Measuring - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Measuring

Description:

Title: Title Author: Lorraine Corner Last modified by: christopher.wilson Created Date: 10/3/2004 6:12:02 AM Document presentation format: On-screen Show (4:3) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: Lorra48
Learn more at: http://ww25.gaportal.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Measuring


1
Measuring Assessing Democratic
GovernancePro-poor gender-sensitive indicators
  • Lorraine Corner

2
Pro-poor gender-sensitive indicators
  • Aim of the guide
  • Why pro-poor gender-sensitive?
  • Framework for selection
  • Underlying values principles
  • Gender-sensitive indicators
  • Pro-poor (gender-sensitive) indicators
  • Tools for identifying indicators
  • Applications

3
GOVERNANCE areas
  • Parliamentary Development
  • Electoral Systems
  • Human Rights
  • Justice
  • Access to Information the Media
  • Decentralisation Local Governance
  • Public Administration Reform Anti-corruption

4
Why pro-poor gender-sensitive GOVERNANCE
indicators?
  • Form groups to answer the question why should
    governance indicators be pro-poor
    gender-sensitive?
  • Select facilitator
  • Select reporter
  • Prepare flip chart for sharing
  • Time 15 minutes

5
Framework for selecting pro-poor
gender-sensitive indicators to measure democratic
governance
  • AIM to assist policy-makers to monitor
    evaluate democratic governance at country level
  • Existing indicators
  • developed by external stakeholders
  • to compare rank countries
  • Not designed to assist countries
  • Not pro-poor or gender-sensitive

6
Based on normative values
  • Citizens control public decision-making
    decision-makers
  • Citizens should be equal in exercising such
    control
  • Women/men
  • Poor/non-poor
  • Normative values of democratic governance
  • Participation
  • Representation
  • Accountability
  • Transparency
  • Responsiveness
  • Efficiency
  • Equity

7
Three levels of indicators
  • Start from objectives what is to be indicated?
  • Outcome
  • what do we want to achieve?
  • How will we know we have achieved it?
  • Process
  • What do we have to do in order to achieve it?
  • How will we know that we are doing it?
  • Inputs
  • What is needed to create these processes?
  • How will we know they are available?

8
What would gender-sensitive GOVERNANCE indicators
look like?
  • Form groups to answer this question
  • Select facilitator
  • Select reporter
  • Prepare flip chart for sharing
  • Time 10 minutes

9
Gender-sensitive indicators
  • Disaggregated by sex
  • Specific to or targeted toward female or male sex
  • Implicitly gendered
  • No reference to sex BUT
  • Of particular relevance to females or males
  • Chosen by women
  • Why not men?
  • Participation of women
  • Based on data defined, collected, presented
    disseminated taking into account differences
    between women men
  • Women decision makers
  • Women enumerators, processors, etc

10
Group review
  • Return to group flip chart for
  • Compare your output with the framework for
    gender-sensitive indicators
  • Prepare new flip chart
  • Differences?
  • Similarities?
  • Comments?

11
What would pro-poor GOVERNANCE indicators look
like?
  • Form groups to answer this question
  • Select facilitator
  • Select reporter
  • Prepare flip chart for sharing
  • Time 10 minutes

12
Pro-poor indicators
  • Disaggregated by poverty status
  • Specific to or targeted toward the poor
  • Implicitly pro-poor more relevant or important
    to low income groups
  • Chosen by the poor
  • Participatory
  • Gender-sensitive take into account different
    impact of poverty on women men

13
Group review
  • Return to your previous flip chart
  • Compare your output with the framework for
    pro-poor indicators
  • Prepare new flip chart
  • Differences?
  • Similarities?
  • Comments?

14
Pro-poor indicators must also be gender-sensitive
15
Other dimensions of disaggregation
  • Democratic values require BROAD participation
  • Ethnicity female/male poor/non-poor
  • Location rural / urban female/male etc
  • Disability etc etc
  • A major challenge for monitoring evaluating
    democratic governance

16
Some tools for selecting indicators
  • Process flow chart framework for developing
    questions about specific governance processes
  • Key questions for each stage in the process,
    how do women/the poor/ etc participate, how are
    they affected?
  • Integrated indicator matrix summarizes
    classifies available indicators, shows gaps

17
Using indicators
  • Exploring relationships between indicators for
    policy analysis
  • Linking input and output indicators to assess the
    effectiveness of interventions
  • Eg training for women candidates
  • What of those trained stood for election?
  • What of those who stood were successful?
  • Did a higher of women MPs lead to greater
    consideration of womens issues?

18
GOVERNANCE areas
  • Parliamentary Development
  • Electoral Systems
  • Human Rights
  • Justice
  • Access to Information the Media
  • Decentralisation Local Governance
  • Public Administration Reform Anti-corruption

19
Based on normative values
  • Citizens control public decision-making
    decision-makers
  • Citizens should be equal in exercising such
    control
  • Women/men
  • Poor/non-poor
  • Normative values of democratic governance
  • Participation
  • Representation
  • Accountability
  • Transparency
  • Responsiveness
  • Efficiency
  • Equity

20
Applying the framework Budgeting
  • In groups, prepare process flow chart for one
    UNDP governance area
  • Formulate key questions in terms of elements of
    democratic governance
  • Use questions to identify potential pro-poor and
    gender-sensitive indicators prepare matrix
  • Prepare flip charts for sharing
  • Time 45 minutes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com