Presentation on

1

• Presentation on
• New HEC Ranking Criteria

2
SCHEME OF PRESENTATION

• Parameters of old new Ranking Criteria
• Comparative Study - HEC Ranking Criteria Old
  New
• Current BU Status
• Recommendations

3
OLD NEW PARAMETERS OF RANKINGS OLD NEW PARAMETERS OF RANKINGS OLD NEW PARAMETERS OF RANKINGS OLD NEW PARAMETERS OF RANKINGS OLD NEW PARAMETERS OF RANKINGS OLD NEW PARAMETERS OF RANKINGS

S.No Old Ranking Criteria (2010) Score S.No New Ranking Criteria (2012) Score
1 Implementation of QA Criteria 18 1 Quality Assurance Enhancement 20
2 Teaching Quality 42 2 Teaching Quality 35
3 Research 40 3 Research 35
      4 Employer Perception 5
      5 Peer Perception 5
  Total Score 100   Total Score 100
4
COMPARATIVE STUDY - HEC RANKING CRITERIA NEW
OLD 1. QA Criteria / Sub parameters
S Old Ranking Criteria (2010) MAX Points New Ranking Criteria (2012) MAX Points System for Assessment Marking  
1 Implementation of QA Criteria 18 Quality Assurance Enhancement 20 System for Assessment Marking  
a Plagiarism policy implementation 6 a Plagiarism policy implementation 6 Based on evidence on various stages ofimplementation 1. Constitution of Plagiarism standingcommittee (PSC)2. Notifications/Minutes ofSyndicate/BOG/Statutory bodymeetings.3. Functioning of the committee (PSC) by resolving the plagiarism cases.
b Eligibility Criteria for appointments of faculty members 4 b Eligibility Criteria for appointments offaculty members 4 Based on adherence HEC criteria appointments of faculty members 1. Notifications/Minutes ofSyndicate/BOG/Statutory bodymeetings for implementation of criteria by university.
c Criteria for M.Phil./MS Ph.D. Programmes 4 c Compliance of M.Phil./MS Ph.D. criteria 4 Based on compliance of HEC criteria 1. Notifications/Minutes ofSyndicate/BOG/Statutory bodymeetings for implementation of criteria by university.
d Quality Enhancement Cell Categorization 4 d Quality Enhancement Cell Categorization 6 As per scorecard developed and shared with Universities by QAA of HEC.
  Total Score 18   Total Score 20  
5
2. Teaching Quality/Sub-Parameters
S Old Ranking Criteria (2010) MAX Points New Ranking Criteria (2012) MAX Points System for Assessment Marking  
2 Teaching Quality 42 Teaching Quality 35 System for Assessment Marking  
a Student Teacher Ratio 12 a Student Teacher Ratio 7 Total regular faculty and FTE (Full Time Equivalent) faculty will be considered for calculating overall Student Teacher Ratio.
b Ratio of PhD faculty to total faculty 9 b Ratio of PhD faculty to total faculty 6 It is the PhD faculty divided by total faculty. For medical FRCS, FCP etc. will be treated as terminal degrees.
c Selectivity 5 c Selectivity 5 It is the ratio of the total applicants seeking admission in the university and students actually selected.
d Computers (Number of computers provided to students by university) 4 d Computers 4 The total number of computers available to students and faculty of university.
e Library books 4 e Library books 4 Total number of books at campus libraryexcluding electronic books.
f Full Time PhD faculty 3 N/A N/A
g Total PhD output for 2010 5 N/A N/A
   N/A  N/A f Ratio of Full time faculty to part time 3 It is the ratio of full time faculty to part time faculty. Full time faculty is regular and contractual faculty whereas part time faculty is the visiting faculty.
N/A N/A g Teacher Evaluation 3 Mechanism of teacher evaluation established within the framework of QEC or universities own conducted faculty evaluation survey .
N/A N/A h Training of faculty 3 As per HEC record and data provided by universities on ranking proforma will be used for this component.Other faculty training information (National as well as international) as per evidence provided by universities will be considered.
  Total Score 42   Total Score 35  
6
3.Research/Sub-Parameters
S.No Old Ranking Criteria (2010) MAX Points New Ranking Criteria (2012) MAX Points MAX Points System for Assessment Marking
3 Research 40 3 Research 35  
i HEC Approved supervisors 5 i Approved supervisors 5 HEC Approved supervisors are thosewho can enroll HEC scholars. Whereas HEC registered supervisors are those who can only supervise scholars which are not funded by HEC.
ii Indigenous scholarship 4 ii Indigenous scholarship 4 Total number of HEC indigenous scholars enrolled in university as per records of HEC scholarship section.
iii Research grants approved 2 iii Research grants approved other than HEC 2 As per the record of HEC RD Division the number of research grants approved by the HEC will be used. Documentary evidence viz. MOUs etc. will be required for those research grants received by the university other than the HEC.Last 3 years data will be considered.
