Gatekeeping - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Gatekeeping

Description:

Gatekeeping Jan Falloon University of Western Sydney A Challenge of child centred research Negotiating and engaging with large numbers of gatekeepers Who? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: M9670
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Gatekeeping


1
Gatekeeping
  • Jan Falloon
  • University of Western Sydney

2
A Challenge of child centred research
  • Negotiating and engaging with large
  • numbers of gatekeepers

3
Who?
  • Parents other carers
  • Agencies
  • Caseworkers
  • Ethics committees
  • Researchers
  • Children and young people

4
Attributes of the gated
  • Barzilai-Nahon (2008) identifies four attributes
    of the 'gated'
  • political power (their ability to set agendas or
    change their preferences),
  • information production
  • relationship with the gatekeeper
  • and alternatives.

5
Political power
  • Conscious, unconscious or positively supporting
    the status quo
  • Positioning of children
  • Control of information, policy practice
  • and decision making
  • Those within the welfare system are in double
    jeopardy

6
Relationship with gatekeepers
  • gating of the gatekeepers
  • Relationship with gatekeeper

7
Ownership of information production
  • Negotiated through adults
  • Child-centred research included in but often
    not controlled by children
  • Children as researchers ?

8
Alternatives
  • Childrens parliaments other information
    sharing or knowledge production fora
  • Children as researchers?

9
Why gatekeep?
  • POWER
  • Unequal power relationships
  • Positioning of children young people
  • Dichotomy - us and them

10
PROTECTION
  • VULNERABILITY
  • Protection because of childrens perceived
    vulnerability
  • Particularly relevant in the child welfare sector
    where the state frequently has stepped in to
    protect children as the ultimate authority
  • Protection from having their views heard-gt
    further silencing

11
  • (IN)COMPETENCE
  • Protection because of childrens perceived
    Incompetence
  • Age related
  • Protection of agencies/workers/parents
  • competence
  • Our competence as researchers?

12
Best Interests
  • Determined by whom?
  • Concept underpins much child welfare work
  • Many of us make our living from children

13
Context/Functions
  • Time constraints in busy schedules
  • Competing priorities parents children agencies
  • Systemic practice eg ethics committees

14
How do we overcome these challenges?
  • Broadly
  • Advocating for the recognition of childrens
    agency
  • Education around childrens competence
  • Recognition of the rights of children to have a
    say

15
  • More specifically
  • Consent to research
  • - children young people to decide
  • to participate in the first instance
  • - homeless young people?
  • -ongoing consent
  • Working with/challenging ethics committees
  • alternative ways of engaging with children

16
  • and
  • Ensuring our research is relevant to those
    involved
  • Improving our communication information
  • Building partnerships with agencies workers
    collaborative research
  • Action research

17
  • Dissemination of research findings refereed
    journals and more accessible publications/forums
    press etc
  • Developing our own skills

18
  • We often try to protect children young
    people who are in the child welfare system but by
    not hearing their views by not ensuring their
    feelings and experiences are central to our
    policy and practice we run the risk of further
    harming them and those who follow

19
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com