DPL, FAST, Abdominal CT When, Why and How? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 61
About This Presentation
Title:

DPL, FAST, Abdominal CT When, Why and How?

Description:

Title: DPL, FAST, Abdominal CT When, Why and How? Author: dennis Last modified by: Dennis Created Date: 8/8/2004 12:38:43 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:145
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 62
Provided by: denn168
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DPL, FAST, Abdominal CT When, Why and How?


1
???????
  • ??? ??
  • ??? ???
  • ??????????????

2
  • ??????????????????????
  • ???????
  • Physical Examination
  • DPL
  • FAST
  • Abdominal CT

?
?
?
3
Scenario XY
  • 19???????????????, ???80/40 mmHg, ??115, ?????
    ??2000ml?????????, ????????????

4
Scenario XX
  • 31????????????????, ???130/60 mmHg, ??95, ??????
    ?????, ??????????????? ??????, ????????????

5
??????
  • DPL
  • Sonographic survey (FAST)
  • CT

6
DPL
  • Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage
  • ???????
  • ????, ??????
  • ?????
  • ?????

7
Open method
8
  • DPA
  • A
  • Closed
  • method

9
????
  • Open and closed techniques
  • Catheter inserted into the abdomen, aspirate
  • Positive if gross blood, bile, food, stool
  • If aspirate negative, lavage with 1 liter NS
  • positive
  • Lavage fluid gt 100,000 RBC/mm3,
  • gt500 WBC/mm3,
  • Bacteria on Gram stain

10
Abdominal CT
  • Computed tomography, CAT scan
  • ???????, ??????
  • ???, ????
  • ????, ????, ????

11
CAT scan
12
FAST
  • Focused Abdominal Sonography for Trauma
  • ???, ????
  • ?????
  • ?????
  • ??????????

13
FAST
  • ?????????
  • ??????????, ???????????????
  • Basic 4 views
  • ??? Cardiac (subxyphoid) view
  • ??? RUQ view (Morrisons pouch)
  • ??? LUQ view (splenorenal space)
  • ??? Suprapubic view (Cul-de-Sac)

14
Typical 4 views
15
(No Transcript)
16
RUQ view
  • Longitudinal scan
  • Transverse scan
  • Intercostal scan
  • Hypochondral scan
  • Morison pouch
  • May observe pleural space

17
  • 10 is identified with infusing 400ml saline
  • 97 is noted with infusing 1L saline

Branney et al. J Trauma 1995
18
LUQ view
  • Longitudinal scan
  • Transverse scan
  • Intercostal scan
  • Hypochondral scan
  • Spleen may be obscured during deep inspiration
  • May observe pleural space simultaneously

19
Subcapsular hematoma
Pleural effusion
Same Victim
20
Subxyphoid view
  • Pericardiac sac
  • Echogenesity of blood
  • Pericardial effusion?
  • Heart movement?
  • Decompressive measure

21
(No Transcript)
22
Echo guided pericardiocentesis
  • Equipment
  • 16-gauge short-bevel large-bore needle
  • 30- or 50-mL syringe
  • Echo- guided
  • Local anesthesia
  • Sterile supplies and povidone-iodine solution

23
Suprapubic view
  • Longitudinal scan
  • Transverse scan
  • Best viewed under full bladder
  • Physiologic fluid

24
(No Transcript)
25
Physiologic ascites
massive pelvic fluid
26
EFAST
  • Extended FAST scan
  • Detect thoracic lesion
  • Focus on occult pneumothorax (OPTX)
  • Gliding pleura signs

27
Lung Sliding
28
  • Lung point

29
Hemothorax
  • Right or left Intercostal view
  • Subcostal view

30
Blunt cardiac injury
  • Pericardial effusion and Wall motion
  • Valve injuries ( regurgitate )

31
FAST or not?
  • 100 victims of penetrating torso trauma assessed
    by our trauma teams. 48 stab wounds, 51 gunshot
    wounds, and 1 puncture wound..
  • The overall accuracy of the US examination in
    penetrating torso trauma was 87, with a
    sensitivity of 64 and a specificity of 96. The
    positive predictive value was 86 and negative
    predictive value was 87...
  • The US examination lacks sensitivity to be used
    alone in determining operative interventionRarely
    does US information contribute to the management
    of patients with penetrating abdominal injuries
  • A PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF
    ULTRASONOGRAPHY DIAGNOSIS OF PENETRATING
    ABDOMINAL INJURY Dror Soffer MD, Mark McKenney et
    al. Ann Emerg Med 2003

