Robin Hogan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Robin Hogan

Description:

Clouds and climate Robin Hogan (with input from Anthony Illingworth, Keith Shine, Tony Slingo and Richard Allan) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:112
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: RobinH156
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Robin Hogan


1
Clouds and climate
  • Robin Hogan
  • (with input from Anthony Illingworth, Keith
    Shine, Tony Slingo and Richard Allan)

2
Overview
  • The importance of clouds feedbacks
  • Feedbacks associated with specific cloud types
  • Getting clouds right in current climate models
  • Evaluation of simulated clouds (e.g. using
    A-train data)
  • Accurate radiation schemes (e.g. cloud
    inhomogeneity)
  • Tackling feedbacks and model cloud schemes
  • Analogues for global warming
  • Using new observations as a tight constraint on
    model development
  • Convection and high-resolution modelling

3
Cloud feedbacks
IPCC (2007)
  • Main uncertainty in climate prediction arises due
    to the different cloud feedbacks in models that
    are not associated with aerosols!

4
Key cloud feedbacks
  • Boundary-layer clouds
  • Many studies show these to be most sensitive for
    climate
  • Not just stratocumulus cumulus actually cover
    larger area
  • Properties annoyingly dependent on both
    large-scale divergence and small-scale details
    (entrainment, drizzle etc)
  • Mid-level and supercooled clouds
  • Potentially important negative feedback (Mitchell
    et al. 1989) but their occurrence is
    underestimated in nearly all models
  • Mid-latitude cyclones
  • Expect pole-ward movement of storm-track but even
    the sign of the associated radiative effect is
    uncertain (IPCC 2007)
  • Deep convection and cirrus
  • climateprediction.net showed that convective
    detrainment is a key uncertainty lower values
    lead to more moisture transport and a greater
    water vapour feedback (Sanderson et al. 2007)
  • But some ensemble members unphysical (Rodwell
    Palmer 07)

5
Evaluating models
AMIP massive spread in model water content -
need some observations!
  • A-Train can now provide this via new techniques
    combining the radar and lidar

6
July 2006 global IWC comparison
A-Train Model
  • Too little spread in model
  • Better than AMIP comparison implied!

Temperature (C)
  • Much more detailed evaluation of models
    (including high resolution ones) will proceed
    within NCEO and CASCADE
  • NCAS should be involved in using these
    comparisons to improve the model

7
Cloud structure in radiation schemes
Fix only inhomogeneity Tripleclouds (fix
both) Plane-parallel Fix only overlap
TOA Shortwave CRF
TOA Longwave CRF
Current models Plane-parallel
Fix only overlap
Fix only inhomogeneity
Tripleclouds minus plane-parallel (W m-2)
New Tripleclouds scheme fix both!
With help from NCAS CMS, Jon Shonk shortly to
implement interactively in Met Office climate
model
next step apply Tripleclouds in Met Office
climate model
8
Analogues for global warming
Models with most positive cloud feedback under
climate change
  • A model that predicts cloud feedbacks should also
    predict their dependence with other cycles, e.g.
    tropical regimes
  • Tropical boundary-layer clouds in suppressed
    conditions cause greatest difference in cloud
    feedback
  • IPCC models with a positive cloud feedback best
    match observed change to BL clouds with increased
    T (Bony Dufresne 2005)
  • Apply to other cycles (seasonal, diurnal, ENSO
    phase)
  • Can we use such analysis to find out why BL
    clouds better represented?
  • Novel compositing methods?
  • Can we throw out bad models?

Observations
Other models
Convective
Suppressed
Bony and Dufresne (2005)
9
Mixed-phase clouds
  • Potentially strong negative feedback
  • Warmer climate ? more clouds in liquid phase ?
    more reflective? longer lifetime (Mitchell et
    al. 1989)
  • But mid-level clouds underestimated in nearly all
    models

10
Further activities required
  • Using observations in model development
  • Climate models in NWP mode (or single column
    version forced by large-scale tendencies
    preferred by Pier Siebesma)
  • Re-run many times with different physics and
    compare to single radar/lidar sites (or A-train
    observations for global runs)
  • Remove unjustified complexity (e.g. double-moment
    ice?)
  • Deep convection
  • Need to bite the bullet and modify the convection
    scheme in the light of cloud-resolving runs (e.g.
    CASCADE)?
  • Observational constraint on water vapour
    detrained from convection, e.g. combination of
    AIRS and CloudSat?
  • Even more tricky areas
  • Is there any hope of getting a reliable long-term
    cloud signal from historic datasets (e.g.
    satellites)?
  • How do we get cloud feedback due to storm-track
    movement?
  • Coupling of clouds to surface changes, e.g. in
    the Arctic?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com