Federal Policy Update - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Federal Policy Update

Description:

Federal Policy Update Alisha ... Labor $1.047 trillion budget cap translates to ... Success Act Eliminates Adequate Yearly Progress and replaced it with state ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:273
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: ACTE9
Category:
Tags: federal | policy | update

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Federal Policy Update


1
Federal Policy Update
  • Alisha Hyslop
  • Assistant Director of Public Policy
  • Association for Career Technical Education

2
Overview
  • Budget and Appropriations
  • Elementary and Secondary Education Act
  • Workforce Investment Act
  • Data Quality Issues
  • Perkins

3
Budget and Appropriations
4
Budget Timeline
  • February President releases budget request
  • March/April House and Senate work to complete
    budget resolutions by April 15
  • May-July Appropriations committees set
    discretionary funding levels
  • September Final appropriations bills passed and
    signed by President
  • October 1 beginning of federal fiscal year

5
FY 2012 Budget
  • Level funding for Perkins based on last years
    level (1.1 billion)
  • .189 cut to all education, workforce, labor and
    health programs
  • Additional 1.5 cut to advance appropriations
    was restored
  • Total education cut by 233 million
  • Most workforce programs level-funded

6
FY 2013 Presidents Budget
  • 1.1 billion level funding for Perkins!
  • 1 billion new career academies initiative
  • 8 billion Community College to Career Fund
  • 4 billion to Department of Education
  • 4 billion to Department of Labor
  • 1.047 trillion budget cap translates to
    4 billion increase for all discretionary
    programs

7
FY 2013 House (Ryan) Budget
  • Cuts overall spending by 5.3 trillion over 10
    years
  • Sets spending cap at 1.028 trillion, 19 billion
    below the 1.047 trillion spending cap agreed to
    in the August 2011 debt limit deal
  • A 9.5 billion cut below the current baseline for
    Labor-Health and Human Services and Education
  • Some Republicans dont think the bill goes far
    enough
  • Not binding, but sets the budget limits that
    appropriators can spend

8
FY 2013 Senate Budget
  • The Budget Committee marked up a version of the
    Simpson-Bowles Commission debt reduction plan
  • Proposal will see little action, no votes are
    expected on this resolution in either the budget
    committee or on the Senate floor
  • The Senate is using the spending cap from debt
    limit deal at 1.047 trillion
  • Five other budget bills to see votes today

9
House and Senate Appropriations
  • Labor-Health and Human Services and Education
    allocations are 157 billion in the Senate and
    150 in the House
  • The 7 billion difference between House and
    Senate will cause problems for appropriators
  • Subcommittees will produce appropriations bills
    in the coming months
  • June markup expected in Senate July in House

10
FY 2013 Presidents Budget
11
Looming Threat Sequestration
  • Perhaps single biggest policy challenge on
    horizon
  • Estimated 7-10 cuts to every domestic
    discretionary program
  • 98 billion in cuts will go into effect January
    2013 without congressional action

12
Education Department Funding
In billions
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
Lame Duck Session
  • Finish appropriations bills
  • Address sequestration
  • Raise the debt ceiling
  • Address expiration of Bush tax cuts

16
Authorizing Legislation
17
Pending Authorizing Legislation
  • Workforce Investment Act (2003)
  • Elementary and Secondary Education Act (2007)
  • Institute for Education Sciences (2009)
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
    (2012)
  • Higher Education Act (2013?)
  • Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education
    Act (2013)

18
ESEA Reauthorization
  • No Child Left Behind
  • Originally due to be reauthorized in 2007
  • House and Senate bills remain far apart,
    conceptually
  • Congress unlikely to complete work on the bill
    this year
  • Administration ESEA waiver authority an
    influencing factor

19
H.R. 3989House Student Success Act
  • Eliminates Adequate Yearly Progress and replaced
    it with state-determined accountability
  • Requires states to develop academic ELA and
    mathematics standards
  • Removes Highly Qualified Teacher requirements

20
H.R. 3990House Encouraging Innovation and
Effective Teachers Act
  • Includes requirements for locally-developed
    teacher evaluations
  • Requires states and school districts to develop
    teacher evaluation systems that measure an
    educators influence on student learning
  • Support opportunities for parents to enroll their
    children in local magnet and charter schools
  • Consolidate a myriad of existing K-12 programs

21
Education for Tomorrows Jobs Act
  • ACTE has worked with Alliance for Excellent
    Education in support
  • Would allow ESEA Title I funds to be used for
    academic CTE integration (with certain
    requirements)
  • Sen. Casey (D-PA) and Rep. Thompson (R-PA)
    sponsors (S. 1686, H.R. 3154)

