Title: Professional Ethics
1Professional Ethics
2AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- Compliance required of all AICPA members, even
CPAs working as accountants. - Basis for CPA ethics rules in each state.
- (So noncompliance can affect CPA License, even
if working as an Accountant.) - PCAOB partially adopted as their interim
standards. - Some rules only apply to members in public
practice. - Some Rules only apply to certain types of
engagements or to certain class of clients.
3AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- PRINCIPLES
- (Overall Framework)
- RULES
- (The Dont Do Specifics)
- INTERPRETATIONS
- (Clarifies Scope Application of Rules)
- ETHICS RULINGS/GUIDANCE
- (Answers to Particular Circumstances)
4AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- Revised and codified in June 2014
- Only minor changes to the content of the Code
- Effective Dec 15, 2014, except for
- Conceptual Framework for Members in Public
Practice - Conceptual Framework for Members in Business
- Effective Dec 15, 2015, unless adopted earlier.
5AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- Application Terminology
- Should consider used in connection with a
specified procedure or action, consideration of
the procedure or action by the member is
presumptively required. - Consider used when the member is required to
think about several matters. - Evaluate used when the member has to assess
and weigh the significance of a matter. - Determine used when the member has to come to
a conclusion and make a decision on a matter.
6The Principles
The Principles
- Responsibilities
- The Public Trust
- Integrity
- Objectivity Independence
- Due Care
- Scope Nature of Services
7Responsibilities
The Principles
- In carrying out their responsibilities as
professionals, members should exercise sensitive
professional and moral judgments in all their
activities.
8The Public Trust
The Principles
- Members should accept the obligation to act in a
way that will - serve the public interest
- honor the public trust
- demonstrate commitment to professionalism
9Integrity
The Principles
- To maintain and broaden public confidence,
members should perform all professional
responsibilities with the highest sense of
integrity.
10Objectivity Independence
The Principles
- A member should maintain objectivity and be free
of conflicts of interest in discharging
professional responsibilities. - A member in public practice should be independent
in fact and appearance when providing auditing
and other attestation services.
11Objectivity Independence (cont)
The Principles
- The principle of objectivity imposes the
obligation to be impartial, intellectually
honest, and free of conflicts of interest. - Independence precludes relationships that may
appear to impair a members objectivity in
rendering attestation services.
12Due Care
The Principles
- A member should observe the profession's
technical and ethical standards, strive
continually to improve competence and the quality
of services, and discharge professional
responsibility to the best of the member's
ability.
13Scope Nature of Services
The Principles
- A member in public practice should observe the
principles of the Code of Professional Conduct in
determining the scope and nature of services to
be provided.
14Code Structure for Rules, Interpretations and
Other Guidance
- Preface Applicable to All Members
- Part 1 Members in Public Practice
- Part 2 Members in Business
- Part 3 Other Members (e.g., retired or
unemployed)
15Part 1 for Members in Public Practice
- Public practice consists of the performance of
professional services for a client by a member or
members firm. - Client is any person or entity, other than the
members employer, that engages a member or
members firm to perform professional services.
16Conceptual Framework for Members in Public
Practice
- Absence a Rule interpretation that addresses a
particular relationship or circumstance, a member
should evaluate whether that relationship or
circumstance would lead a reasonable and informed
third party who is aware of the relevant
information to conclude that there is a threat to
the members compliance with the Rules that is
not at an acceptable level.
17Conceptual Framework for Members in Public
Practice
- Acceptable Level. A level at which a reasonable
and informed 3rd party, who is aware of the
relevant information, would be expected to
conclude that a members compliance with the
rules is not compromised.
18Conceptual Framework for Members in Public
Practice
- Evaluation Steps
- Identify threats (Relationships or circumstances
that could compromise a members compliance with
the rules). - Evaluate the significance of a threat.
- Identify and apply safeguards (Actions or other
measures that may eliminate or reduce a threat
to an acceptable level).
