Title: Assessment of Diagnostics for the Presence of Seasonality
1Assessment of Diagnosticsfor the Presence of
Seasonality
- Catherine C. H. Hood
- Catherine Hood Consulting
- Auburntown, TN
2Acknowledgements
- Roxanne Feldpausch
- X-12-Data, programming assistance
- Kathy McDonald-Johnson
- X-12-Rvw, programming and proof-reading
assistance - Brian Monsell
- Modifications to X-12-ARIMA
- David Findley
3Motivation
- Wanted to check for seasonality in quarterly
series, some with only 8 years of data - For series that are not too short, the spectral
graph is the most sensitive test for residual
seasonality - However, 60 points recommended (15 years for a
quarterly series) - Other diagnostics for residual seasonality can
also be difficult for short series, and also can
be model-dependent
4New Options in X-12-ARIMA
- Ability to change the spectrum used to test for
the presence of seasonality - spectrumseries a1 (or a19, b1)
- Ability to change the estimator for the spectrum
- maxspecar10 (default is 30)
5Spectral Analysis
- Allows us to see the relationships between the
frequencies - In a quarterly time series with a significant
seasonal component, the amplitudes that dominate
are at the two seasonal frequencies - An annual effect at ¼ cycles per quarter and
- A biannual effect at ½ cycles per quarter
6- G.0 10LOG(SPECTRUM) of the differenced,
transformed Original Series - (Table A1). Spectrum estimated from 1991.1
to 2005.2. - I
I - -7.37I
I -7.37 - I
SI - I
SI - I
SI - -10.39I
SI -10.39 - I
SI - I
SI - I
SI - -13.41I
SI -13.41 - I
SI - I
SI - I
SI - -16.44I
SI -16.44 - I
SI - I S
SI - I S
SI
7Evaluating the Estimator
- For the estimate of the spectrum, X-12-ARIMA uses
an AR(30) model fit to each output series and
evaluated at 61 frequencies - In Version 0.3, the order of the AR model for the
spectral estimate can be changed from the default
8Reading the Peaks
- For X-12-ARIMA to flag a seasonal peak
- The frequency must be six stars or asterisks
higher than either neighboring frequency - The higher the peak is above its neighbors, the
more important the peak - A seasonal peak also must be higher than the
median of the frequencies
9- G.0 10LOG(SPECTRUM) of the differenced,
transformed Original Series - (Table A1). Spectrum estimated from 1991.1
to 2005.2. - I
I - -7.37I
I -7.37 - I
SI - I
SI - I
SI - -10.39I
SI -10.39 - I
SI - I
SI - I
SI - -13.41I
SI -13.41 - I
SI - I
SI - I
SI - -16.44I
SI -16.44 - I
SI - I S
SI - I S
SI
10Example First Peak
- I
- I
- -16.44I
- I
- I S
- I S
- -19.46I S
- I S
- I S
- I S
- -22.48I S
- I S
- I S
- I S
11Peak Strength
- X-12-ARIMAs diagnostics file tells us exactly
how many stars are in a given peak - Original Series
- S1 4.4 S2 6.1
12Other Diagnostics
- M7 and D8 F-test
- Chi-square test for seasonal dummies
- regression variables( seasonal )
13D8 F-test of X-12-ARIMA
- After Table D8 is an F-test for stable
seasonality - Sometimes referenced as FS
- Has come to be known as the D8 F
- For time series, a cut-off value of 7.0 is
recommended by Lothian and Morry (1978)
14M7
- A function of F-values derived from two different
ANOVA tables to assess the amount of moving
seasonality present in a series relative to the
amount of stable seasonality - Interpretation a value greater than 1.0
indicates no identifiable seasonality
15Tests for Seasonal Regressors
- In SEATS, AgustÃn Maravall has used a
significance test on the individual months or
quarters to determine if there is significant
seasonality in the original series - X-12-ARIMA has a chi-square test to test for the
significance of the set of seasonal regressors
16Potential Problems
- Changes in the model can affect the stability of
the diagnostics, especially M7, D8 F, and the
Chi-square test for the seasonal regressors - Some users run the seasonally adjusted series
back through X-12-ARIMA to look at the values for
M7 and the D8 F, however, M7 was not designed for
this purpose
17Series for Study
- 314 National Accounts and Retail quarterly
seasonal series with 10 years of data - 432 simulated quarterly series with 15 years of
data - 72 simulated monthly series
- Simulated series computed from seasonal factors,
