Title: Presentation Title Here
1 Short breaks other services for disabled
children and their families Targeted
services Provider-commissioner event 25th June
2014
The right help, in the right place, at the right
time
2What are short breaks?
- Short breaks are activities and family support
services - for disabled children and young people who are
unable to access mainstream activities and clubs - To give disabled children an enjoyable break from
their families - To give parents and carers a break from their
caring role - The short breaks covered by the plan are funded
by Bristol City Council and NHS Bristol Clinical
Commissioning Group.
3Who has short breaks
- Children and young people aged 0-18 years
- With a life-limiting or long-term health
condition or disability - With multiple needs because of emotional or
physical difficulties and /or affected by issues
in their family - Specialist services are for those with more
severe and complex needs (about 300 children) - About 780 activities / holidays / sessions of
targeted - About two-thirds are boys
4Why need to change
- Not about saving money but making money go
further - Child population is increasing
- Numbers of disabled children are increasing
- Currently spend more than half of the total short
breaks budget of 3.3M on residential short
breaks for 85 children (costing about 450 per
night) - Compare costs of overnight short breaks
- Vision
- Help greater numbers of children and families
- Give children, young people and their
parents/carers more choice - Make sure services are targeted at those who most
need them - Services help people to step up and down through
services as needs change - Short breaks are enjoyable for children and young
people - Parents get a real break and better quality of
life - Invest in the most cost effective services
5Consultation
- We are consulting on a draft commissioning plan
- Until 30th June
- Workshops and focus groups with parents/carers,
practitioners and providers - Questionnaire
- In July we will consider all consultation
feedback and revise the plan - Final plan to be adopted by the Mayor in
September
6What were changing
Community care palliative care
Foster-based short breaks
Short breaks for more children
families Increase availability of a range of
options More flexibility choice
Residential short breaks
Residential holidays
Direct payments
7What were changing
Targeted servicesNot known 527
Community care palliative care59 72
Foster-basedshort-breaks56 82
Summary of proposals Providing specialist short
break services for 469 57 more children young
people
Residential overnight Short breaks85 63
Residential holidays44 64
Direct payments 168 188
8Outcomes for children and young people
- We will fund services to achieve these outcomes
- For disabled children and young people
- Have safe and stable lives
- Improved physical health through physical
activities - Improved emotional health and well-being
- Enjoy their short breaks
- Less dependent on their parent or carer
- Learn and develop skills and abilities
- Young people develop skills that help toward
- independence in adulthood
9Outcomes for parents / carers strategic outcomes
- And for parents / carers and families
- Improved quality of life for parents/carers/siblin
gs - Improved emotional well-being
- Have more time to do other things (e.g. leisure,
work, study, spend time with other children) - Family is able to lead a more ordinary life
- Family environment is less chaotic and more
sustainable - And strategic outcomes
- Fewer CYP become looked after because
- of their disability
- Reduced need for unplanned placements
- in residential units
- Families have increased choice control
- over the short breaks they get
10Consultation feedback so far
11- General
- Providing transport is necessary for some
families otherwise their child is unable to
attend, or they will not get a meaningful break - Parent/carers would like more stay and play
opportunities - Need more places for befrienders and PAs to take
children - Parent/carers would like more chances to network
with each other do would personal assistants - Need contracts that maximise collaboration
between providers (including role in upskilling
and coordinating the workforce) - Importance of trust to parents/carers
- Lack of information about what is available
- Personal budgets coming . . .
- Specialist BME service
- South Asian and Somali families said would
welcome a service open to all communities with
focus on their cultural needs and workers who
speak their language. - Some practitioners concerned KHAAS may lose the
reach it has achieved
12- Special schools holiday playschemes
- Often the only targeted service accessed by CYP
with more complex needs - Parent/carers say it works for their child
because of familiar surroundings and staff (
feels safe for the parent) - Highly valued, but not enough available and is
being reduced - Parent/carers would like it to be available not
just at beginning of holidays - Not available to CYP who do not attend the four
schools - Some schools face challenges staffing the schemes
- VCS are saying they could offer services from the
schools premises - Mixing children
- Some parents say they are happy for older
children and younger to mix - Other parents say mixed activities are not
suitable for their teenage children - Some parents whose children have significant
physical needs and/or complex health needs are
concerned about mixing with children with more
challenging behaviour - Very little accessible provision for above CYP
13Proposed evaluation criteria for bids
- How well proposed services will meet outcomes
- Number of children and young people who will
benefit - Breadth and range of activities and their
suitability for different ages and impairment
groups - Providers ability to work in partnership with
the council, health providers, schools and other
local providers - Providers ability and track record of meeting
the needs of children who are hardest to reach - Plans to bring added value, e.g. use of
volunteers, making premises available to other
groups, helping to develop pool of workers in the
city - How well the services will respond to changes in
demand and provide choice to children and
families (and enable increased personalisation)
14Residential holidays
15Residential HolidaysProposal
46
Total proposed children 64
Total current children 44
Total value after 75,000
Residential Holiday Contract
Action for Children
16Residential holidaysIndicative procurement
timetableWhich is best?
