Title: Introduction
1Introduction Rationale
2???????
- ????(Psychometric)
- ????(Edumetric)
- Carver, R.P. (1974). Two dimensions of tests
Psychometric and Edumetric. American
Psychologists, July, pp. 512-518.
3 ???????(Dimensions) ???? ????
(Psychometric) (Edumetric)
- 1. ??
- ???????
- 2. ?????
- ?P??50?,??D???,??????(Variance)?????????
- ?
- ???????
- (Gain/Growth)?
- ????????? ????,???0,???100????
(Sensitive to Gain)
4 ???????(Dimensions) ???? ????
(Psychometric) (Edumetric)
- 3. ??
- ??????????(Consistency)?
- ???????????SEm??Dependent on Variances
- 4. ??
- ??????? (Convergent Discriminant Validity)
- ???????????
- ???????? (Alternate Forms)NOT Dependent on
Variances - ??????????????? (Sensitive to Gain)
5????????
????
????
????
????
6E. L. Thorndike
- If A Thing Exists, It Exists in Some Amount.
- If It Exists in Some Amount It Can be Measured.
7A Grade is Paul Dresse, (1957). Basic College
Quarterly.
- An Inadequate Report of an Inadequate Judgement
by a Biased and Variable Judge of the extent to
which a student has attended an Undefined Level
of Mastery of an Unknown Proportion of an
Indefinite Amount of Material.
8D. L. Stufflebeam
- The Purpose of Evaluation is TO
Improve, NOT to Prove.
9????.
10?? (measurement)
- ????,?????????????
- ?????????????,?????????????
11?? (Evaluation)
- ??????, ??????????????.
- Judgment of merit, usually qualitatively
Measurement is quantitative.
12?????(Assessment or testing)
- ????????
- ???????????????????????
- ???????????????,???????????????????
-
13?????(Assessment or testing)
- ?? ?????????,??????????????????
- ?????
- ?????
- ?????
14????(Ability Tests)
- Assess the performance or level of skills of
individuals in well-defined subject areas.
(Satterly, 1990)
15????(Aptitude Tests)
- Indicate the probability with which new material
will be learned. (Satterly, 1990)
16??(Cognition )
- Includes the processes of perception, thinking,
reasoning, understanding, problem solving, and
remembering. (Satterly, 1990)
17??????(Cognitive Style Tests)
- Assess their typical approach or ways of learning
and thinking in a variety of tasks. (Satterly,
1990)
18??????(Learning Ability Tests)
- Seek to measure the ability to respond to
instruction and so are measures of potential
rather than achievement. - (Hegarty, 1990)
19????????????????
20?????????
- ?????????
- 1.????????
- (Evaluation in the Teaching of Science)
- ?????????????
- ???????
- (Evaluation of Science Teaching)
- ?????????????
21??????????
- ????????????????
- ?????????????
- ????????????????????????,?????????
- ?????????,????????
- ???????????????
22??????????
- ????????????
- ??????????????
- ???????????????????????,????????
- ???????????
23???????
- ????
- ??
- ??
- ??(??????)
- ??(??????)
- ??
24? ??????? ?
- ? ????
- 1. ????(Achievement Test)
- ???????????
- 2. ????(Aptitude Test)
- ???????????
- 3. ????(Intelligence Test)
- ??????
25? ??????? ?
- ? ????
- 1. ????(Preference Test)
- 2. ?????(Belief)??
26? ??????? ?
- ? ??????
- 1. ????(Aptitude Test)
- 2. ????(Intelligence Test)
- ? ??/????
27?????????
- ??????,????????
- ?????(Placement Evaluation)
- ?????(Diagnostic Evaluation)
- ?????(Formative Evaluation)
- ?????(Summative Evaluation)
28?????
- ?????????????,??????????,?????????,??????????,???
???
29?????
- ????????????,????????????????????????????????????
30?????
-
- ??????????????,????????????,??????????????????????
???????,????????
31?????
-
- ??????,?????????????????????
32????????????
- ??????(Norm-Referenced Evaluation)
- ?????,???????????????????????
- ????????????????????(Norm group)??,????????
- 2.??????(Criterion-Referenced Evaluation)
- ?????,?????????????????????
33NRE CRE
34NRE CRE
35??????????
36???????
- NRT
- ?????????,???????????
- CRT
- ?????????,???????????
37??
38???????
39??????
- CRT
- ?????????????(??????)
40??
41? ??????? ?
- ?? ???
- ?? ??
- ??? ????
- ?? ??
- ???? ????
- ?? ??
42????????.
43? ????????? ?
- 1. ??(Measurement)???(Test)?
- ??(Assessment)???(Evaluation) ?
- 2. ??
- ??????
- ?????(Summative Evaluation) ?
- ????????????
- ?????(Formative Evaluation)?
44? ??????? ?
- 1. ???????????
- 2. ?????????--- ???????????(Construct)?
- 3. ?????????????
- 4. ????????????
-
45???????
- ?????????
- ???????????
- ?????????
- ????????????
- ??????????
46????
47Predicted Trends in Measurement and Evaluation of
Science Instruction From . . . . . .
