Title: IS Audit in the Early 21st Century
1IS Audit in the Early 21st Century A Call for
Research
- Presented at the Information Systems Section of
the - American Accounting Association
- 2007 MidYear Meeting
- Savannah, GA, January 4, 2007
2Origins
- This research report is the result of a PCAOB
Research Synthesis Team composed of Mary Curtis,
Jean C. Bedard, Donald Deis, Greg Jenkins - Title of this report Specialty Knowledge and Use
of Specialists - Because of the origins of our team, this report
specifically addresses the public accounting
environment, although many findings are equally
relevant to internal audit.
3- What the literature review is
- This summarizes existing literature regarding the
practice of IT audit - what we know about IT and general auditors,
- how they perform their jobs,
- why and when they perform certain functions, and
- how they become proficient at these functions.
- What the literature review is not
- This review does not attempt to address the
myriad technologies in which IT auditors must be
knowledgeable, such as e-com, ERP, XBRL, etc.
4Existing Standards - What kind of IT knowledge
must non-IT auditors possess?
- AS No. 2 An Audit of Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting Performed in Conjunction With
an Audit of Financial Statements - SAS 94 - Addresses the knowledge that the general
auditor should possess if they use IT
professional in audit - SAS 80 - Evidential Matter - AU 326.12
- SAS 22 - Planning and Supervision - AU 311
- SAS 109 - Understanding the Entity and its
Environment and Assessing the Risks of Material
Misstatement- adopted after PCAOB codification - ISA No. 315 Understanding the Entity and Its
Environment and Assessing the Risks of Material
Misstatement
5Current standards When should IT Specialists Be
Called into an Audit?
- SAS 94 - The Effect of Information Technology on
the Auditors Consideration of Internal Control
in a Financial Statement Audit - Consider whether a professional possessing
specialized IT skills is needed for the audit - SAS 80 - Evidential Matter - AU 326.12
- It may be difficult or impossible for the auditor
to acquire adequate evidential matter without
using IT specialists. - SAS 108 - Planning and Supervision - adopted
after PCAOB codification - Considerations in determining the extent of
involvement of IT professionals - Identifies the preliminary audit procedures the
auditor may assign to an IT specialist
6Our analyses of the standards and research
literature resulted in two primary questions
- Extent of consideration of IT in the audit and IT
audit specialist involvement in the financial
statement audit When? What? - What educational issues arise from this
involvement? - This research stream is very slim there are
many more questions than answers.
7Topic 1 Research findings on IT expertise and
the use of IT audit specialists on audits
- Does current research support the need for the
involvement of IT audit specialists in most
aspects of the audit engagement? - Computer systems are becoming more complex and
computerized controls often the only or best
controls (Bell et al. 1998 Collier et al. 1991),
yet - More control problems are identified in todays
more computerized environments, than previously
(Messier et al. 2004). - Implication increased need for auditors
knowledgeable in complex IT systems and controls
8Topic 1 Research findings on IT expertise and
the use of IT audit specialists on audits
- Does current research support the need for the
involvement of IT audit specialists in most
aspects of the audit engagement? - Research suggests that auditors are relying more
on internal controls than previously, yet are not
necessarily using IT auditors more (Janvrin et
al. 2006, Bierstaker and Wright 2004, Messier et
al. 2004 contrary view). - Research suggests that generalist auditors may
under-estimate the overall audit risk with
complex systems (Bedard et al. 2005, Hunton et
al. 2004, Grabski et al. 1987 contrary view). - Implication it appears that generalist auditors
may be relying on their own knowledge to do
controls testing, yet may not possess the
understanding of IT systems necessary to meet
this challenge
9Topic 1 Research findings on IT expertise and
the use of IT audit specialists on audits
- Does this risk from computerization actually
result in greater problems with the financial
statements? - One study found that few audit differences were
associated in any way with failure in the
computerized system (Bell et al. 1998). - One contrary assertion There are many anecdotal
reports that spreadsheet errors have been the
primary cause of financial statement errors. - Failed systems implementation has significant
impact on going-concern of the company (ex
Hershey)
10Research findings on IT expertise and the use of
IT audit specialists on audits
- Is it likely that audit generalists (financial
auditors) can develop adequate IT expertise to
preclude or at least reduce the need for IT audit
specialist involvement in the engagement? - Research suggests that IT audit specialists have
a distinctly different way of looking at internal
controls and information systems from financial
auditors (Biggs et al. 1987, Borthick et al.
2006, Curtis and Viator 2000, Viator and Curtis
1998,). - Implication These studies imply that it will be
difficult for generalist auditors to gain
sufficient expertise to perform as well as IT
specialists.
