Strategic Management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

Strategic Management

Description:

Education is the best provision for old age. Aristotle Strategic Management BU601A Class 6 Instructor: Steve Hummel, P. Eng. Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:172
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: SJHumm
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Strategic Management


1
Strategic Management
Education is the best provision for old
age. Aristotle
  • BU601A Class 6
  • Instructor Steve Hummel, P. Eng.

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng.
1
2
Agenda
Excellence is an art won by training and
habituation. We do not act rightly because we
have virtue or excellence, but we rather have
those because we have acted rightly. We are what
we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act
but a habit. Aristotle
  • Recap of Fifth Class
  • News!
  • What is Strategy?
  • Organization
  • Victoria Heavy Equipment

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng.
2
3
News! (Organization)
  • HP names ex-SAP chief Apotheker as CEO
  • The news comes as something of a surprise. HP was
    expected to go with an insider for the new CEO
    after the last two CEOs Hurd and his
    predecessor, Carly Fiorina, both outsiders when
    they were hired clashed with the board and were
    forced out
  • Shares of HP were briefly halted after the stock
    market closed. When after-hours trading resumed,
    the stock sank 1.37, or 3.3 percent, to 40.70
  • Rocky economy can't derail train company
  • Rocky Mountaineer s a British Columbia-based,
    family-owned luxury train line, which offers
    travel through some of the most spectacular
    scenery in Western Canada. As a premium priced
    travel brand, the company was forced to reexamine
    how it did business during the recent economic
    downturn, which caused an industry-wide reduction
    in discretionary consumer spending
  • During this time, other prestige train travel
    companies around the world experienced major
    volume and revenue declines, and competitors such
    as cruise lines resorted to heavy discounting in
    an attempt to bolster business
  • The Rocky Mountaineer management team did not
    panic. Instead, they went back to their core
    brand values, and did further research to better
    understand their core target customer, and
    motivations for choosing a multi-day,
    premium-priced, unique travel experience
  • Perhaps the most daring and successful element of
    the campaign involved the innovative partnership
    with ABCs The Bachelorette TV show, which put
    Rocky Mountaineer in the spotlight during two
    episodes in June 2009. This greatly raised
    awareness and interest in the important US
    market

4
Michael Porter
  • What is Strategy?
  • If all you're trying to do is essentially the
    same thing as your rivals, then it's unlikely
    that you'll be very successful. Michael Porter

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng.
4
5
Operational effectiveness is not strategy
  • The rules have changed, management must be more
    flexible to respond rapidly to competitive and
    market changes
  • Benchmarking to achieve best practices and
    outsourcing to gain efficiencies are critical
  • This must be done while nurturing a few core
    competencies to stay ahead of rivals
  • There has been great frustration by companies
    that have tried to implement TQA, Lean, 6 Sigma,
    etc. in an effort to turn these management
    techniques into a sustainable advantage
  • The reality is that if you push to improve on all
    operational fronts you move further from viable
    competitive positions

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng.
5
6
Operational Effectiveness Necessary but not
Sufficient
  • A company can outperform rivals only if it can
    establish a difference that it can preserve
  • It must deliver greater value to customers or
    create comparable value at lower cost, or do both
  • The math is simple, high value means higher
    average prices, greater efficiency means lower
    average unit costs
  • Cost advantage arises from performing particular
    activities better than competitors
  • Differentiation arises from both the choice of
    activities and how they are performed
  • Bottom line, overall advantage/disadvantage
    results from all a companys activities, not only
    a few

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng.
6
7
O.E. Contd
  • Operational Effectiveness means performing
    similar activities better than rivals perform
    them
  • Not limited to just efficiency
  • Defect reduction or fast cycle product
    development are other examples
  • Heart of Japanese industrial revival, low cost
    with superior quality
  • The productivity frontier is the sum of all
    current best practices
  • Note that it changes outward all the time
  • Note the role of disruptive technologies
  • Watch out, best practices can be diffused!
  • A very real danger of competitive convergence!
  • A dramatic result is zero-sum competition,
    static/declining prices, and pressures on costs
    that compromise the ability to invest for the
    long term