19Conceptual Framework for Members in Public
Practice
- Common Threats
- Adverse Interest (members interests are opposed
to the clients interests such as with legal
proceedings) - Advocacy (member promotes a clients
interest/position to the point that his/her
objectivity or independence is compromised) - Familiarity (member or his/her relative or friend
has long or close relationship with a client
(e.g., employment) where a member becomes too
sympathetic to the clients interests or too
accepting of the clients work or product)
20Conceptual Framework for Members in Public
Practice
- Common Threats (cont)
- Management Participation (member takes on the
role of client management or assume client
management responsibilities) - Self-Interest (member could benefit financially
or otherwise from client interest or
relationship) - Self-Review (member previous judgment or service
performed) - Undue Influence (subordinate to client)
21Ethical Conflicts
- Arises when a member encounters one or both of
the following - Obstacles to following an appropriate course of
action due to internal or external pressures - Conflicts in applying relevant professional
standards or legal standards - For example, a member suspects a fraud may have
occurred, but reporting the suspected fraud would
violate the members responsibility to maintain
client confidentiality. - Inability to resolve could involve elevating the
issue or asking to be removed from the situation
or resignation from employment.
22Integrity and Objectivity Rule
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- In the performance of any professional service, a
member shall maintain objectivity and integrity,
shall be free of conflicts of interest, and shall
not knowingly misrepresent facts or subordinate
his or her judgment to others.
23Integrity and Objectivity Rule
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- Interpretation Topics
- Conflicts of Interest
- Gifts Entertainment (member must not offer or
accept to/from client that violates member firm
or client policy or are unreasonable in the
circumstances) - Preparing Reporting Info (knowingly
misrepresents info or subordinates ones judgment)
24Integrity and Objectivity Rule
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- Interpretation Topics (cont)
- Client Advocacy (generally related to non-attest
services, such as tax and consulting services,
that involve acting as an advocate for the client
or supporter of a clients position on accounting
or financial reporting issues within the firm or
outside the firm with standard setters,
regulators, or others) - Use of 3rd party Service Providers (for
professional services, disclosure to client
required)
25Independence Rule
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- Member in public practice shall be independent in
the performance of professional services as
required by standards promulgated by bodies
designated by Council. - (For AICPA PCAOB governed engagements, applies
to all attestation engagements, including F.S.
audits.)
26Independence
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- Means independence in fact and appearance - so,
rules may appear too restrictive. - Applies to all attest (not just audit)
engagements. - Why is independence important?
27Independence
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- CPAs are providing assurance on data reliability
to 3rd party users.
28AICPA Conceptual Framework for Independence
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- The framework is a decision flowchart used to
evaluate threats to a CPAs independence. When a
threat arises, the approach considers - Whether the Code directly addresses the threat
and - If the Code does not directly address the threat,
the auditor considers whether adequate safeguards
exist to eliminate or mitigate the threat to
independence to an acceptably low level.
29AICPA Conceptual Framework for Independence
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- The perspective used throughout is whether a
reasonable person, aware of all the relevant
facts, would conclude that an unacceptable risk
to independence exists.
30AICPA Conceptual Framework for Evaluating Threats
to Independence
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
31Independence Impairment
- Determining if independence is impaired for a CPA
firm is a 3-Stage Process - Is independence of individual auditor impaired?
- 1. When did it occur?
- 2. What was the relationship?
- If individual auditor independence is impaired,
is the CPA firm impaired? - 3. Who in the firm is involved?
32When
Independence
- Period of the Professional Engagement
- Conducting planning and field work
- Rendering opinion/drafting report
- Begins when engagement letter signed or agreement
reached, or CPA starts work. Ends when
professional relationship ends.
While you are engaged.
33When
Independence
- Period(s) Covered by the Attestation Engagement
- (e.g., the clients fiscal year for a financial
statement audit)
34What - Category A
Independence
- Had/committed to acquire any direct or material
indirect financial interest in the client. - Direct Stock, bonds or loans to client
- (even 1 share of stock)
- Indirect Investment in a company or mutual fund
which holds financial interests in client. - Material Significance of amount to CPA or if
ANY partner or professional employee of CPA firm
has significant influence over fund.
35What - Category A
Independence
- Was trustee of any trust or executor or
administrator of any estate which had or was
committed to acquire any direct or material
indirect financial interest in the client AND - Covered member had authority to make investment
decisions or - Trust/estate owned or was committed to acquire
more than 10 percent of the client's outstanding
equity securities or other ownership interests or - Value of the trust/estate's holdings in the
client exceeded 10 percent of the total assets of
the trust/estate. -
36What - Category A
Independence
- Had a joint closely held investment (with client,
client officer/director or owner who has ability
to exercise significant influence over the
client) that was material to the covered member
(auditor or CPA firm).
