Title: JIG
1JIG Learning From Incidents Toolbox Meeting
Pack Pack 10 November 2013
This document is made available for information
only and on the condition that (i) it may not be
relied upon by anyone, in the conduct of their
own operations or otherwise (ii) neither JIG nor
any other person or company concerned with
furnishing information or data used herein (A) is
liable for its accuracy or completeness, or for
any advice given in or any omission from this
document, or for any consequences whatsoever
resulting directly or indirectly from any use
made of this document by any person, even if
there was a failure to exercise reasonable care
on the part of the issuing company or any other
person or company as aforesaid or (B) make any
claim, representation or warranty, express or
implied, that acting in accordance with this
document will produce any particular results with
regard to the subject matter contained herein or
satisfy the requirements of any applicable
federal, state or local laws and regulations and
(iii) nothing in this document constitutes
technical advice, if such advice is required it
should be sought from a qualified professional
adviser.
2Learning From Incidents
- How to use the JIG Learning From Incidents
Toolbox Meeting Pack - The intention is that these slides promote a
healthy, informal dialogue on safety between
operators and management. - Slides should be shared with all operators
(fuelling operators, depot operators and
maintenance technicians) during regular, informal
safety meetings. - No need to review every incident in one Toolbox
meeting, select 1 or 2 incidents per meeting. - The supervisor or manager should host the meeting
to aid the discussion, but should not dominate
the discussion. - All published packs can be found in the
publications section of the JIG website
(www.jigonline.com)
3Learning From Incidents
- For every incident in this pack, ask yourselves
the following questions - What is the potential for a similar type of
incident at our site? - How do our risk assessments identify and
adequately reflect these incidents? - What prevention measures are in place and how
effective are they (procedures and practices)? - what mitigation measures are in place and how
effective are they (safety equipment, emergency
procedures)? - What can I do personally to prevent this type of
incident?
4MisfuellingLFI 2013-05
- Incident Summary A misfuelling took place when
26 litres of Avgas was delivered to a Robin
DR.400-135TDI Ecoflyer. On landing the pilot
asked the ground controller to pass a message to
the fuelling operator for Jet A-1. However ,the
ground controller did not hear the message
clearly and called the fuelling operator stating
that the pilot required Avgas. When approaching
the aircraft the operator was distracted due to
the fuelling orifice being located on the
fuselage in a position that was awkward to reach.
The aircraft had a small decal located just above
the fuelling orifice stating Jet A -1 and Diesel.
The operator did not check the grade and started
to fuel the aircraft with Avgas. The Operator
detected his error after 26 litres had been
fuelled into the aircraft. The fuelling staff
flushed the wing tanks in accordance with
instructions in the aircraft manual, and the
pilot departed.
- Causes
- The Ground Controller relayed the fuel order from
the pilot stating the incorrect grade
requesting Avgas rather than Jet A-1. - The fuelling operator did not carry out fuel
grade verification processes before starting the
fuelling, including verification that the grade
marked on the aircraft and the grade marked on
the over wing nozzle were the same. - Fuelling personnel should never make an
assumption about the grade of fuel required and
shall always confirm the grade of fuel. - The design of decal was not in compliance with EI
1597
- Discussion Points
- Ensure procedures are clear and followed (does
site have written verification processes for
grade identification? - Minimise the numbers of links in the fuel order
taking process. - Where possible, does the pilot place the fuel
order directly with the fuelling staff? - Review JIG 1, Ref 6.5.5 Overwing Fuelling for
clarification of requirements
Can you think of any similar situations that YOU
have experienced or witnessed? Did you report
it?
5Manual Handling Injury ShoulderLFI 2013-06
- Incident Summary A fuelling operator was
assigned a Bombardier Dash 8 to refuel. He
completed refuelling and began the disconnection
process. Whilst disconnecting he stretched his
arms above the shoulders and in the process of
removing the coupling felt a very sharp pain and
discomfort in his right shoulder. The injury
caused the operator to be placed on light duties.
- Causes
- In this incident the operator did not follow site
procedures and use steps to carry out the
fuelling.
- Discussion Points
- Apart from the obvious injury caused, if you look
at the picture opposite what other issues do you
think may arise by carrying out the task as
shown? - Think about his positioning, with regards to both
personal safety and operational requirements. - What does JIG IP 6.5.4 ask you to do?
- What arrangements do you have in place to ensure
the rehabilitation and return to work of
personnel following a work-related injury,
illness or other adverse health effects (JIG
HSSEMS 6.9)
Can you think of any similar situations that YOU
have experienced or witnessed? Did you report
it?
6Not watching Step Causes InjuryLFI 2013-07
- Incident Summary
- Early in the morning, before the opening of the
depot, a contracted night guard fell while
descending a set of steps. He lost his footing
on the second step from the top of a flight of
steps and, even though he was holding the
handrail, he fell down the rest of the stairway
to the ground (several more steps). He suffered
a back injury and was unable to get up. He only
received aid 2 hours later when the depot manager
arrived at work.
- Causes
- Lack of attention probably due to tiredness
towards the end of his shift. - Not fully following the three points of contact
rule when using stairways. - Undertaking activities outside of his role.
- Discussion Points
- Are there any lone worker activities in your
location? - How are you managing lone working? What things
need to be considered? - How are the activities of contractors managed to
ensure their health and safety? Are inductions
given appropriate to the nature of their work and
the hazards to which they may be exposed? (see
JIG HSSEMS 9.5) -
Can you think of any similar situations that YOU
have experienced or witnessed? Did you report
it?
7First Aid Case Trip on Fuelling Hose(LFI
2013-09)
- Incident Summary After fuelling an aircraft
near the end of his shift an operator tripped
over the fuelling hose. The operator fell on his
left elbow, shoulder and thigh. He was taken to
the hospital for X-rays with the results showing
no broken bones.. No medication was prescribed
and there was no lost work time.
- Causes
- The investigation and viewing of CCTV revealed
that the operator tripped over the hose when he
momentarily looked up at the nose of the aircraft.
- Discussion Points
- What do you do to remind staff to have constant
slip/trip awareness in mind? A number of trip
incidents arise where the hazard is of a
temporary nature (e.g. a hose lying across the
ramp, equipment / tools used when maintenance
activities are being done) rather than permanent
obstacles in the workplace. - Do Management and Supervisors undertake site
observations and interviews with employees or
other information gathering techniques to
identify unsafe behaviours and working
conditions? (see JIG HSSEMS 1.9) Are your staff
practicing Situational Awareness? - Staff should remember that walking is still
working and should think through their entire
work activity carefully and be constantly aware
of the dynamic nature of their environment.
Avoid being on auto pilot when performing
routine tasks. Look up, down and around for
hazards. - Did you know ?
- Slips trips and falls are the most common cause
of major injury at work - 95 of major slips result in broken bones
Can you think of any similar situations that YOU
have experienced or witnessed? Did you report it?