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng.
7
8
Strategy Rests on Unique Activities
  • Strategic Positioning means performing different
    activities from rivals or performing similar
    activities in different ways
  • Strategic Positions emerge from three distinct
    sources
  • Variety based positioning
  • Based on the choice of product or service
    varieties rather than customer segments
  • Makes sense when a company can best produce
    particular products or services using distinctive
    sets of activities
  • Needs based positioning
  • Based on serving most or all the needs of a
    particular group of customers
  • Traditional approach
  • Arises when there are groups of customers with
    differing needs and when a tailored set of
    activities can serve those needs best
  • Critical element is differences in needs are
    matched by differences in the best set of
    activities to satisfy them
  • Access based positioning
  • Can be a function of customer geography or
    customer scale, anything that requires a
    different set of activities to reach customers
    the best way
  • Less common approach

8
Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng.
9
A Sustainable Strategic Position Requires
Trade-offs
  • Strategy is the creation of a unique and valuable
    position, involving a different set of activities
  • If there were only one ideal position there would
    be no need for strategy
  • The essence of strategic positioning is to choose
    activities that are different from rivals
  • This is no guarantee of sustainable success
  • Competitors can reposition themselves
  • Competitors can straddle you (matches you while
    maintaining old position)
  • Trade-offs are the essence of sustainability
  • Avoiding inconsistencies in image and reputation
  • Different activities require different equipment,
    infrastructure, people, etc.
  • Limits on internal coordination and control
    (priority management)

9
Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng.
10
Trade-offs Contd
  • Simultaneous improvement of cost and
    differentiation is only possible when a company
    begins far behind the productivity frontier or
    when the frontier shifts dramatically outward
    (disruptive technologies)
  • At the frontier, the trade-off between cost and
    differentiation is very real
  • The essence of strategy is often choosing what
    not to do!

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng.
10
11
Fit Drives Both Competitive Advantage and
Sustainability
  • Operational effectiveness is about achieving
    excellence in individual activities or functions,
    strategy is about combining activities
  • Types of fit
  • First order fit is simple consistency between
    each activity/function and the overall strategy
  • Second order fit is when the activities are
    reinforcing
  • Third order fit is optimization of effort
  • Bottom line
  • The whole matters more than any individual part
  • Competitive advantage grows out of the entire
    system of activities
  • Great fit reduces cost or dramatically improves
    differentiation
  • It is harder for a rival to match interlocked
    activities
  • Use the simple probability model
  • The greater the order of fit the tougher it is
    for a competitor to mimic
  • Fit means that poor performance in one activity
    will degrade the performance in others, and, vice
    versa

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng.
11
12
Rediscovering Strategy
  • The failure to choose
  • When many companies operate far from the
    productivity frontier trade-offs appear
    unnecessary, why not improve on all fronts all at
    once?
  • Managers are pushed to imitate competitors and
    pursue bleeding edge technology
  • Managers avoid thinking about strategy because it
    requires dealing with the professional and
    personal implications of trade-offs
  • Growth is good, any growth is better than no
    growth, so lets go!
  • The growth trap
  • Desire to please all dilutes strategy
  • Compromises and inconsistencies erode core
    strategy
  • Pursuit of revenue versus profits

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng.
12
13
Rediscovering Strategy Contd
  • Profitable growth
  • Best way is to deepen strategic position rather
    than broadening and compromising it
  • Look for extensions of the strategy that leverage
    the existing activity system by offering features
    or services that rivals would find impossible or
    costly to match on a stand-alone basis
  • Globalization is often a viable alternative
  • Growing within your industry by broadening is
    best accomplished by standalone business units
    but there is always the temptation to consolidate
  • Role of leadership
  • Strong leaders willing to make choices is
    necessary
  • Make the trade-offs, forge fit are the essential
    elements!
  • Discipline, coaching, and daily reinforcement of
    the strategy is necessary

13
Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng.
14
Bottom Line
  • The operational agenda involves continual
    improvement where there are no trade-offs
  • The operational agenda is all about continuous
    improvement, flexibility, change, and the pursuit
    of best practices
  • The strategic agenda is all about defining a
    unique position, making clear trade-offs and
    tightening fit
  • The strategic agenda demand continual search for
    ways to reinforce and extend the companys
    position while maintaining discipline and
    continuity
  • Strategic continuity actually makes an
    organizations continuous improvement program
    more effective
  • Today, be careful about the role of disruptive
    technologies!

