Orienteering Shoe Design - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Orienteering Shoe Design

Description:

Final 183.401 Presentation Orienteering Shoe Design & Development – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: MarkR118
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Orienteering Shoe Design


1
Orienteering ShoeDesign Development
  • Final 183.401 Presentation

2
Overview
  • Project Brief
  • Current Marketplace
  • Concept Generation
  • Consumer Feedback
  • Development of the Design
  • Prototyping
  • Manufacturing Techniques and Cost
  • Marketing Techniques and Cost
  • Conclusion

3
Project Brief
  • To design and develop a durable orienteering shoe
    to address the current short comings in design
  • Lack of grip within the arch region of the foot
  • Construction Quality
  • Whilst ensuring the same features of the
    incumbents
  • Superb traction over multiple terrain types
  • Comfort Through Cushioning

4
Current Marketplace
  • Market Size
  • Through numbers obtained from the IOF
  • 67 member nations
  • 5000 clubs
  • 450,000 club members
  • Estimated to be 1 million orienteers worldwide
  • From the IOF World Ranking Site
  • 2300 runners
  • 40 from Scandinavia

5
Current Marketplace
  • Major Competitors
  • Silva
  • K120
  • Flawed Design, however the idea is
  • innovative
  • K100
  • Bullet-proof Shoe, still Silvas best
  • seller
  • VJ
  • Twister
  • A rival to the K100 in the most
  • popular shoe category

6
Initial Research
  • Initial consumer research was undertaken
  • Lead User Groups
  • Internet Forums
  • Maptalk - Australasian
  • Nopesport - International (UK)
  • Attackpoint - International (US)
  • Resulting in ideas such as
  • Arch Spikes to aid in traversing thinnings
  • Adjustable Spike Length
  • Hardwearing material upon the medial side
  • Grip upturns to aid in contouring
  • Improved adhesion between the uppers and
  • the sole

7
Concept Generation
  • Six completely differing concepts were generated
    each looking at different aspects in
  • Aesthetic Design
  • Features
  • Grip Design
  • Were taken to consumers for feedback through
  • Lead User Group
  • Focus Group
  • Conjoint Analysis

8
Consumer Feedback
  • Focus Group
  • Mixed Responses to some of the proposed ideas
  • Arch Spikes
  • Adjustable Spike Length
  • Enthusiasm for the lace cove
  • Would need to be tested
  • Aesthetics was not a major sicking point
  • Pronation support was determined to be essential

9
Consumer Feedback
  • Conjoint Analysis
  • Built up of Eight Cards
  • Arch Spikes
  • Lace Cover
  • Adjustable Spikes
  • Pronation Support
  • Placed upon an internet survey site
  • Limited questions
  • Provided easy to download graphs

10
Consumer Feedback
  • Conjoint Analysis Results
  • Results mirrored those from the focus groups
  • Adjustable Spike Length - 48
  • Arch Spikes - 52
  • Lace Cover - 64
  • Pronation Support - 82
  • Northern Southern Hemisphere responses were
    similar

11
Development
  • Computer Aided Design
  • Shoe was designed using SolidWorks
  • Allows for easy alterations after testing
  • Photo rendering capabilities
  • Files can be easily sent to
  • Rapid Prototyper
  • Other CNC machines

12
Development
13
Prototyping
  • The prototyping process was largely a trial and
    error process
  • Three distinct areas that needed to be
    constructed
  • Outer Sole
  • Midsole
  • Upper
  • Materials were hard to come by thus some
    compromises had to be made to ensure the
    successful completion of the prototype

14
Prototyping
  • Outer Sole - 1st Attempt
  • FDM plug was created that would be inserted into
    a bed of plaster
  • In theory a cheap method of creating the negative
    mould for the soles
  • Issues with this technique
  • The plugs acted as a impervious barrier
    preventing the air from drying the plaster
  • Resulting in a soft centre when the plugs were
    removed
  • New technique had to be found

15
Prototyping
  • Outer Sole 2nd Attempt
  • Still using the FDM plug however the plug was
    placed upwards and covered with plaster
  • In theory the plaster being exposed to the air
    would ensure drying before subsequent layers of
    plaster
  • Issues with this technique
  • The copious amounts of release wax did not act as
    it should have, preventing the removal of the
    plug
  • As the plaster stuck to the plug, hunks of the
    negative mould were pulled out.