22
Senate Republican Bills
  • Elementary and Secondary Education Amendments Act
    (S. 1571)
  • Teacher and Principal Improvement Act (S. 1567)
  • Empowering Local Education Decision-Making Act
    (S. 1569)
  • Empowering Parents Through Quality Charter
    Schools Act (S. 1566)

23
Senate Reauthorization Bill
  • Eliminates AYP
  • Focuses on identifying Achievement Gap Schools
    and Lowest Achieving Gap Schools (lowest
    performing 5)
  • Career Academies are an option that can be used
    to turnaround a school
  • Authorizes Race to the Top
  • Includes new focus on secondary schools

24
Missing ESEA Pieces
  • Good changes include growth model, accountability
    relief, secondary schools focus
  • College and career readiness equated to be
    transition to college with no remediation
  • No focus on comprehensive guidance and career
    development

25
WIA Reauthorization
  • Originally scheduled for reauthorization in 2003
  • House Democrats and Republicans have both
    released new legislation this spring
  • Senate action has stalled
  • Generally speaking, everyone agrees the law needs
    updatingbut disagreement on how to update it

26
WIA House Republican Bill
  • H.R.4297 Workforce Investment Improvement Act
  • Combines current WIA funding streams into a
    single Workforce Investment Fund
  • Options for further consolidation
  • Increases the role of employers on WIBs
  • Establishes common accountability
  • Eliminates Sequence of Services provisions
  • Perkins was originally included as consolidation
    option, but has been removed

27
WIA House Democrat Bill
  • H.R. 4227 Workforce Investment Act
  • Supports adult career pathways and sector
    strategies
  • Includes President Obamas Community College to
    Career Fund
  • Establishes common accountability
  • Eliminates Sequence of Services provisions

28
WIA Senate Action
  • Bipartisan discussion draft was released in
    summer 2011 but only two Republican senators
    signed on
  • Markup of the legislation never materialized
  • Progress has stalled

29
Data Quality Issues
  • New Workforce Data Quality Campaign
  • NCES CEDS Workforce Taskforce
  • OVAE State Perkins Accountability Congress

30
Administrations Perkins Blueprint
31
Perkins Blueprint
  • Released on April 19 at an Iowa Community College
  • Titled Investing in America's Future A
    Blueprint for Transforming Career and Technical
    Education
  • Four key themes
  • Alignment - Accountability
  • Collaboration - Innovation

32
Perkins Blueprint
  • 10 of total set-aside for innovation fund
  • States would have to secure private-sector match
    meet certain conditions
  • 5 of the state total for admin funding and 15
    for leadership activities
  • States would identify in-demand occupations in
    high-growth industry sectors

33
Perkins Blueprint
  • States would run competitions for funding these
    areas
  • Only consortia of LEAs and postsecondary
    institutions and their partners would be allowed
    to apply
  • Grants awarded for entire period of law
  • Consortia must use common measures
  • Performance-based funding would be awarded to
    high-performing consortia

34
Perkins Blueprint
  • Concerns arise with specific details of theme
    implementation
  • Competitive grants
  • Mandatory secondary-postsecondary consortia
  • Funding limited to high-growth career areas
    identified at state level
  • State grant funding redirected to national
    Innovation Fund
  • Private sector match
  • State conditions to receive funding

35
Perkins Blueprint
  • ACTE Response
  • Numerous conversations with OVAE before Blueprint
    release discussing concerns
  • OVAE listening session during NPS
  • Press statement expressing concerns after
    Blueprint release and follow-up interviews with
    press
  • Information distribution to state leaders and
    members
  • Organization of call with other key education and
    workforce groups to discuss common concerns
  • Meetings with key Members of Congress to discuss
    concerns and counter positive statements

36
ACTE Perkins Guiding Principles
  1. Redefine the Federal Role in CTE
  2. Target Expenditures
  3. Define Program Quality Elements
  4. Ensure Relevant Consistent Data
  5. Offer Incentives for Innovation
  6. Provide the Infrastructure to Support the System

37
Perkins Next Steps
  • Blueprint is only a proposal many steps before
    law is reauthorized
  • Congress not likely to discuss Perkins at all
    before 2013, final reauthorization not likely for
    several years
  • ACTE in the process of developing detailed
    recommendations to flesh out principles

38
Contact Info
  • Association for Career and Technical Education
  • 1410 King Street
  • Alexandria, VA 22314
  • 800-826-9972
  • www.acteonline.org
  • ahyslop_at_acteonline.org

38
39
Perkins Discussion Session
40
  • Alignment

41
  • Collaboration

42
  • Innovation

43
  • Accountability

44
Accountability Measures
  • High school graduation
  • Transition to postsecondary (with and without
    remediation)
  • Attainment of an industry-recognized credential
    or licensure
  • Attainment of a postsecondary certificate or
    degree
  • Rates of employment and earnings
  • Participation of special populations in CTE
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com