37What - Category A
Independence
- Cooperative Arrangements With Attest Clients,
unless - The participation of the firm and attest client
are governed by separate agreements,
arrangements, or understandings that do not
create rights or obligations between the firm and
attest client and - Neither the firm nor the attest client assumes
responsibility for the others activities or
results and - Neither party has the authority to act as the
others representative or agent.
38What - Category A
Independence
- Had any loan to/from (1) the client, (2) any
officer or director of the client, or (3) any
individual owning 10 percent or more of the
client's outstanding equity securities or other
ownership interests. Except . . .
39Loan Exceptions
Independence
- Home mortgages, secured loans, and immaterial
unsecured loans (generally OK if not obtained
from an existing attest client by a covered
member and collateral fair value equals or
exceeds loan balance.) - Automobile loans and leases collateralized by the
automobile - Loans fully collateralized by the cash surrender
value of an insurance policy - Loans fully collateralized by cash deposits at
same lending institution - Aggregate outstanding balances from credit cards
and overdraft reserve accounts with a balance of
10,000 or less after payment of the most recent
monthly statement made by the due date or within
any available grace period - For all loans, loan is made under normal lending
terms kept current.
40What - Category B
Independence
- During the period of the professional engagement,
a partner or professional employee of the CPA
firm, his or her immediate family, or any group
of such persons acting together owned more than 5
percent of an attest client's outstanding equity
securities or other ownership interests.
41What - Category C
Independence
- A partner or professional employee of the
members firm is simultaneously employed or
associated with an attest client, except for
adjunct (part-time) faculty member of an
educational institution with certain restrictions
and safeguards
42Who - Category A
Independence
- Covered Member - (Whose Impairment of
Independence Passes to the CPA Firm) - a. Individual on the attest engagement team
43Who - Category A
Independence
- Covered Member - (Whose Impairment of
Independence Passes to the CPA Firm) - a. Individual on the attest engagement team
- b. Individual in a position to influence the
attest engagement
44Who - Category A
Independence
- Covered Member - (Whose Impairment of
Independence Passes to the CPA Firm) - Individual on the attest engagement team
- Individual in a position to influence the attest
engagement - A partner, partner equivalent or manager who
provides more than 10 hours of nonattest services
to the attest client within any fiscal year.
45Who - Category A
Independence
- Covered Member - (Whose Impairment of
Independence Passes to the CPA Firm) - Individual on the attest engagement team
- Individual in a position to influence the attest
engagement - A partner, partner equivalent or manager who
provides more than 10 hours of non-attest
services to the attest client within any fiscal
year. - A partner or partner equivalent in the office in
which the lead attest engagement partner or
partner equivalent primarily practices in
connection with the attest engagement.
46Who - Category A
Independence
- Covered Member - (Whose Impairment of
Independence Passes to the CPA Firm) - Individual on the attest engagement team
- Individual in a position to influence the attest
engagement - A partner, partner equivalent or manager who
provides more than 10 hours of non-attest
services to the attest client within any fiscal
year. - A partner or partner equivalent in the office in
which the lead attest engagement partner pr
partner equivalent primarily practices in
connection with the attest engagement. - The firm, including the firm's employee benefit
plans.
47Who - Category A
Independence
- Covered Member - (Whose Impairment of
Independence Passes to the CPA Firm) - Individual on the attest engagement team
- Individual in a position to influence the attest
engagement - A partner, partner equivalent or manager who
provides 10 or more non-attest services to the
attest client within any fiscal year. - A partner or partner equivalent in the office in
which the lead attest engagement partner or
partner equivalent primarily practices in
connection with the attest engagement. - The firm, including the firm's employee benefit
plans. - An entity whose operating, financial, or
accounting policies can be controlled by any of
the individuals or entities described in a
through e above or by two or more such
individuals or entities if they act together.
48Who - Category B
Independence
- All Partners
- All Professional Employees of the CPA firm
- His or her Immediate Family
- Any group of such persons acting together owned
more than 5 percent of an attest client's
outstanding equity securities or other ownership
interests. - It doesnt matter if they have nothing to do with
the attest engagement.
49Who - Category C
Independence
- Any CPA Partner
- Any CPA Firm Professional Employee
50Conveying Relationships for Relatives to the
Auditor
Independence
- In some cases, relationships between an auditors
relatives and an attest client convey to the
auditor as if the auditor was in the
relationship. - FAIR?
