Title: REPRESENTATION TEAM
1ANNUAL REPORT 2010/2011MUNICIPAL DEMARCATION
BOARDPRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON
COOPERATIVE GOVERNANCE AND TRADITIONAL AFFAIRS
18 October 2011
- REPRESENTATION TEAM
- Mr LJ Mahlangu
- Chairperson Municipal Demarcation Board
- Ms N Gwayi
- Deputy Chairperson Municipal Demarcation Board
- Mr SM Radebe
- Chairperson Audit Risk Committee
- Mr RH Monare
- CEO Municipal Demarcation Board
- Ms MI Mathatho
- Chief Financial Officer
- Ms MP Leburu
- Senior Finance Officer
2OUTLINE
- Last Briefing 24 May 2011
- Outputs and Developments 2010/11
- Strategic Direction
- Progress to date on current strategy
- Financial Results 2010/11
- Receipts for the year ending 31 March 2011
- Expenditure for the year ending 31 March 2011
- Report of the Auditor General
- Medium term expenditure framework (MTEF 2011
2014) - Conclusion
- Additional Slides
- Research Study on Criteria for Determining
Municipal Boundaries and Categorisation of
Metropolitan Boundaries - Research Study on Sizes of Municipalities in
South Africa
3LAST BRIEFING 24 MAY 2011
- Briefed the Portfolio Committee on
- MDB Performance in 2010/11 (Unaudited at the
time) - Strategic Plan 2011/12 2014/15
- Proposed Developments going forward
- Financial Results 2010/11 (Unaudited at the
time) - Medium Term Expenditure Framework 2011/12
2013/14 - We advised the Portfolio Committee that
- The ward delimitation process was successfully
completed for the 18 May 2011 local elections,
despite having started well after schedule by
four months. - The Board was now set to commence with a process
of reconfiguring and aligning outer municipal
boundaries. - Bids had been called for a service provider to
develop a new model on the assessment of the
capacity of Municipalities.
4LAST BRIEFING 24 MAY 2011
- The Board adopted to a new way of carrying out
its mandate, in a number of core areas of the
Boards work. - Research has been done on key subjects
- Review of the Capacity Assessment Model
- Sizes of Municipalities
- Criteria for Demarcation of Municipal Boundaries.
- Current system and processes for ward
delimitation is time consuming and costly, and
needs to be reviewed.
5OUTPUTS AND DEVELOPMENTS 2010/11
- During the period under review, a number of key
outputs and developments were realised - Facilitate accountable local government and
contribute to free and fair local elections and
promote democracy - During this period focus was on the delimitation
of electoral wards within local and metropolitan
municipalities, in preparation for the 2011 local
government elections - The process on 15 July 2009 when the National
Minister of CoGTA published the formula for the
number of councillors, based on the 2009 national
common voters roll as divided into municipal
segments. - To improve on past ward delimitation processes,
especially with respect to consultation with
stakeholders - Time was set aside to allow municipalities to
consult widely with communities in their areas - A very localised process called for by the Board
6OUTPUTS AND DEVELOPMENTS 2010/11
- The primary aim of allowing time for wide
consultation, was to facilitate a process whereby
the final wards would be a product of community
consensus. - Provision was also made for cases where consensus
could not be reached in a municipality, during
the consultation process - Provincial Departments of Local Government, as
well as SALGA and CDWs, were requested to assist
communities in their preparation of submissions
to the Board - The Board also made its own human resources
available to all communities for assistance - Some 50 of municipalities were able to reach
consensus with communities and other
stakeholders, while others could not reach
consensus, or submitted alternative ward
configurations which did not comply with
legislative provisions
7OUTPUTS AND DEVELOPMENTS 2010/11
- Ward delimitation process was finalised in August
2010, and the final wards were officially handed
over to the IEC on 1 September 2011. - Preparations for the next round of municipal
boundary redeterminations began soon after the
handover. - The Board faced a number of court challenges
during the period under review.
8OUTPUTS AND DEVELOPMENTS 2010/11
- Assessment of Municipal Capacity
- Assessment of Municipal Capacity did not take
place in 2010/11 (as well as in 2009/10). - The existing model of capacity assessment that
had been used since 2001 was still being
reviewed. - The Board resolved to devote time and resources
to the ward delimitation process. - Ensuring that the Board is supported by an
effective and efficient organisational structure - Building and enhancing capacity of the Boards
internal machinery was a major priority during
the period under review. - The Board appointed an Organisational Design (OD)
specialist to carry out an investigation into the
Boards organisational structure, as well as
significant restructuring of the organisations
establishment.