16
Prototyping
  • Outer Sole 3rd Attempt
  • Through the use of a start up company Objective
    Design the soles were prototyped directly in a
    rubber compound
  • Ensuring that what you sent to be prototyped was
    indeed what was produced
  • Alterations were made to the CAD file at
    this
  • stage to ensure that the metal dobb spikes would
  • securely fit into the resulting outer sole
  • The material however was not as robust as it was
  • envisaged, thus a full terrain testing
    process
  • would not be feasible

17
Prototyping
  • Ethylene Vinyl Acetate Midsole
  • EVA material was kindly provided by Ultralon in
    Christchurch
  • The sole had to be cut to a profile hence a jig
    had to be set up to ensure the correct profile
    was achieved
  • Pronation support was added using a denser EVA

18
Prototyping
  • Upper
  • Again a lot of learning on the run whilst
    prototyping
  • Patterns were made through laying paper on top of
    a donor shoe
  • Tested three times to ensure the best possible
    fit
  • Patterns translated onto the various materials
  • Assembly of the different parts to create the
    upper.

19
Prototyping
20
Manufacturing
  • Initial Small Run Manufacturing
  • A LEGO set of last sizes and studs to create
    individualised stud patterns.
  • TopMark materials used to create both the mould
    and the sole
  • Ultrasil
  • Flexicast
  • Ultralon EVA used for the midsoles
  • Uppers Created from Schoeller Keprotec
  • Material found in motorcycle safety gear

21
Manufacturing
22
Manufacturing
  • Modularisation
  • The conjoint analysis had three features with a
    50/50 split opening the door for consumer
    co-design modularisation
  • Thus the shoe was designed thinking about the
    possibility of modular designs
  • The soles have capacity for nuts to be inserted
    adjustable spike length
  • Lace cove is just an extended pattern of the
    standard tongue
  • Using the LEGO approach arch spikes could be
    left off moulds
  • Modular design also lends itself to agility
  • A much needed aspect in the ever changing
    footwear marketplace

23
Marketing
  • Techniques
  • Advertisement in Print Media
  • Skogssport
  • Orienteering Today
  • Compass Sport
  • Web Banners
  • Orienteering Today
  • Website
  • Consumer Co-Design
  • Sponsored Athletes
  • The creation of a group of young orienteers on
    the verge of elite status
  • Sponsored Racing Kit
  • Subsidised event entry Fee

24
Marketing
  • Techniques Consumer Co-Design
  • Web based set up that allows consumers to
    create their own shoe design
  • Arch Spikes
  • Adjustable Spikes
  • Customised Colours/Text
  • Would create an avenue for individualisation for
    a start up company
  • Would require modular manufacturing techniques

25
Marketing
26
Marketing
27
Financials
  • After the first year of production having sold
    115 shoes at 245
  • 5 of the elite community the financials of the
    company would look like

28
Financials
  • The following year assuming the production could
    handle twice the number of orders ensuring the
    market share of 10

29
On Selling
  • Thus for the shoe to really flourish it would
    need to be picked up by a major manufacturer such
    as Silva or VJ
  • As for the shoe to successfully enter the market
    the cost of either the manufacture or the
    marketing campaigns need to be significantly
    reduced
  • Enquiries have been made through
  • both the local importers with very little
  • response from either manufacturer.

30
Conclusion
  • A durable orienteering shoe designed and
    developed
  • Through the consultation of end users
  • Development process followed through
  • Concept Generation
  • Development through CAD
  • Prototype Constructed
  • Testing of Key Features
  • For the shoe to be developed further the idea
    really needs to be picked up by a manufacturer

31
  • Questions ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com