Title: The Power of the Supreme Court
1The Power of the Supreme Court
Part One Public Policy Judicial Philosophy
2Shaping Public Policy
- The justices must interpret the Constitution in
regards to the issue - They must decide what the language means of an
act - In a way, justices are making law when deciding
how it applies to actions (not addressed by
Congress)
Ex
3What is the most powerful policy tool?
- Tools
- Judicial review since has invalidated over 200
federal laws and over 1000 state local! - -can change the path of a nation (Dred Scott v.
Sanford) - -can springboard civil rights (Brown v. Board)
4Shaping Public Policy
Stare Decisis destructus?
- Interpretation of laws (discussed)
- Overturning decisions stare decisis, setting a
precedent for other cases - The law is flexible and adapts!
- Appointment justices philosophy similar to Prez.
- 25 stray Warren, Brennan, Souter
5Judicial Philosophy
- Early days, argument was about strict
construction vs. loose construction - Today it is on activism or restraint!
- Judicial activism the courts create new
legislation - Proponents say the court should play a role in
shaping national policies and apply to social
issues
6Judicial Philosophy
- Protection is justices job! (Ex look at how long
it took to overturn separate, but equal!) - Court needs to be watchdog
- -striking down death penalty cases for mentally
retarded - -striking down TX law that banned flag burning
- - Texas v. Johnson (1988)
7Judicial Philosophy
- Judicial restraint courts should avoid taking
the initiative on social political questions - Wishes of reps. a high priority
- Belief in founders intent
8Judicial Restraint
Nurse, let me die!
- Want to leave the development of new policies to
others (2 branches states) - Not responsibility (areas like affirmative
action, state law) - Facilitate, dont interfere
- ex. Courts ruled ag. Constitutional right of
assisted suicide - Dred Scott v. Sanford
(This has also become an issue of federalism!)
9What about the debate on weed, I mean, medicine?
Prop 215
What if an Act somewhat violates FEDERAL
law? Should the court STILL not get involved?
10Paired Reading
- Themed Collection Reading Judicial Review
End of Part 1
11- Part Two Trends in the Court
12Which justice most greatly affected policies of
SC?
- John Marshall credit for setting the course of
the young SC - Ruled that Judiciary Act was unconstitutional
- Judicial review est.
Marbury v. Madison 1803
13Justices effecting public policy
- Roger B. Taney (1836-1864)
- Dred Scott decision set the course for Civil War
- Court also established the right of prez to take
away civil liberties in emergency - (habeas corpus)
Respect the States rights!
14The importance of these two justices decisions
- Marshall and Taney Hippocampus
15Justices effecting public policy
- Economic issues (late 1800s)
- Prior to 1937 liberals complained of cons. court
being too activist! - Industrial- progressive eras
- Trust-busting,child labor, womens rights (court
had struck down) - FDR responds with Court-packing attempt in 1938
(NOT OK) - Courts start accepting ND policies
16FDRs Fireside chat to explain court packing
Whip around I will call on one row What was the
crisis argued in FDRs court-packing attempt?
17What other court advances liberal ideology?
(Hint 50s)
- Earl Warren Court 1953-1969
- Overturns separate but equal, expands rights of
accused, civil rights liberties
Now cons. begin to complain that liberal court is
too active!
Warren Burger also activist, but less
18CJ Earl Warren
19Justices effecting public policy
- William Rehnquist 1986 - 2005
- Was the most cons. court in US history!
- Reversed some of the earlier Warren Burger
decis.
Accused of being too activist, by liberals!
His stripes are fabulous!
20Sandra Day OConner
First female Supreme Court Justice
21What has been the direction of modern Court?
- Under Clinton, some of the conservatism was
reversed - Appointment of Ruth Ginsberg Stephen Beyer
- Turn towards center
- conservative activism?
- i.e. overturning CA Prop 215 Bush v. Gore
2000 - GW Bush/Obama appointees
22Newer Justices
Under Bush
Samuel Alito
John Roberts
Under Obama
Elena Kagan
Sandra Sotomayor
So then is the Court liberal, conservative, or
moderate?
23In the news Reverse Discrimination. What is it?