9OUTPUTS AND DEVELOPMENTS 2010/11
- Ensuring that the Board is supported by an
effective and efficient organisational structure
(Cont.) - The service providers brief was to investigate
and to write a report with recommendations, on
ways of improving the effectiveness of the
Municipal Demarcation Board and its members,
particularly staff members, by means of
systematically planned interventions. - The service provider has since delivered on the
brief, and the Board has resolved to bring about
far-reaching changes in levels of some positions
in the Boards organisational structure. - Also to significantly restructure of the
organisations establishment this in order to
have things done differently, in a number of core
areas of the Boards work.
10OUTPUTS AND DEVELOPMENTS 2010
- Ensuring Good Governance
- Continued to endeavour to ensure that good
governance arrangements are in place throughout
the organization. - The Audit and Risk Committee was fully operation
during the period under review, to oversee and
ensure the effectiveness of the systems of
controls. - There was also an effective internal audit
function in place. The function is outsourced. - At the end of the period under review, the Board
was monitoring action by management to attend to
issues of concern raised in the IT Governance
Audit, including a complete revamp of the Boards
website. - Ensuring Sound Financial Management
- During the period under review we were able to
maintain - Effective management of working capital
- Preparation of short and long term budgets
- Effective internal audits
- Consistent cost control.
11OUTPUTS AND DEVELOPMENTS 2010
- Improving and Enhancing Stakeholder Relations
- As a constitutional institution, it is important
for the Board to reinforce the need to engage
with all stakeholders in a structured manner, to
realise specific organisational goals as well as
to meet broader social, environmental and
economic challenges. - The need for engaging stakeholders in a
structured manner, also reinforced by the fact
that stakeholder relations is one of the core
functions of all Board, in terms of the corporate
governance principles as outlined in the King III
report, to which the Municipal Demarcation Board
subscribes. - At the end of the period under review, the
process to develop a Stakeholder Management and
Governance Framework, Stakeholder Engagement
Plan, as well as the Stakeholder Communication
Strategy was underway.
12STRATEGIC DIRECTION
- The Municipal Demarcation Board has for the
current Strategic Plan identified strategic
themes to focus and guide the organisation over
the next few financial years (2011/2012,
2012/2013, 2013/14 and 2014/15)
Theme 1 Determination and re-determination of municipal boundaries and categorisation and re-categorisation of municipalities
Theme 2 Assessment of the capacity of metropolitan, district and local municipalities
Theme 3 Ensuring that the Board is supported by effective and efficient organisational processes, systems and practices
Theme 4 Ensuring good governance
Theme 5 Ensuring sound financial management
Theme 6 Improving and enhancing stakeholder relations
13STRATEGIC DIRECTION
Strategic Objective Strategic Objective 2010/2011 2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014
Theme 1 Boundary determinations 6,787,118 6,566,881 6,967,250 6,738,727
Theme 2 Capacity assessments 5,000,000 5,180,000 5,569,000 5,566,000
Theme 3 Organisation and Administration 17,440,766 19,175,483 20,536,690 22,306,858
Theme 4 Good Corporate governance 3,035,556 4,242,420 3,345,693 3,646,420
Theme 5 Financial management 2,696,474 2,974,216 3,116,367 3,413,195
Theme 6 Stakeholder management 2,652,086 1,200,000 1,320,000 1,386,800
TOTAL TOTAL 37,612,000 39,339,000 40,855,000 43,058,000
14PROGRESS TO DATE ON CURRENT STRATEGY
- Determination and re-determination of municipal
boundaries and categorisation and
re-categorisation of municipalities - Circular 1 of 2011 was issued to all
municipalities and other key stakeholders, to
communicate the programme for the
re-determination of municipal boundaries, and to
also to provide especially new municipal
councillors with some background information on
the MDB and its mandate. - Launch and Media announcement
- Consultations meetings have been held with the
following key stakeholders - All MECs for local government
- All municipalities in every District Municipality
in the country - MinMEC
- The Chairperson of the NHTL
- National and Provincial structures of SALGA and
the IEC - Political and Civic Structures across the
country.