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng.
14
15
What is Strategy?Summary Basics
  • Position
  • Strategic Position
  • Position as a niche
  • Position as focused or broad
  • Activities
  • Fit
  • Between position and activities
  • Among activities
  • Tradeoffs
  • Regarding position
  • Regarding activities

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng.
15
16
Strategy and Organization
  • The focus of this chapter is organizational
    capabilities, this means what people are
    collectively capable of when they work together
  • Four questions need to be answered
  • What organizational capabilities would you need
    in order to implement the strategic proposal that
    you are considering?
  • What are the gaps between these needed
    organizational capabilities and the capabilities
    that you currently have?
  • What changes would you need to make in
    organization structure, management processes, and
    leadership behaviour to develop the
    organizational capabilities that you would need
    to fill these gaps?
  • Would these changes in fact lead to the
    development of the new capabilities in the time
    available?

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
16
17
Organizational Capabilities
  • New strategies usually require that new things be
    done well
  • Common capabilities usually include speed,
    simplicity, and self confidence
  • Welchs thoughts about boundarylessness
  • Most successful small companies possess three
    defining cultural traits Self-confidence,
    simplicity, and speed. We wanted them. We went
    after them. (Jack Welch, CEO, GE, 1995 Annual
    Report)
  • We began to cultivate self-confidence among our
    leaders by turning them loose, giving them
    independence and resources, and encouraging them
    to take big swings. (Jack Welch, Ch, CEO, GE,
    1995 Annual Report)
  • Capabilities are based upon behaviour of
    employees which in turn is influenced and
    supported by the culture of the organization

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
17
18
Organizational Capabilities
  • Organization turns a resource into a capability.
  • Types of capability
  • Innovation
  • Productivity
  • Speed
  • Cross Cultural effectiveness
  • Cross Unit synergies

19
Organizational Capabilities Model
  • Key Points
  • Any changes need to be sending the same message
    in terms of behavior change.
  • Changes need to be consistent over time.

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
19
20
Behaviour
  • We are talking about readily observable
    behaviour, not aspects of peoples actions that
    would require a trained psychologist to notice
  • This usually means
  • How much energy people put into various aspects
    of their jobs
  • How subordinates are managed
  • How much attention is given to external issues
  • How people relate to one another
  • The rub comes when comparing current behaviour to
    required behaviour with a new strategy and the
    implications in terms of the changes in culture

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
20
21
Culture
  • Culture is the shared beliefs and expectations
    that managers have about the way the organization
    should operate
  • In organizations with a strong culture the
    beliefs are widely shared and strongly held, the
    opposite is true
  • Try to describe current culture with phrases that
    people use and then compare that to the culture
    that you need to have for your strategy to
    succeed to see if you have a gap
  • Note that culture pushes inward, towards
    behaviour and capabilities, but also outward
    influencing choices about structure, management
    processes, and leadership behaviour

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
21
22
Step 1 Identify Required Organizational
Capabilities
  • Table 8.4, Pg. 154 text
  • Implement new goals
  • Implement new value proposition
  • Implement new product market focus
  • Implement new core activities
  • Close resource gaps
  • Close management preferences gaps
  • Tricks are
  • Be as specific as you can about the capabilities
    that you will need (SMAC, Specific, Measurable,
    Actionable, Consistent)
  • Cast a wide net
  • Get everyone involved
  • Deal with management conflict

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
22
23
Step 2 Identify Capability Gaps
  • Be careful to avoid flattering assessments of
    your capabilities
  • Know how good you are not!
  • Involve others
  • After all, do you want to do all the work?
  • How easy is it to implement if everyone agrees on
    the gaps?
  • Remember comparisons are all relative
  • Be sensitive to uniqueness!
  • Capture the value of it!