? To . . . . . .
- 1. Primarily group-administered tests
- A variety of administrative formats including
large groups, small groups, and individuals.
48Predicted Trends in Measurement and Evaluation of
Science Instruction From . . . . . .
? To . . . . . .
- 2. Primarily paper-and-pencil tests
- A variety of test formats including pictorial and
laboratory performance tests.
49Predicted Trends in Measurement and Evaluation of
Science Instruction From . . . . . .
? To . . . . . .
- 3. Primarily end-of-course summative assessment
- A variety of pretest, diagnostic and formative
types of measurements.
50Predicted Trends in Measurement and Evaluation of
Science Instruction From . . . . . .
? To . . . . . .
- 4. Primarily measurement of low-level cognitive
outcomes
- The inclusion of higher level cognitive outcomes
(analysis, evaluation, critical
thinking), as well as the
measurement of affective (attitudes, interests,
and values) and psychomotor outcomes.
51Predicted Trends in Measurement and Evaluation of
Science Instruction From . . . . . .
? To . . . . . .
- 5. Primarily Norm-Referenced Achievement Testing
- The inclusion of more Criterion-Referenced
Assessment, mastery
testing, and self and peer evaluation.
52Predicted Trends in Measurement and Evaluation of
Science Instruction From . . . . . .
? To . . . . . .
- 6. Primarily measurement of facts and principles
of science
- The inclusion of objectives related to the
processes of science, the nature of
science, and the interrelationship of
science,
technology, and society.
53Predicted Trends in Measurement and Evaluation of
Science Instruction From . . . . . .
? To . . . . . .
- 7. Primarily measurement of student achievement
- The inclusion of measuring the effects of
programs, curricula, and teaching techniques.
54Predicted Trends in Measurement and Evaluation of
Science Instruction From . . . . . .
? To . . . . . .
- 8. Primarily teacher-made tests
- The combined use of teacher-made tests,
standardized tests, research
instruments, and items from
collections assembled
by teachers,
projects, and other sources.
55Predicted Trends in Measurement and Evaluation of
Science Instruction From . . . . . .
? To . . . . . .
- 9. Primarily concern with total test scores
- Interest in sub-test performance, item difficulty
and discrimination, all aided by mechanical and
computerized facilities.
56Predicted Trends in Measurement and Evaluation of
Science Instruction From . . . . . .
? To . . . . . .
- 10. Primarily a one-dimensional format of
evaluation (e.g., a numerical or letter grade)
- A multidimentional system of reporting student
progress with respect to such variables as
concepts, processes, laboratory procedures,
classroom discussion, and problem-solving skills.
57National Science Education Standards
58Assessment StandardsNational Science Education
Standards
- Assessments must be consistent with the decisions
they are designed to inform. - Assessments are deliberately designed.
- Assessments have explicitly stated purposes.
- The relationship between the decisions and the
data is clear. -
59Assessment StandardsNational Science Education
Standards
- Achievement and opportunity to learn science must
be assessed. - Achievement data collected focus on the science
content that is most important for students to
learn. - Opportunity-to-learn data collected focus on the
most powerful indicators. - Equal attention must be given to the assessment
of opportunity to learn and to the assessment of
student achievement. -
60Assessment StandardsNational Science Education
Standards
- The technical quality of the data collected is
well matched to the decisions and actions taken
on the basis of their interpretation. - The feature that is claimed to be measured is
actually measured. - Assessment tasks are authentic.
- Students have adequate opportunity to demonstrate
their achievements. - Assessment tasks and methods of presenting them
provide data that are sufficiently stable to lead
to the same decisions if used at different times. -
61Assessment StandardsNational Science Education
Standards
- Assessment practices must be fair.
- Stereotype, language,
- ???? ??
-
62Assessment StandardsNational Science Education
Standards
- The inferences from assessments about student
achievement and opportunity to learn must be
sound. -
63(No Transcript)
64(No Transcript)
65The End!
66????????????
- 1. ????(Peer Evaluation)
- ???????????????
- 2. ??????(Multi-talent Evaluation)
- ??????,?????????????????????
- 3. ???????(Evaluation in Learning Through
Inquiry) - IRA (Inquiry Role Approach)???????????
67????????????
- 4.??????(Laboratory Work Evaluation)
- 1)????????(Science Process Skills),??????????????
- 2)?????????????????????
- 3)????????????
- 5.????(Self-Evaluation)
- ???????????????????,????????
68???????????
- ??(Against)??????????????????
- ???/???
- ???????????????
- ?????????????????????,??????
69???????????
- ????????????????
- ??????????,?????????
- ????????????????(?????????)??????
- ?????/???????,??????????????(????????)?????(Progra
mmed Instruction)?????
70(No Transcript)
71(No Transcript)
72???????????
- ??(Against)??????????????????
- ???/???
- ???????????????
- ?????????????????????,??????
73???????????
- ????????????????
- ??????????,?????????
- ????????????????(?????????)??????
- ?????/???????,??????????????(????????)?????(Progra
mmed Instruction)?????
74(No Transcript)