Mainstreaming Health and Inclusion in Education - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Mainstreaming Health and Inclusion in Education

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: Sergio Meresman Last modified by: emmacarter Created Date: 10/20/2002 3:16:15 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: SergioM52
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mainstreaming Health and Inclusion in Education


1
Mainstreaming Health and Inclusion in Education
in Uruguay
Sergio Meresman VANCOUVER, June 2007
2
Uruguay
  • 3.3 million people
  • 4000 Primary schools (1000 rural)
  • Strong and prestigious education sector, nearly
    universal coverage in primary education
  • 98 percent of the population has access to
    potable water
  • Increasing equity and quality issues
    underprivileged schools accumulating problems,
    demands and services.
  • Teacher training and practice deteriorating

3
Impact of the 2002-03 crisis (selected social
indicators)
  • 15 decrease of GDP (estimated 2002)
  • 55 of Uruguayan children are poor
  • 25 unemployment (April 2003)
  • 18 million living under the poverty line (50 of
    total population)
  • In 2002 Uruguay had a population decrease
    births were 30.000, deaths 20.000 and migrants
    30.000

4
Health situation for school-age children in brief
  • Deterioration of the living conditions for many
    families
  • Deterioration of the quality of the environment
    especially for children exposure to
    pre-transitional risks
  • Epidemiologic regression re-emergence of
    pre-transicitional morbidity, communicable
    diseases

5
Highlights of schools situation
  • Schools are the last places where state presence
    still exists
  • Aggregation of problems leads to an aggregation
    of services. In vulnerable areas schools have to
    provide basic nutrition, health and social
    services
  • In Montevideo, school feeding program expanded
    from 40.000 to 90.000 children
  • That situation tend to reinforce structural
    disadvantage of children, who receive poorer
    education

6
After the Crisis what is the situation?
7
School Health future directions
  • Context
  • Exclusion (youth)
  • Poverty, Inequity
  • Minimal public sector
  • Migration, loss of human capital
  • Descentralization, democratization. Opportunities
    for local development
  • Uncertainty, political unestability
  • Emerging Issues
  • Food security
  • Epidemiological accumulation (infectious
    chronic diseases)
  • Violence
  • Mental health problems

Challenges
Tuning health promotion approaches with on-going
health and education policies and local
develop-ment resources
8
Operational strengths and problems
  • Some Strengths
  • Long standing tradition of preventive health
    interventions in schools
  • Remarkable enthusiasm of children and teachers
    about environmental and health education
  • Increasing participation of CSO on environmental
    education
  • Some Problems
  • Most school health activities have traditionally
    targeted rather than engaged schools
    (delivered vertically from MoH, NGOs). Schools
    used as a captive target.
  • Lack of educational rationale. Dispersion of
    initiatives.
  • Limited training of teachers. Lack of continuous
    training mechanisms (supportive monitoring,
    systematization of good practices, evaluation)
  • Tendency of intersectorial collaboration to
    become too bureaucratic, formal, restrictive of
    participation.
  • Lack of supportive policy to assist schools in
    networking, resource mobilization.

9
Project Overview
  • Education for Life and Environment (Educación
    para la Vida y el Ambiente-EVA) introduced
    between 2002-04 as part of a World Bank-supported
    wider strategy to improve basic education.  
  • EVA projects were piloted in 75 schools in the
    first year and after that targeted 150 primary
    schools per year.
  • Resources were allocated as part of a
    demand-oriented fund that provided small grants
    directly to schools.

10
Education for Life and Environment Educación
para la Vida y el Ambiente (EVA)
  • The Objectives
  • To strengthen and revitalize environmental and
    health education in schools.
  • To pilot inclusive education approaches
  • The approach
  • To promote schools and communities active and
    participatory learning of health and
    environmental topics that where relevant to local
    development.
  • Stimulate inclusive dynamics in schools and
    communities

11
Education for Life and Environment Educación
para la Vida y el Ambiente (EVA)
  • What did the project offered to schools
  • Technical assistance to schools and teachers
  • training,
  • supervision,
  • a teachers manual,
  • educational materials, development of a
    community of practices, electronic
    bulletin.
  • Funding (between 3,000 and 5,000 dollars) in upto
    100 schools every year
  •              school infrastructure renovation
    and development to create healthier, safer
    and more inclusive environments

12
Education for Life and Environment Educación
para la Vida y el Ambiente (EVA)
  • Operational rationale
  • All schools were invited to participate (quota
    was assigned according to socio-educational
    profile)
  • Participating schools were required to identify a
    specific health and inclusion-related issue they
    wanted to change
  • Selected schools received technical assistance
    and funding to tackle their problem.
  • Assistance comprised of resources that were meant
    to benefit the quality of education in general,
    not just health and inclusion objectives.

