Title: WHO
1WHOs cervical cancer screening programmes
managerial guidelines
- by
- Naila Baig Ansari
- Research Fellow
- Dept. of Community Health Sciences
- The Aga Khan University
- Karachi, Pakistan
2Who am I?
- Education
- MSc (Epidemiology), The Aga Khan University,
2001. Thesis Care and feeding practices and
their association with stunting among young
children residing in Karachi-s squatter
settlements - BBA (Management), The College of William and
Mary, Williamsburg, VA, USA, 1989 - Research interest Nutritional and behavioral
epidemiology, methodological issues in dietary
assessment methods, household food security and
gender-related issues, care and feeding
practices, management of data and questionnaire
designing
3Learning Objectives
- To understand the importance of establishing a
cervical cancer screening programme - To be familiar with the WHO recommended
managerial factors to consider prior to setting
up a screening programme - To understand the concept of downstaging in
terms of cervical cancer screening
4Performance Objectives
- Know the managerial issues to consider when
setting up a cervical screening program - Understand the concept of downstaging and
possible approaches of downstaging cervical
cancer
5Introduction
- Cervical cancer is the 2nd most common cancer
among women globally - Higher cervical cancer mortality in developing
countries due to lack of effective screening
programs
6Introduction
- High proportion of women are diagnosed at an
advanced stage due to - Lack of knowledge among women of the relevance of
symptoms - Fatalistic attitude towards cancer and
possibility of being cured - Lack of availability of health care in rural
areas - Low priority of womens health issues
7Managerial factors to consider when setting up a
screening programme
- Formulation of screening programmes
- The natural history of cervical cancer
- Implications of screening policy
- Service delivery
- Information systems
- Programme evaluation
- Downstaging where cytological screening not
possible
8Natural History
- Cervical cancer develops slowly, and the key
precursor is severe dysplasia. The natural
history begins with - the onset of sexual activity at about age 13,
- cervical dysplasia appears about age 18 through
35 years - Carcinoma in situ begins about age 35 years
through to about age 50 when invasive cancers
begin to appear as a prelude to death at about
age 55.
9Risk Factors identified
- Human papillomavirus (HPV DNA is present 93 of
cervical cancer and its precursor lesions) - Epidemiologic studies ongoing on cofactors and
host factors that may explain the natural history
of HPV infections and their associated lesions. - Factors under investigation include smoking use
of hormonal contraceptives number of live
births young age at first sexual intercourse
use of vitamins such as carotenoids, vitamin C,
and folic acid co-infection with other sexually
transmitted diseases (e.g., herpes simplex, HIV,
chlamydia) growth factors
10Implementation and evaluation of cervical
screening
- Decision to implement screening for cervical
cancer should be based on - Evidence that cervical cancer is a major health
problem - Characteristics of individuals and populations at
risk - An appropriate health service infrastructure
- Technical resources for smear collection and
cytological examination - Resources for diagnosis and treatment
11Which health service sector?
- Decision on which health service sector to
utilize for screening based on - Epidemiology
- Coverage of women at risk
- Use of maternal and child health /
family-planning services - Occupational health services
- Mobile units of screening
- Cost of screening in different health sectors
12Frequency of screening
- Women with negative cervical smear have low rates
of invasive cancer for 5 years. Also rates below
those in general population for 10 or more years - Cost-effective approach to recruit high
proportion of the population and screen them
infrequently rather than low proportion and
frequent screening
13Estimated reduction in the cumulative incidence
of invasive cervical cancer in Chile as a result
of a single screen at various ages
Age of single screen reduction in cum. incidence No. of tests in population (based on 1985 est pop. of Chile)
30 11 88,000
35 15 81,000
37 17 81,000
40 20 70,000
45 26 57,000
50 26 45,000
60 21 34,000
14Cost-effectiveness of two different strategies
for cervical cancer screening in Chile
Programme 1 Programme 2
Age 30-55 years 30-50 years
Frequency 3-yearly 10-yearly
Compliance 30 90
Reduction in mortality 15 44
Reduction in treatement costs US 0.13 million US 0.25 million
Cost per case detected US 2,522 US556
15Screening in Primary Health Care
- Setting up a screening service
- Target group
- Ensuring target group is screened
- Recording and reporting
- Management of women with abnormal smears
16What is downstaging for cervical cancers
- Downstaging is the detection of the disease in
the earlier stage when still curable, by nurses
and other non-medical health workers using a
simple speculum for visual inspection of the
cervix
17Possible approaches to downstaging for cervical
cancer
- Health education
- Restrict examination to women over 35 years
- Train female primary health workers to examine
the cervix visually and to identify abnormalities
- Establish a link between identification of an
abnormality and referral
18Example of process and impact measures to monitor
and evaluate downstaging
- Process Measures
- More than 80 of women in the 35-50 year target
group are educated on cervical cancer. - More than 80 of primary health workers are
educated and trained in visual examination of the
cervix. - Impact Measures
- Over 80 of women in the target 35-50 year group
are examined at least once.
19Example of outcome measures to monitor and
evaluate downstaging
- Outcome Measures
- Short Term More than one-third of cervical
cancers are discovered by examination - Medium Term There is more than a third reduction
in cases presenting with advanced disease
(Stage II and beyond). - Long Term There is more than a third reduction
in the mortality of cervical cancer.
20Cancer Control Program
- A cancer control program is like a chair with
four legs, a seat and a back. - Four legs represent interventions or programs
of prevention, screening, treatment and
palliation. - Seat joins the four legs into a functional chair.
It represents the organizational structure,
management and governance of a national cancer
control program that integrates its four programs
into a functional unity. - Back of the chair provides support. Represents
the infrastructure that needs to be in place for
the four programs to function.
21Online sources of interest
- The Merck Manual of Diagnosis and Therapy,
Section 18. Gynecology And Obstetrics Chapter
241. Gynecologic Neoplasms - Cervical Cancer Screening Training Modules
- MedlinePlus Health Information on cervical cancer
- Reproductive Health Outlook (RHO) cervical
cancer