Public interest and broadcasting development: regulation, co-regulation, self regulation

1
(No Transcript)
2
CommunityEngagementsome issues

• Rhodes University Imbizo,
• 22 July, 2006, Mpekweni
• by Guy Berger

3
W X Y Z
1 3
3 2 4
3 1
1 2
A B C D
4
W X Y Z
1 4 3 2
3 2 1 4
2 3 4 1
4 1 2 3
A B C D
5
W X Y Z
1 4 3 2
3 2 1 4
2 3 4 1
4 1 2 3
A B C D
6
Coming up

• Context definitions
• Trade-offs in TL-R-C
• A perspective beyond the universitys corporate
  point of view
• Partnership issues
• Resources priorities
• Resolutions

7
1. Introduction

• Post-94 Accountability
• HEQC Put community service in vision
• VC s in 2000 helps teach citizenship
• BUT
• Substantive or symbolic matter?

8
2. Definitions

CE
9
2. Definitions

CS
CE
10
2. Definitions

SL
CS
CE
11
2. Definitions

• What is community?
• State bodies?
• Industry associations?
• Critique or only constructive?
• Include a controversial contribution?

12
3. Trade-offs integrations
?
R
T
C
T
C
R

• CHE view is ? make a move from
• Silos to Simultaneity
• versus
• Prioritise 1st 2nd functionalities?

13
3. Trade-offs integrations

• Service ?goal? Learning
• Learning ? outcome ? Research
• Learning ?CE ? Research

14
4. Whose point of view?

• CE as a good in-itself, not only in institutional
  interests.
• But assessing players points of view helps with
  sustainability.
• Even reluctant students benefit.
• How ensure symmetry of benefit
• Community ?beneficiary ? Campus

15
5. Partnership who helps who?

• Paternalism? or research
• Opportunity to break myopic preoccupation with
  academic forms of learning by validating
  indigenous, tacit and pre-theoretical knowledge
  endemic to the non-academic world
• Issue contributions of each partner?
• Issue Contracts including risk management.

16
W X Y Z
N E S T
E I N A
S N A P
T A P E
A B C D
EASE EASY EATS EARS EDGE EERY EINA EMIT EN EPIC
EYRE ENDS EUR0 ES
17
W X Y Z
B O O K
O
O
K
A B C D
18
W X Y Z
B O O K
O
O
K
A B C D
19
W X Y Z
B O O K
O B O E
O O Z E
K E E N
A B C D
20
6. Resources rhetoric

• CHE due recognition
• VCs promoted rewarded
• What will be mobilised, and, where relevant, at
  expense of what?

21
7. _at_ Rhodes?

• Many projects, uneven pedagogy.
• Still Cinderella
• Can we go through all stages to 100
  institutionalise?
• Or Concentrate on increasing co-ordination of a
  few, even if limited impact?

22
8. Conclusion

• CE difficult goes against SA trend.
• CE vision conflicts with reality in servicing
  industry ( unequal social order), and with
  aspiration to be ivory tower.
• CE is extrinsic, and new
• But tensions a source of creative energy
• So, despite no resources, embrace it

23
Summing up

• SA context calls for CE
• Definitions and open sky
• Simultaneity, vs hierarchy of functionality?
• Points of view beyond RU interests
• Seeking symmetry of benefit and recognising
  knowledge input to partnership
• Resources strategy shoot for whole, or narrow
  target?

24
So embrace

• creative tension of 3 roles
• ivory,
• ebony/bigben,
• still-to-find-its-colour.
• Not ignoring R, its a fact that a bit of TLC
  never did anyone any harm!

25
Thank you