EDU 224 Foundations of Teaching and Learning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

EDU 224 Foundations of Teaching and Learning

Description:

Money and Schools EDU 224 | Newberry College – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:94
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Newbe9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EDU 224 Foundations of Teaching and Learning


1
Money and SchoolsEDU 224 Newberry College
2
Money and Schools
  • Why is money important?
  • What are the three main three trends in
    educational finance? What do they mean?
  • How is education in South Carolina funded?

3
Why should teachers worry about money?
4
History has determined that American schools are
funded through property taxes.
  • Old Deluder Satan Law (1647, MA)
  • The Northwest Ordinance of 1787
  • The Land Ordinance of 1875
  • 1874 Kalamazoo Michigan case (MI)

5
Trends in educational finance
  • Equity
  • Adequacy
  • Productivity

6
Trend 1 Equity
7
Equity
  • Focus on US Constitution 14th
    Amendment (equal protection of the law)
  • Plessey v. Fergusson (1896)
  • Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954)
  • San Antonio Independent School District v.
    Rodriguez (1973)
  • Focus on funding inter-district equity through
    state constitutions
  • Serrano v. Priest (CA, 1971)
  • Robinson v. Cahill (NJ, 1973)
  • Edgewood v. Kirby (TX, 1989)

8
Trend 2 Adequacy
9
Adequacy
  • Despite equalized funding, disparities remained,
    so some poorer NJ school districts sued.
  • Abbott v. Burke (NJ, 1985)
  • NJ Supreme Court ruled that a thorough and
    efficient education required setting of state
    curriculum standards, achievement outcomes, and
    application of particular school reform models
    for lowest performing schools
  • This case led to the birth of a funding adequacy
    argument and court-ordered school improvement.

10
Trend 3 Productivity
11
Productivity
  • After Abbott v. Burke, poorer NJ school districts
    (known as the Abbott districts) received higher
    levels of funding than other, more prosperous NJ
    school districts. Did increased funding in the
    Abbott school districts make a difference?
  • At the elementary school level there has been
    some improvement
  • At the middle and high school levels student
    achievement has not improved
  • In a recent South Carolina case involving
    Abbeville, elementary, middle, and high school
    funding was found to have a negligible effect on
    student achievement.

12
(No Transcript)
13
The Public Education Dollar Where the Money
Comes From
Sadker Zittleman, p. 218 (citing US Census
Bureau, April 2008)
14
In SC, where does school money come from?
15
How equal are schools?Average Per-Pupil
Expenditures
  • Who spends the most?
  • NJ NY 14,500
  • Who spends the least?
  • UT lt ,5000
  • Average 9,138
  • SC 8,001 - 8,500

Sadker Zittleman, p. 224 (citing US Census
Bureau, April 2007)
16
Federal Role
  • Civil Rights
  • US Department of Education (est. 1979)
  • Funding (Legislation/Control through funding)
  • Categorical or block grants
  • Unrestricted or restricted grants
  • Examples
  • 1965 Elementary and Secondary Education Act
    (ESEA)
  • 2001 reauthorized as No Child Left Behind

17
What does all this mean for you?
  • Accountability will not go away.
  • Competition will increase.
  • Choice programs, charter schools, and for-profit
    schools will multiply.
  • School budgets will continue to be tight.
  • Local schools and districts will seek alternate
    funding.

What do you need to do?
18
Class Wiki
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com