Title: Nicomachean Ethics
1Nicomachean Ethics
2THE NEXT 5 SLIDES ARE REPRODUCED FROM OUR EARLIER
EXAMINATION OF THE FIRST PART OF ARISTOTLES
NICOMACHEAN ETHICS (TO REFRESH YOUR MEMORY).
FOLLOWING THOSE, THE MATERIAL PICKS UP THE NEW
SECTIONS.
3Dont expect more precision than the subject
matter admits of
- Before embarking on an examination of what the
nature of the best life for a person, Aristotle
offers the above caveat. - Wealth and courage are generally good, but have
on occasion contributed to the ruin of some
people. - One should not expect precise proofs out of an
ethicist or political scientist because they have
to deal with things that are just generally true
similarly one should not expect approximate
proofs out of a mathematician, who deals with
things that are determinate and definite.
4The Function Argument (briefly)
- 1. Every action is aimed at some goal (end).
- 2. Accomplishing that goal then is the
characteristic function of whoever aims at that
goal. In other words, what makes a thing what it
is is the goal that it is aimed at. For example
the characteristic function of a house builder is
the goal of building good houses, and the
characteristic function of a flute player is
playing the flute well. What makes a house
builder a house builder is that they have the
goal of building houses well. Nobody else has
such a goal. - 3. Every goal has standards of quality that come
with that particular goal - Therefore, human life has a characteristic
function. - But what is the goal of human life, and what are
the standards of quality for it?
5The goal of human life
- Aristotle says that everyone agrees that the goal
of human life is happiness. - However, this is an unfortunate translation.
When the modern English speaker thinks of
happiness they think of the feeling of being
happy (a sort of pleasure). - The word Aristotle used is e?da?µ???a
(eudaimonia), which means something more like
well-being or fulfillment than happiness. - But what does happiness consist of?
6Happiness
- Aristotle dismisses some answers that others
supply to the question what is hapiness? - The masses say that the life of pleasure is
happiness, but Aristotle contends that this is
vulgar and not fitting of a human being. - Politicians say happiness is in honor, but
Aristotle points out that that requires other
people to honor you. Surely someone could be
live well without others honoring them.
73 lives
- The life of mere survival (the vegetative life)
- This cannot be the characteristic life of a
person because even plants do this, so there must
be more to life for us. - The life of pleasure (the animal life)
- This cannot be the characteristic life of a
person because even animals do this, so there
must be more to life for us. - The life of virtue and reflection (the best life
for a person) - Since only human beings can live the life of
virtue and reflection (uses our faculty of
reason) this is the characteristic function of
human life.
8Virtue and Prudence
- We have seen previous moral theories sweep
prudence aside in favor of what morality demands.
- Aristotle argues that the best life for a person
(i.e. the most prudent life) just is the life of
virtue. So what morality requires is in fact the
best life. - Recall the three lives. It may be that someone
wants to live the life of a pig in the mud, but
that person does not have a refined set of
desires that are appropriate for human happiness.
9An Analogical argument
- Aristotle writes
- For pleasure is a state of soul, and to each man
that which he is said to be a lover of is
pleasant e.g. not only is a horse pleasant to
the lover of horses, and a spectacle to the lover
of sights, but also in the same way just acts are
pleasant to the lover of justice and in general
virtuous acts to the lover of virtue. Now for
most men their pleasures are in conflict with one
another because these are not by nature pleasant,
but the lovers of what is noble find pleasant the
things that are by nature pleasant and virtuous
actions are such, so that these are pleasant for
such men as well as in their own nature. Their
life, therefore, has no further need of pleasure
as a sort of adventitious charm, but has its
pleasure in itself. For, besides what we have
said, the man who does not rejoice in noble
actions is not even good since no one would call
a man just who did not enjoy acting justly, nor
any man liberal who did not enjoy liberal
actions and similarly in all other cases. If
this is so, virtuous actions must be in
themselves pleasant. - The analogy is that to be a lover of the best
life means to be pleased by it, so to live the
best life, we must be able to modify our
character traits to fit with the life of virtue.
10Desires and Character Traits
- Desires are but one part of what we call
character. - A character trait is a stable disposition to act
a certain way in certain circumstances. (e.g. a
generous person is disposed to give when they see
need) - Often, modern persons regard desires as things
that just come with a person and that cant or
shouldnt be changed. However, we often seek to
raise children with positive character traits
(e.g. honesty, patience) and teach them to avoid
negative character traits (e.g. selfishness, bad
tempers).