iv Travel Grants approved 2 iv Travel Grants approved 2 As per the record of HEC RD Division,number of travel grants received by thefaculty members of the universities will be used. Documentary evidence will be required for those travel grants received by the university faculty other than the HEC sources.Last 3 years data will be considered.
7
S.No Old Ranking Criteria (2010) MAX Points S.No New Ranking Criteria (2012) MAX Points System for Assessment Marking
v Publications in Impact Factor Journals 5 v Publications in Impact Factor Journals 4 ISI web of knowledge will be benchmark and(research output extracted by HECDigital Library will be used. Details of Research Publications of Universities by HEC as flashed
vi Number of papers published by theuniversity 3 vi Number of papers published by the university 3 ISI web of knowledge will be benchmark and(research output extracted by HECDigital Library will be used. Details of Research Publications of Universities by HEC as flashed
vii Citations 4 vii Citations 3 ISI web of knowledge will be benchmark and(research output extracted by HECDigital Library will be used. Details of Research Publications of Universities by HEC as flashed
viii University H Index 4 viii University H Index 2 ISI web of knowledge will be benchmark and(research output extracted by HECDigital Library will be used. Details of Research Publications of Universities by HEC as flashed
ix Number of W, X, Y , Z Journals Published bythe University 5 ix Number of W, X, Y , Z Journals Published by the University 3 As per Quality Assurance Divisions record,,number of HEC recognized journals publishedby the university in W, X, Y, Z category will beused.
x Internet Bandwidth (PERN) utilization 4 x Internet Bandwidth (PERN) utilization 3 Average utilization of Internet bandwidth bythe universities acquired through PERN andother ISPs will be used. Documentary proofMRTG (Multi Router Traffic Grapher), PRTG (Paessier Router Traffic Grapher) etc. of Internet bandwidth utilization will be required of other ISPs.
xi Number of Conferences Organized 2 xi Number of Conferences Organized 2 As per the record of RD Division, HEC thenumber of seminars, conferences, workshops symposia organized by university through HEC funding will be used.In addition conferences etc. organized byuniversities through national/internationalcollaboration from sources other than HECfunding will also be accounted, for whichdocumentary evidence will be required.Last 3 years data will be considered.
  - - xii Total PhD output for 2011 2 Data provided by universities throughranking proforma and records of PhDCountry Directory data will be used.
  Total Score 40   Total Score 35  
8
04. New Parameters added
S Old Ranking Criteria (2010) MAX Points New Ranking Criteria (2012) MAX Points System for Assessment Marking  
3 Employer Perception Survey 3 Employer Perception Survey 5 System for Assessment Marking  
N/A N/A Employer Perception Survey All Universities have been requested to Provide the 05 top recruiters information in the relevant field. Employer perception survey will be finalized based on responses received from potential employers of university graduates.
4 Peer Perception 4 Peer Perception 5
N/A Nil Peer Perception Each university has been given opportunity to consider academic standing of other universities among peers and rank them as1,2,3, . to 10, accordingly. Each university has to rate other one falling in the same category, excluding itself. Universities in General Category will be providing peer perception according to respective size of distributed on enrollment basis, given below Largegt7000 Mediumgt3000 lt7000 Small lt3000 The relevant list has been provided by HEC to each university.
  Total Score Nil   Total Score 10  
Note Relative method of scoring or grading will
be used among 18 General Large Universities
9
STATUS OF BU AMONG GENERAL UNIVERSITY (LARGE) OLD
RANKING 2010
S.No Institute Name Teaching Quality (42) QA Criteria(18) Research(40) Total Score(100)
1 University of Punjab, Lahore 15.89 17 12.18 45
2 University of Karachi 15.11 10 10.67 36
3 Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 12.08 12 9.76 34
4 University of Peshawar 12.06 10 10.43 32
5 Intemational Islamic University, Islamabad 9.12 15 6.83 32
6 Govt College University, Faisalabad 8.06 18 2.95 29
7 Federal Urdu University,Arts, Science Technolgy 8.84 17 2.84 29
8 University of Sargodha 8.35 13 4.61 26
9 University of Sindh, Jamshoro 8.30 11 5.74 25
10 The Islamia University, Bahawalpur 9.33 10 5.69 25
11 Hazara University, Mansehra 8.63 13 3.16 25
12 Bahria University 6.35 15 2.18 24
13 University of Education, Lahore 4.94 15 2.70 23
14 National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad 5.69 14 2.54 22
15 University of Gujrat 5.97 14 1.58 22
16 Preston University, Kohat 7.05 7 0.37 14
17 University of Lahore 6.31 5 0.72 12

