Title: DOE Response to Radiological Release from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant
1DOE Response to Radiological Release from the
Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant
2BWR Design
- Fuel rods in the reactor vessel create heat
- Steam-water mixture is separated at the top of
the reactor vessel - Steam turns the turbine
- Water is pumped out of the condenser and
re-circulated through the reactor vessel - Water is condenser cooled by sea water in Japan
3Mark I Boiling Water Reactor (BWR)
4Overview of Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant
- 6 Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) plants
- Fuel Type UO2
- Output (MWe)
- Unit 1 460
- Unit 2-5 784
- Unit 6 1,100
- Years of commercial operation 32-38
- Plant status on March 11
- Unit 13 In operation since Fall 2010
- Unit 4-6 Refueling Outage
Spent Fuel Pools 1 2 3 4 5 6
of Spent Fuel Assemblies 292 587 514 1331 946 876
of New Fuel Assemblies 100 28 52 204 48 64
Water Volume (m3) 1,020 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,425 1,497
5Statement of Problem
Source Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency
(NISA)
6(No Transcript)
7Accident Summary
http//www.tepco.co.jp/en/nu/fukushima-np/f1/image
s/f12np-gaiyou_e_1.pdf
8Root Cause of Damage
Source Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency
(NISA)
9Core Damage Sequence
www.nuceng.ca/refer/japan/FukishimaEvent-FPLSummar
y.ppt
Core Uncovered
Fuel Overheating
Fuel melting - Core Damaged
Containment pressurizes. Leakage possible at
drywell head
Releases of hydrogen into secondary containment
Core Damaged but retained in vessel
Some portions of core melt into lower RPV head
10Unit 4 Fuel Pool - June 29
TEPCO Photo provided by Genn Saji
11Summary of Fukushima Dai-ichi Damage(Courtesy of
AMS)
Unit 2
12 1
2
3
4
13Unit 3
Unit 4
14Unit 3
15Unit 4
16Estimated Releases
Nuclide NISA1 NSC2 Chernobyl
I-131 1.6X1017 Bq 1.5X1017 Bq 1.8X1018 Bq
Cs-137 1.5X1016 Bq 1.2X1016 Bq 8.5X1016 Bq
1 Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (June 6, 2011 Press Release) 1 Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (June 6, 2011 Press Release) 1 Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (June 6, 2011 Press Release) 1 Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (June 6, 2011 Press Release)
2 Japan Nuclear Safety Commission 2 Japan Nuclear Safety Commission 2 Japan Nuclear Safety Commission 2 Japan Nuclear Safety Commission
17Public Protection Measures
- March 12 Government of Japan established
mandatory evacuation zone for people living
within a 20 km radius of the Fukushima Daiichi
NPP and recommended shelter-in-place for people
living within 20-30 km - March 13 US Embassy issued an advisory
restricting travel US citizens within 80 km of
the Fukushima NPP - March 16 US Embassy and US Forces Japan (USFJ)
authorized voluntary departure for dependents
18DOE Support to Operation Tomodachi
- Mission
- Assess the consequences of releases from the
Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP)
19Deploy Assets to Operation Tomodachi
- Objectives
- Assist the State Department mission to advise
American citizens on protective action and
evacuation guidelines - Assist DoD in its mission to safely conduct
humanitarian assistance/disaster relief
operations and to provide advice on
departure/return of military dependents - Partner with the Government of Japan (GOJ)
through the State Department to aid in developing
guidelines for protection of the public
potentially affected by the releases
20DOE/NNSA Radiological Incident Response
- Capabilities
- Predictive modeling
- Data collection
- Measurements
- Air
- Ground
- Samples
- Data assessment
- Data interpretation/ communication
- Resources
- Fixed
- Nuclear Incident Team (NIT)
- National Atmospheric Release Advisory Center
(NARAC) - Consequence Management Home Team (CMHT)
- Radiation Emergency Assistance Center/Training
Site (REAC/TS) - Radiological Triage
- Deployed
- Aerial Measuring System (AMS)
- Consequence Management Response Team (CMRT)
- Radiological Assistance Program (RAP)
21DOE Timeline
- March 11
- DOE/NNSA activated the following assets
- Nuclear Incident Team (NIT) in Washington, DC
- DOE/NNSA Consequence Management expertise on the
US Agency for International Development (USAID)
Disaster Assistance Response Team (DART) in
Tokyo - National Atmospheric Release Advisory Center
(NARAC) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
(LLNL) - Consequence Management Home Team (CMHT) at Remote
Sensing Laboratory (RSL) with outreach to Sandia
National Laboratory (SNL), LLNL, and Los Alamos
National Laboratory (LANL) - The Radiation Emergency Assistance
Center/Training Site (REAC/TS) in Oak Ridge, TN
22DOE Timeline (contd)
- March 14, 2011
- At White House direction, DOE deployed a tailored
CMRT and AMS capability via military airlift to
Yokota Air Base
23(No Transcript)
24Hangar 1503 DOEs home at Yokota AB
Tent in background is AFRATs lab
25Field Team
- Experienced operate in a unique mission space.
- Interdisciplinary address all aspects of
mission. - Adaptable dynamic environment and non-standard
measurement platforms. - Communicate risk to partners and decision-makers.