15PROGRESS TO DATE ON CURRENT STRATEGY
- Determination and re-determination of municipal
boundaries and categorisation and
re-categorisation of municipalities (Cont) - Meetings with provincial houses of Traditional
Leaders are still being arranged in cooperation
with the Chairperson of NHTL. - The purpose of the initial consultation meetings
with was - To give MECs and other stakeholders an
opportunity to raise demarcations issues with the
MDB - To inform MECs and other stakeholders of
demarcations cases that are on record for
consideration by the MDB - Clarify the process and timeframes for changes to
municipal boundaries as per Circular 1/2011 - Seek MECs and other stakeholders support for
the process
16PROGRESS TO DATE ON CURRENT STRATEGY
- Determination and re-determination of municipal
boundaries and categorisation and
re-categorisation of municipalities (Cont) - Request MECs and other stakeholders to assist in
communicating contents of Circular 1/2011 to
provincial stakeholders - Request MECs and other stakeholders to encourage
participation - Request MECs and other stakeholders to assist in
ensuring that municipalities comply with
timeframes - Request MECs that their Departments assist
stakeholders wanting to make representations for
changes to municipal boundaries. -
17Broad process and timeframes within current
legal framework2011 - 2016
18Key periods for public participation
MDB provides information
Meetings per district area
Deadline for new requests
Further visits
Section 26 Sub- missions
Public meetings
Section 21 objections
Aug/Sept 2011
15 Dec 2011
Jan-Mar 2012
Apr-May 2012
Sept-Oct 2012
Aug 12-Jan13
Municipalities consult affected communities, and
encourage participation
More information MDB Circular 1/2011
www.demarcation.org.za
19PROGRESS TO DATE ON CURRENT STRATEGY
- Determination and re-determination of municipal
boundaries and categorisation and
re-categorisation of municipalities (Cont) - A framework has been developed, based on the
research study on criteria for demarcation of
municipal boundaries. - The framework provides information and guidelines
that will empower stakeholders to submit requests
to the Municipal Demarcation Board for the
re-determination of municipal boundaries. - The framework puts together in one concise
document, key relevant information and
guidelines, for stakeholders to motivate a
boundary change request.
20PROGRESS TO DATE ON CURRENT STRATEGY
- Assessment of the capacity of metropolitan,
district and local municipalities - A service provider was appointed for the
implementation of the revised capacity assessment
model, building on the history of capacity
assessment data obtained in previous years. - The review of the capacity assessment model has
elicited a number of weaknesses pertaining to the
old model. - Two-tier local government is neither effective
nor efficient - Lack of clarity on powers and functions
- MEC adjustments have exacerbated the problem
- Adjustments may undermine service delivery
- Framework for adjustments is insufficient
- Narrow conceptualisation of capacity
21PROGRESS TO DATE ON CURRENT STRATEGY
- Capacity assessments not useful for boundary
adjustments - Need to understand environmental institutional
capacity - Capacity assessment model inadequate
- Heavy reliance on subjective indicators of
capacity - The review has subsequently come up with some
recommendations - Advocacy recommendations
- Single-tier local government
- Legislation to assign powers and functions
- Capacity Assessment Model recommendations
- Suspend recommendations on adjustments
- Position Capacity Assessment as a strategic
resource
22PROGRESS TO DATE ON CURRENT STRATEGY
- Revised model
- Financial data is critical
- Include measures of performance
- Identify norms and standards for benchmarking
- Include information on scarce skills
- Introduce qualitative assessment of Powers
Functions - Quantitative process has limitations and should
be used as a trigger for a qualitative review of
powers and functions within a particular district
triggered by one of the following - One or more municipalities performing a function
less than adequately - One or more municipalities performing a function
with less than minimum capacity - Request by MEC for qualitative review
- Programmatic qualitative investigations of all
districts over a five year period i.e. 10
districts qualitatively evaluated a year.
23PROGRESS TO DATE ON CURRENT STRATEGY
- Methodology
- Improve integration with other data collection
processes - National Treasury, StatsSa, National Sector
Departments - Web-based collection methodology with support
- Simplify and shorten questionnaire
- Include metros
- Outputs
- One strategic and analytical report supported by
- Automated municipal reports
- District report
- Provincially aggregated district report
- Accessible, interactive database with reporting
- This year will pilot this methodology. Nine
districts (roughly 20 of all municipalities)
24PROGRESS TO DATE ON CURRENT STRATEGY
- Ensuring that the Board is supported by effective
and efficient organisational processes, systems
and practices - The following reports on the organisation design
were submitted by the service provider and
approved by the Board - The Blueprint Report with findings and
recommendations, on the restructuring of the
organisations establishment, as well as
improvements. - The Board has also adopted a particular option in
the report as the best organisation design to
enable the MDB to meet its mandate more
effectively. - The Implementation Report, which provides the MDB
with an implementation road map. - Job evaluation, which is the process of
determining the worth of one job in relation to
that of other jobs in an organisation so that a
fair and equitable wage and salary system can be
established.