10
BU STATUS Old V/S New BU STATUS Old V/S New BU STATUS Old V/S New BU STATUS Old V/S New BU STATUS Old V/S New
S.No Status (2010) Points scored out Status (2012) Max Points
1 Implementation of QA Criteria 18 Quality Assurance Enhancement 20
1 Plagiarism Standing Committee 3 Out of 6 Plagiarism policy implementation
2 Appointment Criteria 4 Out of 4 Eligibility Criteria for appointments of faculty members
3 Criteria for MS/Mphil Phd 4 Out of 4 Compliance of M.Phil./MS Ph.D. criteria
4 QEC Categorization 4 Out of 4 Quality Enhancement Cell Categorization
Total 15 Out of 18
11
BU STATUS Old V/S New BU STATUS Old V/S New BU STATUS Old V/S New BU STATUS Old V/S New BU STATUS Old V/S New
S.No Status (2010) Ratio / Nos Status (2012) Ratio/ Nos
Teaching Quality (6.35 out of 42) Teaching Quality (35)
1 Student Teacher Ratio (8308593) 141 Student Teacher Ratio (9867813) 121
2 Ratio of PhD faculty to total faculty 401007 125 Ratio of PhD faculty to total faculty(76737) 19
3 Selectivity (No of applicants against available seats) 85002500 31 Selectivity (No of applicants against available seats) 120003000 41
4 Computers (No of computers for the students provided by university) 642 Computers (No of computers for the students and faculty provided by university) 1027
5 Library books 50,000 Library books 55,001
6 Full Time PhD faculty 41 Full Time PhD faculty 40
7 Full Time faculty 406 Full Time faculty 392
8 Part Time Faculty 560 Part Time Faculty 345
9 Full Time Equivalent Faculty 593 Not Asked
10 Total PhD output for 2010 0 Not Asked
11 Not Asked - Ratio of Full time faculty to part time (392345) 11
12 Not Asked - Teacher Evaluation
13 Not Asked Training of faculty 226
12
BU STATUS Old V/S New BU STATUS Old V/S New BU STATUS Old V/S New BU STATUS Old V/S New BU STATUS Old V/S New
S.No Status (2010) Nos Status (2012) Nos
i HEC Approved supervisors 7 Approved supervisors 15
ii Indigenous scholarship 6 Indigenous scholarship 16
iii Research grants approved 4 Research grants approved other than HEC 24
iv Travel Grants approved 10 Travel Grants approved 13
13
BU STATUS Old V/S New BU STATUS Old V/S New BU STATUS Old V/S New BU STATUS Old V/S New BU STATUS Old V/S New
S.No Status (2010) Nos Status (2012) Nos
v Publications in Impact Factor Journals - Publications in Impact Factor Journals 14 (July 11-June12)
vi Number of papers published by theuniversity 10 Number of papers published by the university 25
vii Citations 3 Citations 7
viii University H Index 2 University H Index -
ix Number of W, X, Y , Z Journals Published bythe University 0 Number of W, X, Y , Z Journals Published by the University -
x Internet Bandwidth (PERN) utilization 18 Mbs out of 48 Mbs Internet Bandwidth (PERN) utilization 28.64 Utilization in Islamabad Campus 25.91 Utilization in Karachi Campus
xi Number of Conferences Organized 0 Number of Conferences Organized 28
Total PhD output for 2011 0
14
BU STATUS Old V/S New BU STATUS Old V/S New BU STATUS Old V/S New BU STATUS Old V/S New BU STATUS Old V/S New
S.No Status (2010) Max Points Status (2012) Max Points
Employer Perception Survey Employer Perception Survey
1 Not Asked Employer Perception Survey
Peer Perception Peer Perception
2 Not Asked Peer Perception
15
COMPARATIVE STUDY QA CRITERIA GENERAL
UNIVERSITIES (LARGE)
S.No Institute Name Appointment Criteria Appointment Criteria Criteria for MS/Mphil Phd Criteria for MS/Mphil Phd QEC Categorization QEC Categorization Plagiarism Standing Committee Plagiarism Standing Committee Total
S.No Institute Name 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010
1 Govt. College University, Faisalabad. 4 4 4 6 18
2 Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science Technology. 4 4 3 6 17
3 University of The Punjab, Lahore 4 4 3 6 17
4 Bahria University, Islamabad 4 4 4 3 15
5 International Islamic University. 4 4 4 3 15
6 University of Education, Lahore. 4 4 1 6 15
