WFM 5201: Data Management and Statistical Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

WFM 5201: Data Management and Statistical Analysis

Description:

WFM 5201: Data Management and Statistical Analysis Lecture-8: Probabilistic Analysis Akm Saiful Islam Institute of Water and Flood Management (IWFM) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:302
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: acb59
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WFM 5201: Data Management and Statistical Analysis


1
WFM 5201 Data Management and Statistical Analysis
Lecture-8 Probabilistic Analysis
  • Akm Saiful Islam

Institute of Water and Flood Management
(IWFM) Bangladesh University of Engineering and
Technology (BUET)
June, 2008
2
Frequency Analysis
  • Continuous Distributions
  • Normal distribution
  • Lognormal distribution
  • Pearson Type III distribution
  • Gumbels Extremal distribution
  • Confidence Interval

3
Log-Normal Distribution
  • The lognormal distribution (sometimes spelled
    out as the logarithmic normal distribution) of a
    random variable is one for which the logarithm
    of follows a normal or Gaussian distribution.
    Denote , then Y has a normal or
    Gaussian distribution given by
  • , (1)

4
  • Derived distribution Since ,
  • the distribution of X can be found as

  • (2)
  • Note that equation (1) gives the distribution of
    Y as a normal distribution with mean and
    variance . Equation (2) gives the
    distribution of X as the lognormal distribution
    with parameters
  • and .

5
  • Estimation of parameters ( , ) of
    lognormal distribution
  • Note , ,
    Chow (1954) Method
  • (1)
  • (2)
  • (3)
  • (4)The mean and variance of the lognormal
    distribution are
  • (5) The coefficient of variation of the Xs is
  • (6) The coefficient of skew of the Xs is
  • (7) Thus the lognormal distribution is skewed to
    the right the skewness increasing with
    increasing values of .

and
6
Example-1
  • Use the lognormal distribution and calculate the
    expected relative frequency for the third class
    interval on the discharge data in the next table

7
Frequency of the discharge of a River
Class Number Observed Relative Frequency
25,000 2 0.03
35,000 3 0.045
45,000 10 0.152
55,000 9 0.136
65,000 11 0.167
75,000 10 0.152
85,000 12 0.182
95,000 6 0.091
105,000 0 0.000
115,000 3 0.045
8
Solution
  • According to the lognormal distribution is

9
  • So from the standard normal table we get
  • The expected relative frequency according to the
    lognormal distribution is 0.145

10
Example-2
  • Assume the data of previous table follow the
    lognormal distribution. Calculate the magnitude
    of the 100-year peak flood.

11
Solution
  • The 100-year peak flow corresponds to a prob(X gt
    x) of 0.01. X must be evaluated such that Px(x)
    0.99. This can accomplished by evaluating Z such
    that Pz(z)0.99 and then transforming to X. From
    the standard normal tables the value of Z
    corresponding to Pz(Z) of 0.99 is 2.326.
  • The values of Sy and are given
  • The 100-year peak flow according to the lognormal
    distribution is about 1,30,700 cfs.

12
Extreme Value Distributions
  • Many times interest exists in extreme events such
    as the maximum peak discharge of a stream or
    minimum daily flows.
  • The probability distribution of a set of random
    variables is also a random variable.
  • The probability distribution of this extreme
    value random variable will in general depend on
    the sample size and the parent distribution from
    which the sample was obtained.

13
Extreme value type-I Gumbel distribution
  • Extreme Value Type I distribution, Chow (1953)
    derived the expression
  • To express T in terms of , the above
    equation can be written as

(3)
14
Example-3 Gumble
  • Determine the 5-year return period rainfall for
    Chicago using the frequency factor method and the
    annual maximum rainfall data given below. (Chow
    et al., 1988, p. 391)

Year Rainfall (inch) Year Rainfall (inch) Year Rainfall (inch)
1913 0.49 1926 0.68 1938 0.52
1914 0.66 1927 0.61 1939 0.64
1915 0.36 1928 0.88 1940 0.34
1916 0.58 1929 0.49 1941 0.7
1917 0.41 1930 0.33 1942 0.57
1918 0.47 1931 0.96 1943 0.92
1920 0.74 1932 0.94 1944 0.66
1921 0.53 1933 0.8 1945 0.65
1922 0.76 1934 0.62 1946 0.63
1923 0.57 1935 0.71 1947 0.6
1924 0.8 1936 1.11    
1925 0.66 1937 0.64    
15
Solution
  • The mean and standard deviation of annual maximum
    rainfalls at Chicago are 0.67 inch and 0.177
    inch, respectively. For , T5, equation (3) gives

16
Log Pearson Type III
  • For this distribution, the first step is to take
    the logarithms of the hydrologic data, . Usually
    logarithms to base 10 are used. The mean ,
    standard deviation , and coefficient of skewness,
    Cs are calculated for the logarithms of the data.
    The frequency factor depends on the return period
    and the coefficient of skewness .
  • When , the frequency factor is equal to
    the standard normal variable z .
  • When , is approximated by Kite (1977)
    as

17
Example-4 Calculate the 5- and 50-year return
period annual maximum discharges of the Gaudalupe
River near Victoria, Texas, using the lognormal
and log-pearson Type III distributions. The data
in cfs from 1935 to 1978 are given below. (Chow
et al., 1988, p. 393)
Year 1930   1940   1950   1960   1970
0     55900   13300   23700   9190
1     58000   12300   55800   9740
2     56000   28400   10800   58500
3     7710   11600   4100   33100
4     12300   8560   5720   25200
5 38500   22000   4950   15000   30200
6 179000   17900   1730   9790   14100
7 17200   46000   25300   70000   54500
8 25400   6970   58300   44300   12700
9 4940   20600   10100   15200    
18
Solution
19
  • It can be seen that the effect of including the
    small negative coefficient of skewness in the
    calculations is to alter slightly the estimated
    flow with that effect being more pronounced at
    years than at years. Another feature of the
    results is that the 50-year return period
    estimates are about three times as large as the
    5-year return period estimates for this example,
    the increase in the estimated flood discharges is
    less than proportional to the increase in return
    period.

20
Confidence Interval
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com