AP Microeconomics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

AP Microeconomics

Description:

Warm Up: On a sheet I am collecting for a grade 5 minutes after bell rings!! Illustrate a side-by-side perfectly competitive labor market. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:136
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: TechDep4
Learn more at: https://www.ktufsd.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: AP Microeconomics


1
AP Microeconomics
  • Warm Up On a ½ sheet I am collecting for a
    grade 5 minutes after bell rings!!
  • Illustrate a side-by-side perfectly competitive
    labor market.
  • Identify both the market and firms price and
    quantity for labor.
  • On the same graph illustrate and then explain the
    effect a plague would have on this market and the
    number of workers the firm would employ.

2
  • The Key Efficiency Condition Price Equals
    Marginal Cost
  • If PX gt MCX, society gains value by producing
    more X.
  • If PX lt MCX, society gains value by producing
    less X.

MCX Market-determined value of resources needed to produce a marginal unit of X. This is equal to the opportunity cost of those resources lost production of other goods or the value of the resources left unemployed (leisure time).
The value placed on good X by society through the market, or the social value of a marginal unit of X. PX

3
Efficiency in Perfect Competition
Follows from a weighing of values by both
households and firm
Goal Maximize Profits!!
Goal Maximize Utility!!
MRPL
MRCL
Labor
Leisure
FIRMS
HOUSEHOLDS
4
The Market in Perfect Competition
  • We have been learning about individual markets in
    perfect competition. This is the ideal situation
    where we can apply certain economic rules
  • 1. _____________________ and _____________________
    in the industry (market) determine price for
    each individual firm.
  • 2. Therefore the firms are Price -
    ___________________

Supply
Demand
Takers
5
The Market in Perfect Competition
  • 3. All firms will maximize profits in both the
    short and long run when
  • Output Market Input Market
  • 4. Markets want to be at ___________________ and
    will work hard (sometimes even against
    _________________________ forces) to be there.

Marginal RESOURCE Cost
MRC MRP PL MRPL
MC MR PX MR
Equilibrium
Government
6
Analysis in Perfect Competition
  • When economists study the market and how the
    forces of supply and demand shift the equilibrium
    price and quantity of one market they are doing
    _______________________________________.
  • However, that would be just looking at the little
    picture. Economists need to study further how
    markets affect one another more specifically,
    they need to study all markets and how they
    achieve equilibrium together. This is the
    ___________________________, when all markets
    will find equilibrium.

Partial Equilibrium Analysis
General Equilibrium
7
One Market
  • The U.S. government deports all illegal
    immigrants. How will this affect the citrus
    industry? What changes will occur in price and
    quantity?

8
This one market change will affect other
markets!! It will hurt some industries and help
others. List three of each be able to explain
your answers
  • Industries Hurt
  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • Industries Helped
  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.

9
General Equilibrium
  • However, the General Equilibrium is constantly
    changing because markets that are neither
    substitutes nor complements to one another can
    still have an effect on each other!! For
    example, I will buy fruit juices still even if
    prices are increased because of the above stated
    government policy. However if my income doesnt
    change, I must then sacrifice spending elsewhere
    because I have less money to spend (so no new
    shoes)!! So a strike in the citrus industry
    leads to me buying less shoes!!! ?

10
This final observation leads to the
  • Pareto Efficiency (Pareto Optimality)
  • A condition in which no change is possible that
    will make some members of society better off
    without making some other members of society
    worse off.

11
Pareto Efficiency
  • If an economic system is Pareto efficient, then
    it is the case that no individual can be made
    better off without another being made worse off.
    It is commonly accepted that outcomes that are
    not Pareto efficient are to be avoided, and
    therefore Pareto efficiency is an important
    criterion for evaluating economic systems and
    political policies.

12
Pareto Efficiency
  • If economic allocation in any system is not
    Pareto efficient, there is potential for a Pareto
    improvement, an increase in its efficiency
    through reallocation, improvements to at least
    one participants well-being can be made without
    reducing any other participants well-being. A
    change is said to be efficient if it makes some
    members of society better off without making
    other members of society worse off. An
    efficient, or Pareto optimal, system is one in
    which no such changes are possible. However we
    must weigh the gains and the losses a decision
    is then efficient if the gains are greater than
    the losses.

13
Real World Application
  • 1 Why does the government collect taxes?
  • So therefore, when taxes are cut, we can assume
    that
  • Non-essential services are always the first to
    be cut. So citizens of a local area are pleased
    to see that taxes were cut for this fiscal year.
    However, in return for this tax cut, clerical
    positions at the DMV were also cut. Therefore,
    citizens have to wait in much longer lines in
    order to do business.

14
Real World Application
  • The average wait time was ninety minutes
  • It was calculated that to reinstate the clerks
    each tax payer would need to increase their
    yearly taxes by 2.00.
  • Who would gain by this decision?
  • Who would lose by this decision?
  • Does the gain outweigh the loss making it a
    Pareto-efficient change? Explain.

15
2 USA vs. Microsoft
  • In the year 2000 a federal judge ordered that
    Microsoft be split into two separate companies
    because it had violated the antitrust laws of the
    United States. Some argue that the antitrust
    laws are justified on the grounds of the
    efficiency of competition. That is, breaking up
    a monopoly should result in a Pareto-efficiency
    change. This cannot be so because breaking up
    Microsoft clearly makes its shareholders worse
    off. Do you agree or disagree? Explain
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com