7 National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad. 4 4 3 3 14
8 University of Gujrat. 4 4 3 3 14
9 Hazara University Mansehra, KPK. 4 4 2 3 13
10 University of Sargodha. 4 4 2 3 13
11 Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan. 0 4 2 6 12
12 University of Sindh. 4 4 3 0 11
13 The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan. 4 4 2 0 10
14 University of Karachi. 4 0 3 3 10
15 University of Peshawar. 0 4 3 3 10
16 Preston University, Kohat 4 0 0 3 7
17 University of Lahore, Lahore 0 0 2 3 5
18 National University of Science Technlogy (NUST) 4 4 4 4 18
16
COMPARATIVE STUDY - TEACHING QUALITY GENERAL
UNIVERSITIES (LARGE)
S.No Institute Name Student / Teacher Ratio Student / Teacher Ratio Computers Computers Applicants Applicants Library Library PhD Output PhD Output Graduate/ Postgraduate students Graduate/ Postgraduate students Undergraduate Students Undergraduate Students FT PhD Faculty FT PhD Faculty FT Faculty FT Faculty PT Faculty PT Faculty FTE Faculty
S.No Institute Name  2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010
1 BZU  171 3,500   35,000   304,573   15   7,256 7,594 175 523 960 843
2 Bahria University  141 181 642 1027 8,476  11,539 50,000  55,001 0 1 2,054 2933 6,254 6934 41 40 406 392 560 345 593
3 FUUAST  141 474   2,418   127,973   0   4,509 5,163 114 432 655 650
4 GCU, Faisalabad  161 800   16,942   19,500   1   3,530 8,603 117 592 426 734
5 Hazara UniversityMansehra  191 950   11,000   107,000   0   1,175 7,090 79 405 81 432
6 IIUI  231 3,478   16,642   119,560   16   8,333 11,323 156 585 777 844
7 IUB  211 2,100   22,602   225,000   35   7,974 6,654 115 533 487 695
8 KU  231 5,500   30,000   366,441   125   12,042 15,162 342 739 1,276 1,164
9 NUML  261 600   6,156   115,000   24   9,741 4,146 49 513 29 523
10 NUST  171  6,519    46,832    342,896   10     890    7,337    303    912    116   951
11 PU  251 6,500   140,054   1,223,600   108   13,715 16,893 367 1,006 614 1,211
12 Preston University, Kohat  271 2,630   4,693   51,472   0   4,689 7,434 65 363 246 445
13 UOE, LHR  471 893   30,000   169,964   5   8,213 5,051 29 247 104 282
14 UOS, Sargodha  251 1,500   18,263   78,721   3   6,521 8,244 132 559 55 577
15 UOP, Peshawar  221 1,350   20,000   191,197   7   5,938 5,706 179 419 267 508
16 UOS, Sindh  331 1,458   15,372   382,201   15   3,628 16,039 133 570 67 592
17 University of Gujrat  201 800   15,942   25,141   0   2,668 7,001 38 458 18 464
18 University of Lahore  161 1,680   11,693   25,409   0   2,679 11,290 44 770 163 824
17
COMPARATIVE STUDY - RESEARCH GENERAL UNIVERSITIES
(LARGE)
S.No Institute Name Conferences Conferences PERN PERN H-INDEX H-INDEX Citations Citations Research Papers Research Papers HEC Aprvd Suprvsrs HEC Aprvd Suprvsrs HEC Travel Grants HEC Travel Grants Indigenous Scholars Indigenous Scholars Research Grants Research Grants W Category W Category X Category X Category Y Category Y Category Z Category Z Category
S.No Institute Name 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012
1 BZU 3 25 16 141 143 96 19 280 21     2 1
2 Bahria University   28 18 25 2 - 3 7 10 25 7 15 10 13 6 24 4         1
3 FUUAST 2 9 5 35 61 11 12 27 17        
4 GCU, Faisalabad    6 9 88 73 46 7 14 22       2
5 Hazara UniversityMansehra 2 4 6 63 58 33 6 19 3        
6 IIUI 3 33 7 61 57 55 69 172 14   1   3
7 IUB 2 14 9 99 88 36 41 155 8       1
8 KU 2   25 305 392 80 53 122 135 3   4 6
9 NUML   7 1 3 4 18 6 62 0       3
10 NUST  4  42  19  273    155  170 44  103   80          
11 PU 3 40 20 487 356 182 48 441 53 1 3 9 8
12 Preston University, Kohat     1 3 9 7     0        
13 UOE, LHR 1 3 4 11 9 7 4 25 2       1
14 UOS, Sargodha   9 13 228 193 48 17 35 14        
15 UOP, Peshawar 8 27 14 247 153 73 32 171 26     4 5
16 UOS, Sindh 3 20 21 179 95 15 36 12 18     1 6
17 University of Gujrat   18 1 6 20 20 8   1        
18 University of Lahore   5 3   6 13 2 1 0        
18
RECOMMENDATIONS

