solutions John Prince,
University of Arizona Special
Topics Jurgen Wolf, Fraunhofer Chi Shih
Chang, Kulicke Soffa
3Scope
- System -on-a-chip (SoC) Packaging
- Wafer Level Packaging
- Mixed-signal and Radio Frequency Packaging
- Multi-Chip Packaging (MCP)
- Single Chip Packages (SCP)
- Flip Chip Interconnect (Direct Chip Attach (DCA)
- Bonding/Chip/Package/Substrate Design
- Chip Carrier Substrates
- Thermal Power/Ground Management
- Electrical/Performance Characterization
- Issues to be resolved in 2001
- how to distinguish between single chip packages,
few chip packages/modules, MCP, and substrates
4Compatibility Between Roadmaps
- The ITRS AP roadmap and the NEMI packaging
roadmap have been linked since 1996 - The ITRS roadmap provides much of the content for
the NEMI packaging roadmap - Both roadmaps were updated in 2000
- A majority of DTWG members are common
- The ITRS and the Jisso Roadmaps are closely
coordinated - The Jisso roadmap provides valuable chip,
package, and board level data - The Jisso chair and co-chair are ITWG members
5Typical Products by Sector
Note Major review of sectors planned for 2001
update
6Overall Industry Factors
- Communications markets, especially wireless, will
equal and likely surpass PCs as the predominant
end use market over the next 5 years - chip and board level assembly are converging-
this drives the need for amore comprehensive
approach to technology and cost - outsourcing continues to accelerate, and
technology development continues to shift from
OEMs to EMS providers and suppliers - materials continue to dominate the cost of chip
assembly and packaging
7Chip Packaging Factors
- Area array packages continue to experience CAGR
2X industry average - CSPs are growing faster than BGAs and are driving
cost and technology (thin die,lt 0-.5mm ball
pitch, etc) - CSPs from Wafer Level Packaging (WLP) can shift
the chip packaging paradigm and are limited by a
lack of wafer level test/burn in capability
(memory) - chip interconnect will continue to drive
packaging densification for all chip to next
level connections (TAB, Wire bond and Flip Chip) - chip interconnect is limited by substrate, probe,
and encapsulation capability, all of which drive
packaging cost
8Environmental Factors
- Pb free solder requirements are driving
requalification of components, equipment, and
materials at higher processing temperatures - Elimination of Sb and Br from encapsulants and
substrates requires the selection and
qualification of suitable replacement materials - Life cycle product management and take back
requirements could drive changes in packaging
design and material selection - These factors are becoming requirements for doing
business in Japan and Europe, could be
differentiators in the U.S and have major cost
implications
9Environmental Factor Cost Impact
- Low Cost and Memory segment Cost/pin have No
Known Solutions beginning in 2001 due to
environmental factors for most aggressive
targets - 10-15 cost Increases anticipated to accommodate
- Pb free solders
- Sb and Br free mold compounds and substrates
- new materials solutions should achieve roadmap
cost targets in 12-18 months
10Difficult Challenges
11Assembly Packaging Technology Requirements
122000 Changes
- Cost/pin
- Hand Held, Cost Performance
- upper range costs were lowered
- Hand Held, Cost Performance, Harsh, Memory
- cost labeled as No Known Solution due to
increases which will be driven by new
environmental materials - Memory for 2001
- determine how to address memory categories for
2001 update - deal with increasing complexity
- incorporate performance memory
132000 Changes
- Chip Size
- incorporated ORTC data
- cost-performance have minor changes
- high performance decreases 20-30
- memory increases 20-30
- determine how to address small chip issues that
are highly cost sensitive (RF/mixed signal) in
2001 - Power
- High Performance-minor increases
- Core Voltage
- Harsh- more rapid migration to 1.8V
14(No Transcript)
152000 Changes
- Pincount
- no changes
- Package Profile
- determine how to address stacked chips and
thin/flexible packaging in 2001 - Performance on chip
- Cost Performance , High Performance- matched to
Design ITWG values - Memory- accelerated 166 and 200Mhz introductions
for system memory and peripheral bus speed
162000 Changes
- Performance chip to board
- Cost Performance- accelerated 166 and 200 Mhz
introductions consistent w/ Memory changes - need a new way to deal with game products
(consider making it the high end of Low Cost) in
2001 - new algorithm needed to relate chip to board and
on chip performance targets in 2001 update
172000 Changes
- Junction Temperature
- determine how to address need for 150 C junction
for in cabin automotive application (add to Harsh
or change another category in 2001 update) - Operating Temperature
- no changes
18(No Transcript)
19Key Issues for 2001
- Market sector redefinition
- cost of new environmentally friendly materials
- MEMS
- sensors (eg. Pressure and acceleration)
- relays (eg. Cell phone transmit/receive switch)
- Optical interconnect
- SCP, SIP, MCP,MCM, substrate distinctions
- Performance memory
- Gaming products- where do they fit?
- Stacked/ultra thin chip packaging
- Small chip issues (RF/mixed signal)
20Assembly Packaging Potential Solutions
212000 Changes
- Chip to Next Level Interconnect
- aggressive acceleration of wire bond pitch
- 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
- ball bond (um) 45 35 30 25 20
- wedge (um) 40 35 30 25 20
- some acceleration of area array flip chip
pitches - area array (um) 175 175 150 150 130
- peripheral (um) 150 130 120 110 100
- removed TAB-revisit in 2001 based on JISSO input
- add Flip Chip on Tape/Chip on Flex category
22Chip Interconnect Solutions
23Assembly Packaging Cross TWG Opportunities
24Cross TWG Opportunities for 2001
- Test
- AP TWG should
- add system level thermal modeling statement to
text to address integrated AP/Test/Design issues - discuss how to push industry to deliver thermal
models for standard package types - add thermal management recommendations
- review package electrical modeling section for
high frequency with Design - Test TWG should
- address pitch reduction issues for contactors
- address 1 Ghz issues with Design including
package electrical models
25Cross TWG Opportunities for 2001
- Factory Integration
- the FI TWG agreed to add needs and potential
solutions for AP and Test to provide - unit level traceability
- mis-processing avoidance
- cycle time reduction
- improved equipment utilization
26Cross TWG Opportunities for 2001
- Interconnect
- develop a common section in both TWGs to address
materials and integration issues - Pete Elenius and Jurgen Wolf for AP
- Bob Gefken from Interconnect
- incorporate specific needs and solutions in the
respective roadmap sections - identify overall issues
- Cu wire bond
- bump technology with low k
- determine which issues are specific vs common
- act on issues/incorporate in 2001
27Summary
- Linkages between ITRS, NEMI, and Jisso roadmaps
help provide a unified message to the industry - major changes to date include
- chip size for cost-performance, high-performance,
memory - accelerated memory performance and related impact
on cost-performance segment - accelerated wire bond pitch
- linkages with other TWGs require follow up
- unresolved issues to be addressed in 2001update
are an opportunity to further improve the quality
and impact of the ITRS - active participation from all regions is key to
success