25PROGRESS TO DATE ON CURRENT STRATEGY
- Salary benchmarking, which is a process where an
organisation tests its own pay practices against
that of other outside organisations. - A new Remuneration Policy.
- Migration Policy, to regulate the movement of
employees from one post or position in the
current Organization Structure to another in the
new Organization Design. - New structure envisaged to be operational at the
beginning of the 2012/13 financial year.
26PROGRESS TO DATE ON CURRENT STRATEGY
- Ensuring good governance
- Draft unaudited annual report for the year ended
31 March 2011 considered by the Audit and Risk
Committee. Duly submitted to the Auditor-General
on 31 May 2011. - The Auditor-General has given an unqualified
audit opinion, but with emphasis of matter. - Improving and enhancing stakeholder relations
- Service providers were appointed for a three
month contract for support on media relations and
media engagement. - Other service providers were appointed to prepare
a stakeholder and communication strategy for the
Board. - The stakeholder management function has been
adequately provided for in the organisational
design blueprint report that was approved by the
Board. - The boundary redetermination process was
kick-started with an extensive programme of
initial consultations with key stakeholders
across the country.
27FINANCIAL RESULTS 2010/11
- SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL RESULTS
- RECEIPTS FOR THE YEAR
- FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH
2011 - BREAKDOWN OF EXPENDITURE
28SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL RESULTS
- Total income for the period R37.9 million
- Expenditure during the period R36.0 million
- Resulting in a surplus of R1,9 million
- Expenditure Variance of R1,6 million
- Projections Board has spend within budget
- Current ratio 61
- Accumulated Surplus of R16,9 million
- Commitments of R11,0 million
29RECEIPTS FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 MARCH 2011
Original MTEF allocation R37,187,000
Other income R746,000
TOTAL INCOME AT OUR DISPOSAL 2010/11 R37,933,000
30EXPENDITURE FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31 MARCH 2011
Description YTD YTD YTD
Description Actual Budget Variance
Government Grants 37,187 37,187 0
Other Income 746 425 (321)
Total income 37,933 37,612 (321)
Total expenditure 35,992 37,612 1,619
Loss on disposal of Assets 39 - (39)
SURPLUS 1,902 - 1,902
31BREAKDOWN OF EXPENDITURE FOR THE YEAR ENDING 31
MARCH 2011
Expenditure Item Amount Percentage of Total Income
Administrative expenses 13,840 38
Employee benefits 11,322 31
Audit fees 923 3
Project expenses 3,580 10
Other operating expenses 5,525 15
Depreciation and amortisation 802 2
TOTAL EXPENDITURE 35,992 95
Loss on Sale of Assets 39 0
Surplus for the period 1,902 5
32REPORT OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL
- Unqualified report with emphasis of matter
- Irregular Expenditure of R726,012
- Contravention of PPPFA
- HDI Points scoring was not documented
33MEDIUM TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK (MTEF 2011-2014)
- 2011 MTEF amounts to R121.4 million
- Allocation for 2011/12 increased by R1.3 million
- Representing a 3 increase
- In 2012/13 and 2013/14 grants increased by 5 in
respective years.
