Review of Interim Appendix 18

1
Review of Interim Appendix 18

• FA001089

2
Background

• AS-2053-023/FA was passed by the Senate and
  transmitted to President Suzuki on 1/24/03.
• No response from President Suzuki or President
  Ortiz.
• The President instituted an interim version of
  Appendix 18 effective June 19, 2008

3
Resources

• All MPPs,
• FA Committee
• MPP evaluation criteria at other CSU campuses,
• Presidents task force on Appendix 18

4
Focus of Review

• Committee structure
• Committee membership
• Evaluation process and criteria
• Faculty participation.
• Impact of the evaluation and the end results

5
Committee Structure
Campus Separate Committees for Different Positions?
Fresno Yes
CSUN Yes
Long Beach Yes
San Diego Yes
Dominguez Hills University
San Jose Yes
San Bernardino Yes
San Marcos Yes
Sacramento University
Fullerton University
SLO Yes
Chico University
East Bay Yes
6
Committee Membership
Campus Faculty from same college as Dean? Faculty majority for Academic Administrators?
Fresno Yes Yes
CSUN Yes Yes
Long Beach Yes Yes
San Diego Yes Yes
Dominguez Hills ? No
San Jose Yes Yes
San Bernardino ? Yes for VP
San Marcos Yes Yes for Dean, No for VP
Sacramento ? No
Fullerton ? No
SLO Yes Yes
Chico ? Yes
East Bay Yes Yes
7
Evaluation Tools/Criteria
Campus Based on position? Established by the committee MPP, or supervisor?
Fresno Yes Yes
CSUN Yes Yes
Long Beach Yes Yes
San Diego Yes Yes
Dominguez Hills Yes Yes
San Jose Yes Yes
San Bernardino ? Yes
San Marcos Yes Yes
Sacramento Yes Yes
Fullerton Common Yes
SLO Yes Yes
Chico Yes Yes
East Bay Yes Yes
8
Summary of Major Differences
Presidents Interim Policy FA Recommended Policy
Committee Structure By Division, By Dean By Position
Committee Membership Three employees by President/designee two by senate and one student if appropriate Adjustment to Appendix 14 to reduce committee size.
Faculty participation Shall not be in the Deans College. No Majority for AA 4 out of 5 from the college. Majority for AA
Evaluation Criteria/tools Pre-established common survey, some changes allowed By Committee MPP Reviews
Process MPP may request correct/deletion to the report, President or designee decide. MPP review of the final report, Minority report.
9
Summary of Major Differences (cont.)
Presidents Interim Policy FA Recommended Policy
Evaluation criteria Mostly Pre-established. Each division may add up to three more areas. Developed by the committee. Based on job description, work plan, periodic and annual evaluation reports, self assessment, goals and objectives for current and next review cycle
End Result Report in Personnel file, Summary report to campus community Same. Copy of summary report to EC.