11Research findings on IT expertise and the use of
IT audit specialists on audits
- If current guidance recommends involvement by IT
auditors (Yang and Guan 2004) and research
supports this recommendation, - Is current guidance in the standards being
implemented effectively? -
- The greater the generalist auditors IT
expertise, the more appropriate reactions to IT
auditor findings and expertise. (Brazel and
Agoglia 2006). - Additionally, common knowledge bias (ODonnell et
al. 2000) suggests that knowledge possessed only
by the IT specialist may be disregarded by the
audit team.
12Research findings on IT expertise and the use of
IT audit specialists on audits
- If current guidance recommends involvement by IT
auditors (Yang and Guan 2004) and research
supports this recommendation, - Is current guidance in the standards being
implemented effectively? -
- The greater the generalist auditors IT
expertise, the more appropriate reactions to IT
auditor findings and expertise. (Brazel and
Agoglia 2006). - Additionally, common knowledge bias (ODonnell et
al. 2000) suggests that knowledge possessed only
by the IT specialist may be disregarded by the
audit team.
13Research findings on IT expertise and the use of
IT audit specialists on audits
- Finally, in regard to organizational culture and
IT audit, IT auditors require specialized
training and skills, and may find themselves
disadvantaged in firm organizations where the
primary career path results from financial audit
experience.
14Potential Research Topics
- IT audit and Section 404
- What portion of the 404 audit is primarily IT
today? What proportion of the 404 audit could be
performed by IT auditors? - What advances in IT audit testing have occurred
due to the increase in its use during 404
reviews? - Has increased use led to efficiency or more
sophisticated techniques? - Will more rapid adoption of continuous audit be a
likely result of 404?
15Potential Research Topics
- Application of 404 testing to financial statement
audit - Is audit risk adjusted appropriately for changes
in IT? - What is the connection between 404 testing and
substantive testing? Has any increase in IT
testing for 404 resulted in a significant
reduction in substantive testing? Where have
efficiency gains not been achieved and what
factors impact this?
16Potential Research Topics
- What are the impediments to the use of IT
auditors on the financial statement audit? - General auditor IT knowledge?
- Significant deficiencies in non-IT related areas?
- Budgetary incongruencies?
- Culture?
- Inter-personal issues between the general and IT
audit groups?
17Potential Research Topics
- What are the culture implications for firms
seeking to develop strong IT audit staffs? - Career paths
- Training
- Rewards
18Potential Research Topics
- What is the impact of inadequate IT knowledge on
the part of the generalist auditor? - Risk assessment?
- Budgeting?
- Audit program design?
- Task assignment between IT auditor and generalist
auditors? - Conclusions they draw?
19Topic 2 Guidance and research regarding the
education of generalist auditors and IT audit
specialists on IT audit issues
- Guidance
- The International Federation of Accountancy
(IFAC) guidance regarding the education of
accountants International Education Standards
for Professional Accountants (IES 8 and IES 11). - Standard IES 8 relates to general competency
requirements and IES 11 specifically to
Information Technology for Professional
Accountants - AICPA issued report on the implementation of IES
11 in the U.S. The report states that all
students should study IT from the perspective of
its usefulness, application and impact, and all
educators should be encouraged to integrate the
study of technology with the study of accounting.
- Section on professional training
20Guidance and research regarding the education of
generalist auditors on IT audit issues
- Standards (IES 11 and SAS 94) require that audit
generalists possess a certain level of IT
knowledge, even when computer audit specialists
are involved. Research supports this need. - No research found assessing the educational
preparedness of U.S. accountants in regard to IT
knowledge and competencies. - Implication Academic institutions might consider
whether their audit curriculum is adequate for
providing the IT knowledge of their students
training to be audit generalists. - Implication Firms may consider assessment
methods for evaluating auditors knowledge of
relevant IT issues and what training is necessary
for continuing knowledge growth as technology
changes.
21Guidance and research regarding the education of
IT audit specialists on IT audit issues
- While significant commentary was published early
in the history of the IT audit profession
regarding the types of education and training
needed by IT auditors, little has been published
in the last 15 years
22Potential Research Topics
- Are there gaps between knowledge needed and
knowledge possessed by public accountants? If so,
what factors contribute to current knowledge
gaps? Possible causal factors include - Pace of change,
- lack of coverage in university accounting
programs, - effectiveness of training methods,
- CPE ineffectiveness,
- lack of interest or commitment to gain expertise
by practitioners. - Research could examine the precedents for
specifying certain topics for CPE, and whether
those strategies have been effective. This
research literature review has not discovered any
inroads into this question (beyond PwC 2003
report).
23Potential Research Topics
- There is the big issue of generalists versus
specialists. Possible questions include - If specialty knowledge areas are difficult for
the generalist to acquire, it may be more
efficient to use specialists appropriately. - How much should the generalist auditor know about
these knowledge areas, in order to recognize the
need for specialist help? - How accurate are auditors' perceptions of their
own knowledge related to these topics? - Do current budgeting procedures and other
behavioral motivators inhibit generalists from
calling in specialists when they might be needed?
24Potential Research Topics
- Any additional research ideas from the audience?
- Thank You