• There must be some benchmark to measure
  performance. Despite weaknesses and flaws in the
  assessment, HEC benchmark be followed in letter
  spirit.
• Any suggestion on proposed New Criteria of
  Ranking be forwarded to QA Dte for onward
  submission to HEC for consideration / review.
• Number of HEC enrolled indigenous scholars be
  increased
• Number of Research Grants from HEC from other
  sources like USAID, JICA, Corporate sector
  NGOs etc be increased.
• Number of travel grants from HEC other services
  be increased
• More utilization of PERN
• Organizing Conferences, National International
  with the funding from HEC or atleast HEC may be
  intimated

19

• Thank You

20
GENERAL UNIVERSITIES MEDIUM
No. Institute Teaching Quality QA Criteria Research Total Score
1 Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 23.88 11 32.46 67
2 Government College University, Lahore 14.65 13 11.95 40
3 Gomal University, D.I Khan 10.64 17 4.71 32
4 Kohat University of Science and Technology, Kohat 9.54 15 4.07 29
5 Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur 9.18 14 4.39 28
6 The University of Azad Jammu Kashmir, AJK 9.72 15 3.58 28
7 Riphah International University, Islamabad 9.74 15 2.67 27
8 Fatima Jinnah Women University, Rawalpindi 8.22 15 2.71 26
9 University of Balochisan, Quetta 9.44 13 3.73 26
10 University of Management Technology, Lahore 7.49 13 4.81 25
11 Forman Christian College, Lahore 14.45 7 1.92 23
12 Mohammad Ali Jinnah University, Karachi 7.53 3 6.7 17
13 Hamdard University, Karachi 6.82 7 2.12 16
14 Jinnah University for Women, Karachi 7.39 7 0.69 15
15 University of Central Punjab, Lahore 5.68 8 1.47 15
21
GENERAL UNIVERSITIES SMALL
No. Institute Teaching Quality QA Criteria Research Total Score
1 Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad 23.43 6 7.72 37
2 University of Faisalabad, Faisalabad 16.14 15 0.78 32
3 Sardar Bahadur Khan Women's University, Quetta 12.13 15 2.39 30
4 National Defence University, Islamabad 12.23 11 3.96 27
5 Karakurum International University, Gilgit 11.23 12 1.77 25
6 Textile Institute of Pakistan, Karachi 14.16 11 0 25
7 University of Malakand, Dir, Malakand 7.29 13 3.33 24
8 Foundation University, Islamabad 11.96 7 3.3 22
9 Beaconhouse National University, Lahore 7.59 13 0.4 21
9 Dadabhoy Institute of Higher Education, Karachi 6.05 15 0 21
9 Frontier Women University, Peshawar 4.86 15 1.46 21
9 Sarhad University of Science and Information Technology, Peshawar 10.05 11 0.26 21
9 University of South Asia, Lahore 7.7 11 1.9 21
10 GIFT University, Gujranwala 8.52 11 0 20
11 Indus Institute of Higher Education, Karachi 8.59 10 0 19
11 Mohiuddin Islamic University, AJK 7.7 11 0.01 19
12 Hajvery University, Lahore 6.73 11 0 18
13 Kinnaird College For Women, Lahore 8.19 9 0.48 18
14 The Superior College, Lahore 10.91 7 0.06 18
15 Karachi Institute of Economics Technology, Karachi 9.93 7 0.56 17
15 Newport Institute of Communications Economics, Karachi 5.89 11 0.25 17
16 Greenwich University, Karachi 8.31 7 0.25 16