51Effects of Relative Business and Financial
Interests on Auditor Independence
Independence
- Immediate Family (spouse, spousal equivalent or
dependent) - Any of the forbidden relationships flows to the
CPA, - Except
- Can be a client employee if NOT in a Key
Position, as long as participation in the
clients employee benefit plans (including
share-based compensation and nonqualified
deferred compensation plans) does not violate a
number of specific restrictions.
52Effects of Relative Business and Financial
Interests on Auditor Independence
Independence
- Close Relatives
- (Parents, Siblings, Nondependent Children)
- Relationship or impairment only flows to the CPA
when - 1. On attest engagement team and a close relative
has either - A key position with the attest client during the
period covered by the financial statements or
during the period of the professional engagement. - A financial interest in the attest client during
the professional engagement period that - the individual knows or has reason to believe was
material to the close relative or - enabled the close relative to exercise
significant influence over the attest client.
53Effects of Relative Business and Financial
Interests on Auditor Independence
Independence
- Close Relatives
- (Parents, Siblings, Nondependent Children)
- 2. Position to influence the attest engagement
or any partner or partner equivalent in the
office in which the lead attest engagement
partner or partner equivalent primarily practices
for the attest engagement a close relative has
either - A key position with the attest client during the
period covered by the F.S. or during the
engagement period. - A financial interest in the attest client during
the engagement period that - the individual, partner, or partner equivalent
knows or has reason to believe was material to
the close relative and - enabled the close relative to exercise
significant influence over the attest client.
54Effects of Relative Business Financial
Interests on Auditor Independence
Independence
- Non-Close Relatives
- Normally the relationships of non-close relatives
do NOT impair a CPAs independence. - Unless a reasonable and knowledgeable person
would conclude otherwise. So, the CPA would
probably have to have a very close relationship
with such a relative to effectively move their
status to close relative or immediate family.
55Other Independence Problems
- Past employment with attest client
- Future employment with attest client
- Pending/actual litigation with client
- Rendering certain non-attest services
- Non-independence of network firm
- Past due fees from client - over 1 year
- Significant gifts or entertainment
56Non-independence of Network Firm
Other Independence Problems
- On financial statement audits of international
companies, the large CPA firms frequently use
related CPA firms in other countries to perform
part of the audit. - Therefore, these firms, which are generally
separate legal entities in the foreign country,
become covered members and could impair the
independence of the group auditor issuing the
audit report on the consolidated financial
statements.
57Past Due Fees from Client
Other Independence Problems
- If an attest client has not paid any professional
service fees and more than 1 Year has passed, the
CPA firm is not independent of that client until
the fees have actually been paid. - A promissory note does not constitute payment
according to ethical rulings in the Code. The
reason for this is that the CPA may become bias
in drawing their conclusions and no longer be
objective. - (Exception client in bankruptcy.)
58Significant Gifts or Entertainment
Other Independence Problems
- Impairment occurs during engagement period when
- A members firm, a member of the attest
engagement team or an individual in a position to
influence the attest engagement accepts a gift
from an attest client and the value is not
clearly insignificant to the recipient. - A covered member accepts entertainment from an
attest client that is not reasonable in the
circumstances. - A covered member offers a gift or entertainment
to an attest client that is not reasonable in the
circumstances. - Attest client includes individuals in key
positions with attest client and individuals
owning 10 or more of the attest clients
outstanding equity securities or other ownership
interests.
59Past Employment with Attest Client
Other Independence Problems
- Impairment occurs when a covered member, who
participates on the clients attest engagement or
is in a position to influence the attest
engagement covering any period that includes the
covered members former employment or association
with the attest client s, and - Was formerly employed by an attest client or an
associated entity as an officer, a director, a
promoter, an underwriter, a voting trustee, or a
trustee for the entitys pension or profit
sharing trust. - Failed to disassociate (financial interest,
benefit plans) from the attest client before
becoming a covered member - There could also be self-review risks if the
member was in a key position for which safeguards
must be used.
60Considering Future Employment with Attest Client
Other Independence Problems
- Seeking or discussing potential employment or
association with an attest client or receipt of a
specific offer - Only an impairment if it involves a covered
member on an attest engagement team or in a
position to influence the attest engagement at
the specific attest client. - The individual or another covered member must
report such consideration or offer to appropriate
person in the CPA firm. - The individual immediately ceases participation
in the attest engagement and does not provide any
services to the attest client until the
employment offer is rejected or employment is no
longer sought. (safeguard) - The firm considers altering attest procedures.
