Mixed Model Production Lines - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Mixed Model Production Lines

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: Valued Gateway Client Last modified by: John W Nazemetz Created Date: 9/21/2000 1:55:45 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:90
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: ValuedGate2436
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mixed Model Production Lines


1
  • Mixed Model Production Lines
  • C.S.Kanagaraj
  • ( Kana Garage )
  • IEM 5303

2
Overview
  • Mixed Model Production Lines (MMPL)
  • Production Planning Techniques
  • Evolution of Production Planning Techniques
  • Emergence of a new technique
  • Comparisons - Based on the dynamic environment

3
Overview (2)
  • Problem Statement
  • Automated Sequencing System (ASS)
  • Steps followed in sequencing
  • Conclusion

4
Introduction
  • Mixed Model Production Line (MMPL)
  • Production lines capable of making several
    different parts for a given period of time are
    called as the mixed model production lines.
  • Example An automobile assembly line
  • Mixed Model Production Lines use various
    production planning techniques to enhance their
    production capabilities

5
Production Planning Techniques
  • What are production planning techniques
  • These are a set techniques involving mathematical
    equations and algorithms, which are to used to
    help us effectively in scheduling, sequencing,
    batching, etc. in the manufacturing industry.
  • Example Genetic Algorithms.

6
Evolution of Production Planning Techniques
  • 70s - 80s Optimization Era
  • 80s Heuristic Era
  • late 80s Artificial Intelligence Era
  • - Expert Systems
  • - Neural Networks
  • - Genetic Algorithms
  • - Autonomous Agent
    Architectures
  • 90s Interactive Schedulers Era 1
  • _____________________________________
  • 1 Maria Caridi and Andrea Sianesi Multi-agent
    systems in production planning and control An
    application to the scheduling of mixed-model
    assembly lines, International Journal of
    Production Economics, Volume 68, Issue 1, 30
    October 2000, Pages 29-42

7
Synoptic Table of Scheduling Techniques
8
Limitations of these techniques
  • Optimization Era
  • Differences in mono and multi objective
    approaches
  • long time to reach full automation
  • less product differentiation
  • Heuristic Era
  • More static than being dynamic
  • It seems quite impossible to codify the system
    reactions to possible failures and events
  • 1

9
Limitations of these techniques (2)
  • Artificial Intelligence Era
  • Seems to be natural but complex
  • Expert System
  • Neural Networks
  • Genetic Algorithms
  • complexity of the software
  • difficulty of knowledge codifying
  • Autonomous Agent Architectures
  • very few are in use at present
  • its efficiency and effectiveness are still hard
    to evaluate
  • 1

10
Emerging Technique
  • Interactive Schedulers Era
  • They are the simplest kind of scheduling system
    because the plan is not made by a machine but the
    planner himself, while the system checks for the
    feasibility of the decision makers choices.
  • Schedulers are the ones most commonly used
    instruments in real world applications.
  • 1

11
Graph - Production Planning Techniques
  • Comparisons - High and Low Dynamics 1

12
Problem Statement
  • A production line of a sheet metal manufacturing
    facility is taken into consideration.
  • The problem concerning the production line is
    studied. And the area is identified in a transfer
    area between the press floor and the surface
    treatment zone.
  • The parts are sequenced manually before moving
    into the next process.

13
Problem Statement (2)
  • To accomplish this task, a basic design and an
    algorithm were borrowed from Choi Wonjoon and
    Shin Hyunoh 2 and the model was modified to
    provide a solution to the above manufacturing
    facility.
  • The algorithm developed by Choi Wonjoon and Shin
    Hyunoh 2 suported a dynamic environment.
  • _____________________________________
  • 2 Choi Wonjoon and Shin Hyunoh A Real-Time
    Sequence Control System for the Level Production
    of the Automobile Assembly Line, Computers
    Industrial Engineering, Volume 33, Issues 3-4,
    December 1997, Pages 769-772

14
Automated Sequencing System (ASS)
  • An automated sequencing system is developed
    similar to a PBS system used in by Choi Wonjoon
    and Shin Hyunoh 2.
  • The automated sequencing system, sequences the
    parts according some constraints, like demand and
    overall time taken by the part for getting
    processed.
  • The main aim of the system is to make use of the
    production line intelligently and efficiently.

15
Steps followed for sequencing
  • 1) Selecting the production/feeder line
  • 2) Assigning priorities to the parts according to
    the demand
  • 3) Selecting the part with the least processing
    time to process next
  • 4) Inserting the selected part to the priority
    queue
  • A set of algorithms use by Choi Wonjoon and Shin
    Hyunoh 2 are used to perform the sequencing
    task.

16
Conclusion
  • Mixed model production lines have become a
    universal standard in many manufacturing
    facilities. And therefore when a dynamic
    sequencing system is used, the production line
    becomes highly productive and efficient.
  • Best of luck! Guys
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com