Micromechanical Testing of Thin Films - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Micromechanical Testing of Thin Films

Description:

090606-1214-023. 090606-1214-033. 090606-1214-043. 090606-1214-053. 090606-1214-063. 090606-1214-073. 090606-1214-083. 090606-1214-004. 090606-1214-014. 090606-1214 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: HAKIMIC
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Micromechanical Testing of Thin Films


1
Micromechanical Testing of Thin Films
  • WarrenOliver
  • MTS Nano Instruments
  • Oak Ridge, Tennessee

2
Nano Indenter G200
  • Precise mechanical testing in the micro to
    sub-nano range of loads and displacements

3
Testing instrumentation Nano Indenter XP
4
Load-displacement behavior
Aluminum
  • Aluminum, typical of soft metallic behavior,
    shows very little displacement recovery upon
    unloading
  • Fused silica, typical of ceramic behavior, shows
    large elastic recovery upon unloading

Fused silica
5
Read Heads
6
The problem
Indentation results for 1-mm low-dielectric-consta
nt (low-k) film on silicon
substrate effect
skin effect
All data are affected, to some extent, by either
skin or substrate. So what is the modulus of
this film? Problem is not too bad for 1-micron
films, and hardness is less sensitive than
modulus. But our microelectronics customers tell
us they really want to test 200nm films!
7
The goal
The goal of this work is to develop an empirical
model that
  • Is appropriate for a realistic range of low-k
    materials
  • Correctly models the influence of the silicon
    substrate
  • Requires no a-priori knowledge of film properties
    beyond thickness
  • Can be incorporated into Testworks
  • Is relatively independent of diamond tip radius

8
Developing the model
There is much to be learned from the process of
developing the model.
  1. Survey experimental results. Select properties
    that bound the range of interest in terms of E
    and H.
  2. Perform preliminary simulations to get sy
    f(E,H). Select properties that bound the range
    of interest in terms of E and sy.
  3. Perform simulations for boundary samples.
  4. Calculate errors in modulus and hardness,
    relative to expected properties for bulk
    materials.
  5. Plot error as a function of parameters that are
    relevant, knowable, and dimensionless. Derive
    model for error by curve fitting.
  6. Test model with more simulations (on materials
    inside boundaries)
  7. Test the model experimentally

9
Virtual IndenterTM Features
  • Real area functions, spheres, flat punches
  • Bulk materials
  • Up to three stacked films
  • Particle/fiber/disk in a matrix
  • Range parameters easily
  • A variety of constitutive models
  • Automated Excel output

10
Uncorrected modulus from simulation
11
Uncorrected modulus vs. normalized contact radius
12
Corrected modulus vs. normalized contact radius
13
Applying the model to experimental data
Wafers supplied by SEMATECH
  • 4 wafers of nominally the same film, different
    thicknesses
  • 250nm, 488nm, 747nm, 1156nm
  • k 2.3
  • Technology targeted for use beyond 45nm node
  • Deposited using porogen and then UV cured to
    cause residual pores. Cure times varied with
    thickness. UV cannot penetrate past 750nm.

14
Calculating modulus old way and new way
Old way take minimum
New way take data for 30 lt a/t lt 35
15
Calculating modulus old way and new way
Moduli calculated by old way are too high by 30,
because data at minima are significantly affected
by substrate.
16
Using new model also reduces uncertainty
17
Conclusions
  • A model has been developed to compensate for the
    influence of the substrate on the indentation
    properties of thin low-k films.
  • Model has been incorporated into a Testworks test
    method.
  • Model significantly reduces both error and
    uncertainty, especially for very thin films.
  • We continue to test the model on more low-k
    films.

18
Uniaxial Testing of Free Standing Films
Warren C. Oliver and Erik G. Herbert, MTS
Corporation Johnathan Doan, Reflectivity
19
Nanovision Stage
Travel 100 mm x 100 mm Resolution/Noise 2
nm Flatness of travel 1-2 nm Accuracy 0.01
Settling Time 2 ms-Capacitive feedback control
20
Automated Indent and Scan
21
Scan Procedure
Step 2) Find top of post
Step1) Scan substrate to determine slope of
surface
Step 3) Scan plane of predetermined slope just
below top of post, but above film
Film
22
Leveled Targeting Scan
23
Load Displacement Curves
24
Continuous Stiffness Measurement Technique (CSM)
25
CSM - Elastic Viscoelastic
Elastic
Viscoelastic
26
Stiffness Displacement Curves
27
Describing Bridge Tensile Specimens
28
The Stiffness Displacement Relationship
For not quite so small angles
29
Testworks A Complete Solution
30
Now it gets Interesting
31
TestWorks and the Nano Indenter G200
  • Design of MEMS structural experiments was easily
    done with the flexibility and control offered by
    the TestWorks software
  • TestWorks provides a user interface that
    facilitates the design of new (i.e. MEMS) and
    novel experiments without the need to have
    knowledge of C programming
  • The Nano Indenter G200 system can provide this
    information quickly and reproducibly, offering
    manufacturers an attractive tool for product
    development

32
Thank you!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com