- Small field footprint with large capability
- 33 personnel to Yokota AB
- 12 scientists of many disciplines (nuclear, GIS,
environmental, 5 PhDs, 2 CHPs) - Technicians with a diverse skill set
- 1 DOE HQ liaison to US embassy, Tokyo
26F RMAC
27Distribution of responsibilities
- Field
- monitoring and sampling
- preliminary data assessment
- product development
- CMHT
- detailed assessment
- coordination of sample analysis
- response to requests for information/assistance
- NIT
- initial command and control of deploying assets
- coordination and communication for field assets
and headquarters elements - Embassy
- assessment interpretation for Ambassador
- coordination of bilateral monitoring and
assessment activities
28DOE Timeline (contd)
- March 16 CM Assets arrive at Yokota AB and fly
first AMS Test flight - March 17 First aerial measurement activities
over plant conducted first field monitoring
mission completed - March 22 Initial data published on DOE website
29Bilateral activities
30Stakeholders
- Department of State
- American Embassy
- Department of Defense
- US Forces Japan (USFJ)
- Department of Energy (DOE)
- National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
- Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- Advisory Team for Environment , Food and Health
- Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA)
- Nuclear Safety Commission
- Ministry of Defense (MOD)
- Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI)
- Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA)
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science
Technology (MEXT) - Nuclear Safety Technology Center (NUSTEC)
- Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
(MAFF) - Ministry of Health, Labour Welfare (MLHW)
31Coordination Advisory Activities
- DOE aviation support requirements with USFJ
- Radiological consequence management advice for US
Ambassador - Planning, operations, and assessment with
applicable Ministries and agencies of the
government of Japan - Field expedient early warning system for US
Embassy and USFJ to be used while reactors were
considered unstable
These activities aided key leaders in
decision-making and informed DOE monitoring and
assessment efforts
32Aerial measuring SYSTEM activities
33Aerial Monitoring
- Fixed wing and helicopter
- Up to 3 aircraft per day
- Surveys over US bases
- Joint DOE GOJ survey
- Map ground deposition out to 80 km from FDNPP
- Support evacuation, relocation, agricultural
decisions
34AMS on USAF Aircraft
35Typical flight path
36Typical Results
37Summary of Activities
- Daily aerial measuring missions over US
installations and in the area around the FDNPP - gt 85 flights
- gt 490 flight hours
- Orientation on flying aerial measuring missions
for USFJ and GOJ assets
38Field monitoring activities
39Ground monitoring
- Mobile monitoring
- In-situ measurements
- Exposure rate measurements
- Air sampling
- Soil samples
- Swipes
- Calibrate aerial measurements
- Define Isotopic mix
- Characterize the inhalation component of
integrated dose - Assess vertical and horizontal migration of
deposited material
40Mobile monitoring
41In SITU
42Exposure rate measurements
43Air sampling
44Soil sampling
45Core Sampling
46Summary of Activities
- Daily monitoring activities at the U.S. Embassy,
U.S. military installations, and in support of
ground truth measurements for AMS. - gt 590 air samples
- gt 110 in situ spectra
- gt 95 soil samples
47(No Transcript)
48Assessment Activities
49Assessment Activities
- Field
- Preliminary evaluation of raw data
- Ground level exposure rate from aerial
measurement - Deposited activity by isotope
- Activity concentration in air
- Referenced to protective action measures
- Inform future mission planning
- CMHT
- Detailed analysis of raw monitoring and sampling
data - Trend analysis and quality control
- Integrated dose assessment
- Analysis of postulated scenarios to inform future
planning
50Representative results
51Sources of Data
- DOE/NNSA aerial measurements
- DOE/NNSA field monitoring (measurements and
samples) - US Air Force Radiation Assessment Team (AFRAT)
monitoring (measurements and samples) - Monitoring by USFJ assets in-country (US Army,
Navy, Marine Corps) - MEXT aerial measurement results
- Japanese sensor data
52Maiden Aviation Voyage
Maiden Aviation Voyage
53Joint Survey Final Results
54(No Transcript)
55(No Transcript)
56(No Transcript)
57Seawater Map
Water Deposition Map
58Then and now
59Field Team Activity Successes
- DOE was able to perform on-the-fly analysis to
deal with multiple ongoing releases, unknown
source terms, challenging terrain as well as
non-technical pressures. - DOE Scientists developed customized products for
U.S. military (data products, InField Monitoring
System). - DOE scientists embedded with Japanese scientists
to create joint data products.
60Activity to date
- Daily aerial measuring system missions over US
installations and in the area around the FDNPS - gt80 flights
- gt450 flight hours
- Daily monitoring activities at the U.S. Embassy,
U.S. military installations, and in support of
ground truth measurements for AMS. - gt590 air samples
- gt 110in situ spectra
- gt95 soil sample
61Assessment
- An assessment of measurements gathered through
April 20 continues to show - Radiation levels continue to decrease
- No measurable deposit of radiological material
since March 19 - US bases and facilities all measure dose rates
below 32 microrem/hr (32 millionths of a REM) a
level with no known health risks - Agricultural monitoring and possible intervention
will be required for several hundred square
kilometers surrounding the site - Soil and water samples are the only definitive
method to determine agricultural countermeasures - Ground monitoring can give better fidelity to
identify areas that require agricultural sampling
62End State
- USFJ and Government of Japan to continue
monitoring activities as needed - Japanese trained equipped to fly DOE AMS
- Japanese equipped with an enhanced laboratory
analysis capability - USFJ trained equipped to fly contigency AMS
- DOE continues to support Japanese and USFJ from
Home Team
Resilience following a nuclear catastrophe
63Miscellaneous HP gear in Hangar 1503
64Miscellaneous detectors in Hangar 1503
65Soil core sample in situ
In situ AMS overhead
66(No Transcript)
67Summary of Damage
Unit 2
68BACKUP SLIDES
69(No Transcript)