Internal BGP as PE-CE Protocol - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Internal BGP as PE-CE Protocol

Description:

Title: JunOS Author: Pedro Roque Marques Last modified by: rbonica Created Date: 3/13/2003 5:46:52 AM Document presentation format: On-screen Show Company – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: PedroRoqu7
Learn more at: https://www.ietf.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Internal BGP as PE-CE Protocol


1
Internal BGP as PE-CE Protocol
  • Pedro Marques roque_at_juniper.net
  • Robert Raszuk rraszuk_at_cisco.com
  • Dan Tappan tappan_at_cisco.com
  • Luca Martini luca_at_level3.net

2
Problem
AS 10458
AS 65001
AS 65001
Provider
Route Advertisement
as-path 65001
as-path 10548 65001
  • When BGP is used as PE-CE protocol, it uses
    External BGP rules as-path perpending, etc.
  • Accept looped routes in CE-1
  • Rewrite customer AS with provider AS

3
Continued
  • When CE connections are not isolated islands and
    exchange BGP routes with any other party, it just
    gets messier.
  • Customer island peers with the service provider
    (for Internet service, for instance).
  • Customer islands exchange routes with outside
    world Provider AS appears in the path.
  • Never ending requests for as-path rewrite hacks.

4
Rent-a-core
Core
  • Traditional network design
  • Core distributes routing information to sites.
  • Reflectors participate in top level iBGP mesh.
  • Pop/Site routers receive routing information from
    their respective RRs.
  • IGP may be stub area if there are no backdoor
    links.
  • These are often managed independently.

5
Proposed model
  • PE routers are route reflectors to each CE site
    location.
  • Customer network attributes are pushed into an
    attribute stack at ingress.
  • This deals with interference on local-preference,
    communities, MEDs, etc.
  • At egress attribute stack is poped. cluster is
    perpended when advertising to CE side.
  • cluster-list performs loop avoidance.

6
IGP interaction
  • Shouldnt require a single IGP between distinct
    sites.
  • Even if an IGP is running between all sites it
    may not be able to compare inter-site metrics
    (Provider assigned) and intra-site.
  • Perform implicit next-hop self on the PE/RR
  • when advertising to CE.
  • when advertising to other PEs.
  • PE/RR makes decisions by taking inter-cluster
    metrics always higher than intra-cluster.

7
Deployment
  • Mix and match of eBGP and iBGP in the same VPN.
  • Proposed attribute (ATTR_SET) consists of
    customer AS plus attributes in original path.
  • This allows a PE to know what to advertise to a
    given CE.

iBGP eBGP
internal if same as use internal rules pop and apply external rules
external advertise as-is existing rules
peer
origin
8
Summary
  • Using iBGP between PE and CE requires a few extra
    considerations
  • non-interference of customer attributes in
    provider network.
  • IGP/next-hop dependencies.
  • apply external rules when crossing as boundaries.
  • iBGP interaction can provide transparency to
    customer network.
  • as-path manipulation hacks only get you so far.

9
Thank You
  • For more details see
  • draft-marques-ppvpn-ibgp-00.txt
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com