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
23
24
Step 3 Develop New Organizational Capabilities
  • The 3 leverage points to do this are
  • Organizational structure
  • Management processes
  • Leadership behaviour
  • Organizational structure
  • There are always trade-offs
  • Information/influence flows smoother vertically
    than horizontally (Management Law of Gravity),
    this must be overcome
  • Active encouragement is often required to support
    informal communication pipelines
  • Four common organizational structures are
    functional, product, geographic, and matrix

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
24
25
Organization Structure Alternatives
26
More Structure
  • Functional structure
  • Only GM is responsible for profitability
  • Good for coordinating activities and allocating
    resources
  • Good for standardized products, especially
    globally on the cost front
  • Bad for lack of sensitivity to local markets
  • Problems with slow decision making and poor
    coordination between functional areas
  • Trick to making it work is to get informal
    networks in place, big companies do this by
    continuous transfers
  • Product structure
  • Good for organizations that have multiple
    products, helps to focus on the profitability of
    each major product line
  • There is a cost of duplication versus functional
  • There is also a danger that one division may not
    communicate with other divisions with respect to
    best practices, etc.
  • Potential customer impact if customers are buying
    from more than one division

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
26
27
Yet More Structure
  • Geographic structure
  • Advantage is strong local knowledge
  • Disadvantage is global inefficiency
  • New emerging trend of global product divisions
    versus traditional geographic structure in an
    effort to capture overall benefits while
    mitigating weaknesses
  • Matrix structure
  • Encourages managers to pay attention to local and
    worldwide product strategies
  • They are very complex and slow moving
  • Responsibility and authority are diffused and
    power balances are not clear cut

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
27
28
Organization Structure
  • Align required capabilities with organization
    characteristics.
  • Ref Goold and Campbell nine tests. ( Page 165)

Organization Type
Benefits
Issues
Limited sensitivity to
Standard product -
Functional
local markets
Efficiencies
Slow decision making
Lose Efficiencies
Focus on each product
Product
Multiple contact points
line
for customers.
Good at tailoring to local
Geographical
Lose Efficiencies
markets
Complex and Slow
Matrix
Efficient and Effective
moving.
29
Alternatives
  • Strategic alliances
  • This is a way to extend/develop your
    organizational capabilities
  • Barneys seven inter-firm synergies that can
    motivate strategic alliances
  • Exploiting economies of scale
  • Learning from competitors
  • Managing risks/sharing costs
  • Facilitating tacit collusion
  • Low cost entry into new markets
  • Low cost entry into new industries/new industry
    segments
  • Managing uncertainty
  • Barneys three ways that alliances break down
  • Adverse selection (misrepresentation of skills)
  • Moral hazard (skills contributed at a lower level
    than promised)
  • Hold-up (investments made specific to alliance
    with no economic value outside the relationship,
    vulnerable to unreasonable demands)

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
29
30
Choosing a Structure
  • Goold and Campbells nine tests
  • The market advantage test Does your design
    direct sufficient management attention to your
    sources of competitive advantage in each market?
  • The parenting advantage test Does your design
    help the corporate parent add value to the
    organization?
  • The people test Does your design reflect the
    strengths, weaknesses, and motivations of your
    people?
  • The feasibility test Have you taken account of
    all the constraints that may impeded the
    implementation of your design?
  • The specialist cultures test Does your design
    protect units that need distinct cultures?
  • The difficult links test Does your design
    provide coordination solutions for the
    unit-to-unit links that are likely to be
    problematic?
  • The redundant hierarchy test Does your design
    have too many parent levels and units?
  • The accountability test Does your design support
    effective controls?
  • The flexibility test Does your design facilitate
    the development of new strategies and provide the
    flexibility required to adapt to change?

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
30
31
Management Processes
  • Three major processes
  • Decision making
  • Operating
  • Performance/reward
  • Decision making processes
  • Who makes decisions, what information do they
    have, how are decisions actually made
  • Real-time companies have agility baked in!
  • Systems that supply and demand info are reliable
    and fast
  • Vision, values, strategy are all drilled in

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
31
32
More Process Thoughts
  • Operating processes
  • Govern the way that your people work together to
    create, produce, and deliver products/services to
    your customers
  • The issue is often coordination
  • This can be accomplished informally with
    mechanisms like people rotation or formally by
    creating dedicated cross-functional work groups
  • Performance Assessment and Reward processes
  • It is not just about the money
  • Each person has a different capability level
  • Recommend that you combine this with other
    changes, like that of leadership behaviour

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
32
33
Leadership Behaviour
  • Easiest, fastest thing to change to generate a
    greater/improved/different organizational
    capability
  • Objectively examine if you have the right leaders
  • If your organization is has a strong culture then
    you likely need to make changes on all three
    leverage points, make sure that these changes are
    consistent!