17 Minhaj University, Lahore 11.03 3 0 14
18 Preston Institute of Management, Science and Technology, Karachi 7.76 3 0 11
19 Preston University, Karachi 7.3 0 1.01 8
22
ENGINEERING
No. Institute Teaching Quality QA Criteria Research Total Score
1 Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Islamabad 36.51 17 28.27 81.79
2 National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad 25.83 18 18.22 62.05
3 Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences Technology, Topi 24.37 9 22.67 56.03
4 University of Engineering and Technology- Lahore 16.15 12 11.65 39.79
5 University of Engineering and Technology-Taxila 16.82 10 12.23 39.05
6 Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad 14.72 14 9.92 38.64
7 KPK University of Engineering and Technology 12.48 12 6.05 30.53
8 Mehran University of Engineering Technology, Jamshoro 12.11 12 5.59 29.7
9 NED University of Engineering Technology, Karachi 10.66 13 4.5 28.16
10 Air University, Islamabad 13.77 10 4.27 28.04
11 National Textile University, Faisalabad 9.68 8 8.44 26.12
12 Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Science Technology, Nawabshah 7.97 14 1.54 23.51
13 Balochistan University of Engg Technology, Khuzdar 8.37 13 1.52 22.89
14 Sir Syed University of Engineering Technology, Karachi 7.59 14 0.86 22.45
15 Mirpur University of Science Technology, AJK 6.78 13 2.18 21.96
16 Dawood College of Engineering Technology, Karachi 5.78 14 0 19.78
23
Business Education
No. Institute Teaching Quality QA Criteria Research Total Score
1 Lahore University of Management Sciences, Lahore 30.38 14 24.83 69
2 Institute of Business Administration Karachi 17.09 15 8.42 41
3 Iqra University,Karachi 20.09 14 5.96 40
4 Sukkar, Institute of Business Administration, Sukkar 17.32 15 7.31 40
5 National College of Business Administration Economics, Lahore 22.11 1 14.59 38
6 Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science Technology, Karachi 11.51 11 8.94 31
7 Institute of Management Sciences,Peshawar 9.14 14 8.3 31
8 Lahore School of Economics, Lahore 13.48 11 4.61 29
9 Imperial College of Business Studies, Lahore 20.11 7 0 27
10 Institute of Management Sciences, Lahore 10.6 11 2.47 24
11 Institute of Business Management, Karachi 10.29 10 1.74 22
12 Institute of Business and Technology, Karachi 17.8 2 0.25 20
13 KASB Institute of Technology, Karachi 11.66 7 0.35 19
24
Computer Sciences IT Category
No. Institute Teaching Quality (42) QA Criteria(18) Research(40) Total Score Position
1 COMSATS Institute of Information Technology (CIIT), Islamabad 28.67 15 24.77 68 1
2 National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences (NU-FAST), Islamabad 33.06 9 18.85 61 2
3 Qurtaba University of Science and Information Technology, D I Khan 26.72 11 5.55 43 3
4 Balochistan University of Information Technology and Management Sciences, Quetta 16.79 14 6.04 37 4
5 City University of Science and Information Technology, Peshawar 16.1 11 0.91 28 5
6 CECOS University of Information Technology and Emerging Sciences, Peshawar 14.61 11 0 26 6