Grants 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14
Amount 38,482 40,362 42,578
34MEDIUM TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK(MTEF 2011-
2014)
2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014
Income 39 339 000 40 855 000 43 058 000
Grants 38 482 000 40 362 000 42 578 000
Sundry income - - -
Interest income 857 000 493 000 480 000
Expenses 39 339 000 40 855 000 43 058 000
Capacity Assessment 5 180 000 5 569 000 5 566 000
Publications 0 0 0
Boundary determination 4 804 795 5 078 668 4 587 000
Rental expense 2 310 848 2 310 848 2 310 848
Salaries 13 013 685 14 167 091 15 847 500
Depreciation 710 517 710 517 710 517
Members allowances 1 713 155 1 725 265 2 067 935
Audit expenses 2 056 000 2 210 332 2 431 364
Staff Training 195 205 212 506 237 712
Other expenses 9 354 795 8 870 773 9 299 124
Net surplus 0 0 0
35MEDIUM TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK(MTEF 2011-
2014)
Other expenses 2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014
Advertising 168 000 170 000 172 000
Bank charges 35 000 37 625 41 388
Legal fees 165 000 181 500 199 650
Printing and publication 361 000 397 000 437 000
Venues and facilities 1 531 632 809 950 890 945
Travel and subsistence 1 104 629 1 187 352 1 406 087
36 000 102 000 166 000
Entertainment
Office expenses 119 115 131 026 144 129
Consulting fees other 1 573 800 1 728 680 1 901 548
Computer expenses 270 984 302 082 335 290
Other insurance 332 750 366 025 402 628
Other fleet expenses 29 709 32 679 35 947
Repairs and maintenance 49 500 54 450 59 895
Utilities 159 500 175 450 192 995
Stakeholder management 1 200 000 1 320 000 1 452 000
Other Admin and operations 2 218 177 2 641 919 2 408 485
Total 9 354 795 8 870 773 9 299 124
36MEDIUM TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK(MTEF 2011-
2014)
37Questions and Comments
38RESEARCH STUDY ON CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES AND CATEGORISATION OF
METROPOLITAN BOUNDARIES
- The brief for the research study on demarcation
criteria was to - Expand on and precisely define the criteria
implied, for an area to be regarded as a Category
A (metropolitan) area, as outlined in Section 2
of the Local Government Municipal Structures
Act, 1998, including developing quantifiable
indicators, benchmarks and thresholds for each
criterion - Expand on and precisely define the criteria
implied for municipal boundary demarcation and,
more specifically, the objectives of demarcation
and factors to be taken into account by the Board
when it determines a municipal boundary, as
outlined in Sections 24 and 25 of the Local
Government Municipal Demarcation Act, 1998. - The study was to develop quantifiable indicators,
benchmarks and thresholds for each or clusters of
factors/criterions as outlined in section 25
Local Government Municipal Demarcation Act,
1998. - Institutionalisation and precise application of
the section 2 criteria as well as the sections 24
and 25 demarcation objectives and factors.
39RESEARCH STUDY ON CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES AND CATEGORISATION OF
METROPOLITAN BOUNDARIES
- The study was to develop quantifiable indicators,
benchmarks and thresholds for each of the cluster
factors/criteria as outlined in section 25 Local
Government Municipal Demarcation Act, 1998,
including recommendations/advice on data
requirements, skills sets and other resource
requirements - Recommendations as to which provisions in Section
2 of the Structures Act, 1998, and Sections 24
25 of the Demarcation Act, 1998, would be
reviewed. - The methodology for the study involved
- International Survey of municipal boundary reform
- Development of Data Base of Demarcation
Indicators - Conducted desktop analysis of relevant South
African documentation - Conducted Interviews with relevant experts
40RESEARCH STUDY ON CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES AND CATEGORISATION OF
METROPOLITAN BOUNDARIES
- The study developed a database of indicators, by
- Collating data from Census, Community Census, MDB
and IEC. - Used the MIIF Classification as an illustrative
tool - A-Metros
- B1-Secondary Cities
- B2 -Large Towns
- B3 -Small Towns
- B4 Rural Areas
- C1 -Districts who are Not Water Service Providers
- C2 -Districts who are Water Service Providers
41RESEARCH STUDY ON CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES AND CATEGORISATION OF
METROPOLITAN BOUNDARIES
- The study has developed indicators for each of
the criteria in section 24 and 25 of the
Demarcation Act. - Also suggests a useful organisation of the
criteria used for the demarcation of municipal
boundaries, into a collection of categories
and/or subcategories. - This may enable greater flexibility were the
emphasis with regard to a particular case may be
geared toward a particular set of criteria.
However, there are a number of caveats - Many of the criteria/indicators are
interdependent (i.e., one criterion may influence
the another criterion and vice versa) - Given the interdependence of many of the
criteria, it is difficult to assert a hierarchy
to the criteria (i.e., that some criteria are
more important than others or that some are a
perquisite for other application of other
criteria)
42RESEARCH STUDY ON CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES AND CATEGORISATION OF
METROPOLITAN BOUNDARIES
- Criteria should be given varying weight and
importance depending on the unique circumstances
of an area. - The following are suggested as criteria for small
municipalities - the need for cohesive, integrated and compact
areas - Political boundaries, including areas of
traditional rural communities, ward committees
and local communities - Boundaries that enable the delivery of main
municipal services, particularly irrigation,
water works, electricity and sewerage - The ability to generate a certain amount of
revenue locally - topographical, environmental and physical
characteristics of the area including watersheds - boundaries sensitive to economic conditions of
each small municipality
43RESEARCH STUDY ON CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES AND CATEGORISATION OF
METROPOLITAN BOUNDARIES
- The following are suggested as criteria for
District Municipalities - within the framework of national redistribution
there is a need to share and distribute financial
and administrative resources - existing land use and transport planning.
