Title: Cost-Efficient Framework for Data Collection for CATI Surveys
1Cost-Efficient Framework for Data Collection for
CATI Surveys
- Social Surveys Collection Research
- Steering Committee (SSCRSC)
- François Laflamme
- December 2010
2Past and current research
- Paradata research has mainly directed its effort
in improving the current data collection process
and practices - Paradata research has also suggested that the
interviewer staffing levels are not always
optimally allocated with respect to the workload
sample and the expected productivity
3Challenges and objective
- One of the main challenges is to collect
cost-effective data while maintaining a high
level of quality - According to the forecasted budget reductions,
the pressure has increased and will continue to
grow - The objective of the project is to propose a
cost-efficient framework for data collection for
CATI surveys
4Cost-efficient framework
- Five 5 dimensions
- Metrics used for costing and budgeting surveys
- Resources allocation within surveys
- Resources allocation between surveys
- Collection process and practices
- Operational constraints
51. Metrics used for costing and budgeting surveys
- Should be based on objective, measurable and
comprehensible assumptions - Should be monitored throughout the survey
collection - Budget too high - low productivity
- Budget too low - more difficult to reach targets
- Budget often based on previous survey cycles or
comparable surveys - But it is exactly what we try to improve (e.g.
low TPU)
62 3. Resources allocation within and between
surveys
- Within survey
- Interviewer staffing levels should consider
sample workload and collection progress in taking
advantage of the entire collection period - Survey productivity decreases for all CATI
surveys during collection - Between surveys
- Many concurrent surveys compete for data
collection resources
7Resources allocation within and between surveys
- What is the best strategy within survey?
8Resources allocation within and between surveys
- The main idea is to try to maintain the survey
productivity for all surveys for a given RO (red
line) between reasonable boundaries around the
average productivity - How?
9Resources allocation within and between surveys
- The strategy is to distribute system time for a
given period (day or week) in function of the
inverse of the proportion of the budget spent
(inversely correlated to productivity) to
maintain productivity at RO level
10Resources allocation within and between surveys
- In practice
- Need to get consistent budget figures for all
surveys - Need to get daily or weekly capacity system time
- Need to consider the active collection period of
each survey - Need to take into account operational constraints
- Is it feasible? Can it be operationalized and
automated? - The objective is to produce guidelines for RO to
help them allocate collection resources only at
the aggregate level.
114. Collection process and practices
- Focus of the past research
- Some examples
- Best time to call
- Call scheduler features
- Cap on calls, customized time slices, Z-groups
etc - Increased the proportion of evening shifts versus
day shifts to improve contact rate and
productivity - Active management
- Responsive collection design
- No significant efficiency if budget and resources
allocation remain the same.
125. Operational constraints
- RO capacity
- Varies by day (interviewer availability)
- LFS week
- Holidays and special event
- Average productivity
- Varies by RO and survey
- Interviewer schedule in advance
- Interviewer training across surveys
- Etc
13Comments
- 3 Separate projects
- Costing metrics
- Resources allocation within and between surveys
- Collection process and practices
- All need to take into account operational
constraints - All dimensions have to be considered
simultaneously to succeed in improving the
cost-efficiency of data collection.
14For more information, please contact Pour plus
dinformation, veuillez contacter
François Laflamme francois.laflamme_at_statcan.gc.ca