11Desires and Character Traits
- One example of contemporary struggles to modify
desires are struggles with addictions or other
bad habits. - Our approach to these issues is strongly
reminiscent of Aristotles approach to ethics in
general. A person might decide to quit smoking
because a) life is longer and more pleasant
without smoking, b) they wish to be a better
example to children, c) smoking inhibits other
virtuous behavior (sociability, financial
management, etc.) - These motivations generally match a desire to
live the life of reflection and virtue, i.e. to
live the best life.
12Acquiring/Modifying Character Traits
- Aristotle writes the virtues we get by first
exercising them, as also happens in the case of
the arts as well. For the things we have to learn
before we can do them, we learn by doing them,
e.g. men become builders by building and
lyreplayers by playing the lyre so too we become
just by doing just acts, temperate by doing
temperate acts, brave by doing brave acts. This
is confirmed by what happens in states for
legislators make the citizens good by forming
habits in them, and this is the wish of every
legislator, and those who do not effect it miss
their mark, and it is in this that a good
constitution differs from a bad one.
13Habituation and Training
- We modify character traits by habituation and
training. At some point, someone must teach us
or show us what it means to be trustworthy,
loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind,
cheerful, obedient, thrifty, brave, clean and
reverent (for example) and this is what is meant
by training, and its most effective for the
young. - Beyond just training, we must form habits that
make virtuous behavior part of our nature. To
make honesty a part of your character, you must
be honest until you do so without even trying or
thinking about it. - When you get a bad habit, it takes even more
effort to first break the bad habit and then
replace it with a good habit (e.g. many
ex-smokers replace time spent smoking with
exercise or other worthy pursuits)
14Finding Virtue
- If we are following Aristotle this far, we may
then ask how we determine which character traits
are virtuous. - Aristotle answers as follows First, then, let
us consider this, that it is the nature of such
things to be destroyed by defect and excess, as
we see in the case of strength and of health (for
to gain light on things imperceptible we must use
the evidence of sensible things) both excessive
and defective exercise destroys the strength, and
similarly drink or food which is above or below a
certain amount destroys the health, while that
which is proportionate both produces and
increases and preserves it. So too is it, then,
in the case of temperance and courage and the
other virtues.
15Three Dispositions
- This introduces a general method that Aristotle
follows for determining virtue There are three
kinds of disposition, then, two of them vices,
involving excess and deficiency respectively, and
one a virtue, viz. the mean - Every character trait is expressed by some name
or other, and any competent speaker of the
language knows whether such names describe good
or bad character traits. Aristotle maintatins
that each of these words will describe either 1)
a virtue (good), 2) a vice of deficiency (a lack
of a particular attribute bad), or 3) a vice of
excess (too much of a particular attribute bad).
16The Golden Mean
- This leads to the common misinterpretation that
Aristotle advocates everything in moderation.
Cowardice is not good in moderation any more than
cyanide is good in moderation. - Rather, cowardice is what happens when someone
lacks courage. Courage is the virtue, and when
someone lacks courage, they have the vice of
deficiency of courage called cowardice. If
someone has too much courage, they have the vice
of excess, called rashness, or recklessness.
17The Virtues
- There seem to be as many virtues as there are
positive ways to describe character, but some of
the virtues are as follows
18Temperance the ability to resist what one ought
to resist, even if it is pleasant.
- Intemperance, licentiousness, sybaritism,
over-indulgence satisfying appetites to too
great a degree or with too much freequency.
- Asceticism forgoing things which are really
acceptable to partake of.
19Fortitude the ability to pursue what one ought
to pursue, even if it is unpleasant.
- weakness, irresoluteness, not being able to do
what needs to be done
- ascetic, overly stoic. A person should not seek
out unpleasantness, and should be somewhat
deterred by it.
20Some Other Virtues
- Magnificence being appropriately generous, but
with single great gestures of generosity. - Magnanimity greatness of spirit is knowing
that one is worthy of greatness and actually
being worthy of greatness. - Friendliness being neither clingy nor cold
- Truthfulness being neither a liar nor blunt or
rude - Wit being neither humorless nor a clown