(safeguard)
61Future Employment with Attest Client
Other Independence Problems
- Safeguards required if a partner or professional
employee is hired into a Key Position at an
attest client. Safeguards - Amounts due to the former employee for previous
interest in the firm and unfunded vested
retirement benefits cannot be material to the CPA
firm. - Former employee is not in a position to influence
the CPA firms operations or financial policies. - The former employee does not participate or
appear to participate in the firms business and
is not otherwise associated with the firm. - Consider changing attest team composition and or
attest procedures.
62Litigation with Attest Client
- Independence impaired when
- Litigation starts and client is alleging
deficiencies in audit work. - Litigation starts and CPA is alleging
fraud/deceit by client mgmt. - Client expressed intention to start litigation
alleging deficiencies in audit work and CPA
concludes its probable suit will be filed. - Independence NOT impaired when
- Litigation is unrelated an attest engagement and
is for an amount not material to the CPA firm or
attest client.
63Rendering Certain Non-Attest Services
Other Independence Problems
- Rendering Certain Non-Attest Services Overall
Criteria - Cannot be management responsibility/decision-makin
g - Responsibilities spelled-out in engagement letter
- Specific activities impair independence
- General advisory services OK
64Specific Non-Attest Services/Activities That
Impair Independence
Other Independence Problems
- setting policy or strategic direction for the
attest client. - directing or accepting responsibility for actions
of the attest clients employees except to the
extent permitted when using internal auditors to
provide assistance for services performed under
auditing or attestation standards. - authorizing, executing, or consummating
transactions or otherwise exercising authority on
behalf of an attest client or having the
authority to do so. - preparing source documents that evidence the
occurrence of a transaction. - having custody of an attest clients assets.
- deciding which recommendations of the member or
3rd parties to implement or prioritize. - reporting to those charged with governance on
behalf of management. - serving as attest clients stock transfer, escrow
agent, registrar, general counsel or equiv. - accepting responsibility for the management of an
attest clients project. - accepting responsibility for the preparation and
fair presentation of the attest clients
financial statements in accordance with the
applicable financial reporting framework. - accepting responsibility for designing,
implementing, or maintaining internal control. - performing ongoing evaluations of attest clients
internal control as part of its monitoring
activities.
65Non-Attest Services/Activities Which Impair
Independence
Other Independence Problems
- determines or changes journal entries, any
account coding or classification of transactions,
or any other accounting records without first
obtaining the attest clients approval. - authorizes or approves transactions.
- prepares source documents.
- makes changes to source documents without the
attest clients approval. - accepts responsibility to authorize payment of
attest client funds, electronically or otherwise,
except for most electronic payroll tax payments - accepts responsibility to sign or cosign an
attest clients checks, even if only in emergency
situations. - maintains an attest clients bank account or
otherwise has custody of an attest clients funds
or makes credit or banking decisions for the
attest client. - approves vendor invoices for payment.
66Non-Attest Services/Activities Which Impair
Independence
Other Independence Problems
- Certain Information Systems Design,
Implementation, or Integration - designs or develops an attest clients financial
information system. - makes other than insignificant modifications to
source code underlying an attest clients
existing financial information system. - supervises attest client personnel in the daily
operation of an attest clients information
system. - operates an attest clients network.
- Outsourcing of an Internal Audit function and
performing certain internal control monitoring
evaluations. - Certain Business Risk and Corporate Finance
Consulting - Certain litigation services
67Other Independence Rules
- Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
- Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)
- Government Accountability Office (GAO)
- U.S. Department of Labor (DOL)
- Internal Revenue Service
- U.S. Department of the Treasury
- Banking and Insurance Regulatory Agencies
- State Boards of Accountancy
- State CPA Societies
68SEC Independence Rules
- Specific Rules
- Prohibits Certain Non-Audit Services
- Requires Prior Approval of Non-Audit Services by
Clients Audit Committee - Requires Lead Concurring Partner Rotation
- Prohibits Any Partner Compensation Based on
Obtaining Non-Audit or Non-Attest Work - Requires 1-Year Gap Before Someone Who Worked on
the Audit Can Accept Job With Client for Certain
Positions (Cooling Off Period).