trends, and irregular from different series (see
Hood, Ashley, Findley 2000)
18Series Used for the Spectrum
- Assuming that the AR order is held constant, the
results were almost identical for - The outlier-adjusted original series
- The prior-adjusted original series
- This held true for the simulated series also
- So well focus on the outlier-adjusted original
series
19Spectral Estimators Seasonal Quarterly Series
- With the AR(30) estimator (because there are less
than 60 points) the peaks were often very short
and flat and difficult to distinguish - With the AR(10) estimator, the seasonal peaks are
much easier to distinguish
20Real Series Results for the S1 Peak
- Model AR of Series with Peak
- (2 1 0) 10 71 (25)
- (2 1 0) 30 9 ( 3)
21Real Series Results for the S1 Peak (2)
- Model AR Average of Stars
- (2 1 0) 10 5.3
- (2 1 0) 30 2.6
22Spectral Diagnostic Results from the Models Used
- Spectral diagnostic results suffer when using the
model (0 0 0) with seasonal dummies (generally
inappropriate for these series) due to the
outlier sets chosen automatically by the program
23Real Series Results for the S1 or S2 Peak
- Model AR of Series with Peak
- (2 1 0) 10 98 (31)
- (2 1 0) 30 29 ( 9)
- (0 0 0) 10 69 (22)
- (0 0 0) 30 28 ( 9)
24Results from the Models Used
- Most models gave very similar results
- The diagnostics were inadequate using the model
(0 0 0) with seasonal dummies, which we expect
would be inappropriate for these seasonal series
25Real Series Results for D8 F-test
- Model seasonal (D8F gt 7)
- (2 1 0) 273 (87)
- (2 1 2) 269 (86)
- (0 1 2) 271 (86)
- (0 1 0) 271 (86)
- (0 0 0) 114 (36)
26Real Series Results for the M7
- Model seasonal (M7 lt 1)
- (2 1 0) 286 (91)
- (2 1 2) 277 (88)
- (0 1 2) 281 (89)
- (0 1 0) 278 (89)
- (0 0 0) 104 (33)
27Real Series Results for the Chi-sq test
- Model seasonal (p lt 0.05)
- (2 1 0) 301 (96)
- (2 1 2) 293 (93)
- (0 1 2) 301 (96)
- (0 1 0) 283 (90)
- (0 0 0) 78 (25)
28Simulated Series
- Simulated quarterly series
- With strong seasonality
- With no seasonality
- With very little seasonality, the kind wed like
to detect when looking for residual seasonality
29Series with Strong Seasonality Series Found to
be Seasonal
- Diag (2 1 0) (0 0 0)
- D8 F 144 (100) 49 (34)
- Chi-sq 144 (100) 0 ( 0)
- AR10 Sp 144 (100) 144 (65)
30Series with Strong Seasonality Results for S1
or S2 Peak
- Model AR of Series with Peak
- (2 1 0) 10 144 (100)
- (2 1 0) 30 134 ( 93)
- (0 0 0) 10 144 (100)
- (0 0 0) 30 122 ( 85)
31Nonseasonal Series Series Found to be Seasonal
- Diag (2 1 0) (0 0 0)
- D8 F 56 (39) 0 ( 0)
- Chi-sq 90 (62) 0 ( 0)
- AR10 Sp 57 (40) 51 (35)
32Nonseasonal Series Results for S1 or S2 Peak
- Model AR of Series with Peak
- (2 1 0) 10 57 (40)
- (2 1 0) 30 65 (45)
- (0 0 0) 10 51 (35)
- (0 0 0) 30 72 (50)
33Series with Weak Seasonality Series Found to
be Seasonal
- Diag (2 1 0) (0 0 0)
- D8 F 111 (77) 0 ( 0)
- Chi-sq 124 (86) 0 ( 0)
- AR10 Sp 86 (60) 86 (60)
34Monthly Series
- Very limited study
- With an AR(10) estimator for the spectrum
- Trading day peaks not found
- A few more false positives (peaks for nonseasonal
series) found
35Conclusions
- An AR(10) estimator for the spectrum gives
- Fewer false positives (peaks for nonseasonal
series) than the default AR(30) estimator - More true positives (peaks for seasonal series)
than the default AR(30) estimator
36Conclusions (2)
- The diagnostics are fairly stable between various
seasonal models - However, there can be a lot of disagreement in
the diagnostics when comparing runs with seasonal
versus nonseasonal models - The practice of using M7/D8F to look for residual
seasonality in seasonally adjusted series is very
much dependent on whether or not the ARIMA model
is seasonal
37Future Research
- There has been quite a bit of work looking at the
six star rule for monthly series - Similar research might be useful for AR(10)
estimators for quarterly series
38Contact Information
- Catherine Hood
- Catherine Hood Consulting
- 1090 Kennedy Creek Road
- Auburntown, TN 37016-9614
- Telephone (615) 408-5021
- Email cath_at_catherinechhood.net
- Web www.catherinechhood.net
39(No Transcript)