Title: Xiuzhen Cheng cheng@gwu.edu
1 Xiuzhen Cheng
cheng_at_gwu.edu
Csci332 MAS Networks Challenges and
State-of-the-Art Research Underwater Sensor
Networks
2Introduction
- Underwater acoustic sensor networks consist of a
variable number of sensors and vehicles that are
deployed to perform collaborative monitoring
tasks over a given area. - Acoustic communications are the typical physical
layer technology - Radios propagate to long distance only at extra
low frequencies, with a large antennae and high
transmission power - Mica mote can transmit to 120cm at 433MHz in
underwater
3Applications
- Ocean Sampling Networks
- Environmental (chemical, biological, and nuclear)
monitoring - Water quality in situ analysis
- Undersea explorations (for oilfields, minerals,
reservoirs, for determining routes for laying
undersea cables, etc.) - Disaster prevention (earthquakes, etc.)
- Assisted navigation
- Distributed tactical surveillance
- Mine reconnaissance
4Challenges
- Severely limited bandwidth
- Severely impaired channel
- Propagation delay is 5 times longer
- High bit error rates, intermittent connectivity
- Battery power
- Underwater sensors are error-prone due to fouling
and corrosion
5Two-dimensional Sensor Networks
RF
Two acoustic radios
6Three-dimensional sensor networks
floating
buoy
anchor
7Challenges to enable 3D monitoring
- Sensing coverage
- Need collaborative regulation on sensor depth
- Communication coverage
- Connectivity requirement
8Autonomous Underwater Vehicles
- Can reach any depth in the ocean
- The integration of fixed sensor networks and AUVs
is an almost unexplored research area - Adaptive sampling (where to place sensors?)
- Self-configuration (where there is a failure?)
9Design Challenges (1/2)
- Difference with terrestrial sensor networks
- Cost (more due to complex transceivers and
hardware protection), deployment (sparser due to
cost), power (higher due to long transmission
range and complex DSP), memory (larger due to
intermittent connectivity), spatial correlation
(less likely to happen due to sparser deployment)
- Underwater sensors
- Protecting frames, many underwater sensors exist
- New design
- Develop less expensive, robust, nano-sensors
- Devise periodical cleaning mechanisms against
corrosion and fouling - Design robust, stable sensors on a high range of
temperatures - Design integrated sensors for synoptic sampling
of physical, chemical, and biological parameters
10Design Challenges (2/2)
- A cross-layer protocol stack
- All the layers in the TCP/IP model
- Need a power management plane, a coordination
plane, and a localization plane - Real-time vs. delay-tolerant networking
- Application driven
11Basics of Acoustic Propagation
Underwater acoustic communications are mainly
influenced by path loss, noise, multipath,
Doppler spread, and high and variable
propagation delay
Available bandwidth for different ranges in UW-A
channels Range km Bandwidth kHz Very
long 1000 lt1 Long 10100 25 Medium
1-10 around 10 Short 0.11 2050 Very
short lt0.1 gt100
12Physical Layer
New development needed for inexpensive
transceiver modems, filters, etc.
Evolution of modulation technique Type Year
Rate kbps Band kHz Range kma FSK 1984
1.2 5 3s PSK 1989 500 125 0.06d
FSK 1991 1.25 10 2d PSK 1993 0.30.5
0.31 200d90s PSK 1994 0.02 20 0.9s
FSK 1997 0.62.4 5 10d5s DPSK 1997 20
10 1d PSK 1998 1.676.7 210 4d2s
16-QAM 2001 40 10 0.3s a The subscripts
d and s stand for deep (gt100m) and shallow water
(lt100)
13Data Link Layer
- Challenges low bandwidth and high/variable delay
- FDMA is not suitable due to low bandwidth
- TDMA is not suitable due to the variable delay
(long-term guards) - CSMA is not efficient since it only prevents
collision at the transmitter side - Contention-based schemes that rely on RTS/CTS are
not practical due to the long/variable delay - CDMA is promising due to its robustness again
fading and Doppler spreading especially in
shallow water - Challenges Error control functionalities are
needed - ARQ, FEC, etc.
- Open research issues
- Optimal data packet length for network efficiency
optimization - CDMA code, encoders and decoders, etc.
14Network Layer
- From sensors to surface stations
- 3D routing
- Existing routing schemes (proactive, reactive,
and geographical routing schemes) may be tailored
for underwater sensor networks - Challenges
- Long/variable delay
- Intermittent connectivity
- Accurate modeling of the dynamics of the data
transmission - Route optimization
- The integration of AUV and sensors
- Location discovery techniques for geographical
routing protocols
15Transport Layer
- Totally unexplored area
- Underwater sensor networks necessitate a new
event transport reliability notion - Traditionally transport layer provides robust
end-to-end approach - Challenges long/variable delay
- Needs flow control and congestion control
- Most existing TCP implementations are unsuited
due to the window-based flow/congestion control
mechanisms (RTT is needed) - Rate-based transport protocols may not work due
to the dependency on feedback control messages - Packet loss caused by high bit error rate
- New strategies may be needed!
- Open research issues
- Abundant!
16Application Layer
- Largely unexplored
- Purposes
- To provide a network management protocol
- To provide a language for query the sensor
networks - To assign tasks and to advertise events/data
17Experimental Implementations
- The Front-Resolving Observational Network with
Telemetry (FRONT) project at u Connecticut - Sensors, repeaters, and gateways
- Sensors are connected to acoustic modems
- Repeaters are acoustic modems to relay data
- Gateways are surface buoys
- Experiment conducted 20 sensors and repeaters
are deployed in shallow water - AOSN program at the Monterey Bay Aquarium
Research Institute - To study the upwelling of cold, nutrient-rich
water in the Monterey Bay.