Title: Mainstreaming Health and Inclusion in Education
1Mainstreaming Health and Inclusion in Education
in Uruguay
Sergio Meresman VANCOUVER, June 2007
2Uruguay
- 3.3 million people
- 4000 Primary schools (1000 rural)
- Strong and prestigious education sector, nearly
universal coverage in primary education - 98 percent of the population has access to
potable water - Increasing equity and quality issues
underprivileged schools accumulating problems,
demands and services. - Teacher training and practice deteriorating
3Impact of the 2002-03 crisis (selected social
indicators)
- 15 decrease of GDP (estimated 2002)
- 55 of Uruguayan children are poor
-
- 25 unemployment (April 2003)
- 18 million living under the poverty line (50 of
total population) - In 2002 Uruguay had a population decrease
births were 30.000, deaths 20.000 and migrants
30.000
4Health situation for school-age children in brief
- Deterioration of the living conditions for many
families
- Deterioration of the quality of the environment
especially for children exposure to
pre-transitional risks
- Epidemiologic regression re-emergence of
pre-transicitional morbidity, communicable
diseases
5Highlights of schools situation
- Schools are the last places where state presence
still exists - Aggregation of problems leads to an aggregation
of services. In vulnerable areas schools have to
provide basic nutrition, health and social
services - In Montevideo, school feeding program expanded
from 40.000 to 90.000 children - That situation tend to reinforce structural
disadvantage of children, who receive poorer
education
6After the Crisis what is the situation?
7School Health future directions
- Context
- Exclusion (youth)
- Poverty, Inequity
- Minimal public sector
- Migration, loss of human capital
- Descentralization, democratization. Opportunities
for local development - Uncertainty, political unestability
- Emerging Issues
- Food security
- Epidemiological accumulation (infectious
chronic diseases) - Violence
- Mental health problems
Challenges
Tuning health promotion approaches with on-going
health and education policies and local
develop-ment resources
8Operational strengths and problems
- Some Strengths
- Long standing tradition of preventive health
interventions in schools - Remarkable enthusiasm of children and teachers
about environmental and health education - Increasing participation of CSO on environmental
education
- Some Problems
- Most school health activities have traditionally
targeted rather than engaged schools
(delivered vertically from MoH, NGOs). Schools
used as a captive target. - Lack of educational rationale. Dispersion of
initiatives. - Limited training of teachers. Lack of continuous
training mechanisms (supportive monitoring,
systematization of good practices, evaluation) - Tendency of intersectorial collaboration to
become too bureaucratic, formal, restrictive of
participation. - Lack of supportive policy to assist schools in
networking, resource mobilization.
9 Project Overview
- Education for Life and Environment (Educación
para la Vida y el Ambiente-EVA) introduced
between 2002-04 as part of a World Bank-supported
wider strategy to improve basic education. - EVA projects were piloted in 75 schools in the
first year and after that targeted 150 primary
schools per year. - Resources were allocated as part of a
demand-oriented fund that provided small grants
directly to schools.
10Education for Life and Environment Educación
para la Vida y el Ambiente (EVA)
- The Objectives
- To strengthen and revitalize environmental and
health education in schools. - To pilot inclusive education approaches
- The approach
- To promote schools and communities active and
participatory learning of health and
environmental topics that where relevant to local
development. - Stimulate inclusive dynamics in schools and
communities
11Education for Life and Environment Educación
para la Vida y el Ambiente (EVA)
- What did the project offered to schools
- Technical assistance to schools and teachers
- training,
- supervision,
- a teachers manual,
- educational materials, development of a
community of practices, electronic
bulletin. - Funding (between 3,000 and 5,000 dollars) in upto
100 schools every year - school infrastructure renovation
and development to create healthier, safer
and more inclusive environments
12Education for Life and Environment Educación
para la Vida y el Ambiente (EVA)
- Operational rationale
- All schools were invited to participate (quota
was assigned according to socio-educational
profile) - Participating schools were required to identify a
specific health and inclusion-related issue they
wanted to change - Selected schools received technical assistance
and funding to tackle their problem. - Assistance comprised of resources that were meant
to benefit the quality of education in general,
not just health and inclusion objectives.
13Education for Life and Environment Educación
para la Vida y el Ambiente (EVA)
- Current
- situation
-
- challenges
-
- desired
- scenario
14. A natural solution to rural sanitation. A
contribution to local development. An entry
point for environmental and health education.
Bullrushes are natural purifiers of sewage. They
enhance soils aerobic conditions and kill any
pathogenic organisms. At the end of the treatment
the water is usable for irrigation or to refill
toilet cisterns.
One example of EVA projects school bullrush
gardens
15Education for Life and Environment KEY
IMPLEMENTATION ASPECTS
- 1 Educational focus
- The goal was to influence long term education
policies, institutions and leaders, mainstreaming
HP concepts and practice into the education
sector objectives. - Health, environment and inclusion projects have
high educational value. Help to address relevant
and tangible situation related to living
conditions. Facilitate meaningful learning. - Active teaching and learning, school-family
links, project-based and life skills-oriented
curiculum are all recomendations within quality
education initiatives.
16Education for Life and Environment KEY
IMPLEMENTATION ASPECTS
- Education focus II
- Implementation strategy sought to collaborate as
much as possible with other components of the
education strategy and all technical teams
involved. - Avoid the perception that HP in school is an
additional programme which increases the
teachers workload. - Active citizenship is important for personal
development and taking responsibility for the
determinants of health.
17Education for Life and Environment KEY
IMPLEMENTATION ASPECTS
- 2 Multi-sectoral approach and permanent dialogue
- Moving from inter-sectoral collaboration to
mobilizing all possible parties and resources. - Promoting permanent dialogue and collaborative
management agreements rather than establishing
bureaucratic partnerships/commissions. - Engage teacher unions.
- Foster children representatives as advocates and
stakeholders in school health dialogue.
18Education for Life and Environment KEY
IMPLEMENTATION ASPECTS
- Local ownership, autonomy, contribution to local
development - The fact that schools had to administrate their
funds, prioritise problems and decide which one
they wanted to address, was in itself a learning
and motivational experience. - The whole school community absorbed a methodology
to understand problems and challenges, made
autonomous decisions and planned responses on the
basis of their own culture, resources and skills.
- To optimise sustainability, the project
encouraged schools to identify and mobilize
professional expertise that was available in the
local community.
19Education for Life and Environment KEY
IMPLEMENTATION ASPECTS
- 4 Participation
- The project firmly advocated on the educational
value of active involvement of children. A range
of specific opportunities were highlighted - Producing a situation analysis of school and
community through consultation with other
children and the community - Mapping issues affecting health and well-being
through problem trees - Identifying things that can be changed in their
school and planning strategies for change
20Education for Life and Environment KEY
IMPLEMENTATION ASPECTS
- Participation II
- Still genuine participation didn't go beyond
sporadic and punctual opportunities.
Participation brings additional complexity. When
resources (personnel, support, etc) are limited
and issues multiple, better keep things under
control as usual. - Teachers and headteachers overwhelmed and time is
limited. - Are schools a good environment for genuine
participation?
21How do you build a bridge?
- What do you need to build a bridge?
- Standing points
- Plans, design
- Materials
- People, labour, dialogue
- Whats progressive is not the substance of an
idea but rather the dialogue of ideasbeing very
clear that the results of such a dialogue are
always uncertain. - Edgar Morin