- the promotion of integrated social and economic
development planning - the need for co-ordinated local, provincial and
national programmes and services.
44RESEARCH STUDY ON CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES AND CATEGORISATION OF
METROPOLITAN BOUNDARIES
- Four main categories of municipal demarcation
criteria are put forward in the study - Planning and Development Criteria Many boundary
adjustments particularly in the form of municipal
amalgamations are premised on the need to provide
better planning and economic development over an
extended area. This includes the socio-economic
interdependence of a given city-region. Section
25 (A, H, and J) Criteria and Indicators - Municipal Functioning Criteria These include
the collection of indicators that measure the
delivery of municipal services and the
administration of areas of municipal
responsibility. Section 25 (D, G and I) Criteria
and Indicators - Municipal Financial Criteria These include the
impact of demarcation on a municipalitys revenue
and expenditures. Section ( 25 D, K) Criteria and
Indicators - Municipal Governance Criteria Referring to
indicators that measure the decision making
ability of a municipal government as well as
questions of good governance over the
city-region. Section (25 B, E, F, and L) Criteria
and Indicators
45RESEARCH STUDY ON CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES AND CATEGORISATION OF
METROPOLITAN BOUNDARIES
- Public participation, in particular, is raised as
being an important component of boundary reform.
International overview has pointed out that South
Africa excels at good boundary criteria but lags
behind other nations on the processes of reform. - It is suggested that the Board should be more
transparent in releasing the substantial
deliberations of its decisions. It should provide
local government stakeholders with a written
account of how it has applied the Section 24 and
25 criteria. - The option to hold public meetings is
highlighted. Another way to improve public
participation is by making meetings compulsory
for all boundary investigations. The study
suggests that the Board should always hold public
meetings before it makes boundary decisions.
46RESEARCH STUDY ON CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES AND CATEGORISATION OF
METROPOLITAN BOUNDARIES
- The study also suggests a need for provision to
be made in legislation, for annexation or
technical redeterminations/corrections. - Annexation/technical redetermination often
involves the incorporation of a small piece of
territory such as a farm. The Municipal
Demarcation Act is conspicuously silent on how to
deal with this issue of annexation. - The suggestion is that this process must be dealt
with in legislation along the following lines - Accommodation of growth by all municipalities
must be accomplished without encumbering the
initiating municipality and the responding
municipalitys ability to achieve rational growth
directions, cost effective utilisation of
resources and fiscal accountability - An annexation must be supported by growth
projections, availability of lands within current
boundaries, consideration of reasonable
development densities, accommodation of a variety
of land uses and reasonable growth options within
each municipality (initiating and responding
municipality)
47RESEARCH STUDY ON CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES AND CATEGORISATION OF
METROPOLITAN BOUNDARIES
- An annexation must achieve a logical extension of
growth patterns, transportation and
infrastructure servicing for the affected
municipalities - Each annexation must illustrate a cost effective,
efficient and coordinated approach to the
administration of services - Annexations must demonstrate sensitivity and
respect for key environmental and natural
features - Coordination and cost effective use of resources
will be demonstrated when annexations are aligned
with and supported by integrated development
planning, economic development plans,
transportation and utility servicing plans and
other related infrastructure plans - Annexation proposals must fully consider the
financial impact on the initiating and responding
municipality - Inter-agency consultation, coordination and
cooperation is demonstrated when annexations
proposals fully consider the impacts on other
institutions providing services to the area
48RESEARCH STUDY ON CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES AND CATEGORISATION OF
METROPOLITAN BOUNDARIES
- Annexation proposals that develop reasonable
solutions to impacts on property owners and
citizens with certainty and specific time
horizons will be given careful consideration and
weight - Annexation proposals must be based on effective
public consultation both prior to and during any
annexation hearing or proceedings. - Finally, the study identifies implications for
the Boards skills sets. - There are two main approaches in this regard.