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
33
34
Step 4 Assess Feasibility
  • Two questions remain
  • Can the changes required be made in the needed
    time frame?
  • Will the changes required product the desired
    result?
  • For those managers that do not buy in then you
    must deal with them!

Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
34
35
Creating a Change Plan
Analysis of Starting Conditions
Urgency Are you dealing with anticipatory, reactive, or crisis change? Organizational Readiness Who will be most affected by the proposed change? How ready are they? Personal Readiness How ready are you to lead the change process?
35
Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
36
Establishing Guidelines for Action
Priority Objective What do you need to accomplish first? Priority Targets and Actions Who are your priority targets? What will your first steps be? Leadership Style How are you going to manage the change process? Pace How fast do you need to move?
36
Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
37
Creating an Action Plan
Period 1, etc. Objective Targets First Steps Style Timing
37
Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
38
Change Agenda
  • You have completed the Diamond-E and chosen your
    preferred strategic option
  • This also means that you have identified your new
    resources, management preferences, and
    organizational capabilities
  • You may have also determined how you are going to
    change behaviour in the organization
  • First step is to generate the change agenda as
    behavioural change is often the toughest to make
    happen

38
Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
39
Change Agenda, Change Needs Identified in
Diamond-E Analysis
Non-Behavioural Changes Required Behavioural Changes Required Potential Changes in Organization
Develop New Resources
Change Management Preferences
Develop New Organizational Capabilities
39
Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
40
Closing the Gaps
Considerations
Risks
Magnitude of Changes
  • Gaps too great to fill

Method of change
Number of Changes
  • Too many gaps to fill

Cost of change
  • Lack sufficient time to make the change
  • Lack the skills needed to manage the change

Types of Changes
Ease of change
Cost of Changes
  • Costs too much for what it accomplishes

Timing of change
Productivity of Changes
  • Will not do what is needed

41
Urgency for Action The Crisis Curve
41
Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
42
Readiness for Change and Strategic Capability
42
Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
43
Change Issues
  • Crisis Change
  • Buy time, financially
  • Depleted resources
  • Blow your own preconceived notions away
  • Make do with the talent that you have
  • Anticipatory Change
  • Problem is not clear
  • Lack of a sense of urgency
  • Premium on credibility
  • Reactive Change
  • Concentrate attention on the core business,
    focus!
  • You need the power to make it happen, now!

43
Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
44
Organizational Readiness for Change
  • Target Group Identification
  • Identify the change, those that can be your force
    multiplier
  • Target Group Readiness
  • Make sure that the change agents are committed
    and capable

Personal Readiness for Change
  • Make sure that you are both committed and
    capable, be realistic!

44
Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
45
Assessing Potential Priority Targets
45
Stephen J. Hummel, P. Eng
46
Case Victoria Heavy Equipment Limited
  • Victoria is a family owned firm which as been led
    by an ambitious, entrepreneurial CEO who now want
    to take a less active role. The firm has been
    through two re-organizations in recent years and
    performance has declined to a 4 year low. This
    case focuses on the organizational and strategic
    issues which will need to be addressed by
    management.
  • Lay out the likely qualifications for the new
    president.
  • Assess firm performance.
  • What are the major elements of Victorias
    strategy and organization?
  • How easy or difficult is this firm to change
    organizationally? Why?
  • What are your recommendations?

47
Lessons
  • Realistic and achievable goals drive belief
  • Co-ordinating the organization is critical
  • When in trouble, centralize fixed cost control
  • Do not design the organization to be everything
    to everyone
  • When evaluating family members for succession
    give them equal responsibilities
  • Be prepared to live with the implications of your
    decisions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com