Task Time Time (2)
Provider day 2nd week September 2014 Sep-14
Advertise opportunity 1st October 2014 1st October 2014
Provider response time (40 days/30 days) End December 2014 31st October 2014
Evaluation January February 2015 Nov-14
Contract award Mar-15 Dec-14
New service starts Jul-15 Mar-15
17Targeted services
- Afterschool, holiday weekend activities
- Befrienders
18Targeted services currentPlay, leisure and
sport activities and befriending
Total value 235,000 6 contracts 3 council
services
WECIL Consortium
Special Schools Consortium
Playbus
New Fosse-way
National Autistic Society
Briar-wood
KHASS
Kings-weston
WECIL
Clare-mont
Bristol Autism Project
Befrienders Time 2 Share
Families in Touch Time 2 Share
Bridging workers inclusive play
KHASS
19Targeted services proposalPlay, leisure and
sport activities and befriending
- Re-commission all services with increased funding
Total children min 400
- Plus keep council-run bridging and inclusive play
service
20Targeted services original proposalPlay, leisure
and sport activities and befriending
Competitive tender for two city-wide contracts
preferably consortia
21Alternative proposal preferred option
- 2 lots ideally 2 consortia
A - holiday play schemes in special schools
Joint working befrienders BME targeted
B Weekend, after-school and holiday activities
22Alternative proposal not preferred
- One city-wide lot ideally one consortium
holiday schemes in schools other holiday
activities Weekend after-school activities BME
targeted service befrienders family fun days
23Targeted servicesIndicative procurement
timetableWill this work?
Task Time
Provider day 2nd week September 2014
Advertise opportunity Mid November 2014
Provider response time (80 days) Early March 2015
Evaluation March April 2015
Contract award May 2015
New services starts September 2015
24Introduction to Collaborative
ArrangementsKirsty BarrettProcurement
SpecialistStrategic Commissioning Procurement
Service
25Targeted Services Collaborative Bids
- Consortium Members MUST take their own legal
advice - http//www.supporthub.org.uk/resources/collaborati
on-agreement-template - Council has sight of draft agreement at PQQ (in
this case, Open Tender) stage - Sight of final agreement at award
- Consortiums formed at start of process
26Models of Collaborative Arrangements
- Lead partner consortium
- Joint and several liability consortium
- Sub-contracting
27Lead Partner Consortium
- Consortium of providers working together to bid
for/deliver services - One provider (Lead) contracts with the Council
- Lead Provider SOLELY liable for delivery of
contract - A fail for one member at minimum standards (e.g.
Insurance Levels) may constitute a fail for the
entire organisation. See Invitation for full
details. - Technical capability
- Financial capacity
28Joint and Several Liability Consortium
- Contractual relationship with ALL members of
consortium - May appoint Lead Organisation
- ALL members of consortium equally responsible
- Cumulative strength assessed
- All members joint and severally liable
29Sub-contracting
- Council contracts with one provider (Prime
Contractor) - Provider enters into sub-contracting arrangements
- Subcontractor performance responsibility of Prime
Contractor - At tender stage (minimum requirements), details
of proposed sub contractors given - Minor/specialist elements only Prime Contractor
responsible for core. - Payments Intervention
30Multiple Bids
- Bid as member of more than one consortium
- Comply with http//www.oft.gov.uk/OFTwork/competit
ion-act-and-cartels/competition-lawcompliance/ - Legal advice
- Certificate regarding involvement in other bids
31Consortiums Collaboration
- Check the Invitation to Tender Terms
- Ask collaboration questions early on
- If in doubt - Legal advice
- Any Questions?
32Table top discussion A
How should the lots for targeted services be
split?
- Which outcomes should be monitored to measure
service quality?
33Table top discussion B
How can providers be encouraged and enabled to
collaborate and what are the benefits?
34Table top discussion C
How can we make sure the right children get
services? Should we define categories of need
and/or age groups?
What should be the key features of the services
and how should they be reflected in the specs?
35Target group current services
- Varies across all contracts
- Some refer to Group A and Group B
- Group A - children and young people with ASD or
those children and young people whose challenging
behaviour is associated with other impairments
such as severe learning disabilities - Group B - children and young people with complex
health needs including those with a disability
and life limiting conditions, palliative care,
cognitive or sensory impairments or have
moving/handling needs or require special
equipment adaptation. These groups include where
relevant, those with - ASD
- complex health needs, including the technology
dependent child and those requiring palliative
care - moving and handling needs that will require
equipment and adaptations up to age 18 - challenging behaviour as a result of their
impairment - severely disabled young people 14
36Target group new services
- New SEN areas of need
- Communication interaction
- Cognition learning
- Social, emotional mental health difficulties
- Sensory and/or physical needs
Who might miss out?
1
3
2
37Next steps
- Revise commissioning plan
- Mayor adopt revised plan on 2nd September
- Provider event second week September
- Advertise tenders
- Any questions contact
- ann.james_at_bristol.gov.uk
- joanna.roberts_at_bristol.gov.uk
- mark.hamilton_at_bristol.gov.uk