The Power of the Supreme Court - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

The Power of the Supreme Court

Description:

The Power of the Supreme Court Part One: Public Policy & Judicial Philosophy Shaping Public Policy The justices must interpret the Constitution in regards to the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:421
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: lah45
Category:
Tags: court | kagan | power | supreme

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Power of the Supreme Court


1
The Power of the Supreme Court
Part One Public Policy Judicial Philosophy
2
Shaping Public Policy
  • The justices must interpret the Constitution in
    regards to the issue
  • They must decide what the language means of an
    act
  • In a way, justices are making law when deciding
    how it applies to actions (not addressed by
    Congress)

Ex
3
What is the most powerful policy tool?
  • Tools
  • Judicial review since has invalidated over 200
    federal laws and over 1000 state local!
  • -can change the path of a nation (Dred Scott v.
    Sanford)
  • -can springboard civil rights (Brown v. Board)

4
Shaping Public Policy
Stare Decisis destructus?
  • Interpretation of laws (discussed)
  • Overturning decisions stare decisis, setting a
    precedent for other cases
  • The law is flexible and adapts!
  • Appointment justices philosophy similar to Prez.
  • 25 stray Warren, Brennan, Souter

5
Judicial Philosophy
  • Early days, argument was about strict
    construction vs. loose construction
  • Today it is on activism or restraint!
  • Judicial activism the courts create new
    legislation
  • Proponents say the court should play a role in
    shaping national policies and apply to social
    issues

6
Judicial Philosophy
  • Protection is justices job! (Ex look at how long
    it took to overturn separate, but equal!)
  • Court needs to be watchdog
  • -striking down death penalty cases for mentally
    retarded
  • -striking down TX law that banned flag burning
  • - Texas v. Johnson (1988)

7
Judicial Philosophy
  • Judicial restraint courts should avoid taking
    the initiative on social political questions
  • Wishes of reps. a high priority
  • Belief in founders intent

8
Judicial Restraint
Nurse, let me die!
  • Want to leave the development of new policies to
    others (2 branches states)
  • Not responsibility (areas like affirmative
    action, state law)
  • Facilitate, dont interfere
  • ex. Courts ruled ag. Constitutional right of
    assisted suicide
  • Dred Scott v. Sanford

(This has also become an issue of federalism!)
9
What about the debate on weed, I mean, medicine?
Prop 215
What if an Act somewhat violates FEDERAL
law? Should the court STILL not get involved?
10
Paired Reading
  • Themed Collection Reading Judicial Review

End of Part 1
11
  • Part Two Trends in the Court

12
Which justice most greatly affected policies of
SC?
  • John Marshall credit for setting the course of
    the young SC
  • Ruled that Judiciary Act was unconstitutional
  • Judicial review est.

Marbury v. Madison 1803
13
Justices effecting public policy
  • Roger B. Taney (1836-1864)
  • Dred Scott decision set the course for Civil War
  • Court also established the right of prez to take
    away civil liberties in emergency
  • (habeas corpus)

Respect the States rights!
14
The importance of these two justices decisions
  • Marshall and Taney Hippocampus

15
Justices effecting public policy
  • Economic issues (late 1800s)
  • Prior to 1937 liberals complained of cons. court
    being too activist!
  • Industrial- progressive eras
  • Trust-busting,child labor, womens rights (court
    had struck down)
  • FDR responds with Court-packing attempt in 1938
    (NOT OK)
  • Courts start accepting ND policies

16
FDRs Fireside chat to explain court packing
Whip around I will call on one row What was the
crisis argued in FDRs court-packing attempt?
17
What other court advances liberal ideology?
(Hint 50s)
  • Earl Warren Court 1953-1969
  • Overturns separate but equal, expands rights of
    accused, civil rights liberties

Now cons. begin to complain that liberal court is
too active!
Warren Burger also activist, but less
18
CJ Earl Warren
19
Justices effecting public policy
  • William Rehnquist 1986 - 2005
  • Was the most cons. court in US history!
  • Reversed some of the earlier Warren Burger
    decis.

Accused of being too activist, by liberals!
His stripes are fabulous!
20
Sandra Day OConner
First female Supreme Court Justice
21
What has been the direction of modern Court?
  • Under Clinton, some of the conservatism was
    reversed
  • Appointment of Ruth Ginsberg Stephen Beyer
  • Turn towards center
  • conservative activism?
  • i.e. overturning CA Prop 215 Bush v. Gore
    2000
  • GW Bush/Obama appointees

22
Newer Justices
Under Bush
Samuel Alito
John Roberts
Under Obama
Elena Kagan
Sandra Sotomayor
So then is the Court liberal, conservative, or
moderate?
23
In the news Reverse Discrimination. What is it?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com