32
FAST or not?
  • 149 patients with suspicion for abdominal trauma
    were evaluatedleaving 134 patients for analysis.
  • There were 111 true negative FAST exams, 5 true
    positives, 17 false negatives, and 2 false
    positives.
  • Chi-square analysis showed significant
    discordance between FAST and CT (plt0.001).
  • Utilization of FAST as a screening tool for BAI
    in hemodynamically stable trauma patients results
    in under-diagnosis of intraabdominal injury
  • Patients with suspected abdominal trauma should
    undergo routine CT scanning.
  • Not So Fast! M.T. Miller, ND, M.D.
    Pasquale et al. J Trauma 2002

33
Pitfall
  • Operator-dependent skill
  • Reliable?
  • Sensitivity
  • Missed injuries
  • Pelvic fluid
  • Full Bladder
  • Serial examination
  • Delayed onset
  • Subcutaneous emphysema
  • Gas block

34
The new ABCs
  • Admit
  • Begin
  • CT scan

35
???????
  • When?
  • Why?
  • Why not?

36
DPL
  • When
  • ????YES?NO???
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • ????????CT ???
  • Rare these days
  • ?????????????

37
DPL
  • Why
  • Quick decisions
  • Looking primarily for gross blood

38
DPL
  • Why not
  • ??????
  • Possible complication
  • ????????????
  • Non-therapeutic lap rate app 30!
  • ????????????

39
FAST
  • When
  • ????YES?NO???
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • ??????????
  • Detect for fluid

40
FAST
  • When
  • 69 patients with initial BPlt 90 mmHg
  • 22 with positive FAST
  • 19(86)needed a laparotomy
  • 47 with negative FAST
  • 0(0) needed a laparotomy

Wherrett LJ. J Trauma 1996
41
FAST
  • Why
  • ???????
  • ???????

42
FAST
  • Why
  • Can be done rapidly!
  • Positive FAST
  • Time required 19/-5 sec.
  • Just for internal bleeding or cardiac tamponade
  • Negative FAST
  • Time required 154/-13 sec.

Wherrett LJ. J Trauma 1996
43
FAST
  • Why not
  • ?????????
  • ????????
  • ?????????
  • ??????????

44
Abdominal CT
  • Why
  • ????????
  • Solid organ, retroperitoneum, fluid
  • ????
  • ????

45
Accuracy Vs. Sensitivity
???Accuracy ???Sensitivity
DPL 98 99
FAST 96 75-93
ABD CT 99 99
46
Portable CAT scan HMC Seattle
47
Abdominal CT
  • When
  • ????????
  • ????????????
  • ?????????CT??
  • ?????????

48
Abdominal CT
  • Why not
  • ????
  • ??????????CT?????
  • ???????
  • ??CT????????

49
Abdominal CT
  • Why not
  • Multi-institutional study for small bowel injury
  • 13 without CT findings
  • 21 with solid organ injuries
  • 33 with peritoneal signs

Fakhry J Trauma 2003
50
Digest time
  • ???????????
  • ?????????
  • ???????

51
???? A
?????
??????? ???()
?????? ???(-)
????
???? ????
?????? ??????
??
FAST Pericardial view
CT
Your choice
52
???? B
???? ??????? ???(/-)
FAST ?? ?????DPL
????()
????(-)
Resuscitation Other injury?
????
53
???? C
???? ?????? ???(-)
CT Scan
????(-)
????()
Solid organ injury Retroperitoneal injury
Observation LOC?DPL
(-) OBS/Tx
() Exp-lap?
54
  • Can you make your decision now?

55
Scenario XX
  • 52???????????????, ???80/40 mmHg, ??115, ?????
    ??2000ml?????????, ????????????

56
???? B
???? ??????? ???(/-)
Hemodynamic Instablity
FAST Free fluid()
FAST ?? ?????DPL
????()
????(-)
Resuscitation Other injury?
????
57
Scenario XY
  • 31????????????????, ???130/60 mmHg, ??95, ??????
    ?????, ??????????????? ??????, ????????????

58
???? A
Stable Vital signs
?????
??????? ???()
?????? ???(-)
????
???? ????
?????? ??????
??
FAST Pericardial view
CT
Your choice
59
Conclusion
  • Dont get ABC syndrome
  • Good Decision ? Favorable outcome
  • Good Practice ? Favorable outcome
  • Time pressure?Bedside survey

60
?
61
THANK YOU!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com