Maryland State Bar Association Health Law Section - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Maryland State Bar Association Health Law Section

Description:

Anti-Markup Rules 42 C.F.R 414.50 payment to the billing physician ... or Share diagnostic testing equipment with another Medicare individual or entity Disruptive ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:94
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: msb51
Learn more at: http://www.msba.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Maryland State Bar Association Health Law Section


1
Maryland State Bar AssociationHealth Law Section
  • Understanding Medicare Billing Issues
  • Anti-Markup Rules, Independent Diagnostic Testing
    Facility Rules, and Liability Risks Associated
    with Non-Compliance with Medicare Billing Rules
  • Kathleen M. Stratton
  • Crowell Moring LLP
  • 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
  • Washington, D.C. 20004
  • (202) 624-2723

2
Anti-Markup Rules
  • Current Medicare statutes and regulations
    prohibit the markup of the technical component
    (TC) of certain diagnostic tests performed by
    outside suppliers and billed to Medicare by a
    different individual or entity.

3
Anti-Markup Rules
  • 42 C.F.R 414.50 payment to the billing physician
    is limited to the lowest of the following
    amounts
  • 1. The suppliers net charge to the physician
  • 2. The billing physicians actual charge or
  • 3. The Medicare fee schedule amount that would be
    allowed if the supplier billed directly.

4
Anti-Markup Rules
  • Significant changes made to anti-markup rules in
    the 2008 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Rule
  • Restrictions would apply to technical and
    professional component billing
  • Restrictions would also extend to billing for
    diagnostic tests performed at a site other than
    the office of the billing physician
  • Significant controversy arose with these changes
    CMS delayed implementation until January 1, 2009

5
Independent Diagnostic Testing Facilities
  • Free-standing facilities providing (and billing
    for) diagnostic tests, i.e. MRI, CT, PET (not
    clinical lab or pathology tests) to patients
    referred by their treating physician (the
    physician responsible for treating the patients
    medical condition and who will use the results of
    the diagnostic test in the care of the patient)
  • Must comply with Medicare Performance Standards
    specific to IDTFs.
  • Standards related to business operating
    procedures, location, medical record-keeping,
    patient solicitation, etc.

6
When Must a Supplier of Diagnostic Tests Enroll
in Medicare Program as an IDTF?
  • An entity may bill for diagnostic tests as a
    physician office rather than an IDTF only if it
    meets the following four characteristics
  • Physician practice is owned by physicians or
    hospital
  • The entity primarily bills for physician services
    (e.g. evaluation management (EM) codes and not
    for diagnostic tests
  • It furnishes diagnostic tests primarily to
    patients being treated by physicians in the
    practice
  • The tests are performed and interpreted at the
    same location where the practice physicians also
    treat patients for their medical conditions.

7
When Must a Supplier of Diagnostic Tests Enroll
in Medicare Program as an IDTF?
  • If a substantial portion of the entitys business
    involves the performance of diagnostic tests, the
    diagnostic testing services may be sufficiently
    separate business to warrant enrollment as an
    IDTF in addition to enrollment as a physician
    group practice.
  • In this case, the group would bill as an IDTF for
    tests performed on patients who are not patients
    of the practice the group would bill under its
    group billing number for tests performed on
    patients of the group.

8
Radiology Groups
  • Radiology group practices are generally different
    from those of other physicians because
    radiologists usually do not bill EM codes, nor
    do they treat a patients medical condition on
    an ongoing basis
  • Generally not required to enroll as an IDTF
  • Requirements may vary from carrier to carrier

9
New IDTF Standards
  • 2008 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Rule imposed
    a new performance standard related to shared
    space
  • A fixed-based IDTF (as opposed to hospital-based
    or mobile IDTFs) may not
  • share a practice location with another
    Medicare-enrolled individual or organization
  • Lease or sublease its operations or its practice
    location to another Medicare entity or
    individual or
  • Share diagnostic testing equipment with another
    Medicare individual or entity
  • Disruptive to common leasing arrangements such as
    block leases between IDTFs and physician group
    practices seeking to take advantage of Stark Law
    in-office ancillary services exception which
    was in large part CMS intent

10
What Happens When Medicare Rules are Violated?
  • Routine errors, mistakes vs. intentional
    violations
  • Pattern of routine errors reckless disregard
    for the law?
  • When does a routine overpayment become a false
    claim?

11
The False Claims Act
  • Primary government weapon in combating health
    care fraud
  • - Huge penalties
  • Favorable burden of proof
  • Intent element is somewhat vague
  • Scope of activities covered very broad
  • Since 1986 20 billion recovered under FCA
  • In 2007, FCA recoveries exceeded 2 billion 54
    million in 1986
  • Whistleblower provisions are incorporated in FCA
  • 72 of FCA whistleblower recoveries are
    health-related

12
Elements of the False Claims Act
  • Submitting, causing to be submitted, or
    conspiring to submit
  • A claim for payment to the government
  • When the claim is false or fraudulent and
  • When the defendant acted knowingly
  • In addition, using a false record or statement in
    support of a claim is also actionable
  • Knowingly means deliberate ignorance or
    reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of
    the submission
  • Intent to defraud need not be proven

13
Applying the FCA Beyond Mere Truth Falsity of
the Claim
  • Anyone in the chain of events leading to an FCA
    violation is potentially liable
  • E.g. Physician, physician office staff, billing
    company, etc.
  • Implied Certification Theory
  • Failure to comply with any applicable law or
    regulation

14
FCA Damages and Penalties Enormous
  • Treble the governments damages
  • Additional penalties of 5,500 - 11,000 per
    claim
  • Parallel consequences suspension/exclusion from
    participation in health care payer programs the
    death knell for most physicians
  • Not to mention
  • Time and effort
  • Attorneys fees
  • Likely Corporate Integrity Agreement
  • Damage to reputation

15
Examples of Enforcement Actions Related to
Physician Billing
  • Anesthesiologist in Oregon double billing
  • Cardiologist in Maryland billing for left and
    right heart catheterizations only performing
    left heart catheterization
  • Psychiatrist in New York Overbilling resulting
    from glitch in billing software
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com