- Firstly, the Board could use consultants to
support them on boundary investigations. This is
largely the existing approach of the MDB and also
is the approach used by most of the international
Demarcation Boards sampled in this report. - The advantage of this approach is that enables
the Board to draw on specialised expertise and
independent insight when investigating
boundaries. It is also a more cost-effective way
of utilising resources given that consultants are
only used when needed. - The disadvantage is that the Board does not
develop a critical mass of internal capacity.
49RESEARCH STUDY ON CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING
MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES AND CATEGORISATION OF
METROPOLITAN BOUNDARIES
- The second approach entails the Board developing
its own internal expertise. If the MDB supports
this approach it should employ empirical Social
Scientists to help disaggregate census data and
other relevant data bases (presuming that it does
not have such people in its employ). - The advantage of this approach is that enables
the Board to develop its own in-house capacity. - The disadvantage is that it will have highly paid
professionals in its employ who may be
underutilised in quiet periods. - The MDBs preference is for the second approach.
50RESEARCH STUDY ON SIZES OF MUNICIPALITIES IN
SOUTH AFRICA
- The brief for the research study on demarcation
criteria was to explore - Challenges faced by the new local government
system in South Africa towards realising the
vision of developmental local government,
particularly those challenges that come with
large, inclusive municipalities - The relationship between municipal size and the
efficiency of the delivery of municipal services.
Is there an optimal size or range of sizes for a
municipality in the South African context, from
the standpoint of efficiency and to minimise
duplication of resources and efforts? - The methodology for the study involved
- International Survey of Literature on Local
Government Size - Development of Data Base of Demarcation
Indicators - Conducted desktop analysis of relevant South
African documentation - Conducted Interviews with relevant experts
51RESEARCH STUDY ON SIZES OF MUNICIPALITIES IN
SOUTH AFRICA
- Conducted interviews with relevant stakeholders
- MDB,
- COGTA,
- Treasury,
- Provincial Governments
- SALGA,
- individual municipalities
- Consultants
- Semi-structured interviews.
- The study explored the issue of Economies of
Scale and Size explored. - Also looked at arguments from Public Choice
Theory also looked at. - Democracy and Municipal Size.
- How size is defined-by population, area, budget,
employment or range of services?
52RESEARCH STUDY ON SIZES OF MUNICIPALITIES IN
SOUTH AFRICA
- On Economies of Scale and Size
- It is often argued that enlarging local
government areas will enhance local government
efficiency. - Smaller municipalities lack resources and
citizens. - Larger jurisdictions lead to bigger thresholds in
populations, tax bases and workloads. - Public Choice Theory
- Citizens have diverse preferences for local
government - Fragmented local government will operate more
efficiently. - Democracy and Municipal Size
- Literature suggests that local government needs
to be local enough for citizens to identify with. - Larger local units risk being remote.
53RESEARCH STUDY ON SIZES OF MUNICIPALITIES IN
SOUTH AFRICA
- None of the criteria in Section 2 specifically
require that the metropolitan area be of a
particular size. The definition does give some
pointers in this regard - A conurbation, meaning something large,
- Extensive development, implying that the
metropolitan area is large, - The notion of complexity which implies question
of scale, - With its strong emphasis on interdependency, a
wider conceptualisation of metropolitan
government that would encompass the economically
interdependent suburbs, black townships, rural
areas and informal settlements. - Great Deal of Variation between metros in South
Africa. - Three big metros (Johannesburg, Cape Town,
Ethekwini) - Two reasonably big metros (Tshwane, Ekurhuleni)
54RESEARCH STUDY ON SIZES OF MUNICIPALITIES IN
SOUTH AFRICA
- Three small metros (Nelson Mandela Bay, Buffalo
City, Mangaung). Do not meet OECD definition of
1,5 million population. - Limited data but no correlation of size with
performance - With respect to District Municipalities little
guidance in legislation. - MDB suggested four principles
- Functional linkages showing a coherent social and
economic base eg spending patterns, sectors of
economic activity - Districts should not be too large-radius of
50-100 km - While the population of Districts should not be
too large, for economies of scale it was felt
districts should have a base population of at
least 100 000 persons and that - Wherever possible, there should be some coherence
to the economic and social base of districts.
