Title: ASSESSING PRACTICAL WORK IN THE UNDERGRADUATE TEACHING LABORATORIES
1ASSESSING PRACTICAL WORK IN THE UNDERGRADUATE
TEACHING LABORATORIES
2Contents
- Introduction
- How we used to assess practical work
- Why we changed the way we assess practical work
- How we changed the way we assess practical work
- Group Work
- Summary
- Questions
3How we used to assess practical work
- Traditional laboratory reports.
- Mark out of 10 which includes the following
components - product yield,
- observations and equations,
- quality of written report,
- answers to questions.
4Advantages of laboratory reports
- Improves written communication skills
- -writing in a scientific manner
- -presenting experimental data.
- Encourages students to think about the experiment
they have carried out. - Prepares students for life in a research
laboratory.
5Disadvantages of laboratory reports
- Very little formal training given to students
about how to write an experimental report. - Little agreement between scientific branches and
disciplines as to what a report should include. - Often just copy the experimental method in the
manual.
6Disadvantages of laboratory reports
- A lot of work for the students.
- Report writing is over-assessed (over the course
of their three year degree the students have to
write almost 100 reports). - A lot of work for staff (marking).
- Large student numbers make it difficult to give
informative feedback sufficiently quickly. - Written communication skills and answers to
questions are often assessed more than practical
skills.
7How we assess practical work now
- Laboratory classes are now assessed through a
mixture of answer sheets and laboratory reports. - The writing of experimental reports is phased in
over the three years of the degree course. - First year students mainly complete answer
sheets. - Second year students have a more even mixture of
answer sheets and written reports. - Third year students mainly produce full reports.
8Designing answer sheets
- Answer sheets have the same design for both first
and second year laboratories. - Answer sheets have boxes for students to write
their answers in. - Each box has a mark associated with it so the
students have an idea of the mark scheme. - In each box the students are told exactly what
information is required from them (i.e. yield
calculation, observations, equations, answer to a
question, etc.).
9Designing answer sheets
- At the end of the sheet the students are told
which products they are required to hand in for
marking and how many marks are assigned to the
quality of the product. - If the experiment involves spectroscopy the
students are told at the start of the script
which spectra they need to attach to the answer
sheet.
10Designing answer sheets
- For synthesis-based experiments a lot of the
marks are assigned to product quality and yield
(separate). - For spectroscopy-based experiments a lot of the
marks are assigned to quality of spectra and
interpretation of the spectroscopic data
(separate). - Experiments that test observational skills have
mark schemes weighted towards the students
observations and their chemical interpretation. - Very few marks for answering theoretical
questions.
11What are we trying to assess?
- First Year Undergraduate Teaching Laboratories
- Basic practical skills
- synthetic skills
- observational skills
- use of lab equipment/handling chemicals
- Ability to carry out yield and mole calculations
- Basic understanding of the experiment
12What are we trying to assess?
- Second Year Undergraduate Teaching Laboratories
- Experiments more complicated so more demand on
technical skills. - Students are often asked questions relating to
the experimental procedure (reaction conditions,
reagents, etc.) to test their understanding. - Students required to make a more detailed
analysis of spectroscopic data. - Students asked to explain any differences between
expected theoretical data and experimental
results.
13Advantages of answer sheets
- Act as a guide for the students during the
experiment (particularly in the first year). - Less time consuming for the students (allows them
to focus on interpreting data rather than writing
report). - Detailed marking scheme makes making easier
- -speeds up feedback process
- -increases consistency.
14Advantages of answer sheets
- Use of boxes with marks in makes mark scheme more
transparent so students can see where they lost
or gained marks. - Assigning marks to the boxes makes you think
before you add unnecessary questions! - Writing full reports takes on more of a
significance for the students as they dont do
as many and are generally worth double marks
(greater effort made).
15Advantages of answer sheets
- In synthetic experiments students much more
focused on getting quality sample as worth a
significant proportion of marks. - In spectroscopic experiments students more
focused on getting quality spectra to gain higher
marks. - Use of boxes allows the students to handle
complicated data in a step-by-step fashion
(particularly important when they are not used to
handling experimental data).
16Disadvantages of answer sheets
- Can be seen as dumbing down.
- Does not improve written communication skills.
- Easier to copy from a friend.
17Other assessment methods?
- In groups discuss other methods of assessing
teaching labs - Take into account all the factors that we have
already discussed - What are the main advantages of your new
assessment method?
18Other assessment methods?
- Group Assessment
- poster
- oral presentation
- group written report
- Peer Assessment
19Summary
- Writing of laboratory reports is over assessed.
- Should be assessing the students practical skills
(synthesis, data recording and interpretation,
etc). - Have made a conscious effort to gradually phase
in the writing of reports throughout the degree. - This is done through the use of answer sheets for
the recording and interpretation of the
experimental data. - Answers sheets are designed to reward those
students with superior practical skills.