69SEC Independence RulesProhibited Non-Audit
Services
- 1. Bookkeeping Services Related to Acctg
Records - 2. Financial Info System Design/Implementation
(IT) - 3. Appraisal/Valuation Services
- 4. Actuarial Services
- 5. Internal Audit Outsourcing
- 6. Management Functions (Even Temporary), HR
- 7. Broker-Dealer, Investment Adviser or Banking
- 8. Legal Services Certain Tax Services
- 9. Expert Services Unrelated to Audit
70PCAOB Independence Rules
- Rule 3600 AICPA Rule 101 as of 2003
interpretations. - Rule 3502 Person associated with an audit firm
not to knowingly or recklessly contribute to rule
or law violations. - Rule 3520 Firm must be independent for F.S.
period and engagement period. - Rule 3521 No contingent fees for audit client.
- Rule 3522 No marketing, planning or opining on
confidential or aggressive tax position
transactions.
71PCAOB Independence Rules (cont)
- Rule 3523 No personal tax services for those in
financial reporting oversight role or immediate
family. - Rule 3525 Audit Comm. pre-approval for
non-prohibited non-audit services on internal
control over financial reporting. - Rule 3526 Initially and annually confirm
independence in writing and describe any
relationships that might bear on independence.
72General Standards Rule
- A member shall comply with the following
standards and with any interpretations thereof by
bodies designated by Council. - A. Professional Competence . . .
- B. Due Professional Care . . .
- C. Planning and Supervision . . .
- D. Sufficient Relevant Data . . .
73Compliance with Standards Rule
- A member who performs auditing, review,
compilation, management consulting, tax, or other
professional services shall comply with standards
promulgated by bodies designated by Council.
74Accounting Principles Rule
- A member shall not (1) express an opinion
or state affirmatively that the financial
statements or other financial data of any entity
are presented in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles or (2) state that
he or she is not aware of any material
modifications that should be made to such
statements or data in order for them to be in
conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles, if such statements or data contain
any departure from an accounting principle . . .
75Promulgating Bodies for Code Rules
Body Standards/Principles Rules
FASAB Federal Financial Accounting Stds. Accounting Principles
FASB St. of Financial Accounting Stds. Compliance w/ Standards Accounting Principles
GASB St. of Governmental Accounting Stds. Compliance w/ Standards Accounting Principles
PCAOB Audit Attestation Standards General Standards Compliance w/ Standards
AICPA Various Engagement Performance Standards General Standards Compliance w/ Standards
IASB International Financial Accounting Reporting Principles Compliance w/ Standards Accounting Principles
76Confidential Client Information Rule
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- A member in public practice shall not disclose
any confidential client information without the
specific consent of the client.
77Confidential Client Information Rule
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- Need client consent to disclose in most cases.
- Permitted disclosure of confidential client
information without consent - Response to validly issued subpoena or summons
- Adherence to applicable laws regulations (e.g.,
SAA, PCAOB) - Compliance with peer review/investigation of CPA
practice - Defense in an investigation of the CPA
- Reviews conducted in connections with CPA firm
sale or merger . Confidentiality agreement
required. (Interpretation 301-3). - Internal whistle blowing permitted.
- External whistle blowing may violate rule.
78Contingent Fees Rule
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- Cannot accept if related to a client for which
CPA also performs any of the following
engagements - Audit or review of historical F.S.
- Compilation of F.S. and a 3rd party might use the
CPAs report and the report does not disclose
this lack of independence - An examination (attest) of prospective F.S.
- Cannot accept for tax preparation.
79Acts Discreditable Rule
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- A member shall not commit an act discreditable to
the profession.
80Advertising and Other Forms of Solicitation Rule
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- A member in public practice shall not seek to
obtain clients by advertising or other forms of
solicitation in a manner that is false,
misleading, or deceptive. - Solicitation by the use of coercion,
over-reaching, or harassing conduct is prohibited.
81Commissions and Referral Fees Rule
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- Prohibited commissions
- A member in public practice shall not for a
commission recommend or refer to a client any
product or service, or for a commission recommend
or refer any product or service to be supplied by
a client, or receive a commission, when the
member or the member's firm also performs for
that client - (a) an audit or review of a financial statement
or - (b) a compilation of a financial statement when
the member expects, or reasonably might expect,
that a third party will use the financial
statement and the member's compilation report
does not disclose a lack of independence or - (c) an examination of prospective financial
information.
