Title: Robin Hogan
1Clouds and climate
- Robin Hogan
- (with input from Anthony Illingworth, Keith
Shine, Tony Slingo and Richard Allan)
2Overview
- The importance of clouds feedbacks
- Feedbacks associated with specific cloud types
- Getting clouds right in current climate models
- Evaluation of simulated clouds (e.g. using
A-train data) - Accurate radiation schemes (e.g. cloud
inhomogeneity) - Tackling feedbacks and model cloud schemes
- Analogues for global warming
- Using new observations as a tight constraint on
model development - Convection and high-resolution modelling
3Cloud feedbacks
IPCC (2007)
- Main uncertainty in climate prediction arises due
to the different cloud feedbacks in models that
are not associated with aerosols!
4Key cloud feedbacks
- Boundary-layer clouds
- Many studies show these to be most sensitive for
climate - Not just stratocumulus cumulus actually cover
larger area - Properties annoyingly dependent on both
large-scale divergence and small-scale details
(entrainment, drizzle etc) - Mid-level and supercooled clouds
- Potentially important negative feedback (Mitchell
et al. 1989) but their occurrence is
underestimated in nearly all models - Mid-latitude cyclones
- Expect pole-ward movement of storm-track but even
the sign of the associated radiative effect is
uncertain (IPCC 2007) - Deep convection and cirrus
- climateprediction.net showed that convective
detrainment is a key uncertainty lower values
lead to more moisture transport and a greater
water vapour feedback (Sanderson et al. 2007) - But some ensemble members unphysical (Rodwell
Palmer 07)
5Evaluating models
AMIP massive spread in model water content -
need some observations!
- A-Train can now provide this via new techniques
combining the radar and lidar
6July 2006 global IWC comparison
A-Train Model
- Too little spread in model
- Better than AMIP comparison implied!
Temperature (C)
- Much more detailed evaluation of models
(including high resolution ones) will proceed
within NCEO and CASCADE - NCAS should be involved in using these
comparisons to improve the model
7Cloud structure in radiation schemes
Fix only inhomogeneity Tripleclouds (fix
both) Plane-parallel Fix only overlap
TOA Shortwave CRF
TOA Longwave CRF
Current models Plane-parallel
Fix only overlap
Fix only inhomogeneity
Tripleclouds minus plane-parallel (W m-2)
New Tripleclouds scheme fix both!
With help from NCAS CMS, Jon Shonk shortly to
implement interactively in Met Office climate
model
next step apply Tripleclouds in Met Office
climate model
8Analogues for global warming
Models with most positive cloud feedback under
climate change
- A model that predicts cloud feedbacks should also
predict their dependence with other cycles, e.g.
tropical regimes - Tropical boundary-layer clouds in suppressed
conditions cause greatest difference in cloud
feedback - IPCC models with a positive cloud feedback best
match observed change to BL clouds with increased
T (Bony Dufresne 2005) - Apply to other cycles (seasonal, diurnal, ENSO
phase) - Can we use such analysis to find out why BL
clouds better represented? - Novel compositing methods?
- Can we throw out bad models?
Observations
Other models
Convective
Suppressed
Bony and Dufresne (2005)
9Mixed-phase clouds
- Potentially strong negative feedback
- Warmer climate ? more clouds in liquid phase ?
more reflective? longer lifetime (Mitchell et
al. 1989) - But mid-level clouds underestimated in nearly all
models
10Further activities required
- Using observations in model development
- Climate models in NWP mode (or single column
version forced by large-scale tendencies
preferred by Pier Siebesma) - Re-run many times with different physics and
compare to single radar/lidar sites (or A-train
observations for global runs) - Remove unjustified complexity (e.g. double-moment
ice?) - Deep convection
- Need to bite the bullet and modify the convection
scheme in the light of cloud-resolving runs (e.g.
CASCADE)? - Observational constraint on water vapour
detrained from convection, e.g. combination of
AIRS and CloudSat? - Even more tricky areas
- Is there any hope of getting a reliable long-term
cloud signal from historic datasets (e.g.
satellites)? - How do we get cloud feedback due to storm-track
movement? - Coupling of clouds to surface changes, e.g. in
the Arctic?