55RESEARCH STUDY ON SIZES OF MUNICIPALITIES IN
SOUTH AFRICA
- An analysis of District Municipalities indicates
that no clear relationship between size and
population, operating and budget budgets,
functions performed, years experience of managers
of managers and financial managers and audit
rating - With respect to local municipalities, the MDB
decided on the following principles based on
Sections 24 and 25 of the Demarcation Act - Capacity Assessment Objective was to develop a
critical mass of municipal capacity (staff,
assets, finances). - Resource Sharing.
- Manageable Size Indicators of 3500 square
kilometres and 80 000 people were suggested as
norm - Functionality Alignment of transport routes and
physical features
56RESEARCH STUDY ON SIZES OF MUNICIPALITIES IN
SOUTH AFRICA
- An analysis of local municipalities indicates
that - Density correlates with population size
- Weak link with capital budgets but no link with
operating accounts - There is no clear cut pattern when it comes to
the percentage of functions performed, the size
of municipalities, the years of experience of
either municipal managers or financial managers
and audit relationship - The 50 000-100 category has performed better than
the 100 000 to 200 000 category in respect of
capital and operating expenditure, staff,
functions performed, the years of experience of
municipal managers and financial managers and
COGTAs spatial classification system per
population range. This may suggest that 50 000 to
100 000 is an optimal size for smaller
municipalities but more research is needed to
verify this.
57RESEARCH STUDY ON SIZES OF MUNICIPALITIES IN
SOUTH AFRICA
- With respect to Municipal Wards, an analysis
indicates that - A number of problems were identified with the
ward process - The unclear definition of what a community is
- The provision that the number of registered
voters in each ward, may not vary by more than
fifteen per cent from the norm, leads to the
creation of dysfunctional wards. The strict
application of this formula prevents the creation
of wards which promote local democracy and
service delivery/development - The use of voting districts as the building
blocks for wards is problematic. - The following recommendations are made in
respective of wards - Repeal, the provisions providing for the
determination of a formula for the number of
councillors by the Minister and the determination
of the number of councillors by the MEC s
responsible for local government - Provide for ward boundaries determined for the
2011 local government elections to remain in
place for local elections in the foreseeable
future
58RESEARCH STUDY ON SIZES OF MUNICIPALITIES IN
SOUTH AFRICA
- Provide a continuous process to review ward
boundaries with a view to enhance service
delivery and development but also to promote
local democracy. One needs to take into account
population of ward, consultation with ward
committees, municipal development and service
delivery projects, and especially planning over a
longer than the current 5 year period for the
municipality as a whole. - Allow deviations from the 15 norm where it can
promote service delivery/ development and/or
promote local democracy. - To what extent size has been a variable affecting
performance, post 2000? - There are a number of problems bedevilling local
government. Many of these factors are not due to
issues of size around local government e.g.
politics/administrative relationships,
clientelistic practices, local electoral system,
the executive system.
59RESEARCH STUDY ON SIZES OF MUNICIPALITIES IN
SOUTH AFRICA
- There is no conclusive evidence linking service
delivery problems to the size of municipalities. - The metros widely-drawn boundaries seem to have
facilitated service delivery. - There are hints by the government that the large
size of wards is a factor inhibiting the
performance of ward committees but no evidence is
produced to support this. - There is also no conclusive evidence linking
performance to the size of integrated development
plans. - Likewise the argument that councillors in rural
communities have large constituencies and this
makes it difficult to represent communities
adequately is also untested. - The international literature on size and
performance on municipalities did not produce any
ideal or optimal size for local government.
60RESEARCH STUDY ON SIZES OF MUNICIPALITIES IN
SOUTH AFRICA
- The available empirical data and government and
academic literature suggest that there is no
conclusive evidence to show that the size of a
municipality has been a major problem impeding
the performance of local government. - Changing the size of municipalities should be
treated with circumspect. - If socio-economic interdependence, most notably
commuting, is the primarily basis for determining
boundaries then the nature of settlement patterns
rather than population size becomes the major
determinant of boundaries. - Problem of Reorganisation Fatigue.
- There may be opportunistic incentives for the
creation of new councils by local politicians.
61RESEARCH STUDY ON SIZES OF MUNICIPALITIES IN
SOUTH AFRICA
- Future Research
- The Board should investigate the possibility of
undertaking a more systematic analysis of the
relationship between size and performance between
and within municipalities. - It will entail inter alia looking extensively at
customer surveys, auditor generals reports and
other performance evaluation data. In order to be
scientific such a study will have to identify
external constraints on councils that could
explain at least part of any apparent performance
variation economic and social conditions, the
needs and demands of local residents, previous
council policies and the behaviour of other
organisations.