13
Education for Life and Environment Educación
para la Vida y el Ambiente (EVA)
  • Current
  • situation
  • challenges
  • desired
  • scenario

14
. A natural solution to rural sanitation. A
contribution to local development. An entry
point for environmental and health education.
Bullrushes are natural purifiers of sewage. They
enhance soils aerobic conditions and kill any
pathogenic organisms. At the end of the treatment
the water is usable for irrigation or to refill
toilet cisterns.
One example of EVA projects school bullrush
gardens
15
Education for Life and Environment KEY
IMPLEMENTATION ASPECTS
  • 1 Educational focus
  • The goal was to influence long term education
    policies, institutions and leaders, mainstreaming
    HP concepts and practice into the education
    sector objectives.
  • Health, environment and inclusion projects have
    high educational value. Help to address relevant
    and tangible situation related to living
    conditions. Facilitate meaningful learning.
  • Active teaching and learning, school-family
    links, project-based and life skills-oriented
    curiculum are all recomendations within quality
    education initiatives.

16
Education for Life and Environment KEY
IMPLEMENTATION ASPECTS
  • Education focus II
  • Implementation strategy sought to collaborate as
    much as possible with other components of the
    education strategy and all technical teams
    involved.
  • Avoid the perception that HP in school is an
    additional programme which increases the
    teachers workload.
  • Active citizenship is important for personal
    development and taking responsibility for the
    determinants of health.

17
Education for Life and Environment KEY
IMPLEMENTATION ASPECTS
  • 2 Multi-sectoral approach and permanent dialogue
  • Moving from inter-sectoral collaboration to
    mobilizing all possible parties and resources.
  • Promoting permanent dialogue and collaborative
    management agreements rather than establishing
    bureaucratic partnerships/commissions.
  • Engage teacher unions.
  • Foster children representatives as advocates and
    stakeholders in school health dialogue.

18
Education for Life and Environment KEY
IMPLEMENTATION ASPECTS
  • Local ownership, autonomy, contribution to local
    development
  • The fact that schools had to administrate their
    funds, prioritise problems and decide which one
    they wanted to address, was in itself a learning
    and motivational experience.
  • The whole school community absorbed a methodology
    to understand problems and challenges, made
    autonomous decisions and planned responses on the
    basis of their own culture, resources and skills.
  • To optimise sustainability, the project
    encouraged schools to identify and mobilize
    professional expertise that was available in the
    local community.

19
Education for Life and Environment KEY
IMPLEMENTATION ASPECTS
  • 4 Participation
  • The project firmly advocated on the educational
    value of active involvement of children. A range
    of specific opportunities were highlighted
  • Producing a situation analysis of school and
    community through consultation with other
    children and the community
  • Mapping issues affecting health and well-being
    through problem trees
  • Identifying things that can be changed in their
    school and planning strategies for change

20
Education for Life and Environment KEY
IMPLEMENTATION ASPECTS
  • Participation II
  • Still genuine participation didn't go beyond
    sporadic and punctual opportunities.
    Participation brings additional complexity. When
    resources (personnel, support, etc) are limited
    and issues multiple, better keep things under
    control as usual.
  • Teachers and headteachers overwhelmed and time is
    limited.
  • Are schools a good environment for genuine
    participation?

21
How do you build a bridge?
  • What do you need to build a bridge?
  • Standing points
  • Plans, design
  • Materials
  • People, labour, dialogue
  • Whats progressive is not the substance of an
    idea but rather the dialogue of ideasbeing very
    clear that the results of such a dialogue are
    always uncertain.
  • Edgar Morin
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com