82Commissions and Referral Fees Rule
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- Disclosure of permitted commissions
- A member in public practice who is not prohibited
by this rule from performing services for or
receiving a commission and who is paid or expects
to be paid a commission shall disclose that fact
to any person or entity to whom the member
recommends or refers a product or service to
which the commission relates.
83Commissions and Referral Fees Rule
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- Referral fees
- Any member who accepts a referral fee for
recommending or referring any service of a CPA to
any person or entity or who pays a referral fee
to obtain a client shall disclose such acceptance
or payment to the client.
84Form of Organization and Name Rule
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- A member may practice public accounting only in a
form of organization permitted by law or
regulation whose characteristics conform to
resolutions of Council. - A member shall not practice public accounting
under a firm name that is misleading. Names of
one or more past owners may be included in the
firm name of a successor organization. - A firm may not designate itself as "Members of
the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants" unless all of its CPA owners are
members of the Institute.
85Part 2 for Members in Business
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- Similar Rules, Conceptual Framework and Ethical
Conflicts exist that we covered for members in
public practice, so we will focus on the
differences.
86Part 2 for Members in Business
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- Common Threats to Compliance
- Adverse Interest (members interests are opposed
to the interests of the employing organization
such as legal proceedings or relative interest
with a competitor) - Advocacy (member will promote an employing
organizations interests or position to the point
that his or her objectivity is compromised) - Familiarity (long or close relationship with a
person or an employing organization, a member
will become too sympathetic to their interests or
too accepting of the persons work or employing
organizations product or service)
87Part 2 for Members in Business
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- Common Threats to Compliance
- Self-Interest (member could benefit, financially
or otherwise, from an interest in, or
relationship with, the employing organization or
associated persons) - Self-Review (member will not appropriately
evaluate the results of a previous judgment made
or service performed or supervised by the member) - Undue Influence (a member will subordinate his or
her judgment to that of an individual associated
with the employing organization or a 3rd party)
88Part 2 for Members in Business
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- Integrity and Objectivity Rule Rule identical to
Part 1. - Fewer Interpretations
- Offering or Accepting Gifts or Entertainment
Virtually identical to Part 1, but substitutes
customer vendor for client. - Knowing Misrepresentations in the Preparation of
Financial Statements or Records and Subordination
of Judgment Virtually identical to Part 1 - External Auditors must be candid and not
knowingly misrepresent facts or knowingly fail to
disclose material facts.
89Part 2 for Members in Business
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- Rules Interpretations virtually identical to
Part 1 - General Standards Rule
- Compliance with Standards Rule
- Accounting Principles Rule
- Acts Discreditable Rule
- No other Rules.
90Part 3 for Other Members
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- Primarily for members who are retired, unemployed
and not in public practice. - Only has one Rule Acts Discreditable, which is
virtually identical to that in Parts 1 2.
91Additional Ethics for Tax Services
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- Tax Advocacy
- CPA must still be objective Must have a
reasonable basis (tax code/court decisions) for a
tax position. - Position should have a realistic possibility of
being upheld by the taxing authority or a tax
court. - Source AICPAs Statements on Standards for Tax
Services (SSTS)
92Additional Ethics for Tax Services
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- Tax Shelters (Investments)
- Marketing of tax shelters must have a valid
purpose, such as helping clients legally pay
minimum taxes. - Court Case
- Tax shelter business was very profitable for KPMG
between 1996 2002. - KPMG held criminally liable for attempting to
deceive IRS with false docs. - KPMG paid 456 mil Tax Partner Manager to jail.
93Prior Year Tax Return Errors
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- CPAs Must
- Advise taxpayer of potential consequences of
errors or omissions. - Recommend to client measures to correct the error
or omission. - Not inform taxing authority without the
taxpayers permission, unless required by law. - Consider withdrawing from engagement if
- Client has not taken appropriate action to
correct an error or omission. - Current subsequent years tax returns cannot be
prepared without perpetuating the error. - Source Statements on Standards for Tax Services
(SSTS) No. 6
94AICPA Quality Control Standards on Ethics
Rules of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
- A CPA firm should establish policies procedures
to provide reasonable assurance that the firm and
its personnel comply with relevant ethical
requirements with special emphasis on
independence, including requiring - Annual written confirmation of compliance with
its policies and procedures on independence from
all firm personnel required to be independent. - Maintenance updating info relating to
independence. - Rotation of staff after a specified period, when
required.